1. Nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for acute kidney injury – 2020 consensus of the Taiwan AKI-task force
- Author
-
Che-Hsiung Wu, Wei-Jie Wang, Heng-Chih Pan, Shang-Jyh Hwang, Yung-Chang Chen, Ji-Tsung Fang, Shao-Yu Yang, Terry Ting-Yu Chiou, Vin-Cent Wu, Ming-Jen Chan, Yen-Ta Huang, Chiao-Yin Sun, Hugo You-Hsien Lin, and Chih-Chung Shiao
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Creatinine ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,urogenital system ,business.industry ,Task force ,Acute kidney injury ,General Medicine ,Disease ,Guideline ,urologic and male genital diseases ,medicine.disease ,female genital diseases and pregnancy complications ,Clinical Practice ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,chemistry ,Medicine ,Renal biopsy ,business ,Intensive care medicine ,Kidney disease - Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common syndrome that has a significant impact on prognosis in various clinical settings. To evaluate whether new evidence supports changing the current definition/classification/staging systems for AKI suggested by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline, the Taiwan AKI-TASK Force, composed of 64 experts in various disciplines, systematically reviewed the literature and proposed recommendations about the current nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for AKI. The Taiwan Acute Kidney Injury (TW-AKI) Consensus 2020 was established following the principles of evidence-based medicine to investigate topics covered in AKI guidelines. The Taiwan AKI-TASK Force determined that patients with AKI have a higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, and death. After a comprehensive review, the TASK Force recommended using novel biomarkers, imaging examinations, renal biopsy, and body fluid assessment in the diagnosis of AKI. Clinical issues with regards to the definitions of baseline serum creatinine (sCr) level and renal recovery, as well as the use of biomarkers to predict renal recovery are also discussed in this consensus. Although the present classification systems using sCr and urine output for the diagnosis of AKI are not perfect, there is not enough evidence to change the current criteria in clinical practice. Future research should investigate and clarify the roles of the aforementioned tools in clinical practice for AKI.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF