Search

To compare complication rates and 5-year reoperation rates between open debridement (OD) and arthroscopic debridement (AD) for lateral epicondylitis.The PearlDiver MUExtr database (2010-2019) was reviewed for patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis (queried by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] codes) undergoing OD or AD of the common extensor tendon without repair (queried by Current Procedural Terminology codes). Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: those who underwent AD and those who underwent OD. Nonoperative treatment modalities were reported for both groups within 1 year before index procedure. The rates of 90-day postoperative complications were compared, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for complications. The 5-year reoperation rates, using laterality-specific ICD-10 codes, were also compared between the 2 groups.In total, 19,280 patients (OD = 17,139, AD = 2,141) were analyzed in this study. The most common nonoperative treatments for patients who underwent OD or AD were corticosteroid injections (49.5% vs 43.2%), physical therapy (24.8% vs 25.7%), bracing (2.8% vs 3.2%), and platelet-rich plasma injections (1.3% vs 1.0%). There were no significant differences in radial nerve injuries, hematomas, surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, and sepsis events between the 2 procedures (P = .50). The 5-year reoperation rate was not significantly different between the AD (5.0%) and OD (3.9%) cohorts (P = .10).For lateral epicondylitis, both AD and OD of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (without repair) were found to have low rates of 90-day adverse events, with no significant differences between the 2 approaches. Similarly, the 5-year reoperation rate was low and not statistically different for those treated with OD or AD.Level III, cross-sectional study.

Background Injury to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) complex of the elbow often results in posterolateral rotatory instability. Although surgical reconstruction of the LUCL is often required, gaps in our understanding of the LUCL complex remain. The purpose of this study was to provide a robust and accurate characterization of the lateral elbow ligamentous complex. Methods The LUCLs, radial collateral ligaments, and annular ligaments in 10 cadaveric elbows were 3-dimensionally digitized and reconstructed using computed tomography. Surface areas, origin and insertion footprint areas, distances between perceived footprint centers and geometric footprint centroids, distances to key landmarks, and ligament isometry were measured. Results The mean surface area of the LUCL was 229.3 mm2. The mean origin and insertion footprint areas were 26.0 mm2 and 22.9 mm2, respectively. The mean distance between the apparent centers and the geometric centroids of the footprints was 1 mm. The center of the LUCL origin was 10.7 mm distal to the lateral epicondyle and 8.2 mm from the capitellar articular margin. The center of the LUCL insertion was 3.3 mm distal to the apex of the supinator crest. The LUCL showed anisometric properties as elbow flexion increased (P Conclusions The LUCL origin center was 10.7 mm from the lateral epicondyle, whereas the insertion center was 3.3 mm from the apex of the supinator crest. The visually estimated footprint centers were generally within 1 mm of the geometric centroid. These geometries and distances to key landmarks will be informative for surgeons seeking to perform anatomic ligament reconstruction procedures.

Injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow is a debilitating condition in overhead throwing athletes, particularly baseball pitchers. In order to restore the primary ligamentous restraint against valgus stress at the elbow, MCL reconstruction is increasingly performed in both adolescent and elite throwing athletes in order to return to competition. We describe the pertinent surgical anatomy and indications for ligament reconstruction. Although various surgical techniques have been reported, we describe our preferred reconstruction with the docking technique through a muscle-splitting approach, which allows for secure graft fixation over bone bridges, identification and treatment of intra-articular pathology, and minimization of ulnar nerve-related complications. Excellent outcomes have been reported in approximately 90% of patients following MCL reconstruction with the docking technique.

To use a national database to determine (1) the incidence of joint infection after elbow arthroscopy, (2) identify independent patient-related risk factors for infection, and (3) determine the influence of concomitant intra-articular corticosteroid injection on infection risk.The 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files were queried to identify patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy from 2005 to 2012. Postoperative elbow infections occurring within 6 months of surgery were identified using both International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes for postoperative infection and Current Procedural Terminology codes for the surgical treatment of a postoperative infection. Patients were excluded if their initial arthroscopic procedure was performed for infection. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was then used to evaluate patient-related risk factors for postoperative infection.Of the 2,704 elbow arthroscopy cases identified, 42 (1.55%) developed a postoperative infection. The annual incidence of infections did not increase significantly over the course of the study (P = .374). A number of patient demographics and medical comorbidities significantly increased the risk of infection. The most notable factors included age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.38, P = .006), body mass index40 (OR 1.97, P = .024), tobacco usage (OR 1.80, P = .046), alcohol usage (OR 4.01, P.001), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.10, P = .015), inflammatory arthritis (OR 2.81, P.001), hypercoagulable disorder (OR 2.51, P = .015), and intra-articular corticosteroid injection at the time of arthroscopy (OR 2.79, P = .006).The annual number of elbow arthroscopies performed in the United States has increased steadily; however, the postoperative infection rate remained consistently low at 1.55%. There are a number of patient-specific risk factors that increase this risk with OR ranging from 1.97 to 4.01. Similarly, patients who receive an intra-articular corticosteroid injection at the time of surgery are nearly 3 times (OR 2.79) more likely to develop a postoperative infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

The literature investigating risk factors for failure after decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow (cubital tunnel release [CuTR]) is limited. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of isolated CuTR, defined as progression to subsequent ipsilateral revision surgery.The 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files from 2005 to 2012 were queried for patients undergoing CuTR. Patients undergoing any concomitant procedures were excluded. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate patient-related risk factors for ipsilateral revision surgery. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each risk factor.A total of 25,977 patients underwent primary CuTR, and 304 (1.4%) of those with ≥2 years of follow-up required revision surgery. Although the rate of primary procedures is on the rise (P = .002), the revision rate remains steady (P = .148). Significant, independent risk factors for revision surgery included age65 years (OR, 1.5; P .001), obesity (OR, 1.3; P = .022), morbid obesity (OR, 1.3; P = .044), tobacco use (OR, 2.0; P .001), diabetes (OR, 1.3; P = .011), hyperlipidemia (OR, 1.2; P = .015), chronic liver disease (OR, 1.6; P = .001), chronic anemia (OR, 1.6; P = .001), and hypercoagulable disorder (OR, 2.1; P = .001).The incidence of failure requiring ipsilateral revision surgery after CuTR remained steadily low (1.4%) during the study period. There are numerous patient-related risk factors that are independently associated with an increased risk for revision surgery, the most significant of which are tobacco use, younger age, hypercoagulable disorder, liver disease, and anemia.

This study was conducted to identify the rate of failure of operative treatment of lateral epicondylitis, defined as progression to ipsilateral revision surgery, and associated patient-specific risk factors for failure.A national database was used to identify patients undergoing surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis from 2005 to 2012. Patients undergoing concomitant procedures were excluded. Patients who then required subsequent ipsilateral extensor carpi radialis brevis débridement or release within 2 years were identified using similar methods. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate patient-related risk factors for revision surgery. In addition, the number of preoperative injections (1, 2, or ≥3) in the ipsilateral elbow was identified and included in the regression analysis. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each risk factor.Of 3863 patients who underwent operative treatment of lateral epicondylitis, 58 (1.5%) required ipsilateral revision surgery. Risk factors for revision surgery included age65 years (OR, 2.95; P = .003), male gender (OR, 1.53; P = .017), morbid obesity (OR, 2.13; P = .002), tobacco use (OR, 1.87; P .001), and inflammatory arthritis (OR, 1.79; P = .009). Having ≥3 ipsilateral preoperative injections was the most significant risk factor (OR, 3.55; P .001), whereas having 2 (OR, 1.44; P = .135) or 1 (OR, 1.15; P = .495) was not significant.The incidence of failure requiring revision surgery for lateral epicondylitis in the studied population is low (1.5%). Risk factors for revision surgery include younger age, male gender, morbid obesity, tobacco use, and inflammatory arthritis. The most significant risk factor for revision surgery is having ≥3 ipsilateral preoperative injections.

Purpose To investigate differences between sport types for patient-reported outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods Included patients were enrolled as part of a prospective institutional ACL registry. Inclusion criteria were preoperative self-identification as a competitive athlete, maximum score on the preoperative Marx Activity Scale, and minimum 2-year follow-up. Demographic, intraoperative, and outcome data were extracted from the registry. Outcome tools administered as part of the registry included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm-Tegner Scales, Marx Activity Scale (MAS), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Results A total of 294 patients with a mean age of 25.5 years (standard deviation 12.1) met the study inclusion criteria; mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Included sports categories were soccer (n = 92; 31.3%), skiing (n = 67; 22.8%), basketball (n = 56; 19.1%), lacrosse (n = 38; 12.9%), football (n = 29; 9.9%), and Tennis (n = 12; 4.1%). At baseline, compared with other sports, lacrosse players have higher outcome scores while skiers had lower scores. At 2-year follow-up, however, across all outcome tools, football players demonstrated significantly higher outcome scores than all other athletes (IKDC, 93.2, P = .001; Lysholm, 93.2, P = .03; MAS, 13.1, P = .03; SF-12 Mental Component Summary, 57.9, P = .0002). Conversely, at 2-year follow-up, soccer players demonstrated a significantly lower Lysholm (86.7, P = .02) and a trend toward lower IKDC (85.6, P = .09) scores. Conclusions Patient-reported outcomes after ACLR among active athletes are comparable. Football players demonstrate quantitatively higher outcome scores whereas soccer players have lower scores. However, these outcome score differences may not be clinically significant and may be subject to confounding variables. Continued attention should be paid to understanding sport-specific outcome after ACLR. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Purpose To evaluate the effects of retensioning and knot tying on the biomechanical properties of an adjustable loop anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction device. Methods Testing consisted of 3 phases, which used both adjustable loop devices (ALD) and closed loop devices (CLD) tested under cyclic loading to 4,500 cycles. Phase 1 consisted of implant-only testing using cyclic loading from 50 to 250 N. Phase 2 used relatively unloaded cyclic loading of 10 to 250 N. Phase 3 used a tendon/bone/implant model. Subsets of the ALD implants were subjected to isolated retensioning, isolated knot tying, or a combination of both to allow for independent examination of these interventions. Results In phase 1, retensioning and knot tying reduced final ALD elongation by 60% (0.38 v 0.96 mm; P = .00004). In phase 2, retensioning and knot tying reduced final ALD elongation by 88% (0.51 v 4.22 mm, P = .014). In phase 3, retensioning and knot tying reduced final ALD elongation by 45% (1.5 v 2.7 mm; P = .001), which was half of the elongation of the CLD (3.0 mm; P = .0007). Conclusions The ALD did demonstrate an increase in cyclic elongation as compared with the CLD during both extended loading conditions. The phase 1 ALD elongation (0.96 mm), while statistically greater than the CLD (0.52 mm), was likely not of clinical importance. However, the ALD elongation in phase 2 (4.22 mm) could be of clinical concern. Both of these increased elongations were eliminated by retensioning and knot tying. Furthermore, when evaluating in a graft-femur construct, retensioning and knot tying of the ALD reduced final cyclic elongation by 50% when compared with CLD. Clinical Relevance Retensioning and knot tying after initial reduction of the tendon graft with an adjustable loop ACL fixation device may help to further reduce concerns of loop slippage and displacement with cyclic loading during postoperative rehabilitation.

Capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is one of the most common causes of elbow pain and dysfunction in adolescent athletes. It typically occurs in gymnasts and overhead throwers and presents along a wide spectrum of severity. Stable lesions can typically be treated with conservative therapy; however, those presenting with instability, fragmentation, or loose bodies generally require surgical intervention. Although there are a number of described surgical options used to treat capitellar OCD lesions, microfracture is one of the most commonly performed and well studied. Patients who are candidates for microfracture generally have favorable outcomes with high rates of return to athletic activity after postoperative rehabilitation. In this work, we present our preferred arthroscopic technique for microfracture of OCD lesions of the capitellum. This technique is most suitable for patients with unstable or fragmented OCD lesions that are less than 1 cm in diameter and do not violate the lateral-most articular margin of the capitellum.

In the world of glenoid labral chondral injuries, perhaps the most recognizable by magnetic resonance imaging is the "teardrop" version, and the glenoid labral teardrop lesion is the glenoid chondral lesion most frequently associated with shoulder instability.

Shoulder instability is most commonly anterior and the majority of these dislocations are associated with a Bankart tear. Open Bankart repair remains the gold standard for surgical treatment; however, arthroscopic anterior stabilization has become the procedure of choice for most surgeons. The arthroscopic technique avoids subscapularis violation, provides the ability to treat concomitant intra-articular pathology, and results in improved cosmesis and decreased postoperative pain. However, there are certain patients, depending on history and pathology, that would benefit from an open stabilization procedure. Positioning for arthroscopic stabilization should be determined by surgeon preference as both beach chair and lateral decubitus positioning can achieve excellent visualization. Whichever technique is utilized, the surgical goals are to restore the labrum and attached capsule and ligaments to the anatomical position on the face of the anteroinferior glenoid, while reducing any capsular redundancy. The described techniques and pearls can be used to achieve these goals while avoiding any of the common pitfalls.

A complex interplay exists between the static and dynamic stabilizers in the glenohumeral joint, especially in overheard athletes who need a shoulder hypermobile enough to perform overhead activity yet stable enough to prevent joint subluxation. Concomitant shoulder pathologies commonly occur in the setting of microinstability and internal impingement. Before any surgical intervention, a 3- to 6-month course of conservative measures should first be attempted, with exercises focused on rotator cuff and scapular stabilizer strengthening combined with posterior capsule stretching. If surgery is needed, arthroscopic suture plication with treatment of concomitant lesions has been shown to provide the best clinical outcomes.

Hypothesis Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction is a commonly used surgical approach for the treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). We hypothesized that favorable clinical results could be obtained using the docking technique. Materials and methods Between 1996 and 2009, the docking technique was used for surgical reconstruction of the LUCL in 8 patients with purely ligamentous posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. The clinical results of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Results At a mean follow-up of 7.1 years (range, 5.2-9.4 years), 6 patients (75%) demonstrated complete resolution of lateral elbow instability, and 2 (25%) reported occasional instability with activities of daily living. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 87.5 (range, 75-100). Subjective assessment revealed that all patients were satisfied with their clinical outcome. Conclusion LUCL reconstruction using the docking technique facilitates simple graft tensioning and excellent graft fixation. Clinical results are comparable with previously reported studies with a low complication rate.

