Search

Objectives: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed using anatomic guidance. Data connecting the physiologic significance of the coronary vessel stenosis to the acute physiologic response to grafting are lacking. The Collaborative Pilot Study to Determine the Correlation Between Intraoperative Observations Using Spy Near-Infrared Imaging and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Physiological Assessment of Lesion Severity study is the first to compare preintervention coronary physiology with the acute regional myocardial perfusion change (RMP-QC) at CABG in a per-graft analysis. Methods: Non-emergent patients undergoing diagnostic catheterization suitable for multivessel CABG were enrolled. Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus score, fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR), and quantitative coronary angiography was documented in 75 epicardial coronary arteries, with 62 angiographically intermediate and 13 severe stenoses. At CABG, near-infrared fluorescence analysis quantified the relative change (post- vs pregrafting, termed RMP-QC) in the grafted vessel's perfusion territory. Scatter plots were constructed for RMP-QC versus quantitative coronary angiography and RMP-QC versus FFR/iFR. Exact quadrant randomization test for randomness was used. Results: There was no relationship between RMP-QC and quantitative coronary angiography percent diameter stenosis, whether all study vessels were included (P = .949) or vessels with core-lab quantitative coronary angiography only (P = .922). A significant nonrandom association between RMP-QC and FFR (P = .025), as well as between RMP-QC and iFR (P = .008), was documented. These associations remained when excluding vessels with assigned FFR and iFR values (P = .0092 and P = .0006 for FFR and iFR, respectively). Conclusions: The Collaborative Pilot Study to Determine the Correlation Between Intraoperative Observations Using Spy Near-Infrared Imaging and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Physiological Assessment of Lesion Severity study demonstrates there is no association between angiographic coronary stenosis severity and the acute perfusion change after grafting; there is an association between functional stenosis severity and absolute increase in regional myocardial perfusion after CABG.

Machine learning may enhance prediction of outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We sought to develop and validate a dynamic machine learning model to predict CABG outcomes at clinically relevant pre- and postoperative time points.The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) registry data elements from 2086 isolated CABG patients were divided into training and testing datasets and input into Extreme Gradient Boosting decision-tree machine learning algorithms. Two prediction models were developed based on data from preoperative (80 parameters) and postoperative (125 parameters) phases of care. Outcomes included operative mortality, major morbidity or mortality, high cost, and 30-day readmission. Machine learning and STS model performance were assessed using accuracy and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR).Preoperative machine learning models predicted mortality (accuracy, 98%; AUC-PR = 0.16; F1 = 0.24), major morbidity or mortality (accuracy, 75%; AUC-PR = 0.33; F1 = 0.42), high cost (accuracy, 83%; AUC-PR = 0.51; F1 = 0.52), and 30-day readmission (accuracy, 70%; AUC-PR = 0.47; F1 = 0.49) with high accuracy. Preoperative machine learning models performed similarly to the STS for prediction of mortality (STS AUC-PR = 0.11; P = .409) and outperformed STS for prediction of mortality or major morbidity (STS AUC-PR = 0.28; P.001). Addition of intraoperative parameters further improved machine learning model performance for major morbidity or mortality (AUC-PR = 0.39; P.01) and high cost (AUC-PR = 0.64; P.01), with cross-clamp and bypass times emerging as important additive predictive parameters.Machine learning can predict mortality, major morbidity, high cost, and readmission after isolated CABG. Prediction based on the phase of care allows for dynamic risk assessment through the hospital course, which may benefit quality assessment and clinical decision-making.

Background The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Quality Measurement Task Force has developed risk models and composite performance measures for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), isolated mitral valve replacement or repair (MVRR), AVR+CABG, and MVRR+CABG. To further enhance its portfolio of risk-adjusted performance metrics, STS has developed new risk models for multiple valve operations ± CABG procedures. Methods Using July 2011 to June 2019 STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database data, risk models for AVR+MVRR (n = 31,968) and AVR+MVRR+CABG (n = 12,650) were developed with the following endpoints: Operative Mortality, major morbidity (any 1 or more of the following: cardiac reoperation, deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis, stroke, prolonged ventilation, and renal failure), and combined mortality and/or major morbidity. Data were divided into development (July 2011 to June 2017; n = 35,109) and validation (July 2017 to June 2019; n = 9509) samples. Predictors were selected by assessing model performance and clinical face validity of full and progressively more parsimonious models. Performance of the resulting models was evaluated by assessing discrimination and calibration. Results C-statistics for the overall population of multiple valve ± CABG procedures were 0.7086, 0.6734, and 0.6840 for mortality, morbidity, and combined mortality and/or morbidity in the development sample, and 0.6953, 0.6561, and 0.6634 for the same outcomes, respectively, in the validation sample. Conclusions New STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database risk models have been developed for multiple valve ± CABG operations, and these models will be used in subsequent STS performance metrics.

Background Cardiothoracic surgery is one of the more highly litigated medical specialties, and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) constitutes a substantial portion of cardiothoracic surgery cases. Therefore, understanding litigations relating to CABG would be of benefit to surgeons working to uphold the standards of care that their patients seek and minimize their own legal liability. This study analyzed CABG litigations to identify predictive factors of litigation and verdict type. Methods This study utilized the Westlaw legal database to compile litigations from 1994-2019 across the United States, and resulted in 307 total litigations. After individual screening, 211 litigations met the criteria for inclusion, and were analyzed for demographic, clinical, chronological, and verdict characteristics. Results Litigations were present in 33 US states, with California, New York, and Florida having the most litigations. Defendant verdicts were reached in 67.78% of litigations, followed by 20.38% of plaintiff verdicts, and 11.85% of settlements. Plaintiff verdicts were associated with the incidence of myocardial infarction during hospitalization. The winter season had the most litigations (42.18%), and the most defendant verdicts (37.76%). Patient mortality occurred in 47.39% of litigations. The most common alleged reason for litigation was a procedural error (55.45%). Conclusions Defendant verdicts were significantly associated with an alleged reason of procedural errors, an alleged reason of a failure to monitor, and congestive heart failure present in patients. The common nature of defendant verdicts, and the significantly greater occurrence of defendant verdicts during the highly litigated winter season, suggest that surgeons frequently satisfy the legal standard of care.

