Search

Intra-stent thrombosis is one of the major failure modes of popliteal aneurysm endovascular repair, especially when the diseased arterial segment is long and requires overlapping stent-grafts having different nominal diameters in order to accommodate the native arterial tapering. However, the interplay between stent sizing, post-operative arterial tortuosity, luminal diameter, local hemodynamics, and thrombosis onset is not elucidated, yet. In the present study, a popliteal aneurysm was treated with endovascular deployment of two overlapped stent-grafts, showing intra-stent thrombosis at one-year follow-up examination. Patient-specific computational fluid-dynamics analyses including straight- and bent-leg position were performed. The computational fluid-dynamics analysis showed that the overlapping of the stent-grafts induces a severe discontinuity of lumen, dividing the stented artery in two regions: the proximal part, affected by thrombosis, is characterized by larger diameter, low tortuosity, low flow velocity, low helicity, and low wall shear stress; the distal part presents higher tortuosity and smaller lumen diameter promoting higher flow velocity, higher helicity, and higher wall shear stress. Moreover, leg bending induces an overall increase of arterial tortuosity and reduces flow velocity promoting furtherly the luminal area exposed to low wall shear stress.

Background The Mediterranean Federation for the Advancing of Vascular Surgery (MeFAVS) was founded on October 1, 2018, to enhance cooperation among vascular professionals within Mediterranean countries. Due to its prominent social and economic impact on national health systems, diabetic arteriopathy has been selected as the very first topic to be investigated by the federation. Methods MeFAVS members were asked to reply to a questionnaire on the management of diabetic ischemic foot. Results were collected and analyzed statistically. The questionnaire consisted of 15 multiple choice answers regarding diabetic foot (DF) diagnosis and treatment. The questionnaire was submitted to 21 centers on April 20, 2019. Results Response rate was 62%. The survey revealed that vascular surgeons, diabetologists, and wound care nurses made-up the core of the diabetic teams present in 76.9%, 69.3%, and 92.3% of the centers, respectively. Diabetic teams were most often led by vascular surgeons (53.8%) and diabetologists (42.2%), but only in 7.9% of cases by nurses. Duplex ultrasonography and computed tomographic angiography were the most commonly available tools used to assess diabetic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Surgical wound care was undertaken by vascular surgeons in the majority of cases, and only in 46.2% of the cases to orthopedic or plastic surgeons, while nonsurgical wound care was handled by specialized nurses (76.6%) and diabetologists (53.8%). First-line revascularization was preferred over conservative treatment (61.5% vs 53.8%) and endovascular strategy (45.3%) over open (33.7%) or hybrid (21.0%) surgery. Vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists were found to be the most common performers of endovascular revascularization (92.3% and 53.8%, respectively). Amputations had an overall rate of 16.6% (range 4–30%) and a mean reintervention rate of 22.5%, and were usually performed by vascular surgeons for both minor and major interventions (84.6%) followed by orthopedic surgeons (15.4% minor and 30.8% major). The availability of a DF clinic (84.6%) and endovascular (53.8%) and open surgery (46.2%) capabilities were considered fundamental to reduce amputation rates. Conclusions Especially since the introduction and spreading of new endovascular techniques for the treatment of DF, it is a common consensus amongst vascular surgeons that a standardized approach to the discipline is necessary in order to improve outcomes such as amputation-free survival and mortality and it is with this perspective and purpose that transnational cooperation amongst vascular professionals and residents in training are aiming for greater proficiency in endovascular and open surgery.

Background The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on vascular surgery practice in a regional hub center for complex vascular disease. Methods This is an observational single-center study in which we collected clinical and surgical data during (P1) and after (P2) the COVID-19 outbreak and the lockdown measures implemented in Northern Italy. We compared those data with the two-month period before the pandemic (P0). Results Compared to P0, ambulatory activities were severely reduced during P1 and limited to hospitalized patients and outpatients with urgent criteria. We performed 61 operations (18 urgent and 43 elective), with a decrease in both aortic (−17.8%), cerebrovascular (−53.3%), and peripheral artery (−42.6%) disease treatments. We also observed a greater drop in open procedures (−53.2%) than in endovascular ones (−22%). All the elective patients were treated for notdeferrable conditions and they were COVID-19 negative at the ward admission screening; despite this one of them developed COVID19 during the hospital stay. Four COVID-19 positive patients were treated in urgent setting for acute limb ischemia. Throughout P2 we gradually rescheduled elective ambulatory (+155.5%) and surgical (+18%) activities, while remaining substantially lower than during P0 (respectively −45.6% and −25.7%). Conclusions Despite COVID-19 pandemic, our experience shows that with careful patient's selection, dedicated prehospitalization protocol and proper use of personal protective equipment it is possible to guarantee continuity of care.

