Search

The cornerstone of management in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is early diagnosis and prompt initiation of treatment with an all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)-based regimen. Identification of the t(15;17)(PML-RARA) chromosomal translocation through conventional cytogenetics fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) or detection of the promyelocytic leukemia-retinoic acid receptor alpha (PML-RARα) fusion through RT-PCR represent the current standard of care for diagnosing APL. However, about 1–2% of patients with APL have a variant translocation involving other fusion partners with RARα besides PML. These patients present a unique diagnostic and clinical challenge in that conventional cytogenetics in addition to FISH and/or RT-PCR for PML-RARα may fail to identify these clinically relevant genetic lesions leading to an inappropriate diagnosis and treatment. We present two cases of patients who had APL with variant translocations whose bone marrow specimens were sent to the University of Michigan for enrollment in the MI-ONCOSEQ study (HUM00067928) after standard testing failed to identify PML-RARα or t(15;17) despite a phenotypic concern for this diagnosis. In these two patients, whole exome and transcriptome profiling via the MI-ONCOSEQ platform identified a PRKAR1A-RARα fusion in one patient and ZBTB16-RARα fusion in another patient. These cases illustrate the utility of whole exome and transcriptome profiling in diagnosing variant translocations in patients in whom there is a high clinical suspicion for APL based on hematopathology review.

Summary Background Daunorubicin and cytarabine are used as standard induction chemotherapy for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a synergistic 1:5 molar ratio. Primary analysis of the phase 3 trial in adults aged 60–75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia provided support for approval of CPX-351 by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. We describe the prospectively planned final 5-year follow-up results. Methods This randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial was done across 39 academic and regional cancer centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients were aged 60–75 years and had a pathological diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia according to WHO 2008 criteria, no previous induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (stratified by age and acute myeloid leukaemia subtype) to receive up to two induction cycles of CPX-351 (100 units/m2 administered as a 90-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 3, and 5; on days 1 and 3 for the second induction) or standard chemotherapy (cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days plus intravenous daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3 [7+3]; cytarabine for 5 days and daunorubicin on days 1 and 2 for the second induction [5+2]). Patients with complete remission or complete remission with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery could receive up to tw cycles of consolidation therapy with CPX-351 (65 units/m2 90-min infusion on days 1 and 3) or chemotherapy (5+2, same dosage as in the second induction cycle). The primary outcome was overall survival analysed in all randomly assigned patients. No additional adverse events were collected with long-term follow-up, except data for deaths. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01696084 , and is complete. Findings Between Dec 20, 2012, and Nov 11, 2014, 309 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive CPX-351 (153 patients) or 7+3 (156 patients). At a median follow-up of 60·91 months (IQR 60·06–62·98) in the CPX-351 group and 59·93 months (59·73–60·50) in the 7+3 group, median overall survival was 9·33 months (95% CI 6·37–11·86) with CPX-351 and 5·95 months (4·99–7·75) with 7+3 (HR 0·70, 95% CI 0·55–0·91). 5-year overall survival was 18% (95% CI 12–25%) in the CPX-351 group and 8% (4–13%) in the 7+3 group. The most common cause of death in both groups was progressive leukaemia (70 [56%] of 124 deaths in the CPX-351 group and 74 [53%] of 140 deaths in the 7+3 group). Six (5%) of 124 deaths in the CPX-351 group and seven (5%) of 140 deaths in the 7+3 group were considered related to study treatment. Interpretation After 5 years of follow-up, the improved overall survival with CPX-351 versus 7+3 was maintained, which supports the previous evidence that CPX-351 can contribute to long-term remission and improved overall survival in patients aged 60–75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia. Funding Jazz Pharmaceuticals.