The optimal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients after an acute myocardial infarction (MI) is unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates in patients who underwent CABG at different time intervals after acute MI. Bias assessments were completed for each study, and summary of proportions of all-cause mortality were calculated based on CABG at various time intervals after MI. A total of 22 retrospective studies, which included a total of 137,373 patients were identified. The average proportion of patients who died when CABG was performed within 6 hours of MI was 12.7%, within 6 to 24 hours of MI was 10.9%, within 1 day of MI was 9.8%, any time after 1 day of MI was 3.0%, within 7 days of MI was 5.9%, and any time after 7 days of MI was 2.7%. Interstudy heterogeneity, assessed using I2 values, showed significant heterogeneity in death rates within subgroups. Only 1 study accounted for immortal time bias, and there was a serious risk of selection bias in all other studies. Confounding was found to be a serious risk for bias in 55% of studies because of a lack of accounting for type of MI, MI severity, or other verified cardiac risk factors. The current publications comparing timing of CABG after MI is at serious risk of bias because of patient selection and confounding, with heterogeneity in both study populations and intervention time intervals.

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting 30-day unplanned readmission is a focus for the CMS Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. Awareness of the critical elements of the care delivery environment, including hospital infrastructure and patient clinical profiles that predispose toward readmission, is essential to proactively decrease readmissions. Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-State Inpatient Database, American Hospital Association Annual Health Survey Database, and Healthcare Information Management Systems Society data sets were merged to create a single data set of patient- and hospital-level data from 8 states. Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures were queried for all-cause 30-day readmission, and backwards stepwise logistic regression was performed. Readmission rate was then used to categorize hospitals into quartiles, and analysis focused on the hospitals with the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) readmission rates. Univariate analysis was performed comparing Q1 and Q4 hospitals. Results: A total of 150,215 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with 23,244 (15.5%) readmitted patients among 903 hospitals. Model area under the curve was 0.709 (95% confidence interval, 0.702–0.716), with the top 3 readmission determinants related to discharge disposition. Compared to Q1, Q4 patients more often were female, were >70 years of age, and had Medicare as a primary payor (P < .001). Low readmission rate hospitals were characterized by higher costs; not-for-profit status; having Joint Commission accreditation; and higher total admissions, operative volume, hospital/ICU beds, full-time physicians, nurses, and ancillary personnel (P < .001). Conclusion: Readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting is strongly influenced by discharge disposition. However, hospital factors such as scale, personnel, and ownership structure are significant contributors to readmission. Focus beyond patient factors to include the entire continuum of care is required to enhance outcomes, of which readmission is one surrogate measure.

Background The ratio of early mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic strain rate (E/e'sr) is a novel echocardiographic measure to estimate early left ventricular (LV) filling pressure. We hypothesize that E/e'sr is a predictor of outcome following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and that it is superior to the conventionally used E/e'. Methods & results Consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG at Gentofte Hospital (n = 652) were included. The mean age of the study population was 67 ± 9 years, 84% were male, mean LVEF was 50 ± 11%. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent an extensive echocardiographic examination. The outcome was all-cause mortality. During follow-up (median 3.8 years [IQR: 2.7; 4.9 years]), a total of 73 (11.2%) died. Both E/e' and E/e'sr were significant predictors in univariable models. In a multivariable model, E/e'sr remained an independent predictor of outcome (HR:1.05 [1.01–1.10], p = 0.049, per 10 cm increase) whereas E/e' did not (HR:1.05 [0.99–1.11], p = 0.053, per 1-unit increase). The relationship between E/e'sr, and the outcome was significantly modified by GLS (p for interaction = 0.043). In the multivariable model, E/e'sr was still significantly associated with the outcome in patients with high GLS (≥13.6%) (HR:1.18 [1.02–1.36], p = 0.029) but not in patients with low GLS (HR 1.04 CI95%: [0.99–1.10], p = 0.14). E/e' was not a significant predictor of all-cause mortality after multivariable adjustment in neither of the groups. E/e'sr improved net reclassification with 33% when added to EuroSCOREII. Conclusion Following CABG, preoperative E/e'sr is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, especially in patients with preserved systolic function and superior to E/e'.