Background We report endovascular treatment of a patient with an isolated Internal Iliac Artery (IIA) aneurysm who was treated by positioning a novel covered stent that could adapt to different proximal and distal diameters. Case report A 68-year-old man who had already had several previous aortic surgeries underwent endovascular treatment for a 41 mm isolated right IIA aneurysm. Two Viabahn VBX (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) covered stents (7 × 79 mm and 8Lx59 mm) were placed from a 6 mm gluteal artery to an 11 mm Dacron hypogastric artery via contralateral femoral surgical access. No complications occurred. One-month follow-up computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan showed the complete exclusion of the aneurysmal sac with spontaneous endoleak resolution and patency of the covered stents. Geometric analysis of the postoperative CTA highlighted VBX conformability to the native vessel. Maximum stented vessel diameter ranged between 9 and 13 mm, and circularity was maintained along the whole stent length, even in zones of higher centerline curvature. Conclusions The Viabahn VBX covered stent could be used to treat aneurysms of the IIA.

Background The aim of this study was to analyze our series of endovascular treatments using a multilayer flow modulator (MFM) and to show the midterm results. Methods At our institution, 8 patients were treated with an MFM. Four patients presented with an aortic aneurysm (2 type II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms [TAAAs], 1 type IV TAAA, and 1 juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm) and 4 with an aneurysm involving the common iliac artery. Mortality, rupture and secondary intervention, major complications, patency of collateral vessels, and volume analysis were evaluated. Treated patients were followed up with computed tomography angiography at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results Results showed no 30-day mortality or major complications; technical success was achieved in 87.5% of patients, patency of collateral vessels was reached in all cases at intraoperative completion angiography. Mean follow-up was 22.1 months (range, 18–30), survival rate was 87.5%, and one case of death unrelated to MFM treatment was reported. During follow-up, MFM and collateral vessel patency were observed in all cases. Secondary endovascular or open surgical procedures were not needed during follow-up. Volume analysis showed a slight increase in patients with aortic aneurysm, and an overall trend to increase in thrombosis was observed in all cases. Conclusions Endovascular treatment of aneurysms with MFM seems to have encouraging midterm results. Should our results be confirmed by larger series and longer follow-up studies, MFM may become a viable alternative to other endovascular approaches.

Objectives Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as a localized dilatation of an aortic vessel. Though predominantly asymptomatic, it is a chronic degenerative condition associated with life-threatening risk of rupture. The early diagnosis of AAA, ie, before it ruptures, is therefore important; a simple, effective diagnostic method is ultrasound examination. To assess the benefit of screening in Italy, we developed a cost-effective Markov model comparing screening vs nonscreening scenarios. Methods A 13-health-states Markov model was developed to compare two cohorts of 65- to 75-year-old men: the first group undergoing screening for AAA by means of ultrasound (US), the second following the current practice of incidental detection. The following health states were distinguished: no AAA, unknown small AAA (3-3.9 cm), followed-up small AAA (1 year), unknown medium-sized AAA (4-4.9 cm), followed-up medium-sized AAA (6 months), unknown large AAA (>5 cm), elective repair, emergency repair, postelective-repair AAA, postemergency-repair AAA, rejected large AAA, and death. Transitions between health states were simulated by using 6-month cycles. Transition probabilities were derived from a literature review of relevant randomized controlled trial and from a screening program that is currently ongoing at San Martino Hospital in Genoa, Italy. The Italian National Health Service (NHS) perspective was adopted and incremental cost per life-year saved was calculated with a lifetime horizon; costs and health benefits were discounted at an annual rate of 3% from year 2 onward. Uncertainty surrounding the model inputs was tested by means of univariate, multivariate, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results Considering an attendance rate of 62%, the individual cost per invited subject was €60 (US $83.2); 0.011 additional quality adjusted life years (QALY) were gained per patient in the screened cohort, corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €5673/QALY (US $7870/QALY). The results were sensitive to some parameter variations but consistent with the base case scenario. They suggest that on the basis of a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50,000/QALY, screening for AAA is cost-effective, with a probability approaching 100%. Conclusions As in economic evaluations developed in other countries, such as the UK, Canada, and The Netherlands, setting up a screening program for AAA can be considered cost-effective from the Italian NHS perspective.