Internal tandem duplications and tyrosine kinase mutations in the fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) receptor can occur in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and portend a poor prognosis. Midostaurin, a multikinase inhibitor that targets FLT3, demonstrated a survival benefit in FLT3-mutated AML in combination with front-line chemotherapy. Despite this advancement, the use of FLT3 inhibitors in clinical practice is complicated by significant drug-drug interactions and uncertainty about optimal timing, duration, and sequencing of therapy. As monotherapy, the utility of FLT3 inhibitors was initially limited by incomplete and transient clinical responses and the development of acquired resistance. This led to the development of more potent and selective FLT3 inhibitors designed to overcome common resistance mechanisms. One of these second generation FLT3 inhibitors, gilteritinib, is now FDA-approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory AML. Now that multiple FLT3 inhibitors are commercially available, it is important to further delineate the role of these agents in the AML population. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of FLT3 inhibitors in AML and apply the current literature to clinical practice.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous category of myeloid neoplasms that represent the most common class of acquired bone marrow failure syndromes in adults. MDS is typically associated with a hypoproliferative macrocytic anemia, but atypical findings on initial diagnostic evaluations can raise concern for a distinct pathophysiological process and lead to the investigation of alternative etiologies. Here, we report a case of MDS with a concomitant hypoproliferative microcytic and hypochromic anemia that led to the identification of acquired hemoglobin H due to a novel somatic ATRX mutation.

Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been associated with a worse prognosis compared to Ph negative ALL. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has led to an improvement in response rates and survival, thus becoming a critical component of therapy. We performed a retrospective cohort study of Ph+ ALL patients treated at the University of Michigan who received TKI therapy pre- and post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from April 2007 to November 2019. The study included 40 patients with Ph+ ALL (47.5% female) with a median age of 54 (24-69) years. Median event-free survival (EFS) was not reached, with a 5-year EFS of 61%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with a 5-year OS of 71%. There was no difference in 2-year EFS or OS for patients on pre-transplant imatinib or dasatinib (p = 0.16, 0.09, respectively), though definitive conclusions are challenging as post-transplant TKI therapy was variable. The incidence of any grade acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 62.5% (25/40) and any grade chronic GVHD was 77.5% (31/40). Complete molecular remission (CMR) was achieved in 57.5% of patients pre-transplant with no significant difference when stratified by induction TKI (p = 1). Achievement of CMR pre-HSCT showed a trend towards improved 2-year EFS (p=0.0198) but did not significantly change 2-year OS (p = 1). Patients receiving 1

Context: The current standard of care for Ph+ ALL is concurrent chemotherapy or corticosteroids with a TKI, followed by an allogeneic transplant for those who are eligible and have attained complete morphologic remission. However, recent studies have suggested that transplant may not be necessary for all patients with Ph+ ALL, especially those who achieve CMR after induction. Objective: Our objective is to analyze the outcomes and characteristics of patients with Ph+ ALL treated within our institution who did not undergo allogeneic stem cell transplant. Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with Ph+ ALL who did not undergo allogeneic stem cell transplant treated at the University of Michigan between 2007 and 2019. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measurements of our study were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Results: 31 patients were identified in our database and met eligibility criteria. 30/31 patients received an upfront TKI (20 received dasatinib, 9 received imatinib, and 1 received ponatinib). 11 patients had molecular testing, and 4 had an IKZF1 mutation. The median OS was 388 days, with a median EFS of 247 days. 7 patients were deemed medically eligible for transplant but did not undergo transplant for reasons including patient preference and lack of an adequately matched donor. The median OS was 372 days for these 7 patients. 10/31 patients achieved CMR, with a median time to CMR of 148.5 days. The median OS in patients who achieved CMR was 551 days. The median OS for those who survived at least 50 days after diagnosis was 494 days. Cox regression analysis found an HR of.129 [0.020–0.841] for initial induction with hyperCVAD + TKI and an HR of 10.177 [1.209–85.677] with dexamethasone, vincristine, and TKI. No significant difference in OS was observed based on the choice of TKI. All patients who achieved CR experienced relapse or death during follow-up. Conclusions: Our results reveal poor outcomes in non-transplanted patients with Ph+ ALL and support the current standard of care utilizing concomitant chemotherapy and TKI with allogeneic transplant in those who are medically eligible.

