Search

Seismic capacity assessment of existing buildings is of paramount importance for mitigating the seismic risk in earthquake-prone areas. In Europe, the next version of Eurocode 8 and the current version of the Italian standards suggest the adoption of both linear and nonlinear approaches to perform seismic analyses of existing masonry buildings. This paper discusses with the main issues concerning linear and nonlinear analyses methodologies provided by the Italian standards for existing unreinforced masonry buildings. An historical building located in Southern Italy, representative of the Mediterranean basin buildings, has been chosen as a case study and modelled through the equivalent frame model. According to the Italian standards, the influence of in-plane stiffness of floors and spandrels on the overall seismic capacity of the structure has been considered in the analyses. Beyond the code prescriptions, the effect of different ultimate drifts values assumed for the spandrels on nonlinear behavior of the structure has been analysed. The results of two types of linear analyses (lateral static force method and modal response spectrum analysis) have been compared among them and with those provided by the nonlinear static method. Conclusions show that either behavior and overstrength factors provided by the Italian standards are conservative than those estimated through the nonlinear static analyses. Moreover, it has been remarked that the value of ultimate drift adopted for the spandrel can affect significantly the nonlinear response of the structures, although this topic still represents an open issue.

This paper presents a benchmark exercise for the seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings as a follow-up of a blind prediction test organized in the context of the European Conference of Earthquake Engineering Series. The blind prediction exercise was aimed at better defining the open issues in current procedures for modeling and performing seismic analysis of URM buildings, by highlighting the uncertainty that can influence the results. This work presents an overview of the approaches used by different research teams and the scope of predictions. The benchmark structure was a three-story building with traditional European architecture from which two Cases were considered: A) stone masonry walls and flexible horizontal diaphragms and B) brick masonry walls and rigid horizontal diaphragms. A wide range of approaches was used by the participating teams concerning modeling strategies, methods of analysis and criteria for the attainment of limit states, which are here addressed as potential sources for the dispersion of predictions. The results were compared in terms of capacity curves, predicted failure mechanisms compatible with the fulfillment of limit states of near collapse and damage limitation, and related minimum values of peak ground acceleration (PGA). The results show an overall good agreement for damage patterns and collapse mechanisms in both benchmark structures, presenting some differences in the type of failure mode and its extent. However, the scatter of predicted capacity curves and critical PGAs is very high, especially for the Case with brick masonry and rigid diaphragms, indicating that clearer procedures in the building codes are required for professionals., This work was partly financed by FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R&D Unit Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE), under reference UIDB/04029/2020.

In-plane seismic behaviour of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) walls is influenced by panel-to-panel and panel-to-foundation mechanical connections, which consist of hold-downs and angle brackets. Due to the platform constructional technology, the orthogonal to grain timber-to-timber contact is also involved in the seismic response of the panels. To date, literature theoretical approaches to evaluating the flexural load-bearing capacity of CLT panels focus their attention on the schematization of hold-downs and angle brackets only, under evaluating the role of timber compressed in the perpendicular direction. In this paper the influence of orthogonal to grain timber properties on the overall seismic behaviour of CLT walls has been investigated, proposing a general theoretical model to schematize the panel-to-panel and panel-to-foundation connections. A parabola-rectangle constitutive behaviour has been defined to describe the orthogonal to grain timber behaviour in the connection zones, while hold-downs and angle brackets are modelled adopting literature models. Five different failure conditions, described by mathematical formulations, able to describe the entire axial force-bending moment interaction domain have been defined. The proposed model has also been employed to schematize the connection zones in multi-storey CLT walls with openings, allowing to investigate the effect of the orthogonal to grain properties on its seismic behaviour. Results of nonlinear analyses demonstrate a significant influence of orthogonal to grain timber properties on seismic behaviour of the walls, affecting their strength, stiffness, ductility and collapse mechanisms.

In this paper the results of a wide experimental campaign on the structural behaviour of ancient chestnut beams are presented. The beams were taken from the floor slab of an existing building, they being representative of the bearing structures of common historical buildings of many Mediterranean countries. Therefore, they were characterized by natural defects and degradation phenomena, which may have a significant effect on the evaluation of the load bearing capacity of the member. Four beams in actual dimension have been considered, which have been subjected to static bending tests, aimed at the evaluation of stiffness, strength, post-elastic behaviour and collapse mechanism. In the paper, the global influence of relevant defect patterns on the behaviour of these beams has been evaluated by comparing their overall behaviour with the actual material response obtained by compression, bending and shear tests on defect-free small specimens. The obtained results show that the simplified methods commonly used to evaluate the bearing capacity of wooden beams can be safely applied to ancient structural members as well, provided that adequate reduction factors for the shear resistance are considered.