Search

Your search keyword '"Balzarini, F"' showing total 13 results
Start Over Author "Balzarini, F" Publisher elsevier bv
13 results on '"Balzarini, F"'

1. A new tridimensional effective method to calculate tumor contact surface area with high predictive power of the main operative outcomes in nephron sparing surgery.

Author

Traverso, P., primary, Carfì, A., additional, Bulanti, A., additional, Fabbi, M., additional, Giasotto, V., additional, Mattiauda, M., additional, Lo Monaco, L., additional, Tappero, S., additional, Guano, G., additional, Martiriggiano, M., additional, Balzarini, F., additional, Borghesi, M., additional, Mastrogiovanni, F., additional, and Terrone, C., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Impacto de la presentación tardía al servicio de Urgencias por cólico renal agudo en los resultados bioquímicos y clínicos

Author

Mantica, G., primary, Carrion, D.M., additional, Antón-Juanilla, M., additional, Pang, K.H., additional, Parodi, S., additional, Tappero, S., additional, Rodriguez-Serrano, A., additional, Crespo-Atín, V., additional, Cansino, R., additional, Scarpa, R.M., additional, Nikles, S., additional, Balzarini, F., additional, Terrone, C., additional, Rivas, J. Gomez, additional, and Esperto, F., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Impact of a delayed presentation to the emergency department for acute renal colic on biochemical and clinical outcomes

Author

Mantica, G., primary, Carrion, D.M., additional, Antón-Juanilla, M., additional, Pang, K.H., additional, Parodi, S., additional, Tappero, S., additional, Rodriguez-Serrano, A., additional, Crespo-Atín, V., additional, Cansino, R., additional, Scarpa, R.M., additional, Nikles, S., additional, Balzarini, F., additional, Terrone, C., additional, Gomez Rivas, J., additional, and Esperto, F., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. The impact of the delay in presenting to the emergency department with acute renal colic: which patients are at higher risk?

Author

Mantica, G., primary, Parodi, S., additional, Tappero, S., additional, Balzarini, F., additional, Malinaric, R., additional, Testino, N., additional, Carrion, D.M., additional, Juanilla, M.A., additional, Pang, K.H., additional, Serrano, A.R., additional, Crespo-Atìn, V., additional, Cansino, R., additional, Scarpa, R.M., additional, Borghesi, M., additional, Suardi, N., additional, Bottino, P., additional, Rivas, J.G., additional, Esperto, F., additional, and Terrone, C., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Does the use of personal electronic health records increase vaccine uptake? A systematic review

Author

Giovanni Gaetti, Pier Luigi Lopalco, Michael Edelstein, Beatrice Frascella, Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat, Federica Balzarini, Aurea Oradini-Alacreu, Anna Odone, Carlo Signorelli, Balzarini, F., Frascella, B., Oradini-Alacreu, A., Gaetti, G., Lopalco, P. L., Edelstein, M., Azzopardi-Muscat, N., Signorelli, C., and Odone, A.

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, 030231 tropical medicine, Health records, law.invention, 03 medical and health sciences, Childhood immunization, 0302 clinical medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Standard care, law, Influenza, Human, medicine, Electronic Health Records, Humans, Pooled data, 030212 general & internal medicine, Child, General Veterinary, General Immunology and Microbiology, Immunization Programs, business.industry, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental research, Observational Studies as Topic, Infectious Diseases, Health Records, Personal, Influenza Vaccines, Family medicine, Molecular Medicine, Health education, Observational study, business
Abstract

Background Although Personal Electronic Health Records (PEHR) have been identified as innovative tools enabling the provision of patient-centered care and prevention, evidence on the impact of their use is scant. With PEHRs being more and more marketed as easily implementable and cost-effective instruments to provide people with direct control on their health, the question on whether their use might be associated with the priority to improve vaccine coverage arises. Methods We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines to retrieve, quantitatively pool and critically appraise the effectiveness of PEHR access on vaccine uptake. Analysis on PEHR effectiveness were carried out for the following comparison strata: i) PEHR access vs no intervention (standard care, no access to PEHR), ii) PEHR access only vs access to PEHR with additional features (e.g. health education materials, active reminders). Results Of 3114 identified citations, 8 studies were included, the majority published in the US and before 2015; 62% were randomized trials, the rest having an observational study design. Evidence suggests a moderate positive impact of PEHR access in increasing vaccine uptake, with data available for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, diabetic patients and childhood immunization. Pooled data report the addition of digital communication features, i.e. the delivery of educational messages, reminders and availability of scheduling features might increase vaccine uptake, as compared to PEHR access alone. However, evidence is not conclusive. Conclusion While immunization programs are struggling to achieve optimal coverage targets, it seems the potential of PEHRSs supporting informed adherence to vaccines recommendations is neither fully exploited nor explored. Which factors mediate the association between PEHRs access and vaccine uptake? Which PEHRs’ design and functional components can maximize their impact? On which target populations? Which PEHR models works better for high-risk populations? Our findings can only partially answer those questions and further experimental research is needed.

Published
2020

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results