Search

Rehabilitation after injury and reconstruction to the anterior cruciate ligament is thought to require a gradual reintroduction of loading, particularly during resumption of running. One strategy to achieve this is via the use of a reduced-gravity treadmill but it is unknown, if and how muscle activity varies in the reduced gravity conditions compared to regular treadmill running. Nineteen healthy participants and 18 male patients at the end of their rehabilitation (8 with a bone-patellar-bone graft, 10 with a hamstring graft) participated in this multi-muscle surface electromyography (sEMG) running study. The hamstrings and triceps surae were evaluated during a 16km/h running while at 6 different relative bodyweight conditions from 50% (half weight-bearing) to 100% (full weight-bearing). Muscle activation was examined individually as well as normalized to a composite "entire" activation and considered across the entire gait cycle using Statistical Parametric Mapping. The healthy participants showed differences between the 50-100% BW and 60-100% conditions and in the hamstring graft group for 60-100% and 80-100% conditions. No differences were seen comparing all loading conditions in the bone-patellar-bone graft group. For the hamstrings, from 70% BW and above, there appear to be no difference in activation patterns for any of the groups. The activation patterns of the hamstrings was essentially the same from 70% indicated bodyweight through to full weight bearing when running at 16km/h. Accordingly, when running at this relatively high speed, we do not expect any adverse effects in terms of altered motor patterns during rehabilitation of these muscles.

The goal of this research was to study the postural adjustments that occur during the course of a voluntary movement (Simultaneous Postural Adjustments: SPA). A pointing task performed at maximal velocity was considered and upper limb kinematics and body kinetics were recorded. A 2-DOF model was elaborated that distinguishes between the body segments that are mobilized in order to perform the pointing movement. These segments are the right upper limb (termed the “focal” component) and the rest of the body (termed the “postural” component). This model allowed for the calculation of both sub-systems׳ kinetics and a comparison of the resultant reaction (RoSh) with the corresponding action (AoSh) at the shoulder level. The analysis was based on the ellipsoidal shape of their relationship. The ellipse computation (“Lissajous ellipse”) allowed the time lag to be estimated. The results showed that the kinetics of the postural component preceded that of the focal ones and that the time lag during the SPA was not statistically different from the APA duration (dAPA). In addition, the kinetics of the postural component were found to be opposed to the perturbation induced by the pointing movement, but only during part of the SPA time interval. It was concluded that the postural component plays a dual role during the movement, which consists of postural stabilization and propulsive action, with one prevailing over the other depending on the time-instant of movement evolution. This new evidence in healthy subjects is helpful to further specify differences associated with motor impairments.

We present a simple method to compare ‘focal’ and ‘postural’ chain kinetics in the course of pointing task. The method is based on the analysis of ellipses obtained by plotting the data issued from...