Background Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confers a poor prognosis, and there is no single standard of care first-line salvage regimen. FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) is a common salvage regimen with a favorable toxicity and efficacy profile in poor-risk AML. Materials and Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of first relapse/primary refractory patients with AML that received salvage chemotherapy from January 2009 to July 2019. We propensity-score matched patients 1:1 (based on age at diagnosis, cytogenetic risk group, Charlson comorbidity index, de novo vs. secondary AML, and whether or not they received an allogeneic stem cell transplant in first complete remission) into 2 groups, FLAG (Group 1) or non-FLAG (Group 2) as first-line salvage regimen, with 66 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (complete response and complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery). Results The median patient age was 59 years (range, 19-80 years). Patients treated with FLAG had a higher overall response rate (complete response/complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery) (71.2% vs. 50.0%; odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-5.08; P = .013), longer event-free survival (8.9 vs. 2.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86; P = .005), and longer overall survival (14.2 vs. 5.9 months; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.93; P = .019). Patients who received FLAG had a shorter median duration of neutropenia (22 vs. 34 days; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29-0.64; P Conclusion This analysis supports the FLAG regimen as an effective and well-tolerated salvage therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory AML.

Asparaginase remains a cornerstone of ALL therapy and is one of the key contributing factors to improved outcomes in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients treated on pediatric protocols. Asparagine depletion has been associated with improved outcomes in ALL patients; this has led to an increased emphasis on optimizing asparagine depletion in ALL patients of all ages. To ensure adequate asparagine depletion, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of asparaginase therapy holds much promise, yet remains underutilized in practice. Data regarding asparaginase activity level monitoring and associated outcomes are reviewed, and an evidence-based asparaginase activity level monitoring algorithm is presented. Finally, unique management strategies for key asparaginase toxicities in ALL patients are discussed, as well as a discussion of novel asparaginase formulations on the horizon.

High dose cytarabine (HIDAC) consolidation has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The increasing prevalence of obesity and the toxicity risk with this therapy renders important the quantification of potential risks with weight-based dosing in this patient population. The American Society of Clinical Oncology published recommendations on chemotherapy dosing in obese patients, but patients with leukemia were excluded from analysis. This was a retrospective comparison of safety and efficacy outcomes in obese and non-obese patients with AML who received HIDAC consolidation. Thirty-nine (41.9 %) patients received dose adjusted HIDAC in cycle 1. Nine of the 40 patients in the obese group received HIDAC dose-adjusted for obesity. The combined incidence of cycle delays, febrile neutropenia, or documented infection was 41.5 % in non-obese patients compared to 57.5 % in obese patients (p = 0.127). The median overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were not reached in both cohorts. The estimated 36-month overall survival was 76.4 % (95 % CI 0.623-0.905) in non-obese patients, compared to 66.1 % (95 % CI 0.472-0.85) in obese patients. There were no significant differences in safety or efficacy outcomes for obese versus non-obese patients who received HIDAC consolidation. For class III obesity, baseline dose-adjustments were more common.

Context Secondary AML (sAML) represents up to 30% of total AML cases and is associated with a poor porgnosis. Response rates to traditional chemotherapy regimens are poor. Prior studies have shown that both fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (FLAG) and HMA-based regimens (e.g. decitabine ± venetoclax) can provide favorable responses with lower treatment related toxicities than traditional regimens such as 7+3 or CPX-351. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare response rates in patient with sAML receiving 10-day decitabine ± venetoclax to FLAG. Design Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with sAML starting induction therapy at Michigan Medicine between January 2014 and July 2019. Setting Academic Medical Center. Patients or other participants Adult patients with sAML receiving first induction. Exclusion criteria as follows: receipt of prior therapy for this AML occurrence, or prior use of hypomethylating agent for antecedent hematologic disorder. Main outcome measures Complete response/Complete response with incomplete count recovery (CR/CRi) Results The median age was 73 (range, 37–80) in the decitabine ± venetoclax group and 67 (range, 27–82) in the FLAG group (p = 0.037). There was numerically lower but statistically similar CR/CRi rate in patients treated with decitabine ± venetoclax compared to FLAG (40 vs. 62%, p = 0.076). More patients in the decitabine ± venetoclax group achieved MLFS (25% vs. 1%, p = 0.002). The median overall survival was comparable in both groups (11.1 months, decitabine ± venetoclax vs. 9.5 months, FLAG; p = 0.472). There was a higher incidence of documented infections (20% vs. 55%, p = 0.01) with FLAG, despite days to absolute neutrophil count recovery being longer with decitabine ± venetoclax (median, 34 vs. 19 days; p Conclusions Response rates after FLAG and decitabine ± venetoclax are comparable and translate to similar overall survival in the sAML population in this real-world, single-center retrospective review. Larger studies are necessary to elucidate benefits of the individual regimens in the sAML patient population.