Using 3-dimensional high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we sought to compare femoral and tibial tunnel position and resultant graft obliquity with single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using transtibial (TT) or anteromedial (AM) portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques.Thirty patients were prospectively enrolled after primary, autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction by 2 groups of high-volume, fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons. With the TT technique, an external starting point was used to maximize graft obliquity and femoral footprint capture. By use of high-resolution MRI and imaging analysis software, bilateral 3-dimensional knee models were created, mirrored, and superimposed. Differences between centroids for each femoral and tibial insertion, as well as corresponding ACL/graft obliquity, were evaluated with paired t tests and 2-sided Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests, with P.05 defined as significant.No significant differences were observed between groups in position of reconstructed femoral footprints. However, on the tibial side, AM centroids averaged 0.8 ± 1.9 mm anterior to native ACL centroids, whereas the TT group centered 5.23 ± 2.4 mm posterior to native ACL centroids (P.001). Sagittal obliquity was closely restored with the AM technique (mean, 52.2° v. 53.5° for native ACL) but was significantly more vertical (mean, 66.9°) (P = .0001) for the TT group.In this clinical series, AM portal femoral tunnel reaming more accurately restored native ACL anatomy than the TT technique. Although both techniques can capture the native femoral footprint with similar accuracy, the TT technique requires significantly greater posterior placement of the tibial tunnel, resulting in decreased sagittal graft obliquity. When a tibial tunnel is drilled without the need to accommodate subsequent femoral tunnel reaming, more accurate tibial tunnel position and resultant sagittal graft obliquity are achieved.Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate the anatomic and biomechanical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling of the femoral tunnel. Methods Ten human cadaveric knees (5 matched pairs) without ligament injury or pre-existing arthritis underwent ACL reconstruction by either a transtibial or anteromedial portal technique. A medial arthrotomy was created in all cases before reconstruction to determine the center of the native ACL tibial and femoral footprints. A 10-mm tibial tunnel directed toward the center of the tibial footprint was prepared in an identical fashion, starting at the anterior border of the medial collateral ligament in all cases. For transtibial femoral socket preparation (n = 5), a guidewire was placed as close to the center of the femoral footprint as possible. With anteromedial portal reconstruction (n = 5), the guidewire was positioned centrally in the femoral footprint and the tunnel drilled through the medial portal in hyperflexion. An identical graft was fixed and tensioned, and knee stability was assessed with the following standardized examinations: (1) anterior drawer, (2) Lachman, (3) maximal internal rotation at 30°, (4) manual pivot shift, and (5) instrumented pivot shift. Distance from the femoral guidewire to the center of the femoral footprint and dimensions of the tibial tunnel intra-articular aperture were measured for all specimens. Statistical analysis was completed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons test with P ≤ .05 defined as significant. Results The anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction controlled tibial translation significantly more than the transtibial reconstruction with anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift examinations of knee stability ( P ≤ .05). Anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction restored the Lachman and anterior drawer examinations to those of the intact condition and constrained translation with the manual and instrumented pivot-shift examinations more than the native ACL ( P ≤ .05). Despite optimal guidewire positioning, the transtibial technique resulted in a mean position 1.94 mm anterior and 3.26 mm superior to the center of the femoral footprint. The guidewire was positioned at the center of the femoral footprint through the anteromedial portal in all cases. The tibial tunnel intra-articular aperture was 38% larger in the anteroposterior dimension with the transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique (mean, 14.9 mm v 10.8 mm; P ≤ .05). Conclusions The anteromedial portal drilling technique allows for accurate positioning of the femoral socket in the center of the native footprint, resulting in secondary improvement in time-zero control of tibial translation with Lachman and pivot-shift testing compared with conventional transtibial ACL reconstruction. This technique respects the native ACL anatomy but cannot restore it with a single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Eccentric, posterolateral positioning of the guidewire in the tibial tunnel with the transtibial technique results in iatrogenic re-reaming of the tibial tunnel and significant intra-articular aperture expansion. Clinical Relevance Anteromedial portal drilling of the femoral socket may allow for improved restoration of anatomy and stability with ACL reconstruction compared with conventional transtibial drilling techniques.

Several arthroscopic techniques have been described to address patellar instability. Most arthroscopic procedures focus on soft-tissue plication or “tightening” of the medial retinacular structures to correct lateral patellar instability. Good results have been reported using these techniques; however, we have found these techniques to be ineffective when the medial stabilizers have been avulsed from the patella. As a result, we have developed an arthroscopic technique to repair medial patellofemoral ligament avulsions to the patella using suture anchors. The purpose of this article is to review our indications for arthroscopic management of patellar instability and describe our 2 most common techniques.

Introduction Elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction has become the standard of care for the throwing athlete with a symptomatic ruptured or insufficient ligament and the desire to resume competitive play. Since Jobe's initial description of UCL reconstruction, the technique has evolved. A novel modification was the "docking" technique developed by Altchek. Subsequently, the docking technique as originally described was slightly modified. Arthroscopy is no longer routinely performed, and in some cases, a 3-strand graft is used. Materials and methods We treated 21 overhand athletes with clinical and radiographic evidence of UCL insufficiency with ligament reconstruction using a modified version of the docking technique using a 3-strand graft. There were 5 professional, 11 college, and 5 high school baseball players in the reconstructed group. Athletes were evaluated postoperatively by use of the Conway Scale. Results Of the 21 patients who underwent the modified docking technique with a three-strand graft, 19 (90%) had excellent results. There were 2 good results and no complications. Discussion UCL reconstruction can successfully treat athletes with UCL insufficiency. Several different reconstruction techniques have been described. By use of the docking and modified docking techniques, good to excellent results can be achieved in the majority of cases with a low complication rate.

