Search

Objetivo El test del aliento con 13C-urea (TAU) es la prueba no invasiva más utilizada para diagnosticar Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). La posible interferencia de la toma de antiácidos en su resultado es aún controvertida. El estudio se dirige a confirmar la no interferencia del almagato en la determinación de H. pylori mediante el TAU. Pacientes y métodos Estudio observacional, multicéntrico, en pacientes adultos en tratamiento con almagato y a los que se indicó un TAU (TAUKIT®). Cuando el resultado del TAU fue negativo, se suprimió la toma de almagato durante 30 días y se repitió un segundo TAU. En los pacientes cuyo resultado fue positivo, no se realizaron más determinaciones. La variable principal a estudio fue el porcentaje de pacientes que teniendo resultado negativo en la primera prueba de aliento, tras suprimir la toma de almagato y repetirla, ésta se positivizó (falsos negativos del TAU, posiblemente atribuibles a almagato). Resultados De los 167 pacientes evaluables, 59% fueron mujeres, la media de edad fue de 49 años y 97% de los casos presentaban sintomatología digestiva. El resultado del primer TAU fue negativo en un 71% de casos. De éstos, en la segunda prueba de TAU tras suprimir almagato, este resultado se confirmó en el 97,5%. El porcentaje de falsos negativos sobre el total de casos evaluados fue del 1,8%. Conclusiones La toma de almagato tiene una interferencia mínima o nula en el resultado del TAU para el diagnóstico de la infección por H. pylori; por tanto, se puede utilizar en las semanas previas a la realización del TAU, Objective The 13C-urea breath test (UBT) is the most widely used non-invasive diagnostic test for Helicobacter pylori. Debate continues to surround the possible interference of antacid intake on its result. This study aims to confirm the non-interference of almagate in the determination of H. pylori by UBT. Patients and methods Observational, multicentre study in adult patients treated with almagate in whom a UBT (TAUKIT®) was indicated. When the UBT result was negative, use of almagate was stopped for 30 days and the UBT was repeated. When the result was positive, no further determinations were made. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who, having had a negative result in the first breath test, were positive in the second after having stopped taking almagate (UBT false negatives, possibly attributable to almagate). Results Of the 167 evaluable patients, 59% were female, average age was 49 and 97% had gastrointestinal symptoms. The result of the first UBT was negative in 71% of cases. Of these, in the second UBT test after stopping the almagate, the negative result was confirmed in 97.5%. Out of the total number of cases evaluated, the rate of false negatives was 1.8%. Conclusions Taking almagate has minimal or no interference in the result of UBT for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. It can therefore be used in the weeks prior to a UBT, El presente trabajo ha sido financiado por Almirall, S.A., Barcelona y también ha sido posible gracias a la aportación gratuita de los test de urea por parte de Isomed Pharma (kit TAUKIT 100 mg de 13C).

Secondary bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients is an uncommon entity that has been little reported. Our aim is to analyse the frequency, clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis of patients with secondary peritonitis in comparison to those of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).Retrospective analysis of 24 cirrhotic patients with secondary peritonitis compared with 106 SBP episodes.Secondary peritonitis represented 4.5% of all peritonitis in cirrhotic patients. Patients with secondary peritonitis showed a significantly more severe local inflammatory response than patients with SBP. Considering diagnosis of secondary peritonitis, the sensitivity of Runyon's criteria was 66.6% and specificity 89.7%, Runyon's criteria and/or polymicrobial ascitic fluid culture were present in 95.6%, and abdominal computed tomography was diagnostic in 85% of patients in whom diagnosis was confirmed by surgery or autopsy. Mortality during hospitalization was higher in patients with secondary peritonitis than in those with SBP (16/24, 66.6% vs. 28/106, 26.4%) (p0.001). There was a trend to lower mortality in secondary peritonitis patients who underwent surgery (7/13, 53.8%) than in those who received medical treatment only (9/11, 81.8%) (p=0.21). Considering surgically treated patients, the time between diagnostic paracentesis and surgery was shorter in survivors than in non-survivors (3.2+/-2.4 vs. 7.2+/-6.1 days, p=0.31).Secondary peritonitis is an infrequent complication in cirrhotic patients but mortality is high. A low threshold of suspicion on the basis of Runyon's criteria and microbiological data, together with an aggressive approach that includes prompt abdominal computed tomography and early surgical evaluation, could improve prognosis in these patients.