Search

This study aimed to investigate the effect of calcifications on shear-wave elastography in evaluating breast lesions. We retrospectively reviewed ultrasound images of 673 breast lesions and compared the elasticity between lesions with and without calcifications in three subgroups: benign lesions, in situ carcinomas and invasive carcinomas. Breast lesions were confirmed histologically (n = 401) or by follow-up images for more than 2 y (n = 272). Calcifications were present in 25.3% (170/673) of the lesions. The Emean values with and without calcifications, respectively, were as follows: 62.8 and 29.8 kPa in benign lesions (p = 0.000), 114.6 and 52.8 kPa in in situ carcinomas (p = 0.037) and 171.9 and 146.4 kPa in invasive carcinomas (p = 0.018). The presence of calcifications significantly increased the Emean of breast lesions. Shear-wave elastography should be carefully interpreted in benign lesions with calcifications and in situ carcinomas without calcifications.

Objective To determine what percentage of cancers, detected by screening ultrasonography (US), were detectable by full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Materials and methods Eighty-four consecutive women in whom mammography was negatively interpreted and supplementary screening US initially detected breast cancers at outside hospitals underwent both FFDM and DBT. We excluded cases with overt suspicious findings on repeat mammography and ineligible cases. In the remaining 41 cases, three radiologists who were blinded to tumor location, even though they were aware that they had breast cancers independently reviewed both FFDM and DBT. The reference standard was the reference FFDM made by two unblinded reviewers who were aware of the tumor location and shape on DBT, US, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The visibility score based on the correct marking was compared between FFDM and DBT. Results Among the 41 cases, the cancers were visible in 25 (61.0%) on FFDM and in 34 (82.9%) on DBT ( P = 0.047) by the unblinded review. In the blinded analysis, the cancers were significantly more "constantly visible" in the three radiologists on DBT than on FFDM [53.7% (22/41) vs. 26.8% (11/41), respectively, P = 0.013]. The dominant lesion type was "focal asymmetry" on DBT (39.0%) and "asymmetry" on FFDM (31.7%). Conclusions Our analysis suggests that 54% of cancers that were detected by US and were not evident on 2D mammography were detectable by screening using DBT. Additional 29% of cancers were visualized on DBT, when the area of concern was known.

Two automated volumetric breast density analyses of 44 patients who underwent image-guided needle localization in one breast were compared to calculate the agreement of assessment parameters in short-term digital mammography reimaging. The outputs of the automated volumetric breast density method included four parameters [fibroglandular tissue volume (Vfg), total breast volume (Vb), volumetric breast density (Vbd), and area breast density (Abd)]. The variability and agreement of each parameter were calculated in serial mammograms. There was no significant difference in mean Vfg, Vb, Vbd, or Abd between two mammograms (P = .249, .053, .727, and .603, respectively).

Purpose To investigate the detectability and imaging characteristics of primary tumors according to imaging modalities and to identify clinical features and histological prognostic factors for axillary metastases in patients with small (≤1cm, T1a and T1b) invasive breast cancer. Materials and methods A total of 221 patients with histologically confirmed small invasive cancers were included for the statistical analysis. At mammography, ultrasonography and MRI, the detectability, and imaging characteristics of primary tumors were compared in patients with or without axillary metastases. Clinical features and histological prognostic factors for axillary metastases were investigated. Results Of 221 patients examined, axillary metastasis was found in 42 (19%) at the time of surgery. There was no significant difference in detectability of small tumors using ultrasonography and MRI between patients with and without axillary metastasis. However, mammography had a higher positive rate of primary tumors in patients with axillary metastasis than without metastasis (92.9% vs. 77.1%, p =0.023). Patients with axillary metastasis in small cancers showed more common architectural distortion than negative ( p =0.0147) or mass ( p =0.0356) on mammography. Clinical features were not different in the two groups. Only lymphovascular invasion was independently associated with axillary metastasis ( p =0.0051, 95% CI, 1.527–11.597). Conclusion The detectability of small invasive breast cancers among patients with and without axillary metastasis is different with mammography, but not with US and MRI. Lymphovascular invasion is only a predictor for axillary metastasis in small invasive cancers.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma (PILC) is different from classic invasive lobular carcinoma (CILC) in terms of radiologic and clinicopathologic features. We compared the radiologic and clinicopathologic features of 22 surgically confirmed PILCs in 21 patients from 2004 to 2009 and 47 CILCs from 47 consecutive patients. For all cases, we reviewed the imaging findings, medical records and pathological results. PILC had a higher T stage, N stage, nuclear and histologic grade compared to CILC. PILC was more commonly negative for estrogen receptors and positive for HER2 than CILC (all p 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in age, symptoms, tumor size, extensive intraductal component, lymphovascular invasion, triple negative profile, or multiplicity between the two groups. PILC was not detected on mammography in 1 (4.5%) of 22 cases, whereas CILC was not detected on mammography in 7 (14.9%) of 47 cases and on MRI in 2 (5.0%) of 40 (p = 0.42 and p = 1.000, respectively). MRI identified more frequent multiplicity than mammography for both PILC and CILC (p 0.001), but was similar to US (p = 0.066). Most lesions showed a spiculated mass or architectural distortion with or without calcifications on mammography and ultrasound. No differences in mass and/or non-mass lesions or kinetics on MRI were observed between the two groups. PILC shows more pathologically aggressive features, but cannot be differentiated from CILC based on imaging findings.

