Search

Initial guidelines recommended a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in young competitive athletes following SARS-CoV-2 infection to screen for myocarditis. However, no data are available that detail ECG findings before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection in young athletes without clinical or imaging evidence of overt myocarditis. This study applied the International Criteria for ECG interpretation in a cohort of 378 collegiate athletes to compare ECG findings at baseline and during the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our results suggest that ECG changes can occur in the absence of definitive SARS-CoV-2 cardiac involvement in young competitive athletes.

Preparticipation screening for conditions associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD) is required in college athletes. Previous cost analyses used theoretical models based on variable assumptions, but no study used real-life outcomes.The purpose of this study was to compare disease prevalence, positive findings, and costs of 2 different screening strategies: history and physical examination alone (HP) or with an electrocardiogram (HP+ECG).De-identified preparticipation data (2009-2017) from Pacific-12 Conference institutions were abstracted for cardiovascular history questions, cardiovascular physical examination, and ECG result. Secondary testing, cardiac diagnoses, return to play outcomes, and complications from testing were recorded. The costs of screening and secondary testing were based on the Centers for MedicareMedicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule.A total of 8602 records (4955 HP, 3647 HP+ECG) were included. Eleven conditions associated with SCD were detected (2 HP only, 9 HP+ECG). The prevalence of cardiovascular conditions associated with SCD discovered with HP alone was 0.04% (1/2454) compared to 0.24% (1/410) when ECG was added (P = .01) (odds ratio 5.17; 95% confidence interval 1.28-20.85; P = .02). Cost of screening and secondary testing with HP alone was $130 per athlete and in the ECG-added group was $152 per athlete. The cost per diagnosis was $312,407 in the HP group and $61,712 in the ECG-added group. There were no adverse outcomes from secondary testing or treatment.HP with the addition of ECG is 6 times more likely to detect a cardiovascular condition associated with SCD than without. The addition of ECG improves the cost efficiency per diagnosis by 5-fold and should be considered at college institutions with appropriate resources.

Electrocardiogram (ECG) screening in athletes enhances the detection of conditions associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD), but concerns remain for false positive results when conducted outside of specialized centers. This study compared ECG interpretation in college athletes between local physicians and a sports cardiology center (SCC).Screening ECGs in athletes from eight Pacific-12 Conference institutions performed between 2010 and 2016 were included. Local interpretation was compared to SCC interpretation using both the Seattle Criteria (SCC-SC) and the International Criteria (SCC-IC).A total of 2445 athlete ECGs (mean age 18.5 years; 57.1% male; 63.2% Caucasian and 15.3% African American) were reviewed. The proportion of ECGs classified as abnormal was similar between local and SCC-SC interpretation (3.5% vs. 3.4%, respectively; p = .94), but was lower by SCC-IC interpretation (1.5%, p .001). ECG abnormalities interpreted as normal by local physicians but as abnormal by SCC-SC (n = 33) and SCC-IC (n = 16) standards included: pathological Q waves (n = 15 SCC-SC; n = 3 SCC-IC), T-wave inversions (n = 8 both), and ST-depressions (n = 3 both). There was a 97.5% ECG interpretation agreement and substantial interobserver reliability (k = 0.611, p .001) between local and SCC-SC interpretation in athletes screened starting one year after publication of the Seattle Criteria (n = 1388). Both local and SCC physicians correctly identified six abnormal ECGs associated with conditions at risk of SCD.ECG interpretation by local physicians at college universities had similar accuracy compared to a specialized SCC with a low overall abnormal rate, similar sensitivity, and substantial interobserver reliability. Uniform application of current ECG interpretation standards is recommended to further improve accuracy.

To test the diagnostic accuracy of ECG-gated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to detect coronary artery disease (CAD) among survivors of out-of-hospital circulatory arrest (OHCA).We prospectively studied head-to-pelvis computed tomography (CT) scanning (6 h from hospital arrival) in OHCA survivors. This sub-study tested the primary outcome of CCTA diagnostic accuracy to identify obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) compared to clinically-ordered invasive coronary angiography. Patients were not optimized with beta receptor blockade or nitroglycerin. Secondary analyses included CCTA accuracy for CAD in major coronary arteries, obstructive disease at ≥70% stenosis threshold, and where non-evaluable CCTA segments were considered either obstructive or non-obstructive.Of the 104 enrolled OHCA survivors, 28 (27%) received both CT and invasive angiography in this sub study. All CCTA studies were evaluable although 49/346 (14%) individual coronary segments were unevaluable, primarily due to being too small to evaluate (65%). Patient-level diagnostic accuracy for the ≥50% stenosis threshold was high at 0.93 (95% CI 0.77-0.98) with a specificity of 1.0 (95% CI 0.8-1.0), sensitivity of 0.85 (95%CI 0.58-0.96), negative predictive value of 0.88 (95% CI 0.66-0.97) and positive predictive value of 1.0 (0.74-1.0). When non-evaluable segments were considered obstructive, the sensitivity rose to 0.92 (95% CI 0.67-0.99) with lower specificity of 0.27 (95% CI 0.11-0.52).Early CCTA of OHCA survivors has high diagnostic accuracy to detect obstructive coronary artery disease. However, the number of non-diagnostic coronary segments is high suggesting further CCTA refinement is needed, such as the pre-CCTA use of nitroglycerin.NCT03111043 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03111043.

Syncope is a commonly encountered and challenging problem in medical practice. Presentations are variable, and the causal mechanism often remains elusive even after extensive (and often expensive) evaluation. Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to help guide the multidisciplinary approach necessary to diagnose and manage the broad spectrum of patients presenting with syncope. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society, published its first syncope guidelines in 2017. The European Society of Cardiology released the fourth iteration of its syncope guidelines in 2018. This review highlights the differences and congruencies between the 2 sets of recommendations, their implications for clinical practice, the remaining gaps in understanding, and areas of future research.

Aim To review data for non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis of non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Data sources We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception to January 2017 for studies utilizing non-invasive imaging to identify potential causes of OHCA [computed tomography (CT), ultrasound including echocardiography, and magnetic resonance (MRI)]. Study selection Inclusion criteria were the following: (1) randomized control trials, cohort studies or observational studies; (2) contained a population ≥18 years old with non-traumatic OHCA who underwent diagnostic imaging with CT, MRI, echocardiography, or abdominal ultrasound; (3) imaging was obtained for diagnostic purposes; (4) patients were alive or were undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation at the time of imaging; (5) contained potential causes of OHCA. Endpoints studied were the number of potential OHCA causes identified, diagnostic accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values), and diagnostic utility (number of imaging findings with reported changes in clinical management). Results Of the total 5722 studies identified, 17 (0.3%) met inclusion criteria. The majority of studies assessed the utility of CT in OHCA (n = 10), and potential causes of OHCA were found in 8–54% of patients following head, abdominal and/or chest CT. Only 1/17 (6%) studies reported diagnostic accuracy measures, and 9/17 (53%) studies included a time to imaging criteria within 24 h. Conclusion Although non-invasive imaging is commonly performed in patients after OHCA, its diagnostic utility remains poorly characterized. Prospective studies are needed for appropriate imaging selection and their potential impact on treatment and outcome.

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of death in college athletes during sports [(1)][1]. Pre-participation examinations are required in college athletes, although the best screening protocol to identify cardiovascular diseases known to cause SCD is debated. The purpose of this study was

Survivors of sudden cardiac arrest may be exposed to iodinated contrast from invasive coronary angiography or contrast-enhanced computed tomography, although the effects on incident acute kidney injury are unknown. The study objective was to determine whether contrast administration within the first 24 hours was associated with acute kidney injury in survivors of sudden cardiac arrest.This cohort study, derived from a prospective clinical trial, included patients with sudden cardiac arrest who survived for 48 hours, had no history of end-stage renal disease, and had at least 2 serum creatinine measurements during hospitalization. The contrast group included patients with exposure to iodinated contrast within 24 hours of sudden cardiac arrest. Incident acute kidney injury and first-time dialysis were compared between contrast and no contrast groups and then controlled for known acute kidney injury risk factors.Of the 199 survivors of sudden cardiac arrest, 94 received iodinated contrast. Mean baseline serum creatinine level was 1.3 mg/dL (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4 to 1.5 mg/dL) for the contrast group and 1.6 mg/dL (95% CI 1.4 to 1.7 mg/dL) for the no contrast group. Incident acute kidney injury was lower in the contrast group (12.8%) than the no contrast group (17.1%; difference 4.4%; 95% CI -9.2% to 17.5%). Contrast administration was not associated with significant increases in incident acute kidney injury within quartiles of baseline serum creatinine level or after controlling for age, sex, race, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and admission serum creatinine level by regression analysis. Older age was independently associated with acute kidney injury.Despite elevated baseline serum creatinine level in most survivors of sudden cardiac arrest, iodinated contrast administration was not associated with incident acute kidney injury even when other acute kidney injury risk factors were controlled for. Thus, although acute kidney injury is not uncommon among survivors of sudden cardiac arrest, early (24 hours) contrast administration from imaging procedures did not confer an increased risk for acute kidney injury.