An 81-year-old female presented with chronic coronary disease (Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina severity grading III). The patient underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) that revealed three-vessel coronary artery disease (3VD). This case illustrates that in a patient with 3VD, planning and execution of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were successfully performed based solely on CCTA combined with fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography (FFRCT). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was planned and executed as follows: left internal mammary artery grafted to the left anterior descending artery (LAD), saphenous vein graft (SVG) to the right coronary artery (RCA), and SVG to the obtuse marginal artery (OM). Repeat imaging assessment with non-invasive CCTA and FFRCT at 30-day follow-up confirmed the safety of this approach. The FFRCT values of the RCA and LAD were normalized, whereas a borderline pressure drop was observed in the distal run-off of the OM (FFRCT=0.79). Notably, this is the first case in which post-CABG FFRCT assessment was performed. Post-CABG FFRCT is an investigational novel non-invasive tool for assessing the functional improvement of the epicardial conductance vessels following surgical revascularization.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeries are complex, involving long operative times and surgical morbidity. It is currently unclear how the invasiveness of ASD surgery compares to other major operations.To: (1) develop a quantitative score of surgical morbidity and invasiveness, and (2) compare this score between ASD surgery and other major operations.Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.A prospective surgical registry was used to identify all patients undergoing ASD surgery involving ≥ 7 segments. Seventeen additional procedures were included: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), pancreatectomy, and esophagectomy, among others.Perioperative factors (operative time, transfusions, ventilation) and complications were collected and combined with a previously validated Postoperative Morbidity Survey to create a Surgical Invasiveness and Morbidity Score (SIMS).Computed scores were compared across surgeries using Welch's t-test. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to compare the SIMS of major surgeries relative to ASD while controlling for patient demographics and comorbidities.A total of 1,245,282 surgical patients were included, 4,656 of which underwent ASD surgery. After multiple regression modeling controlling for patient demographics and comorbidities, ASD surgery ranked fourth in SIMS. ASD surgery had a significantly greater SIMS than 13 other major procedures including 6th esophagectomy (adjusted mean difference=-0.05, 95%CI -0.01-0.09, p.001), 8th pancreatectomy (-0.40, 0.37-0.44, p.001), 11th craniotomy for tumor (-1.01, 0.98-1.04, p.001), and 12th sacral chordoma resection (-1.31, 1.26-1.37, p.001).ASD surgery was associated with significantly greater SIMS than many other major operations, even when controlling for important perioperative factors. These data have implications for patient counseling, resource allocation, and informed consent.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can compromise pulmonary function and range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder and knee joints due to median sternotomy and saphenectomy, the Pilates method being a strategy for reducing loss.To evaluate the effect of applying the Pilates method on pulmonary function and ROM in patients undergoing CABG.ology: This is a clinical trial. Patients were evaluated preoperatively at discharge from the hospital for shoulder flexion and abduction and knee flexion-extension. In addition, vital capacity(VC), maximum inspiratory pressure(MIP), expiratory pressure(MEP) and peak expiratory flow(PEF) were evaluated. Upon discharge from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), they were divided into a control group(CG) that received conventional assistance and Pilates(PG) was increased with Pilates method techniques.40 patients were analyzed, 25 were men(61%), with a mean age of 66 ± 7 years. At the end, the left shoulder abduction in the CG was 105±9vs115 ± 8 in the PG(p = 0.03), the right shoulder abduction in the CG 104 ± 11vs116 ± 10 in the PG(p 0.001) and right knee flexion in the CG 78 ± 13vs92 ± 9 in the PG(0.002). In relation to MIP, the CG had a loss of 32 ± 8 while the PG 18 ± 10cmH2O(p 0.001), the worsening MEP was 31 ± 9(CG)vs29 ± 11cmH2O(PG)(p = 0.53), the VC in the CG reduced 8±9vs6±8 in the PG(p = 0.23) and the PEF reduced 107 ± 5 in the GCvs83 ± 88 in the PG(p = 0.09).It is concluded that the Pilates method decreased the loss of ROM and maximum inspiratory pressure in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND Medicaid expansion (ME) under the Affordable Care Act has reduced the number of uninsured patients, although its preferential effects on vulnerable populations have been mixed. This study examined whether ME preferentially improved cardiac surgery use by insurance strata, race, and income level. METHODS Non-elderly adults (aged 18-64 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, or mitral valve repair were identified in the State Inpatient Databases for 3 expansion states (Kentucky, New Jersey, and Maryland) and 2 non-expansion states (North Carolina and Florida) from 2012 to the third quarter of 2015. We used adjusted Poisson interrupted time series to determine the impact of ME on cardiac surgery use for Medicaid or uninsured (MCD/UIS) patients, racial and ethnic minorities, and individuals from low-income areas. RESULTS In expansion states, use among non-White MCD/UIS patients had a positive trend after ME (2.3%/quarter; P = .156), whereas use for White MCD/UIS patients fell (-1.7%/quarter; P = .117). In contrast, use among non-White MCD/UIS in non-expansion states decreased by 4.4% (P < .001) which was a greater decline than among White MCD/UIS patients (-1.8%/quarter; P = .057). There was no substantial effect of ME on cardiac surgery use for MCD/UIS patients from low- versus high-income areas. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate that the use of cardiac surgical procedures was generally unchanged after ME; however, nonsignificant trend differences suggest a narrowing gap between vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups in ME states. These preliminary findings help describe the association of insurance coverage as a driver of cardiac surgery use among vulnerable patients.

Background The current representation of female patients and racial and ethnic minorities in cardiovascular trials is unclear. We evaluated these groups’ inclusion in U.S. cardiovascular trials. Methods Using publicly available data from ClinicalTrials.gov , we evaluated cardiovascular trials pertaining to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), heart valve disease, aortic aneurysm, ventricular assist devices, and heart transplantation. This yielded 178 U.S. trials (159 completed, 19 active but not recruiting) started between September 1998 and May 2017, with 237,132 participants. To examine female patients’ and racial and ethnic minorities’ representation in these trials, we calculated participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs). Values of 0.8 to 1.2 reflect similar representation. Results All 178 trials reported sex distribution, whereas only 76 (42.7%) trials reported racial distribution and 52 (29.2%) trials reported ethnic (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic) distribution. Among all trials, participants were 28.3% female, 11.2% were Hispanic/Latino, 4.0% were African American, 10.4% were Asian, and 2.3% were other. The CABG PPR for female patients was 0.64, for Hispanic patients was 0.72, for African American patients was 0.28, and for Asian patients was 3.20. Between 2008-2012 and 2013-2017, the CABG PPR decreased for female patients (0.67→0.50) and African American patients (0.37→0.17) but increased for Hispanic patients (0.38→1.32) and Asian patients (3.51→4.57). Conclusions Participation in cardiovascular trials by female patients and minorities (except Asian patients) remains low. Given that inherent differences among the previously mentioned groups could affect outcomes, balance is clearly needed. The engagement of our surgical leadership, community, and industry to address these disparities is vitally important.