Introduction Relapse remains a significant challenge towards improving survival after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (HCT) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) not in remission or possessing poor cytogenetic/molecular features. Insights from murine pre-clinical studies demonstrate a central role for CD8+ dendritic cells in cross-presentation of leukemia associated antigens (LAA) in mediating GVL without aggravating acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)(Toubai, Blood 2013). We posited that enhancing LAA cross-presentation with exogenous Type I Interferon (pegIFNα) would promote GVL response and reduce rates of relapse after HCT. Methods We initiated a prospective, phase I/II, clinical trial of pegIFNα administration after myeloablative conditioning for prevention of relapse in pts with detectable AML at time of HCT (resistant to induction) or with cytogenetic/molecular features conferring high relapse risk and poor survival. Pts received up to four doses of 90mcg or 180mcg pegIFNα SubQ on d -1 and d 14, 28, 42 after PBSC or BMT. aGVHD prophy was tacrolimus + MTX or MMF. The primary endpoint was to determine the incidence of relapse in pts receiving the phase II dosage of pegIFNα. We hypothesized that 30 pts assigned to the same dose would provide 80% power to detect a difference between a promising day 180 relapse rate of 40% versus a rate of 60%. Results A total of 30 pts received study treatment at a median age of 60 years (17-72). Conditioning was myeloablative FluBu (n=9), CloBu (n=20) or FluCyTBI (n=1). At time of HCT, AML was detected in 28 pts and 2 pts enrolled for poor cytogenetic/molecular risk, complex/monosomal karyotype (n=1) and FLT3-ITD+ (n=1). There was no DLT at 90mcg (n=3) and one DLT (graft failure) after escalation to 180mcg (n=27). pegIFNα was well tolerated with ≥3 doses administered to 87% of pts. ≥Grade 3 SAEs during treatment include acute kidney injury(n=1), engraftment failure(n=1), bone pain/weakness(n=1), hypotension(n=1) and hypoxemia (n=1). 29 pts (97%) experienced primary engraftment and bone marrow exam at d 30 revealed CR in 100% of pts. Thirteen pts (43%) experienced infection. Grade II-IV aGVHD and grade III-IV aGVHD occurred in 35% (20 – 56%) and 11% (4 – 30%) by day 180. The incidence of TRM was 11% (3-30%) at day 180 and 19% (8-41%) at 1-yr. The day 180 (and 1-yr) incidence of relapse was 39% (24 – 60%) in the overall cohort and 36% (20 – 58%) in 27 pts treated at the phase II dose. At a median follow up of 19 months, the 1-yr OS was 42% (27 – 65%). Conclusion These data provide initial evidence of clinical translation for pegIFNα when administered prophylactically in an AML cohort at high risk for relapse. Type I Interferon did not significantly alter toxicity or aGVHD risk and produced relatively low rates of relapse suggesting a robust GVL response. The role of type 1 IFN in reducing clinical relapse and its underlying biological mechanisms warrants additional study.