The rotator cuff registry was established to evaluate prospectively the effectiveness of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the present study is to report the preliminary data at the 1- and 2-year time point and perform subgroup analysis to identify factors that may affect outcome.A total of 193 patients underwent all-arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear and met the inclusion criteria and 127 (65.8%) completed 2-year follow-up. The outcome measurements included physical examination, manual muscle testing, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and ultrasonography.The pre-operative ASES score was 52.37 +/- 24.09 and improved to 83.88 +/- 19.28 at 1 year (P.0001) and 92.65 +/- 11.36 at 2 years (P0.0001). The percent healing for all patients was 64.10% at 3 months and 64.34% at 1 year (P = .4080). At 2 years, there was a significant increase in the percentage of healed tendon at 75.42% compared to the 3-month (P (1/4) .0001) and 1-year (P = 0.0332) time points. Patients with intact tendons had an ASES score of 93.9 +/- 10.2 compared to tendon defects with a score of 88.0 +/- 15.6 (P = .0623). Gender, tear size, and acromioclavicular joint involvement have a significant effect on ASES score. Rotator cuff characteristics such as tear size, biceps pathology, acromioclavicular joint pathology, and tissue quality have a significant effect on postoperative tendon integrity.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair demonstrates significant improvement in clinical outcomes and good rate of healing by postoperative ultrasound. Longer-term studies are necessary to determine the efficacy over time.

The purpose of this study was to identify potential predictors of function and tendon healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair that will enable the orthopaedic surgeon to determine which patients can expect a successful outcome. Between 2003 and 2005, the Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Registry was established to collect demographic, intraoperative, functional outcome, and ultrasound data prospectively on all patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. At total of 193 patients met the study criteria, and 127 (65.8%) completed the 2-year follow-up. The most significant independent factors affecting ultrasound outcome were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.14; P = .006) and tear size (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.55-3.38; P < .001). After adjustment for age and tear size, the intraoperative factors found to be significantly associated with a tendon defect were concomitant biceps procedures (OR, 11.39; 95% CI, 2.90-44.69; P < .001) and acromioclavicular joint procedures (OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.46-10.12; P = .006). In contrast to the ultrasound data, the functional outcome variables, such as satisfaction (OR, 3.92; 95% CI, 2.00-7.68; P < .001) and strength (OR, 10.05; 95% CI, 1.61-62.77; P = .01), had a greater role in predicting an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score greater than 90. The progression from a single-tendon rotator cuff tear to a multiple-tendon tear with associated pathology increased the likelihood of tendon defect by at least 9 times, and therefore, earlier surgical intervention for isolated, single-tendon rotator cuff tears could optimize the likelihood of ultrasound healing and an excellent functional outcome.

The throwing athlete generates a tremendous force and torque on the shoulder to create the acceleration and deceleration necessary to propel objects at a high velocity. The muscles of the rotator cuff must offset these high-energy forces to stabilize the humeral head within the glenoid which, overtime, can lead to muscle fatigue and repetitive microtrauma. As a result, overhead athletes constantly subject their rotator cuffs to extreme loads, which can lead to a spectrum of rotator cuff pathology. It has been our experience that partial-thickness rotator cuff tears are one of the most common findings in the injured thrower’s shoulder. The purpose of this article is to address the technical aspects of treating throwing athletes with partial thickness rotator cuff tears.

Interscalene block (ISB) of the brachial plexus is frequently used for patients undergoing ambulatory shoulder surgery. We previously reported that the incidence of postoperative complaints (neurapraxia) after an ISB was low (3% at 2 weeks), but objective neurologic assessment was not included in the study. The present study combines subjective findings with both preoperative and postoperative objective sensory and motor assessments after an ISB. We prospectively evaluated 133 patients undergoing elective ambulatory shoulder surgery. ISB anesthesia was accomplished by use of 1.5% mepivacaine alone or in combination with bupivacaine (0.5%-0.75%) via a paresthesia technique and a 23-gauge needle. All of the blocks were performed by experienced anesthesiologists. The number of passes with the needle, site of paresthesia, ease of performing the block, and success of the ISB were recorded for each patient. Neurologic assessment was performed preoperatively and up to 2 weeks postoperatively by 1 of 4 health care professionals but not by the anesthesiologists who performed the ISB and included diminished sensation, localized nerve pain, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament pressure threshold sensibility, Weber static 2-point discrimination, and grip strength changes. Patients with postoperative changes were followed up until resolution of symptoms occurred. Successful surgical anesthesia was achieved in 98% of the patients. There was 1 major perioperative complication (0.7%), a seizure that occurred within 5 minutes of the ISB. Two (1.4%) complained of transient postoperative neurapraxias. Neither patient had any changes in objective sensory and motor measurements. Hence, there was no correlation between subjective complaints and objective findings in this study. This study demonstrates that, in the hands of anesthesiologists doing predominantly regional anesthesia, there is a 1.4% incidence of neurologic complications after an ISB. ISB is a safe and effective technique for patients undergoing ambulatory shoulder surgery when an anesthesiologist experienced with regional anesthesia is involved.

