Search

Purpose The adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), Erbitux, and Particle Therapy (ACCEPT) phase 1/2 trial (NCT01192087) evaluated a combined-modality approach (concurrent cetuximab and intensity modulated radiation therapy with carbon ion boost) for newly diagnosed nonmetastatic head and neck ACC. Methods and Materials Twenty-three patients with ACC were enrolled between June 2012 and June 2017 after initial diagnosis or postoperatively. All received a 400 mg/m2 cetuximab loading dose a week before radiation therapy, followed by weekly 250 mg/m2 doses starting on the first day of radiation therapy. The carbon ion radiation therapy boost was 24 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 8 daily fractions, followed by intensity modulated radiation therapy (54 Gy). The primary endpoint was safety and feasibility (defined based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3 events). Secondary endpoints included local and distant relapse, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Results Disease was most commonly in the paranasal sinuses (30%), palate (17%), and nasopharynx (17%). Nine (39%) patients underwent surgery (R1: 22%, R2: 78%). Median follow-up was 38.5 months. No patients experienced grade 4 to 5 events. Rates of grade 3 rash and radiation dermatitis were 17% and 22%, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 mucositis and dysgeusia occurred in 43% and 48% and in 9% and 0%, respectively. Grade 2 to 3 dysphagia and xerostomia were present in 43% and 4% and in 26% and 0%, respectively. At last follow-up, 5 (22%) patients experienced in-field relapse and 6 (26%) developed distant metastases. The 3-year disease-free survival was 67%, and median overall survival was 54 months. Conclusions Outcomes of this trial were satisfactory. Although the trial did not meet the predefined criteria of feasibility owing to the comparatively high rates of grade 3 dermatitis, numbers are comparable to existing data on cetuximab + radiation therapy.

To compare patterns of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, and conventionally fractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer (CaP).Eligible study patients included 439 patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer who were treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone between 2003 and 2013, remained free of biochemical recurrence, and had at least 2 PSA values within the first year following RT. Of these, 130 were treated with SBRT, 220 with HDR brachytherapy, and 89 with IMRT. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare PSA nadirs (nPSA), time to nPSA, and PSA bounce parameters among the 3 modalities. Indicator variable analysis was used to develop empirical models of PSA decay using the treatment modalities as indicator variables.Significantly more patients treated with SBRT or HDR brachytherapy achieved raw nPSAs of0.5 ng/mL compared with patients treated with IMRT (76.2% and 75.9% vs 44.9%, respectively; P.0001 for SBRT or HDR brachytherapy vs IMRT). On multivariate analysis, nPSA was significantly lower with SBRT and HDR compared with IMRT (P.0001). Time to nPSA and bounce parameters was not significantly different among IMRT, SBRT, and HDR. Overall, SBRT and HDR brachytherapy caused significantly larger PSA decay rates (P.001). When truncating follow-up at 1000 days, the corresponding decay rates were larger for all 3 modalities, with no significant differences between them.Stereotactic body radiation therapy and HDR brachytherapy produce lower nPSAs than IMRT. Within 1000 days of follow-up, the modalities produce similar rates of PSA decay; subsequently, decay continues (albeit at a slower pace) after SBRT and HDR brachytherapy but plateaus with IMRT. Because nPSA is a validated predictor of long-term outcome, these data not only suggest a distinct radiobiological effect with SBRT and HDR brachytherapy, but also predict for clinical outcomes that might equal or surpass those of IMRT.

Purpose High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy was originally used with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to increase the dose to the prostate without injuring the bladder or rectum. Numerous studies have reported HDR brachytherapy is safe and effective. We adapted it for use without EBRT for cases not requiring lymph node treatment. Patients and Methods We entered the patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment parameters into a prospective registry and serially added follow-up data for 448 men with low-risk (n=288) and intermediate-risk (n=160) prostate cancer treated from 1996 to 2009. Their median age was 64 years (range 42-90). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 6.0 ng/mL (range 0.2-18.2). The Gleason score was ≤6 in 76% and 7 in 24%. The median dose was 43.5 Gy in 6 fractions. The clinical and biochemical disease control and survival rates were calculated. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of Adverse Events. Results The median follow-up period was 6.5 years (range 0.3-15.3). The actuarial 6- and 10-year PSA progression-free survival was 98.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96.9%-99.4%) and 97.8% (95% CI 95.5%-98.9%). Overall survival at 10 years was 76.7% (95% CI 69.9%-82.2%). The local control, distant metastasis-free survival, and cause-specific survival were 99.7% (95% CI 97.9%-99.9%), 98.9% (95% CI 96.3%-99.7%), and 99.1% (95% CI 95.8%-99.8%). T stage, initial PSA level, Gleason score, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group, patient age, and androgen deprivation therapy did not significantly correlate with disease control or survival. No late grade 3 to 4 rectal toxicities developed. Late grade 3 to 4 genitourinary toxicity occurred in 4.9% (grade 3 in 4.7%). Conclusions HDR monotherapy is a safe and highly effective treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Background Aim was to access outcome and toxicity of repeated linac-based radiosurgery in incompletely obliterated cerebral AVM. Patients and methods Between 1998 and 2008, 11 patients were treated with repeated radiosurgery. The median dose to the 80%-isodose was 15 Gy (range, 12–18 Gy). During initial radiosurgery the median dose was 18 Gy (range, 9–22 Gy). Results The median time interval between initial radiosurgery and re-treatment was 9 years (range, 4–16 years). The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 2–115 months). Treatment response was seen in 8 patients (89%). Complete (partial) obliteration was achieved in 5 (3) patients (56%, 33%, respectively).The median time to complete obliteration was 26 months (range, 5–45 months). Pre-existing neurological symptoms improved in 2 patients (18%), were stable in 7 patients (64%) and worsened in 2 patients (18%). Prevalence of intracranial hemorrhage was 9% (1/11). Post-re-treatment intracranial hemorrhage rate was 2.7% (1/38 years at risk). During follow-up, no secondary malignancies or toxicity > grade III were observed. Conclusion Repeated linac-based radiosurgery in incompletely obliterated cerebral AVM is an effective treatment option with a high rate of treatment response and an acceptable risk for side effects. Marginal doses above 15 Gy might further improve the rate of complete obliterations.