Background Severe carotid artery stenosis (sCAS) is frequently discovered at the time of evaluation for coronary arterial revascularization. However, there has been controversy regarding the optimal management of sCAS. This study evaluated the potential effects of untreated sCAS at time of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in contemporary practice. Methods This was a retrospective study from a multihospital healthcare system including patients undergoing isolated CABG between 2011 and 2018. Patients were stratified by the presence of sCAS (≥80% stenosis) in at least 1 carotid artery. Perioperative and 5-year stroke were compared, and multivariable analysis was used to identify risk-adjusted predictors of stroke and mortality. Results A total of 5475 patients were included, 459 (8.4%) with sCAS and 5016 (91.6%) without sCAS. Patients with sCAS experienced more frequent perioperative stroke (4.4% vs 1.2%; P Conclusions This contemporary analysis of CABG procedures reveals that concurrent sCAS continues to confer a significant stroke risk, especially in those with history of previous stroke. Although whether sCAS lesions are responsible for most strokes is unclear, they likely serve as a surrogate for other stroke risk factors.

The treatment of coronary artery disease has substantially changed over the past two decades. However, it is unknown whether and how much these changes have contributed to the improvement of long-term outcomes after coronary revascularization. We assessed trends in the demographics, practice patterns and long-term outcomes in 24,951 patients who underwent their first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 20,106), or isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 4,845) using the data in a series of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registries (Cohort-1 [2000 to 2002]: n = 7,435, Cohort-2 [2005 to 2007]: n = 8,435, and Cohort-3 [2011 to 2013]: n = 9,081). From Cohort-1 to Cohort-3, the patients got progressively older across subsequent cohorts (67.0 ± 10.0, 68.4 ± 9.9, and 69.8 ± 10.2 years, ptrend

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) often causes physiological changes in patients. Although functional changes, such as lung function and exercise capacity changes, are observed in patients, there are no detailed studies examining this. The aim was to compare preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function and exercise capacity in patients undergoing on-pump CABG with a multidimensional index (BODE index). Demographic and surgical characteristics of patients were recorded. Pulmonary function test, six-minute walk test (6MWT), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score were assessed and BODE index were calculated in preoperative and at six months postoperatively. A total of 75 patients were included with a mean ± standard deviation age of 59.8±10.0 years. The male to female ratio was 57/18. There was a statistically significant decrease in the forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (FEF25-75%) value after CABG. Other pulmonary function test values were also lower in the postoperative period compared to the preoperative period, but these changes were not significant. The mean distance achieved in the 6MWT (p=0.02) and the mMRC dyspnea score (p=0.001) were significantly better postoperatively. The BODE index, which combines these parameters, had increased in the postoperative period. Age (OR 1.09; 95% CI: 1.008-1.181) and postoperative FEF25-75% (OR -0.96; 95% CI: 0.938-0.988) were the independent predictors of BODE score ≥3 in multivariate analysis. Despite the decrease in pulmonary function in patients undergoing CABG, there was an improvement in exercise capacity and dyspnea score.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was introduced in the 1960s as the first procedure for direct coronary artery revascularization and rapidly became one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide, with an overall total of more than 20 million operations performed. CABG continues to be the most common cardiac surgical procedure performed and has been one of the most carefully studied therapies. Best CABG techniques, optimal bypass conduits, and appropriate patient selection have been rigorously tested in landmark clinical trials, some of which have resolved controversy and most of which have stoked further debate and trials. The evolution of CABG cannot be properly portrayed without presenting it in the context of the parallel development of percutaneous coronary intervention. In this Historical Perspective, we a provide a broad overview of the history of coronary revascularization with a focus on the foundations, evolution, best evidence, and future directions of CABG.

Although not formalized into current risk assessment models, frailty has been associated with negative postoperative outcomes in many specialties. Using administrative coding, we evaluated the impact of frailty on in-hospital death, complications, and resource use in a nationally representative cohort of patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).Patients aged 18 years and older who underwent isolated CABG across the United States were identified using the 2005 to 2016 National Inpatient Sample. Frailty was defined using a derivative of the validated Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnosis indicator. Mortality, length of stay, inflation-adjusted costs, and postoperative complications were evaluated using multilevel multivariable regression.Of an estimated 2,137,618 patients undergoing isolated CABG, 85,879 (4.0%) were considered frail. The proportion of frail patients increased over the study period (nonparametric test for trend P = .002), while annual mortality rates declined (nonparametric test for trend P.001). Frail patients were older (68.9 ± 10.7 years vs 65.0 ± 10.6 years, P.001), and more commonly female (32.8% vs 26.2%, P.001). After adjustment, frailty was associated with increased odds of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30-2.70; P.001), major complications (AOR, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.39-2.71; P.001), increased length of stay (AOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09-2.11; P.001), and costs (AOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07; P.001).Frailty, as identified by administrative coding, serves as a strong independent predictor of death and complications after CABG. Incorporation of frailty into risk models may aid in counseling patients about operative risk and benchmarking outcomes.