Summary: Long-lived reservoirs of persistent HIV are a major barrier to a cure. CD4+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) have the capacity for lifelong survival, self-renewal, and the generation of daughter cells. Recent evidence shows that they are also susceptible to HIV infection in vitro and in vivo. Whether HSPCs harbor infectious virus or contribute to plasma virus (PV) is unknown. Here, we provide strong evidence that clusters of identical proviruses from HSPCs and their likely progeny often match residual PV. A higher proportion of these sequences match residual PV than proviral genomes from bone marrow and peripheral blood mononuclear cells that are observed only once. Furthermore, an analysis of near-full-length genomes isolated from HSPCs provides evidence that HSPCs harbor functional HIV proviral genomes that often match residual PV. These results support the conclusion that HIV-infected HSPCs form a distinct and functionally significant reservoir of persistent HIV in infected people. : HIV causes an infection that persists even when optimal therapy is used. Zaikos et al. provide evidence that HIV-infected progenitor cells from the bone marrow can amplify virus through normal cellular growth pathways in some treated people. Keywords: HIV, latency, reservoir, virus, persistence, clonal, hematopoietic, human, defective, infectious

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib are the standard of care for treating patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Compared with interferon-based treatment, the previous standard of care, imatinib is associated with significantly higher cytogenetic response rates and prolonged overall survival. Nilotinib and dasatinib, both newer and more potent TKIs, significantly improve cytogenetic and molecular response rates compared with imatinib. Despite significant advances in CML treatment enabled by the TKIs, a fraction of patients who receive frontline treatment with a TKI demonstrate inadequate response. The reasons for this vary, but in many cases, inadequate response can be attributed to non-adherence to the treatment regimen, intolerance to the drug, intrinsic or acquired resistance to the drug, or a combination of reasons. More often than not, strategies to improve response necessitate a change in treatment plan, either a dose adjustment or a switch to an alternate drug, particularly in the case of drug intolerance or drug resistance. Improved physician-patient communication and patient education are effective strategies to address issues relating to adherence and intolerance. Because inadequate response to TKI treatment correlates with poor long-term outcomes, it is imperative that patients who experience intolerance or who fail to achieve appropriate responses are carefully evaluated so that appropriate treatment modifications can be made to maximize the likelihood of positive long-term outcome.

Imatinib is one of the most potent cancer therapeutic agents identified to date. Before the introduction of this tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), 5-year survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was approximately 40%-60%, but since the introduction of imatinib, overall survival has increased to approximately 90% for patients with chronic-phase disease. However, nearly one fifth of patients are intolerant or resistant to imatinib, resulting in patients with persistent or progressive disease. Recent research has identified a number of additional compounds that more efficiently inhibit the Abl tyrosine kinase and additional kinases that potentially play a role in imatinib resistance. The advent of dasatinib and nilotinib has provided additional options for patients with progressive disease. A number of phase II clinical trials have recently demonstrated that these second-generation TKIs are well tolerated and effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemias. Recent clinical trial developments raise questions regarding the proper dosage and schedule of these newer agents as well as the timing of their use in the treatment of patients with CML. Additionally, the development of nonoverlapping resistance patterns with sequential drug exposure argues for the possibility of a drug selection scheme that might limit the development of resistant disease. As the era of personalized medicine has begun to take shape in the 21st century, the addition of newer TKIs might facilitate this trend in the treatment of Ph+ leukemias.

A total synthesis of the pseudopterosin A and E aglycon 3 has been achieved through a novel intramolecular benzyne Diels-Aldcr cycloaddition with a substituted cyclohexadiene.

Long-term Results of Ponatinib in CP-CML: 4-Year Minimum Follow-up of a Phase 1 Trial Hagop M. Kantarjian, Moshe Talpaz, Jorge E. Cortes, Neil P. Shah, Dale L. Bixby, Ian W. Flinn, Thomas J. O’Hare, Simin Hu, Victor M. Rivera, Tim Clackson, Maureen G. Conlan, Frank G. Haluska, Brian J. Druker, Michael W. Deininger, Michael J. Mauro The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA; Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA; Oregon