Search

Step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), a historically important factor in the selection of vascular surgery residents and fellows, transitioned to completely pass/fail on January 26, 2022. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, residency and fellowship interviews were conducted virtually during the 2020-21 and 2021-22 application cycles. Given these significant changes in the evaluation of candidates for residency training, we sought to understand vascular surgery program directors' (PDs) perspectives regarding the change in step 1 scoring and use of virtual interviews as well as determine which factors will assume importance when applying to vascular surgery training programs in the future.A 26-item survey questionnaire was created using Qualtrics survey tools with questions regarding attitudes toward the change in step 1 scoring and virtual interviews, the importance of additional factors utilized by programs in selecting candidates for interviews and ranking applicants for residency/fellowship selection, and programmatic demographics. This was distributed anonymously to all vascular surgery training programs over a 2-week period using a comprehensive list of 249 unique email addresses created by cross-referencing the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education list of certified vascular training programs with email addresses from individual program websites identifying current program leadership. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics with values listed as average Likert scale weight ± standard deviation (SD) or percentages.Sixty-eight of 249 (27.3%) program and associate PDs responded to the survey. Of which, 33.9% of respondents strongly disagreed with step 1 going completely pass/fail. In the absence of a scored USMLE step 1, letters of recommendation (average Likert scale weight ± SD, 4.43 ± 0.92), dedication to specialty (4.14 ± 1.03), and USMLE step 2 CK (4.06 ± 0.92) had the highest average scores for deciding which applicants to interview for integrated vascular surgery residency. For determining which candidates to interview for vascular surgery fellowship, letters of recommendation (4.51 ± 0.84), dedication to specialty (4.12 ± 0.90), and research (4.10 ± 0.80) had the highest average scores. For ranking residency candidates, the interviewee's perceived "fit" (4.61 ± 0.55), letters of recommendation (4.53 ± 0.76), and an overall interview experience (4.47 ± 0.62) had the highest average scores. Similarly, the factors with the highest average Likert scores for ranking fellowship candidates included the interviewee's perceived "fit" (4.69 ± 0.51), letters of recommendation (4.65 ± 0.52), and an overall interview experience (4.51 ± 0.59). The majority (72.2%) of PDs preferred in-person interviews; however, 50% of respondents were at least "somewhat satisfied" with virtual interviews during the 2021-22 application cycle as they could judge applicants' interview skills at least "moderately well." The minority (18.8%) who preferred virtual interviews most commonly noted a "reduction of the financial burden for applicants" as the reason for this preference.Most vascular surgery program and associate PDs were dissatisfied with USMLE step 1 going pass/fail with most indicating prescreening applicants using both step 1 and step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) during the residency and fellowship selection processes. In the absence of a scored step 1, the top factors for interviewing and ranking integrated vascular surgery residency and fellowship candidates included letters of recommendation, dedication to specialty, research, USMLE step 2 CK, the interviewee's perceived "fit," and overall interview experience. Though most PDs preferred face-to-face interviews, they were overall at least "somewhat satisfied" with the virtual format that took place during the 2021-22 cycle.

ObjectiveThe acute technical failure of endovascular treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is most often due to the inability to re-enter the true lumen after occlusion is crossed in a subintimal plane. This study reports our initial experience with true lumen re-entry devices in the treatment of CTOs.MethodsPatients with treatment of CTOs were identified from our vascular registry. All patients in whom the Pioneer catheter or the Outback catheter were used were also identified from a prospectively maintained separate database of cases in which true lumen re-entry devices were used. We used procedural data from the prospective database and reviewed the medical records. Lesion character and location, access type, location of true lumen re-entry, stent usage, procedural times, and complications, were tabulated.ResultsFrom August 2003 to December 2004, endovascular techniques were used to treat 87 CTOs in 58 iliac and 29 superficial femoral arteries. In 24 (26%), the true lumen could not be re-entered by using standard catheter and wire techniques. The true lumen was not initially re-entered in 20 (34%) of 58 of treated iliac CTOs and four (13%) of 29 of treated superficial femoral artery CTOs (73% TASC C and D lesions). Intravascular ultrasound-guided true lumen re-entry using the Pioneer catheter (21 CTOs), or fluoroscopic-guided true lumen re-entry using the Outback catheter (3 CTOs) was successful in achieving true lumen re-entry in all cases at the location desired. Total time of re-entry catheter manipulation required to achieve re-entry was

Background: During prolonged laparoscopic operations with carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) pneumoperitoneum (PP), hypercapnia with significant acidosis has been reported to occur in some patients with pulmonary dysfunction. An alternate inert insufflation gas like helium (He) could avoid this problem. Methods: This prospective, IRB-approved study compared the cardiopulmonary response in 20 patients with both CO 2 and He PP. With the minute ventilation held constant, baseline arterial blood gases and ventilatory and cardiac parameters were obtained after anesthetic induction but prior to CO 2 PP. All values were repeated at 20 to 30 and 40 to 60-minute intervals after the insufflation of CO 2 PP, then again during He PP. Values were compared by a paired t test analysis. Results: Patients experienced significant hypercapnia during CO 2 PP when compared with baseline arterial blood gases, but all values returned to baseline levels during He PP. Conclusions: He PP is an effective alternative to CO 2 PP for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy avoiding CO 2 retention and subsequent acidosis. Carbon dioxide retention may be dangerous in patients with pulmonary dysfunction who undergo laparoscopy. (Gastrointest Endosc (1996;43:38-41.)

Background Aortic infections, even with treatment, have a high mortality and risk of recurrent infection and limb loss. Cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft (CAA) has been proposed for aortic reconstruction to improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Methods A multicenter study using a standardized database was performed at 14 of the 20 highest volume institutions that used CAA for aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for prosthetic graft infection. Results Two hundred twenty patients (mean age, 65; male:female, 1.6/1) were treated since 2002 for culture positive aortic graft infection (60%), culture negative aortic graft infection (16%), enteric fistula/erosion (15%), infected pseudoaneurysm adjacent to the aortic graft (4%), and other (4%). Intraop cultures indicated infection in 66%. Distal anastomosis was to the femoral artery and iliac. Mean hospital length of stay was 24 days, and 30-day mortality was 9%. Complications occurred in 24% and included persistent sepsis (n = 17), CAA thrombosis (n = 9), CAA rupture (n = 8), recurrent CAA/aortic infection (n = 8), CAA pseudoaneurysm (n = 6), recurrence of aortoenteric fistula (n = 4), and compartment syndrome (n = 1). Patients with full graft excision had significantly better outcomes. Ten (5%) patients required allograft explant. Mean follow-up was 30 ± 3 months. Freedom from graft-related complications, graft explant, and limb loss was 80%, 88%, and 97%, respectively, at 5 years. Primary graft patency was 97% at 5 years, and patient survival was 75% at 1 year and 51% at 5 years. Conclusions This largest study of CAA indicates that CAA allows aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for infection with lower early and long-term morbidity and mortality than other previously reported treatment options. Repair with CAA is associated with low rates of aneurysm formation, recurrent infection, aortic blowout, and limb loss. We believe that CAA should be considered a first line treatment of aortic infections.