Burr entrapment is a rare but serious complication during rotational atherectomy (RA). The Japanese have termed this the Kokeshi phenomenon named after a wooden doll found in northern Japan consisted of a simple trunk but a large head akin to the Rotablator (Mechery et al., 2016; Kaneda et al., 2000). The reason underlying this complication is the lack of diamond dust on the back end of the burr (Lin et al., 2013). The burr is olive-shaped and has diamond coating at its distal surface for antegrade ablation. The proximal part is smooth without diamonds, which prevents backward ablation of tissues when retracted (Lin et al., 2013; Dahdouh et al., 2013). Rota entrapment usually needs surgical management with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. To date, only few cases of successful non-traumatic retrieval using nonsurgical bailout techniques have been published (Grise et al., 2002). We report a case of burr entrapment within the left anterior descending (LAD) artery which was successfully retrieved by combination of multiple maneuvers and the patient underwent routine PCI following the retrieval.

Background: In this study, we investigated the impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on operative and midterm mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) undergoing surgical repair. Methods: From January 2012 to December 2014, among 489 patients (mean age: 47.6 ± 10.4 years, 77.1% male) with ATAAD who received surgical repair at our institute, 21 patients (4.3%) underwent concomitant CABG. Isolated aortic repair was performed in the remaining 468 cases (95.7%). Coronary dissection was indicated in 15 patients (Neri classification type B in 2, type C in 13), concomitant coronary artery disease in five and coronary artery compression in one. The follow-up time was 97.3% at 44.1 ± 13.9 months. Results: A total of 44 patients (9%) died from surgery, and operative mortality in the concomitant CABG group was significantly higher than that in the isolated aortic repair group (47.6%, 10/21 vs. 7.3%, 34/468; P

Background The role of simulation-based training in coronary artery bypass grafting remains undefined. Barriers to simulator use include clinical and personal obligations, insufficient materials, and lack of mentorship. The purpose of this study was to implement a longitudinal, residency-wide coronary anastomosis simulation curriculum. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted from 2018 to 2019 at a single academic center. All residents of the Thoracic Surgery training program participated. Each participant was provided a low-fidelity coronary anastomosis simulator, high-quality instruments, and faculty mentor. Formal assessments were held quarterly, and residents were encouraged to practice alone and with their mentor. Baseline and follow-up metrics were compared with simple descriptive statistics. Results Seventeen residents and 12 faculty participated in the study. Residents demonstrated increased use of the simulator, with 21% participating in independent practice at baseline and 82% in the fourth quarter (P = .02). The median score on the Thoracic Surgery Directors Association Vessel Anastomosis Assessment improved from 42 out of 65 at baseline to 54 out of 65 in the fourth quarter (P = .04), and mean anastomosis time was reduced by 5 minutes 6 seconds (P = .02). Over 12 months, junior residents demonstrated a mean reduction in anastomosis time of 6 minutes 36 seconds, and senior residents decreased anastomosis time by 3 minutes 6 seconds (P = .02). Conclusions Providing residents with a low-fidelity coronary anastomosis trainer with high-quality instruments and a faculty mentor improved rates of independent practice, Thoracic Surgery Directors Association assessment scores, and anastomosis time. Our next step is validating the coronary simulator curriculum by measuring improvement of resident performance in the operating room.

The efficacy of coronary artery bypass grafting for pregnancy-related spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is controversial, as graft occlusion due to SCAD lesion healing has been reported. Only 24 grafts in 14 cases of coronary artery bypass grafting for SCAD have been reported: 8 of the 9 arterial grafts were occluded, but 9 of the 15 vein grafts were patent. We encountered a case of coronary artery bypass grafting with left internal thoracic artery to the left antero-descending branch due to pregnancy-related SCAD. The patient’s graft revealed good patency immediately postoperatively but string signs 7 months later due to healing of SCAD lesions.

Background The updated Australian System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (AusSCORE II) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Score are well-established tools in cardiac surgery for estimating operative mortality risk. No validation analysis of both risk models has been undertaken for a contemporary New Zealand population undergoing isolated coronary bypass surgery. We therefore aimed to assess the efficacy of these models in predicting mortality for New Zealand patients receiving isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Material and Methods A prospective database was maintained of patients undergoing isolated CABG at a major tertiary referral centre in New Zealand between September 2014 and September 2017. This database collected the patients’ demographic, clinical, biochemical, operative and mortality data. The primary outcome measure was the correlation between the predicted AusSCORE II and STS Score mortality risks and the observed 30-day mortality events for all patients in the database using discrimination and calibration statistics. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test respectively. Results A total of 933 patients underwent isolated CABG during the 3-year study period. There were seven deaths in the study cohort occurring within 30 days of surgery. Discrimination analysis demonstrated the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the AusSCORE II and STS Score as 88.2% (95% CI: 85.9–90.2, p Calibration analysis revealed Hosmer-Lemeshow test p-values for the AusSCORE II and STS Score as 0.696 and 0.294 respectively. Discussion ROC curve analysis produced very high and statistically significant AUC values for the AusSCORE II and STS Score. Hosmer-Lemeshow test analysis revealed that both risk scoring tools are well calibrated for our study cohort. Therefore, the AusSCORE II and STS Score are both strongly predictive of 30-day mortality for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in our New Zealand patient population. Both risk models have performed with excellent discrimination and calibration. There is, however, a need to consider the performance of these risk stratification models in other cardiac surgical procedures outside isolated coronary bypass surgery where appropriate.