Medial collateral ligament insufficiency of the elbow can be a debilitating injury that often prevents athletes from competing effectively. The overhead athlete is particularly susceptible to this injury because the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament is the primary restraint to the valgus stress that is created during the throwing motion. Repetitive trauma from constant overhead or throwing activity can ultimately render the ligament incompetent and cause recurrent pain and instability. We have found that the only reliable way to return these athletes to sport is by ligament reconstruction. We currently use a “docking technique” that provides excellent graft fixation, the identification and treatment of intra-articular pathology, and the reduction of ulnar nerve related complications. This article details the assessment of the throwing athlete with valgus instability secondary to medial collateral ligament insufficiency and highlights the technical aspects for reconstruction.

Open posterior capsular shift is used for posterior glenohumeral instability that has failed nonoperative treatment. Few series have fully evaluated the outcome after open posterior stabilization. The purpose of this series was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome after open posterior stabilization of the shoulder. Preoperative and intraoperative factors were analyzed with regard to their impact on results. Forty-eight consecutive shoulders were identified that had undergone primary open shoulder stabilization by use of open posterior capsular shift. Of the shoulders, 4 were lost to follow-up, resulting in a study group of 44 shoulders in 41 patients. Shoulders were evaluated at a range of 1.8 to 22.5 years after surgery by use of the L'Insalata shoulder form, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and a subjective shoulder rating in 44 shoulders. Thirty-nine shoulders were evaluated by physical examination, and thirty-seven underwent radiographic examination. A recurrence of posterior instability occurred in 8 shoulders (19%). Of the patients, 84% were satisfied with the current status of their shoulder. The mean L'Insalata score was 81.25+/-17.8 points, the mean SF-36 physical component score was 50.81+/-7.87, and the mean mental component score was 53.82+/-7.55. Significantly poorer satisfaction and outcome scores were seen in shoulders found to have a chondral defect at the time of stabilization and in patients aged greater than 37 years at the time of surgery. No progressive radiographic signs of glenohumeral arthritis were seen up to 22 years after surgery. Open posterior shoulder stabilization is a reliable procedure for treating significant posterior instability without causing arthritic changes. Patients found to have chondral damage within the shoulder and older patients were found to have less success after stabilization.

Background With the recent rise in the number of Tommy John surgeries, a proportionate rise in revisions is expected. However, much is unknown regarding the current revision rate of Tommy John surgery, return to play, and change in performance in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. Methods Publicly available databases were used to obtain a list of all MLB pitchers who underwent primary and revision Tommy John surgery. Pitching performance preoperatively and postoperatively for pitchers who returned to 1 or more MLB games after revision surgery was compared with controls matched for age and position. Results Since 1999, 235 MLB pitchers have undergone Tommy John surgeries; 31 pitchers (13.2%) underwent revision surgery, and 37% underwent revision within 3 years of the index procedure. Twenty-six revisions had more than 2 years of follow-up; 17 pitchers (65.4%) returned to pitch at least 1 major league game, whereas only 11 (42.3%) returned to pitch 10 or more games. Of those who returned to MLB competition, the average length of recovery was 20.76 months. Compared with controls matched for age and position, MLB pitchers undergoing revision surgery had a statistically shorter career after revision surgery (4.9 vs 2.6 seasons, P = .002), pitched fewer innings, and had fewer total pitches per season. Conclusions The rate of revision Tommy John surgery is substantially higher than previously reported. For MLB pitchers, return to play after revision surgery is much lower than after primary reconstruction. The overall durability of MLB pitchers after revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction decreases significantly compared with controls matched for age and matched controls.

The purpose of this study is to define the prevalence of peripheral nerve injury associated with full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff presenting with shoulder muscle atrophy. Twenty-five patients with the diagnosis of full-thickness rotator cuff tear were included. Electrodiagnostic testing, including nerve conduction studies and needle examination, was performed on all patients. There were 7 abnormal electromyographic examinations. The most common diagnosis was upper trunk brachial plexopathy severely affecting the axillary nerve (4/7), followed by suprascapular neuropathy (2/7) and cervical radiculopathy (1/7). The prevalence of associated peripheral neuropathy was found to be 28%. Greater degrees of atrophy were significantly associated with the presence of neuropathy in these patients. Careful neurologic screening in all patients and electromyographic examination in clinically suspicious groups are recommended in patients with full-thickness cuff tears before surgical repair.

Patients' preoperative expectations of shoulder surgery affect both the decision to proceed with surgery and how patients assess outcomes of surgery. Our goals were to identify patients' expectations of shoulder surgery, to develop and test a patient-derived shoulder surgery expectations survey, and to determine the prevalence of major expectations by diagnosis. An initial sample of 409 patients (mean age, 51 +/- 17 years; 58% men) with diverse shoulder diagnoses were asked open-ended questions preoperatively about their expectations of shoulder surgery. Their responses were grouped into 38 categories including the following: pain relief, increasing range of motion, improving the ability to wash and dress, returning to sports, improving the ability to interact and care for others, and for the shoulder to be back to the way it was before shoulder symptoms started. Expectations varied by demographic characteristics, diagnosis, and functional status measured by the L'Insalata Shoulder Rating Questionnaire and the Short Form 36. The most frequently cited categories were then assembled into closed-format questions to form a draft survey. A second sample of 100 patients with diverse shoulder diagnoses completed the draft survey on 2 separate occasions to establish test-retest reliability. Items retained to form the final survey were frequently cited, represented clinically relevant or potentially unrealistic expectations, and had concordance levels of 0.40 to 0.83 measured by the kappa statistic (71% had kappa >or= 0.60). The final 17-item Hospital for Special Surgery Shoulder Surgery Expectations Survey requires less than 5 minutes to complete. This patient-derived, self-administered survey has several possible uses in daily clinical practice, such as providing a way to learn about the patient's perspectives, providing the orthopaedist with a template to guide a formal discussion about realistic and unrealistic goals, and providing a prospective record that can be used jointly by the orthopaedist and patient postoperatively to assess the outcome of surgery.

Mini-open rotator cuff repair has been used successfully to treat small- and moderate-sized rotator cuff tears but not large tears (>3 cm and

The goal of this study was to document whether an association exists between shoulder dislocation and the development of arthrosis and to quantify this association, if present. Patients with osteoarthrosis who had undergone hemi-shoulder or total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) were studied. Patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty for arthrosis and who had no history of shoulder symptoms served as control subjects. All patients were asked if they had ever sustained a shoulder dislocation. Ninety-one TSA patients and 282 control subjects responded. The odds ratio for developing arthrosis after a shoulder dislocation was 19.3 (P =.000006). With the 5 patients who had shoulder surgery prior to TSA excluded, the odds ratio was 10.5 (P =.003). The risk of developing severe arthrosis of the shoulder is between 10 and 20 times greater for individuals who have had a dislocation of the shoulder.

Sporting activities, such as throwing, swimming, tennis, and the javelin, require the shoulder to rotate at high speeds with the arm abducted, which places the rotator cuff at risk for microtraumatic injury. The rotator cuff works with the labrum and glenohumeral ligaments to restrain abnormal motion of the humeral head on the glenoid. If microtraumatic injury occurs to one component of this restraint system, greater forces are placed on the other components, often resulting in combined injuries, for example to the rotator cuff and labrum. The clinician should be aware that combined injuries are common, and it is difficult to isolate an injury to a single structure by using history, physical examination, or imaging.

Successful nonoperative treatment of shoulder injury in the throwing athlete requires a team approach. The physician, physical therapist, and athletic trainer work together with the athlete to determine a diagnosis and design a treatment protocol. Injury recovery requires restoration of muscle strength and balance followed by a careful return to a throwing program.

The nonoperative management of shoulder injuries in the throwing athlete requires a team approach. The physician, trainer, physical therapist, and coaches must work together with the athlete to enable a complete recovery. Each member of the team must have a clearly defined role. The trainer should initiate the process by recognizing the injury as early as possible. The physician must do a thorough evaluation and arrive at a clear diagnosis. A complete history and physical examination should be supplemented by appropriate radiographs and imaging studies. The physician needs to perform the evaluation in a manner such that the athlete and trainer feel confident in the diagnosis. The physician needs to spend an adequate amount of time with the player during the evaluation process to allow the player to express any concerns. Athletes often have their own insights into the injury that the physician should take the time to hear. Once a diagnosis is made the physician must, in consultation with the trainer, make several decisions: 1Can the athlete continue to participate? Only in exceptional circumstances is the athlete allowed to play through the injury. 2What medications are needed? In most incidences, an oral anti-inflammatory is indicated. Steroidal medications are not used because of the potential associated risks. Only in exceptional instances are narcotic pain medications used. 3Modalities such as cryotherapy, electric stimulation, and ultrasound are prescribed to decrease tissue edema and muscle stiffness. 4Injection therapy, particularly cortisone, rarely is indicated in this population. 5Physical therapy is usually the cornerstone of the treatment protocol. The conceptual structure of the program is designed by the physician in consultation with the physical therapist. The therapist and trainer carry out the program. Although the timing depends on the specific injury, in general, the player should demonstrate significant improvement in symptoms by the sixth week. If not, the player should be re-evaluated by the physician. On occasion the original diagnosis is modified at this juncture.

To add clinical perspective to the articles of this two-issue collection, eight prominent shoulder surgeons discuss their approach to the treatment of rotator cuff disease. There is broad agreement in many areas, however, significant controversies remain.

Injury to the acromioclavicular joint is common and represents the source of many shoulder-related symptoms.Frequently, nonoperative treatment regimens such as physical therapy, oral antiinflamatory medication, and corticosteroid injections resolve symptoms. However, certain patients with cases refractory to conservative therapy require an operative intervention. The traditional open resection of the distal clavicle, as described independently by Mumford and Gurd has been a reproducible and reliable surgical method of treatment in patients with posttraumatic, degenerative disease of the acromioclavicluar joint associated with osteoarthritis, distal clavicle osteolisis, fractures and separations, and shoulder impingement syndrome. Advances in arthroscopic shoulder surgery and subacromial decompression have made debridement of the acromioclavicular joint and resection of the distal clavicle a viable alternative to the open approach, avoiding complication such as AC joint instability and residual postoperative shoulder weakness, and with distinct advantages like 1) evaluation of glenohumeral joint, 2) evaluation and treatment of coexistent impingement and rotator cuff pathology, 3) generally, performed on an outpatient basis, which decreases hospital cost and increases patient convenience.

