Search

An increasing proportion of elderly patients (EP) are undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). They have increased comorbidities and perioperative risk. Current literature is deficient in describing the outcomes of EP undergoing CRS/HIPEC.A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained CRS/HIPEC database analyzed perioperative and oncological outcomes of EP (70 y) compared to younger patients (YP) (60 y).Of 500 CRS/HIPEC patients, 62 EP and 210 YP were included. Median age was 73 y in EP and 46 y in YP. Demographic, clinical, operative, and perioperative outcomes were similar between groups. American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 was more prevalent in the EP with 88.2% versus 54.8% in the YP (P 0.001). Comorbidities were higher in the EP with 87.1% versus 39.0% in the YP (P 0.001). Peritoneal Cancer Index score was similar with a median of 9. All postoperative and severe complications were similar with 55.2% and 17.1% in the YP and 64.5% and 21.0% in the EP (P = 0.242; P = 0.448). Postoperative mortality was similar with 1.5% in the YP and 5.0% in the EP (P = 0.134). In colorectal primary patients, median overall and disease-free survival was 61.8 and 12.9 mo in the YP and 64.6 and 11.3 mo in the EP (P = 0.363; P = 0.845).Despite a significant age difference, increased comorbidities, worse American Society of Anesthesiologists, and similar Peritoneal Cancer Index burden, we found no significant differences in perioperative complications or oncological benefit in elderly CRS/HIPEC patients. EP appear to have similar perioperative and oncological outcomes as YP.

Background Gastrointestinal (GI) leaks after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a known life-threatening complication that may alter patients’ outcomes. Our aim is to investigate risk factors associated with GI leaks and evaluate the impact of GI leaks on patient’s oncological outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis of perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients with and without GI leaks after CRS/HIPEC. Results Out of 191 patients included in this study, GI leaks were identified in 17.8% (34/191) of patients. Small bowel anastomoses were the most common site (44%). Most of the GI leaks were managed conservatively and re-operation was needed in 44.1% of cases. Univariate analysis identified higher PCI (p = 0.03), higher number of packed cells transfused (p = 0.036), pelvic peritonectomy (p = 0.013), high number of anastomoses (p = 0.003) and colonic resection (p = 0.042) as factors associated with GI leaks. Multivariate analysis identified stapled anastomoses (OR 2.59, p = 0.001) and pelvic peritonectomy (OR 2.33, p = 0.044) as independent factors associated with GI leaks. Disease-free survival tended to be worse in the leak group but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.235). The 3- and 5-year OS was 73.2% and 52.9% in the leak group compared to 75.8% and 73.2% in the non-leak group (p = 0.236). Conclusions GI leak showed no impact on overall and disease free survival after CRS/HIPEC.Avoidance of stapled reconstruction in high risk patients with high tumor burden and large number of anastomoses may yield improved outcomes.

Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and complete cytoreduction are the best outcome predictors following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Lesions in critical areas, regardless of PCI, complicate surgery and impact oncological outcomes. We prospectively defined "Critical lesions" (CL) as penetrating the hepatic hilum, diaphragm at hepatic outflow, major blood vessels, pancreas, or urinary tract.Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 352 CRS + HIPEC patients from 2015 to 2019. Excluded patients with aborted/redo operation (n = 112), or incomplete data (n = 19). Patients categorized by CL status and compared: operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), PCI, transfusions, hospital stay, post-operative complications and mortality, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).Included 221 patients (78 CL; 143 no-CL). No difference in patients' characteristics: age, BMI, gender or co-morbidities noted. Operative time longer (5.3 h vs 4.3 h, p 0.01), EBL higher (769 ml vs 405 ml, p 0.01), transfusions higher (1.9 vs 0.7 Units, p 0.001) and PCI higher (15.5 vs 9.5, p 0.01) in CL. No difference in major complications. Postoperative complications, CL, OR-time and transfusions were predictive of OS in univariate analysis, while only complications remained on multivariate analysis. Median follow up of 21.4 months, 3-year DFS/OS was 22% vs 30% (p 0.037) and 73% vs 87% (p 0.014) in CL and non-CL, respectively. Despite CL complete resection, 17/38 patients (44.7%) that recurred had recurrence at previous CL site.Critical lesions complicate surgery and may be associated with poor oncological outcomes with high local recurrence rate, despite no significant difference in complications. Utilizing adjuvant or intra-operative radiation may be beneficial.

Metastatic spread of malignant melanoma to the abdomen presents a therapeutic challenge. Targeted and Immune-therapies dramatically improve patients' survival, yet some patients may still benefit from surgical intervention. This study investigates the outcomes of surgical treatment of abdominal metastatic melanoma in the era of modern therapy.This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent surgical resection for abdominal metastatic melanoma between the years 2009-2021 (n = 80). We examined the clinical, operative, perioperative, and oncological outcomes of these patients.The cohort included a therapeutic group (T, n = 43) and palliative group (P, n = 37). The rate of overall post-operative complications was lower in the T group (n = 3, 9.3%) compared to the P group (n = 10, 27.1%) (p = 0.04), but no difference in major complications rate (p = 0.41). The median follow-up was 13.4 months (range, 0.5-107), with an estimated 2- and 5-years survival of 66.5% and 45.3% respectively. The estimated 2- and 5-years survival of the T group was 76.61% and 69.65%, and 49.01% and 28.01% in the P group (p = 0.005). Univariate analysis identified Therapeutic resection (HR 3.2, p = 0.008), isolated lesions (HR 1.47, p = 0.033) and major complication score (HR 1.8, p=0.001) to be correlated with survival. On multivariate analysis, Therapeutic resection (HR 2.53, p = 0.042) and major complication score (HR 1.62, p = 0.004) remained significant independent factors correlated with survival. In patients who progressed on treatment, and their progression was treated with surgical resection 46.1% where able to be maintained on the same preoperative treatment strategy.We have demonstrated that abdominal metastesectomy is a safe and oncologically efficacious therapy in selected patients. Especially in the era of modern therapeutics, patients with isolated disease site, limited resectable progression on therapy, or patients with symptomatic metastases should be considered for surgical resection.