Purpose To retrospectively evaluate previous imaging findings of breast cancers that occurred in women whose combined screening using both mammography and ultrasonography was negative. Materials and methods A search of the institutional database identified 65 patients with breast cancers who had comparable previous negative screening mammography and ultrasonography (BI-RADS category 1 or 2) within 2 years. We classified each case as true or false negative. The previous imaging findings and the final outcome were analyzed. Results Among 65 cases, 42 (65%) were true negatives, 23 (35%) were false negatives. The abnormalities of false negatives were underestimated in 16 (70%) and unrecognized in 7 (30%). The findings were calcifications ( n = 8) or a mass ( n = 6) on mammography, a mass ( n = 5) or a non-mass ( n = 3) on ultrasonography and a density on mammography correlated with non-mass on ultrasonography ( n = 1). Ductal carcinoma in situ among false and true negatives accounted for 5 (22%) and 7 (17%), respectively. Symptomatic cancers among false and true negatives were 6 (26%) and 13 (31%), respectively. Conclusion Breast cancers that rarely occurred in combined screening negatives are often retrospectively seen as minimal abnormalities on previous imaging studies.

We evaluated the sonographic findings that can help differentiate widely invasive follicular thyroid carcinomas (WIFTC) from minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinomas (MIFTC).We retrospectively compared the sonographic and clinical findings of 24 patients (M:F=5:19) with 24 MIFTCs and 12 patients (M:F=1:11) with 13 WIFTCs that were confirmed pathologically and available in sonography at our institution between 1995 and 2007.WIFTC was more common in elderly patients than MIFTC (p0.0001). WIFTC was seen with a larger size than MIFTC (p=0.0092). The best cut-off values for age and size were 49 years and 5.6 cm, respectively. On sonography, all tumors were seen as a well-defined oval or round mass. Heterogeneous mulberry-like echotexture was more common for WIFTC than for MIFTC (77% vs. 25%) (p=0.0046). The presence of calcifications was more frequent in WIFTC than in MIFTC (54% vs. 8%) (p=0.0041). Ring calcifications (86%) were the most common type for WIFTC. WIFTC was commonly hypoechoic (70%) and rarely cystic change (8%), but without statistical differences. When WIFTCs represented tumors with two or more findings with a statistical difference, the specificity was 96%.WIFTC is distinguishable from MIFTC by sonography for patients with an ageor=49 years, a tumoror=5.6 cm, a heterogeneous mulberry-like echotexure, or the presence of calcifications. The sonographic impression of a WIFTC can support a preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis of a difficult case as determined by FNA or with a frozen section.

Breast lymphoma is uncommon, accounting for approximately 0.15% of malignant breast lesions. It usually originates from lymphocytes in breast parenchyma and ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes. In breast, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is more common than T-cell lymphoma. Here, we report a rare case of cutaneous natural killer/T-cell (NK/T) lymphoma mimicking panniculitis of the breast, that was presented as a growing palpable mass and pain in both breasts of a 33-year-old male patient. Ultrasonographic appearance was extensive hyperechogenicity in subcutaneous fat layer of mammary areas, mimicking panniculitis or fat necrosis. Pathologically, a histologic subtype was extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal-type.

891 stacle to obtaining adequate cytologic specimens because of technical difficulty or lack of a cellular component. Nam et al. [7] reported that the application of the BRAFV600E mutation analysis from FNA specimens is more effective for thyroid nodules with malignant ultrasound features than for nodules without malignant ultrasound features. On the basis of these data, we hypothesized that BRAFV600E mutation testing of FNA specimens is likely to increase the diagnostic accuracy in calcified nodules. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic contribution of BRAFV600E mutation analysis from the FNA specimens of calcified thyroid nodules.