Impingment is a chronic syndrome characterized by microtrauma, which causes progressive injury to the rotator cuff tendon. In recent years, arthro- scopic subacromial decompression/acromioplasty has been frequently used for the treatment of impingement syndrome and is quickly becoming the preferred surgical treatment when conservative modalities fail. Arthroscopic acromioplasty offers many benefits over open acromioplasty, including better cosmesis, lessened preoperative morbidity, a more complete intraoperative examination, and a hastened, early rehabilitation program.

A comprehensive review of the history, indications, applications, results, and arthroscopic technique for the evaluation and treatment of common lesions of the rotator cuff and subacromial space is presented.

A method for directly measuring the position of the humeral head on the face of the glenoid in different positions of abduction of the arm was developed. We studied three subject groups: 12 patients with normal shoulders (group 1), 15 patients with stage II impingement syndrome (group 2), and 20 patients with rotator cuff tears or stage III impingement (group 3). The study consisted of a series of anteroposterior roentgenograms in the plane of the scapula with the arm in neutral rotation. Roentgenograms were obtained at 20 degrees intervals as the arm was elevated in the plane of the scapula from 0 degree to 120 degrees. Patients held a weight equal to 2 1/2% of body weight in the hand. The parameters measured were excursion of the humeral head on the glenoid face, expressed as the distance that the center of the head lies above or below the center of the glenoid, arm angle, scapulothoracic angle, and glenohumeral angle. For patients with normal shoulders (group 1), there was no significant change in position of the humeral head with arm elevation. In contrast, those with stage II impingement (group 2) had significant (p0.05) superior displacement of the center of the humeral head with arm elevation. Patients with rotator cuff tears (group 3) demonstrated a significant rise (p0.05) during the first 40 degrees of abduction. The average position of the humeral head in the two pathologic patient groups was superior (p0.05) to the average head position in the normal patient group. There was no significant difference in head position between patients with stage II impingement and patients with rotator cuff tear. The ratio of the glenohumeral angle to the scapulothoracic angle during abduction was calculated for our patient groups. In both patient groups, arm abduction had a larger scapulothoracic component than for normal shoulders. The superior migration of the humeral head is a probable result of cuff failure, either partial or complete.

The selective capsular repair for anterior shoulder instability allows the surgical technique to address the pathology encountered. An initial transverse capsulotomy allows visualization of the joint and flexibility in determining the site of the repair. The capsular tensioning can be performed either medially or laterally as determined by the presence of a Bankart lesion. Examination of the joint following the procedure should reveal the elimination of the pathologic anterior translation, reduction in the inferior translation, and the degree of external rotation desired to meet the specific goals of the patient.

Twenty-two patients were treated for symptomatic lesions of the superior glenoid labrum in association with instability of the tendinous insertion of the long head of the biceps brachii. A biodegradable implant was used to fix the labrum to the bony glenoid using an arthroscopic technique. At 2-year average follow-up, satisfactory results were obtained in 86% of the patients. Two patients, both of whom had undergone concomitant subacromial decompression, continued to complain of pain after the procedure; 3 patients had restricted motion postoperatively, and 1 required manipulation under anesthesia. Twelve of 13 overhead athletes were able to return to full premorbid function. Arthroscopic fixation of unstable lesions of the superior labrum led to a resolution of symptoms in the majority of patients. There were no complications related to the use of the biodegradable implant.

Since 1986, 20 shoulder orthroplasties have been performed for chronic, posttroumatic changes of the proximal humerus with a modular prosthetic system. The average patient follow-up was 33 months, range 24 to 47 months. Sixteen women and four men with an average age of 69.6 years were studied. The procedure was carried out for malunion of the tuberosities or humeral head in eight patients, nonunion of the humeral head in six patients, osteonecrosis in three patients, and chronic impression fractures associated with dislocations of the humeral head in three patients. Fair, good, or excellent results were achieved in 90% of patients. The average postoperative motions were forward elevation, 111°; external rotation, 30°; and internal rotation to L2. Two failures occurred. One patient had nonunion of a tuberosity repair with superior instability and secondary impingement requiring revision surgery. A second patient had a postoperative neuropothy and posterior subluxotion with poor function. Patients younger than 70 years of age and those who did not require tuberosity osteotomy had better results. The success of orthroplasty in these difficult occurrences is dependent upon appropriate patient selection, extensive preoperative evaluation, strict attention to surgical detail, and postoperative rehabilitation. Avoidance of tuberosity osteotomy, when feasible, is advised. A modular design has advantages because it facilitates soft-tissue tensioning and tuberosity repair.

Traditional open rotator cuff repair techniques are successful and reliable in terms of pain relief; however, the possibility of retum to overhead throwing and racquet sports is uncertain. Our preliminary experience with an arthroscopic-assisted technique of rotator cuff repair indicates that both pain relief and function are as good or better in comparison with open techniques because of the preservation of the deltoid sleeve and limitation of the dissection. The technique also allows inspection of the glenohumeral joint and detection of any concomitant labral pathology. Because arthroscopy is performed with the patient in the beach-chair position, conversion to an open technique is easy if arthroscopic repair cannot be performed.