1. Effectiveness of an extended period of flashing lights and strategic signage to increase the salience of alcohol-gel dispensers for improving hand hygiene compliance
- Author
-
Elham Sabri, Irene E. Harmsen, Rakesh Patel, Kwadwo Kyeremanteng, Gianni D’Egidio, Babak Rashidi, and Aimee Li
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Epidemiology ,Reminder Systems ,media_common.quotation_subject ,030106 microbiology ,Annoyance ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Hand sanitizer ,Hygiene ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cold weather ,media_common ,Infection Control ,business.industry ,Health Policy ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Flashing ,Surgery ,Infectious Diseases ,Multiple factors ,Signage ,Alcohols ,Optometry ,Guideline Adherence ,business ,Gels ,Disinfectants ,Hand Disinfection - Abstract
Background Multiple factors affect compliance with hand hygiene, including conspicuity of alcohol-gel dispensers. Previous studies have shown that flashing lights increase hand hygiene compliance; however, the durability of this effect has not been studied. Methods We affixed flashing lights to hand sanitizer dispensers for a total of 6 weeks. Regression analysis was used to compare compliance rates between the beginning and end of the intervention. Our secondary objective was to determine whether compliance rates in cold weather could be improved by adding a sign separated in time and space from the dispensers. Results Flashing lights improved hand hygiene compliance from 11.8% to 20.7%, and this effect was unchanged over the 6-week study period. Fully charged lights resulted in a greater compliance increase. A preemptive sign did not have a significant effect on hand hygiene rates nor did absolute temperatures. Conclusions Flashing lights are a simple, inexpensive way of improving hand hygiene. Brighter lights appear to have a greater effect; however, this must be balanced with annoyance in specific settings. Temperature did not have a significant effect; however, this may be because the relationship does not fit a linear model. Other interventions, such as signs, may need to be tailored specifically to individual hospital environments.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF