1. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic tissue acquisition for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the PREOPANC and PREOPANC-2 trials
- Author
-
Quisette P. Janssen, Rutger Quispel, Marc G. Besselink, Bert A. Bonsing, Marco J. Bruno, Michael Doukas, Arantza F. Sarasqueta, Marjolein Y.V. Homs, Jeanin E. van Hooft, Geertjan van Tienhoven, Marie-Louise F. van Velthuysen, Joanne Verheij, Rogier P. Voermans, Johanna W. Wilmink, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Casper H.J. van Eijck, Lydi M.J.W. van Driel, Radiation Oncology, Pathology, CCA - Cancer biology and immunology, CCA - Imaging and biomarkers, Surgery, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radiotherapy, Oncology, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, and Medical Oncology
- Subjects
neoadjuvant treatment ,endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Hepatology ,Gastroenterology ,biopsy ,sensitivity ,endoscopic ultrasonography - Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has increased, necessitating histopathologic confirmation of cancer. This study evaluates the performance of endoscopic tissue acquisition (TA) procedures for borderline resectable and resectable PDAC. Methods: Pathology reports of patients included in two nationwide randomized controlled trials (PREOPANC and PREOPANC-2) were reviewed. The primary outcome was sensitivity for malignancy (SFM), considering both “suspicious for” and “malignant” as positive. Secondary outcomes were rate of adequate sampling (RAS) and diagnoses other than PDAC. Results: Overall, 892 endoscopic procedures were performed in 617 patients, including endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided TA in 550 (89.1%), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided brush cytology in 188 (30.5%), and periampullary biopsies in 61 patients (9.9%). The SFM was 85.2% for EUS, 88.2% for repeat EUS, 52.7% for ERCP, and 37.7% for periampullary biopsies. The RAS ranged 94–100%. Diagnoses other than PDAC were other periampullary cancers in 24 (5.4%), premalignant disease in five (1.1%), and pancreatitis in three patients (0.7%). Conclusions: EUS-guided TA of patients with borderline resectable and resectable PDAC included in RCTs had an SFM above 85% for both first and repeat procedures, meeting international standards. Two percent had false positive result for malignancy and 5% had other (non-PDAC) periampullary cancers.
- Published
- 2023