The aims of this study were to examine rates of radial artery access in post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients undergoing diagnostic catherization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), whether operators with higher procedural volumes and higher percentage radial use were more likely to perform diagnostic catherization and/or PCI via the radial approach in post-CABG patients, and clinical and procedural outcomes in post-CABG patients who undergo diagnostic catherization and/or PCI via the radial or femoral approach.There are limited data comparing outcomes of patients with prior CABG undergoing transradial or transfemoral diagnostic catheterization and/or PCI.Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry, all diagnostic catheterizations and PCIs performed in patients with prior CABG from July 1, 2009, to March 31, 2018 (n = 1,279,058, 1,173 sites) were evaluated. Temporal trends in transradial access were examined, and mortality, bleeding, vascular complications, and procedural metrics were compared between transradial and transfemoral access.The rate of transradial access increased from 1.4% to 18.7% over the study period. Transradial access was associated with decreased mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 0.91), decreased bleeding (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.63), decreased vascular complications (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.47), increased PCI procedural success (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.16; p 0.0001), and significantly decreased contrast volume across all procedure types. Transradial access was associated with shorter fluoroscopy time for PCI-only procedures but longer fluoroscopy time for diagnostic procedures plus ad hoc PCI and diagnostic procedures only. Operators with a higher rate of transradial access in non-CABG patients were more likely to perform transradial access in patients with prior CABG.The rate of transradial artery access in patients with prior CABG undergoing diagnostic catheterization and/or PCI has increased over the past decade in the United States, and it was more often performed by operators using a transradial approach in non-CABG patients. Compared with transfemoral access, transradial access was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with prior CABG.

There is a scarcity of data on incidence, risk factors, especially clinical severity, and long-term prognostic impact of periprocedural stroke after coronary revascularization in contemporary real-world practice. Among 14,867 consecutive patients undergoing first coronary revascularization between January 2011 and December 2013 (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]: N = 13258, and coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]: N = 1609) in the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG registry Cohort-3, we evaluated the details on periprocedural stroke. Periprocedural stroke was defined as stroke within 30 days after the index procedure. Incidence of periprocedural stroke was 0.96% after PCI and 2.13% after CABG (log-rank p0.001). Proportions of major stroke defined by modified Rankin Scale ≥2 at hospital discharge were 68% after PCI, and 77% after CABG. Independent risk factors of periprocedural stroke were acute coronary syndrome (ACS), carotid artery disease, advanced age, heart failure, and end-stage renal disease after PCI, whereas they were ACS, carotid artery disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignancy, and frailty after CABG. There was excess long-term mortality risk of patients with periprocedural stroke relative to those without after both PCI and CABG (hazard ratio 1.71 [1.25 to 2.33], and hazard ratio 4.55 [2.79 to 7.43]). In conclusion, incidence of periprocedural stroke was not negligible not only after CABG, but also after PCI in contemporary real-world practice. Majority of patients with periprocedural stroke had at least mild disability at hospital discharge. ACS and carotid artery disease were independent strong risk factors of periprocedural stroke after both PCI and CABG. Periprocedural stroke was associated with significant long-term mortality risk after both PCI and CABG.

A 69-year-old man underwent coronary angiography 7 years after coronary artery bypass. Saphenous vein graft spasm was observed during contrast injection, resulting in ventricular fibrillation. Angiography 6 years later showed graft patency. Vein graft spasm after coronary artery bypass grafting is rarely described. Further investigation is needed regarding incidence, mechanism, and clinical outcomes. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.)

A simultaneous operative approach to patients with significant carotid and coronary disease has been suggested as a safe, lower cost, and more convenient alternative to a staged approach. During the last three decades, spanning the career of our senior author, our group has pursued simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in limited circumstances. We previously reported on our results in series from 1984 to 1994 and 1994 to 1999. Based on these prior results and the current literature, we liberalized our inclusion criteria. We are now reporting on a contemporary cohort of 91 patients operated on from 2006 to 2018.All patients who underwent combined CEA/CABG in 2006 to 2018 were entered into the Vascular Quality Initiative database. We compared the current series of 91 patients (group 3) with the 74 patients (group 2) from 1994 to 1999 and the 100 patients (group 1) from 1984 to 1994 who also underwent combined CEA/CABG. We examined demographic and comorbid factors, presence of cerebrovascular symptoms, degree of contralateral carotid stenosis, perioperative stroke, and death. Statistical comparison was made with χThe groups had similar demographics and comorbidities. Significant differences were noted in the preoperative diagnosis of hyperlipidemia (42%, 51%, 75%; P = .005) and the proportion of patients requiring urgent operations (24%, 47%, 56%; P = .002) during successive time periods. Patients in group 3 were much less likely to have preoperative symptoms from carotid stenosis before operation (55%, 31%, 4.4%; P .001). Correspondingly, patients in group 3 were more likely to have asymptomatic unilateral carotid stenosis (20%, 55%, 78%; P .001). The 30-day mortality rate remained stable compared with the first interval (8%, 3%, 2.2%; P = .11). Likewise, the overall stroke rate decreased in the later periods compared with the first series (9%, 1.4%, 2.2%; P = .016). Of the two perioperative strokes recorded for group 3, only one event was ipsilateral to the carotid artery operated on compared with the four ipsilateral strokes of nine total reported in group 1 and no ipsilateral stroke reported in group 2.Based on the favorable results of the previously reported series of CEA/CABG from our group, we continued to liberalize selection criteria for the combined procedure to essentially mirror the standard recommendations for CEA in patients without coronary disease. The current series using this treatment algorithm demonstrates the safety of this approach, with stroke and death rates equivalent to those of CABG alone. These excellent results were achieved in the face of increasingly urgent cardiac procedures. The fact that the majority of the perioperative strokes were contralateral to the carotid artery operated on reinforces the safety of our approach but underscores the significant burden of atherosclerosis in these patients.

