Search

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is considered the standard of care for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). However, there is no proven survival benefit of NAT compared to adjuvant therapy for the survival of patients with early-stage HER2-positive BC. This study aimed to compare the prognosis of HER2-positive BC patients treated with NAT to that of patients treated with adjuvant therapy.This was a single-center real-world retrospective study. This study analyzed the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 538 HER2-positive BC patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy and 2684 patients treated with adjuvant therapy at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) between 2012 and 2016. Patients with a clinical tumor size (cT) ≤5 cm or5 cm were matched using the propensity score matching (PSM) method to prevent selection bias.After PSM, among patients with cT ≤ 5 cm, there was no significant difference in DFS (P = 0.08) or OS (P = 0.11) between the two groups. The analysis of survival outcomes of patients treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in the different chemotherapy subgroups yielded consistent results. According to multivariate analysis, lymph node status and response to NAT showed independent prognostic value for OS and DFS. Among patients with cT 5 cm, the DFS (P = 0.25) and OS (P = 0.57) of patients treated with NAT were similar to those of patients treated with adjuvant therapy after PSM.We confirmed the equivalent effects of adjuvant therapy and NAT in HER2-positive BC patients. Neoadjuvant therapy should be used for patients with HER2-positive BC.

The current National Practice Questionnaire of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) (NPQi) was to assess the clinical practice of mesh-assisted IBBR in China.A questionnaire was mailed to 110 hospitals in China, which have more than 200 breast cancer operations performed in 2017. The survey mainly included questions on the type and timing of IBBR, questions about the use of TiLOOP® Bra and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and the complications of IBBR.IBBR was routinely carried out in 86.36% (95/110) hospitals. IBBR was the most frequently-used (65.7%, 4,296/6,534) BR after mastectomy with a median of 24 cases (IQR 7.5-65) in each hospital. TiLOOP® Bra and ADM were available in 49.5% and 33.7% hospitals, respectively. Hospitals with ADM offered were more likely to located in economically developed regions (65.6%), when compared with hospitals without any mesh offered (14/35, 40.0%, P = 0.036) and with only TiLOOP® Bra offered (16/28, 57.1%, P = 0.032). The surgery volume was largely variated from hospitals without any mesh offered (median 380 cases, IQR 304-550), with only TiLOOP® Bra offered (median 790 cases, IQR 439-1096, P = 0.001) and with ADM offered (median 797 cases, IQR 497-1528, P 0.001). Higher proportion of one-stage mesh-augmented direct-to-implant BR and lower proportion of autologous BR were observed in hospitals with mesh offered. The reported major complications were similar between hospitals with or without mesh offered.The NPQi has provided a valuable insight into the current practice of IBBR and mesh used in China. The introduction of mesh-assisted techniques has revolutionized the clinical practice.

Summary Background Fat necrosis is one of the most common complications following free flap breast reconstruction. Although a minor complication, fat necrosis can compromise esthetic results and confuse with cancer recurrence. Perfusion-related factors and post-operative radiotherapy are the known risks. However, the influence of adjuvant chemotherapy on fat necrosis prevalence remains unknown. Methods Our initial experience of 88 consecutive breast reconstructions with free abdominal flaps was reviewed. The prevalence of fat necrosis was recorded and the risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results The overall prevalence of fat necrosis was 36.4% in this series. In a multivariate logistic regression model, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased the risk of fat necrosis. The relative risk was 4.762 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.767–12.831; p = 0.002). There was no evidence of a specific chemotherapeutic agent causing fat necrosis. The first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy was frequently delivered earlier in patients with fat necrosis than those without fat necrosis, although this tendency was not statistically significant. Conclusions Our initial experience with free flap breast reconstruction seems to suggest that chemotherapy may increase the risk of fat necrosis following immediate breast reconstruction. Patients should be fully informed, and the initiation of post-operative chemotherapy may be adjusted accordingly.

Purpose Clinical data suggest that the estrogen receptor (ER) contributes to chemotherapeutic responsiveness. However, ER status alone is not consistently predictive. In this study, we used a microarray approach to find novel ER-related genes that predicted chemotherapy responses, with the hope of providing a robust multi-variable prediction method. Methods One hundred and ten patients with stages II and III breast cancer were included. They received four preoperative cycles of a weekly PCb (paclitaxel plus carboplatin) regimen. A total of 55 training cases were used for marker discovery and for identification of any ER-related genes that may have been associated with a chemotherapeutic response (“training cases”). The other 55 patients were available as an independent validation set (“validation cases”) to test, using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results In the training set, 20 significantly differentially expressed genes were identified. Among these 20 genes, TFF1, ESR1, GATA3 and TFF3 were found to be ER-related. Among 55 independent validation cases, univariate analysis indicated that clinical variables and ER-related genes were all significantly associated with pCR. It was shown that the pCR rate was as high as 80% when these five factors were all negative. In contrast, these five factors were all positive in seven of nine chemo-resistant patients. Conclusion In conjunction with levels of ER-related genes, expression of ER protein may provide important predictive outcomes for responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and may allow for the identification of a subgroup of patients who could significantly benefit from chemotherapy (or who may be resistant to it).