1. Flow-diverting Stent in the Treatment of Cervical Carotid Dissection and Pseudoaneurysm: Review of Literature and Case Report
- Author
-
Ricardo Aun, Anna Paula Weinhardt Baptista-Sincos, Aline Bigatão Simplício, Adjaldes Moraes, Alex Leaderman, Igor Rafael Sincos, and Fernando Saliture Neto
- Subjects
Adult ,Carotid Artery Diseases ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Computed Tomography Angiography ,medicine.medical_treatment ,MEDLINE ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Prosthesis Design ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,Pseudoaneurysm ,0302 clinical medicine ,Aneurysm ,medicine ,Humans ,cardiovascular diseases ,Embolization ,Aged ,Computed tomography angiography ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Endovascular Procedures ,Stent ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Vascular surgery ,medicine.disease ,Embolization, Therapeutic ,Surgery ,Aortic Dissection ,Treatment Outcome ,Regional Blood Flow ,Female ,Stents ,Radiology ,Carotid dissection ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Aneurysm, False ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background The endovascular technique has been recommended over the past few years to extracranial carotid dissection and pseudoaneurysm with promising results, especially after medical therapy failure. Flow-diverting stents are an alternative for complex cases. These stents have proven to be effective treatment devices for intracranial aneurysms. Methods The reference list of Pham’s systematic review, published in 2011, and Seward’s literature review, published in 2015, was considered, as well as all new articles with eligible features. Search was conducted on specific databases: MEDLINE and Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciencias da Saude. Results For carotid dissection and pseudoaneurysm, our review yielded 3 published articles including 12 patients. The technical success rate of flow-diverting stent was 100% with no procedural complication described. Mean clinical follow-up was 27.2 months (range 5–48), and in 5 months’ angiographic follow-up, all lesions had healed. No new neurological events were reported during the clinical follow-up. Conclusions Flow diverter stent use on intracranial and peripheral vascular surgery demonstrates satisfactory initial results, but it is still under investigation. There are very few cases treated till now and the initial results with flow-diverting stents to cervical carotid dissection are promising. In well-selected cases, where simple embolization or conventional stent is not appropriate, this technic may be considered.
- Published
- 2018