The use of the bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) in coronary artery bypass grafting remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes using the BIMA vs the single internal mammary artery (SIMA) in the United States.Medicare beneficiaries who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery using the SIMA or BIMA from 1999 to 2010 were included in this retrospective study, with follow-up through 2014. Greedy matching algorithms were used for 1:4 matching on propensity score based on age, gender, year of surgery, and comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. The primary outcome was death from any cause.A total of 1,156,339 and 25,005 patients who were 72 ± 7.6 years of age and 70.3 ± 7.9 years of age underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery using SIMA and BIMA, respectively. Matching created comparable groups with 95,780 SIMA and 24,160 BIMA patients. Matched median survival using SIMA vs BIMA was 11.8 vs 12.4 years (P.001) and 9.6 vs 10 years in diabetic patients (P = .006), respectively. At 10 years of follow-up, the respective survival rates of using SIMA vs BIMA were 58.3% vs 61.1%, respectively. The stratified matched median survival using SIMA vs BIMA with 1, 2, 3, and 4 or more aortocoronary bypasses were 11.8 vs 12.3 years (P = .005), 11.7 vs 12.5 years (P.001), 11.9 vs 12.3 years (P = .01), and 11.4 vs 12 years (P = .02), respectively.Primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery using the BIMA rather than the SIMA was associated with improved long-term survival. This survival advantage was independent of aortocoronary bypass grafts or patient diabetes status.

Social determinants of health, including neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES), are increasingly being associated with disparate outcomes in those undergoing cardiac procedures. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of NSES on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).Adults undergoing isolated CABG between July 2011 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Neighborhood median household income (NMI) and neighborhood high school graduation rate (NHS) were obtained by individual patient ZIP code from the American FactFinder Database. Primary outcome was 5-year all-cause mortality stratified by NMI quartile. Secondary end points included mortality risk by NHS, freedom and frequency of readmission, and mortality and readmission predictors.During the study period, 5243 patients underwent CABG. Increasing NMI quartile was associated with increasing age, male sex, white race, decreased diabetes prevalence, decreased active smoker status, and decreased lung disease (all P.05). Although no difference in 30-day mortality was observed, lower NMI quartiles were associated with increased longitudinal mortality through 5 years (log-rank P.01). Lower NMI quartile was associated with increased blood transfusions and sternal wound infections. Multivariable modeling demonstrated multiple complex associations between socioeconomic status variables (race, sex, age, NMI, and NHS) for mortality and readmission.NSES affects longer-term outcomes after CABG. Patient-focused NSES interventions and incorporation of NSES variables into prediction models may improve prediction and outcomes after CABG.

Although the numbers of older adults in the US are rapidly increasing, there is sparse recent data on the use and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) among this population. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of older adults undergoing CABG and to measure temporal trends.Using data from the National Inpatient Sample (2005-2014), patients aged 85 y and older who underwent CABG were selected. Demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics were extracted. Outcomes measured were hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, discharge home, and operative complications. Patients were grouped by 2-year increments. Differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes over time were evaluated using trend analyses.There were 60,124 patients included in the cohort. The mean age was 86.8 y with majority being men (61%), white (88%), and treated in teaching hospitals (61%). Over the study period, the annual surgical volume decreased from 6689 in 2005/06 to 5150 in 2013/14. Mortality decreased from 8.5% to 5.5% (P-trend0.001) and mean hospital length of stay decreased from 13.9 d to 12.0 d (P-trend0.001), whereas the rate of discharge home remained stable (14.1% versus 11.6%, P-trend = 0.056). Compared with patients in 2005/06, those in 2013/14 had higher comorbidities [diabetes: 27.6% versus 17.3%; chronic kidney disease: 29.8% versus 9.2%; peripheral artery disease: 7.5% versus 6.0%; and hypertension: 83.7% versus 64.5% (all P-trend0.001)].CABG volumes are decreasing among older adults, and comorbidity burden is increasing, but outcomes are improving. These data may indicate improved preoperative optimization and better perioperative care processes.

Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has an established increased operative risk with worse perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, contemporary propensity-matched outcomes are limited in the existing literature.All patients who underwent CABG from 2011 to 2017 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania were included. Propensity matching yielded risk-adjusted patient populations. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality and readmission.The total population consisted of 7615 patients who underwent CABG; 7265 of these patients had first-time CABG, and 350 patients had reoperative CABG. After propensity score matching, blood product transfusion (45.5% vs 56.4%; P = .002) and delayed sternal closure (0.2% vs 2.5%; P.001) remained significantly higher for reoperative CABG. There was no difference in 30-day (5.3% vs 7.5%; P = .19) or 1-year (12.1% vs 14.8%; P = .23) mortality for first-time vs reoperative CABG. Five-year mortality was significantly higher for the reoperative cohort (28.5% vs 38.3%; P = .03). There was no difference in 30-day, 1-year, or 5-year hospital readmissions. On Cox multivariable regression analysis, reoperative CABG was not a predictor of mortality or readmission at 30 days, 1 year, or 5 years.After propensity score matching, there was no difference in postoperative mortality or readmission for reoperative CABG up to 1-year. This trend continued for 5-year readmissions; however, 5-year mortality was higher for the reoperative cohort. Risk adjustment did not identify reoperative CABG as a risk factor for long-term mortality.

