Search

Efficiency of percutaneous revascularization and the utility of levosimendan for advanced ischemic heart failure (HF) is unclear. We examined the efficacy of revascularization and levosimendan on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mortality of patients admitted with acute decompensated HF and severe left ventricular dysfunction.A prospective case control study that enrolled 84 patients with ischemic decompensated HF with LVEF35% and preserved LV wall thickness. Group A: 42 patients whose LVEF improved post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Group B1: 22 patients whose LVEF did not improve post-PCI alone but improved after levosimendan. Group B2: 20 patients whose LVEF did not improve neither post-PCI nor post levosimendan.LVEF increased in group A from 22 ± 5 to 29 ± 5% post PCI and continued to improve at the 6 month follow-up (36 ± 4%). In group B1 LVEF did not improve after PCI, but increased after levosimendan from 23 ± 4% to 32 ± 4% and remained constant at 6 months. In group B2 LVEF 26 ± 4% did not change following both interventions. Reverse remodeling with a decrease in end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters was observed only in groups A and B1. Group B2 had a dismal prognosis with 36% in-hospital and 43% six month mortality. Groups A and B1 had a lower in hospital (4.7%, 4.5%) and mid term (11%, 11%) mortality.Improvement of LV size and function with better prognosis can be expected in the majority of patients undergoing PCI for decompensated ischemic HF. Levosimendan enhanced the recovery of LV function post PCI.

Background Primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Currently it is recommended to treat only the culprit artery during the acute procedure. Only few reports describe the results of simultaneous non-culprit vessel PCI. The study hypothesizes that complete revascularization during primary PCI can be achieved safely with an improved clinical outcome during the indexed hospitalization. Methods One hundred and twenty consecutive patients presented with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary stenosis. Ninety five underwent complete revascularization (CR): the culprit artery was opened first followed by dilatation of the other significantly narrowed arteries. Twenty five had culprit only revascularization (COR): the culprit artery only was dilated and the other arteries were left untreated during the primary PCI. Results Complete revascularization (CR) was associated with reduced incidence of major cardiac events (recurrent ischemia, reinfarction, acute heart failure and in-hospital mortality 16.7 versus 52%, P =0.0001). There was a significant lower rate of recurrent ischemic episodes (4.2% versus 32%, P =0.002), myocardial reinfarction (3.1% versus 16%, P =0.01), reintervention (7.3% versus 32%, P =0.001), acute heart failure (9.4% versus 32%, P =0.01) during the indexed hospitalization and shorter hospitalization (4.4±1.27 versus 9.6±2.3, P =0.001) in the CR group. Transient renal dysfunction was more common in CR patients (8.4% versus 4% P =0.01). In-hospital and one year mortality were similar between the two groups. Conclusion Multivessel PCI during acute myocardial infarction is feasible and safe. Complete revascularization resulted in an improved acute clinical course. These data support a policy of complete revascularization during primary PCI for STEMI.