Search

Objective To examine whether blocking multiple points of the angiogenesis pathway by addition of sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor against VEGFR2/3, Raf, c-Kit, and PDGFR, to bevacizumab would yield clinical activity in ovarian cancer (OvCa). Methods This phase II study tested bevacizumab plus sorafenib in two cohorts; bevacizumab-naive and bevacizumab-exposed patients. Bevacizumab (5 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) was given with sorafenib 200 mg bid 5 days-on/2 days-off. The primary objective was response rate using a Simon two-stage optimal design. Progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were the secondary endpoints. Exploratory correlative studies included plasma cytokine concentrations, tissue proteomics and dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Results Between March 2007 and August 2012, 54 women were enrolled, 41 bevacizumab-naive and 13 bevacizumab-prior, with median 5 (2–9) and 6 (5–9) prior systemic therapies, respectively. Nine of 35 (26%) evaluable bevacizumab-naive patients attained partial responses (PR), and 18 had stable disease (SD) ≥ 4 months. No responses were seen in the bevacizumab-prior group and 7 (54%) patients had SD ≥ 4 months, including one exceptional responder with SD of 27 months. The overall median PFS was 5.5 months (95%CI: 4.0–6.8 months). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events (≥5%) included hypertension (17/54 [31%]; grade 3 in 16 patients and grade 4 in one patient) and venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (5/54 [9%]; grade 3 in 4 patients and grade 4 in one patient). Pretreatment low IL8 concentration was associated with PFS ≥ 4 months (p = .031). Conclusions The bevacizumab and sorafenib combination did not meet the pre-specified primary endpoint although some clinical activity was seen in heavily-pretreated bevacizumab-naive OvCa patients with platinum-resistant disease. Anticipated class toxicities required close monitoring and dose modifications.

A small fraction of cancer patients with advanced disease survive significantly longer than patients with clinically comparable tumors. Molecular mechanisms for exceptional responses to therapy have been identified by genomic analysis of tumor biopsies from individual patients. Here, we analyzed tumor biopsies from an unbiased cohort of 111 exceptional responder patients using multiple platforms to profile genetic and epigenetic aberrations as well as the tumor microenvironment. Integrative analysis uncovered plausible mechanisms for the therapeutic response in nearly a quarter of the patients. The mechanisms were assigned to four broad categories���DNA damage response, intracellular signaling, immune engagement, and genetic alterations characteristic of favorable prognosis���with many tumors falling into multiple categories. These analyses revealed synthetic lethal relationships that may be exploited therapeutically and rare genetic lesions that favor therapeutic success, while also providing a wealth of testable hypotheses regarding oncogenic mechanisms that may influence the response to cancer therapy. Profiling multi-platform genomics of 110 cancer patients with an exceptional therapeutic response, Wheeler et al. identify putative molecular mechanisms explaining this survival phenotype in ���23% of cases. Therapeutic success is related to rare molecular features of responding tumors, exploiting synthetic lethality and oncogene addiction.

Background Strategies to reduce LDL-cholesterol involve reductions in cholesterol synthesis or absorption. We identified a familial hypercholesterolemia patient with an exceptional response to the cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe. Niemann-Pick C 1-like 1 (NPC1L1) is the molecular target of ezetimibe. Methods and results Sequencing identified nucleotide changes predicted to change amino acids 52 (L52P), 300 (I300T) and 489 (S489G) in exceptional NPC1L1. In silico analyses identified increased stability and cholesterol binding affinity in L52P-NPC1L1 versus WT-NPC1L1. HEK293 cells overexpressing WT-NPC1L1 or NPC1L1 harboring amino acid changes singly or in combination (Comb-NPC1L1) had reduced cholesterol uptake in Comb-NPC1L1 when ezetimibe was present. Cholesterol uptake was reduced by ezetimibe in L52P-NPC1L1, I300T-NPC1L1, but increased in S489G-NPC1L1 overexpressing cells. Immunolocalization studies found preferential plasma membrane localization of mutant NPC1L1 independent of ezetimibe. Flotillin 1 and 2 expression was reduced and binding to Comb-NPC1L1 was reduced independent of ezetimibe exposure. Proteomic analyses identified increased association with proteins that modulate intermediate filament proteins in Comb-NPC1L1 versus WT-NPC1L1 treated with ezetimibe. Conclusion This is the first detailed analysis of the role of NPC1L1 mutations in an exceptional responder to ezetimibe. The results point to a complex set of events in which the combined mutations were shown to affect cholesterol uptake in the presence of ezetimibe. Proteomic analysis suggests that the exceptional response may also lie in the nature of interactions with cytosolic proteins.