The radial artery (RA) has seen a recent resurgence in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Recent randomized evidence has shown higher long-term patency rates and better clinical outcomes with the RA when compared to other conduits such as the right internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein grafts. In fact, the RA is now class I indication as the second conduit in CABG. Therefore, it is important that the coronary surgeon is familiar with the RA and its use in CABG. In this report we describe our operative technique for RA harvesting and use in CABG. As with any surgical procedure, patient selection is key. We describe our approach to screening including duplex ultrasonography and plethysmography, endoscopic and open harvesting techniques, preservation and grafting strategies, target vessel selection, and anastomotic techniques.

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with poor outcomes after cardiac surgery. Guidelines recommend correction of severe TR in patients undergoing left-sided valve surgery but not coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). We sought to evaluate impact of TR on outcomes after CABG.All patients (n = 28,027) undergoing CABG in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) regional database (2011 to 2018) were stratified by TR severity. Primary outcomes included major morbidity or mortality, which were compared using univariate analysis.Of patients undergoing CABG, 4837 (17%) had mild, 800 (3%) had moderate, and 81 (0.29%) had severe TR. Increased severity was associated with higher rate of preoperative heart failure (none 5162 [23.4%] vs mild 1697 [35%] vs moderate 427 [53%] vs severe 54 [67%], P.001] and STS predicted risk of mortality (1.0 [0.6 to 1.9) vs 1.4 [0.8 to 2.9] vs 2.8 [1.4 to 5.4] vs 6.2 [2.2 to 11.4], P.001). Increasing severity was associated with higher postoperative rate of renal failure (426 [1.9%] vs 145 [3%] vs 58 [7.3%] vs 7 [8.6%], P.001), prolonged ventilation (1652 [7.5%] vs 495 [10.2%] vs 153 [19.1%] vs 22 [27.2%], P.001), and mortality (344 [1.6%] vs 132 [2.7%] vs 58 [7.3%] vs 9 [11.1%], P.001). After risk adjustment, mild, moderate, and severe TR remained associated with increased morbidity and mortality (all P.05).Increasing TR severity, although independently associated with higher surgical risk, is not accounted for entirely by STS risk calculator. This highlights the importance of TR on operative risk and supports consideration of concurrent tricuspid intervention for patients with significant TR undergoing CABG.

Background Learning curves and skill attrition with aging have been reported to impair outcomes in select surgical subspecialties, but their role in complex cardiac surgery remains unknown. Methods From 1986 to 2019, 2314 patients underwent reoperative cardiac surgery: coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 543), valve (n = 1527), or combined coronary artery bypass grafting and valve (n = 244). Thirty-four different surgeons in practice between 1 and 39 years were included. Standardized mortality ratio (observed-to-expected) was determined for all surgeons in each post-training year of experience. Results Risk-adjusted cumulative sum change-point analysis was used to define five distinct career phases: 0 to 4 years, 5 to 8 years, 9 to 17 years, 18 to 28 years, and 29 to 39 years. With 5 to 8 years and 18 to 28 years of experience, standardized mortality ratio was near unity (0.95 and 1.05, respectively) and lowest with 9 to 17 years of experience (0.78, P = .03). In the youngest experience group (0 to 4 years), observed and expected mortality were both highest, and standardized mortality ratio was elevated at 1.29, which approached statistical significance (P = .059). In the oldest experience group (29 to 39 years), expected mortality was low compared with most other groups but observed mortality increased, yielding a significantly elevated standardized mortality ratio at 1.53 (P = .032). Conclusions Standardized mortality ratios with reoperative cardiac surgery were highest early and late in a surgeon’s career and lowest in mid career. As surgeons gain experience, outcomes improve through the first two career decades, then stabilize in the third decade before declining in the fourth decade.

We report a case of a 55-year-old woman with previous coronary artery bypass grafting. She presented with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction secondary to occlusion of the proximal left subclavian artery causing reduced flow in the left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery graft. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Background Cardiovascular disease is commonly seen in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is a major cause of graft failure and death in patients undergoing kidney transplant. Methods The retrospective study included 77 patients with ESRD who underwent combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and kidney transplant between May 2010 and September 2017. Results The patients included 65 (84.4%) men and 12 (15.6%) women. Diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HT) were present in 71.4% and 90.9% of the patients, respectively. Mean postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 3.4 ± 1.6 days, mean time to extubation was 12.1 ± 3.7 hours, and mean hospital stay was 11.6 ± 3.5 days. In the small group with graft rejection, EF was 41.1 ± 12.3. Two patients underwent second kidney transplant, and 1 patient underwent a third kidney transplant. Mean amount of red blood cells (RBC) and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion was 2.6 ± 0.7 and 2.1 ± 0.7 units, respectively. Conclusion The study showed that CABG and kidney transplant can be performed in a combined approach in the same session and that this combined approach is likely to have a more favorable effect on mortality and morbidity compared to the administration of these 2 surgeries in separate sessions.

In patients with myocardial bridges (MBs) and insufficient medical management, the optimal surgical strategy remains undetermined. Based on computer simulations we developed a novel procedure, MB bypass grafting, that showed better hemodynamics compared with coronary artery bypass grafting in a simulation study. In this novel procedure the left internal mammary artery was used to connect the proximal and distal ends of the MB. For the first time we used MB bypass grafting to treat a patient with extensive MB. The patient recovered well after surgery, and the left internal mammary artery graft remained patent 3 months postoperatively.