1. Low field T1ρ imaging of myositis
- Author
-
Hannu Kalimo, Anu Alanen, Antti Airio, Satu K. Jääskeläinen, Markku Komu, Martti Kormano, Anette Virta, and Nina Lundbom
- Subjects
Male ,Pathology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Muscle Relaxation ,Biomedical Engineering ,Biophysics ,Adipose tissue ,Connective tissue ,B1 field ,Edema ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Muscle, Skeletal ,Myositis ,Aged ,Relaxation (psychology) ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Muscle relaxation ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Adipose Tissue ,Connective Tissue ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate 1/T1rho in relation to 1/T1 and 1/T2 in characterizing normal and diseased muscle. We measured the muscle relaxation rates 1/T1 and 1/T2 at 0.1 T and 1/T1rho at on-resonance locking fields B1 between 10 and 160 microT in myositis patients and normal volunteers. 1/T2 and 1/T1rho of muscle were lower in the patients than in the volunteers, whereas there was no difference in the 1/T1 values. The lower relaxation rates 1/T2 and 1/T1rho in the diseased muscle may be due to fat and connective tissue infiltrations and edema. 1/T1rho contrast between muscle and subcutaneous fat was higher than 1/T2 and 1/T1 contrast. This may be explained by the different B1 dispersion behavior of these two tissue types. 1/T1rho of fat is B1 field independent, whereas 1/T1rho of muscle decreases clearly with increasing B1 field. In conclusion, 1/T1rho provides a useful tool in manipulating contrast in magnetic resonance imaging of diseased muscle.
- Published
- 1998
- Full Text
- View/download PDF