1. The Role of Metastasectomy in Urothelial Carcinoma: Where Are We in 2020?
- Author
-
Deepak Kilari, Emily Lemke, Edward M. Messing, Scott Johnson, Elizabeth A. Guancial, Deepak M. Sahasrabudhe, and Kathryn A. Bylow
- Subjects
Oncology ,Urologic Neoplasms ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Bladder cancer ,Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ,business.industry ,Urology ,Metastasectomy ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Multimodal therapy ,Disease ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Systemic therapy ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,business ,Urothelial carcinoma - Abstract
Systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Responses to first-line platinum-based therapy tend to be short-lived with potential toxicity. Despite the approval of checkpoint inhibitors, the long-term prognosis for patients with metastatic UC remains dismal. Herein we report the case of a patient with a solitary pulmonary metastatic lesion of urothelial origin as the only site of metastatic disease who remained free of disease for more than 2 years without systemic therapy after metastasectomy. We review the literature discussing the role of combined surgical and medical management of oligometastatic UC. As our case illustrates, a growing body of evidence suggests a potential role for a multimodal approach in patients with oligometastatic UC.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF