Search

Background Time spent in hospital (length of stay) is an important component of patient experience and the financial cost of cancer care. This study documents the length of stay across English cancer diagnoses at a national level and reports on variation by patient demographics and tumour characteristics. Methods Data on all diagnoses of malignant neoplasms from the English National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service for 252,202 patients first diagnosed in 2015 was linked with NHS Digital’s Admitted Patient Care and Outpatient Hospital Episode Statistics datasets to quantify length of stay within one year following diagnosis. Length of stay was modelled using linear regression adjusted for sex, age, tumour type, stage, time spent alive during the study period, vital status at end of study period, region, deprivation and ethnicity. Results Patients spend a mean of 25 days (median = 17 days; IQR = 8–34 days) in hospital in their first year. Tumour type, stage, age and vital status corrections had the strongest effects in the model adjusting for other independent variables. Younger patients tended towards longer stays. Conclusion Length of stay varies among patients by tumour type, age and stage. Estimating future health service demands should account for changes in incident tumour characteristics.

We determined the diagnostic significance of IgM anti-HBc by a rapid, fully automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay (IMx CORE-M) in acute HBsAg positive hepatitis.We studied prospectively for at least 6 months 100 patients with acute self-limited hepatitis B (group A) and 40 patients with acute hepatitis superimposed on histologically confirmed chronic hepatitis B (group B). On admission, all patients in group A were positive and those in group B were negative for IgM anti-HBc by a commercially available enzyme immunoassay.Based on the assay criteria, the rates of IMx CORE-M (1.2) positive serum samples on admission, 4, 12 and 24 weeks later were: in group A: 100%, 95%, 72%, 44% and in group B: 20%, 27.5%, 17.5%, and 15%, respectively. Misclassification was observed in 20-27.5% of the acute on chronic hepatitis B cases. However, the mean IMx CORE-M index value was found to be significantly higher in group A during the whole follow-up. In particular, on admission the mean IMx CORE-M index value was 2.504 +/- 0.435 (range: 1.508-3.482) in group A and 0.747 +/- 0.346 (range: 0.062-1.384) in group B (p0.001). Discriminant function analysis showed that the cutoff level between the two groups for IMxCORE-M index on admission was 1.5. Four to 12 weeks from admission, in the group with acute on chronic hepatitis B cases, 13 patients with HDV and/or HCV superinfection had significantly lower IMx-CORE M index values compared with 27 patients with acute hepatitis due to exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B.IMx CORE-M appears to be an accurate diagnostic test to differentiate acute from acute on chronic HBsAg positive hepatitis, but the cut-off level seems to be higher (1.5 instead of 1.2).