1. Changes in treatment for NSTEMI in women and the elderly over the past 16 years in a large real-world population
- Author
-
R Schoeller, Steffen Behrens, Helmut Schühlen, David M. Leistner, Leonhard Riehle, Martin Stockburger, Georg M. Fröhlich, Ulf Landmesser, Birga Maier, Leonhard Bruch, and Heinz Theres
- Subjects
Male ,Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Population ,Myocardial Infarction ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Revascularization ,Coronary artery disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,0302 clinical medicine ,Age groups ,Risk Factors ,Humans ,Medicine ,Registries ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction ,education ,Aged ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Drug-Eluting Stents ,World population ,medicine.disease ,Treatment Outcome ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
This study investigates the changes in therapy for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) over the past 16 years in a large German registry. In particular, the high-risk population of female and elderly patients was analyzed.In total, 19.383 patients presenting with NSTEMI were included in this study. Patients were stratified by age groups75 years and ≥75 years and by sex. Four different time periods from 2000-2004, 2005-2008, 2009-2012 and 2013-2016 were compared. Influence on hospital mortality as the primary outcome measure was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcome measures included percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the use of drug eluting stents (DES), radial access route and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, stroke, re-infarction, percutaneous re-intervention, intervention-related bleeding, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and new onset of cardiogenic shock or need for mechanical ventilation.Mortality decreased in all age groups between the initial time period and the most recent one (8.9% vs. 4.5%, p 0.01), particularly in female patients ≥75 years (18.2% in 2000-2004 vs. 7.9% in 2013-2016, p 0.01). Revascularization rates differed by gender (68.3% in women vs. 78.1% in men, p 0.01) and by age (64.2% for ≥75 years vs. 80.9% for75 years, p 0.01). PCI rates in elderly female patients increased from 28.7% to 69.8% (p 0.01) from the initial to the latest period.The present study demonstrates, that revascularization rates improved in all patient groups over the study period. However, females and elderly patients still remain less likely to be treated according to current guidelines.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF