Search

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB) is increasingly recognized as urgent healthcare threat. Trend data on AMR of NFGNB in Saudi Arabia are either old or limited. The objective was to estimate the prevalence and resistance trends of isolated NFGNB in Saudi Arabia. Methods A retrospective multicenter study involving seven tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia was conducted between 2011 and 2016. Susceptibility testing for non-duplicate isolates was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines in College of American Pathologists accredited diagnostic microbiology laboratories in the participating hospitals. Results Out of 461,274 isolates, 100,132 (21.7%) were NFGNB which represented 30% of gram-negative pathogens. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common (73.6%), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (21.0%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (5.3%). Resistance trends of P. aeruginosa were increasing for aztreonam (absolute increase during the study was 17.3%), imipenem (12.3%), and meropenem (11.6%). A. baumannii was fully resistant to several beta lactam drugs, and resistance trends were increasing for potential treatments such as tigecycline (25.1%) and tobramycin (15.5%). S. maltophilia was >90% resistant to trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin by the end of the study. Conclusion We are reporting high and/or increasing resistance of NFGNB to common treatment options. The current findings call for urgent actions to combat the increasing resistance of NFGNB. Large scale sharing of AMR data collected at different hospitals with the Saudi AMR committee would be critical to set priorities and monitor progress.

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriaceae have been isolated from human patients in many countries across the globe but rarely in Saudi Arabia. Here we provide the genomic characterization of the first KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolated from the urine of a patient in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, who had a recent travel history to Egypt involving a medical procedure. Presence of KPC-encoding gene initially detected with the Xpert Carba-R assay was confirmed by traditional PCR. Susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 system, E-test and microbroth dilution methods showed that the K. pneumoniae isolate, namely SA01_KPC-2, was resistant to all antibiotics except colistin and ceftazidime/avibactam. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS), performed on the Illumina Miseq instrument, identified the isolate as sequence type (ST) 383 and serotype KL30-D1 O1v2. Genome assembly of SA01_KPC-2 indicated the presence of two plasmids. Plasmid pSA01_KPC-2, of approximately 45.9 kb in size, harbored the blaKPC-2 flanked by ISKpn27 and ISKpn6 and had a backbone similar to published KPC-carrying IncX6 plasmids. The second plasmid pSA01_incHIB1, a derivative of published 372-kb plasmid pKpvST383, carried genes encoding virulence factors and resistance to five classes of antibiotics. The isolation of the first KPC producer in Saudi Arabia requires high attention and rapid interventions to prevent further spread. Keywords: Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), IncX6 plasmids, ST383, Saudi Arabia

Background and objectives: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in 2014 was associated with high public anxiety in the affected countries. Media speculations may have increased this psychological distress. The healthcare community was the most distressed because they were at the highest risk of infection. This study is the first to explore MERS-CoV epidemic impact on medical students’ perception and determinants of their psychological distress during this outbreak. Methods: We randomly selected and surveyed 200 students from the College of Medicine at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A predesigned questionnaire was answered by participants, and the collected data were statistically analyzed. Results: One hundred and seventy-four (87%) responded. Female students had a significantly higher mean stress level than males (P < 0.001). Participants had a mean GAD score of 2.7 ± 3.1 and a median of 2. Perceived sufficiency of information score was the highest mean and median (17.4 ± 4.2 and 18 respectively). College and hospital announcements were the most common source of information (25.4%). One hundred and thirty-four (77%) reported minimal anxiety, thirty-two (18.4%) reported mild anxiety, 8 (4.6%) reported moderate anxiety, and none of them reported severe anxiety (score >14). The stress level (as reported on 1–10 scale) shows significant correlation with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) score. We found in this study that significant predictors in our model, in terms of more significant to the least, were: an increased self-report on hygienic habits, self-reported social avoidance, the generalized anxiety score and finally being female gander while other variables including numbers of resources access, agreeing with public fear and knowledge score on MERS-CoV all were found to be non-significant. However, the number of accessed resources, as per students, has borderline significant correlation with higher self-reported anxiety from MERS-CoV. Conclusions: Medical students’ psychological needs during the MERS-CoV outbreak should be addressed appropriately. Our results highlight the need to establish psychological support programs for medical students during an infectious disease outbreak. Keywords: MERS-CoV, Psychological stress, Medical students, Saudi Arabia

Since discovery of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), a novel betacoronavirus first isolated and characterized in 2012, MERS-CoV real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assays represent one of the most rapidly expanding commercial tests. However, in the absence of extensive evaluations of these assays on positive clinical material of different sources, evaluating their diagnostic effectiveness remains challenging. We describe the diagnostic performance evaluation of 3 common commercial MERS-CoV rRT-PCR assays on a large panel (n = 234) of upper respiratory tract specimens collected during an outbreak episode in Saudi Arabia. Assays were compared to the RealStar® MERS-CoV RT-PCR (Alton Diagnostics, Hamburg, Germany) assay as the gold standard. Results showed i) the TIB MolBiol® LightMix UpE and Orf1a assays (TIB MolBiol, Berlin, Germany) to be the most sensitive, followed by ii) the Anyplex™ Seegene MERS-CoV assay (Seegene, Seoul, Korea), and finally iii) the PrimerDesign™ Genesig® HCoV_2012 assay (PrimerDesign, England, United Kingdom). We also evaluate a modified protocol for the PrimerDesign™ Genesig® HCoV_2012 assay., Highlights • Diagnostic performance evaluation of 3 commercial MERS-CoV rRT-PCR assays. • LightMix UpE/Orf1a, Seegene MERS-CoV, and Genesig HCoV_2012 assays were evaluated. • Two hundred thiry-four URT specimens collected during an outbreak episode in Saudi Arabia. • Assays were compared to the RealStar® MERS-CoV RT-PCR assay as the gold standard. • Results showed the TIB MolBiol LightMix UpE/Orf1a assays to be the most sensitive.

Summary Objectives CC22-MRSA-IV, UK-EMRSA-15/Barnim EMRSA, is a common and pandemic strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) that has been found mainly in Western Europe, but also in other parts of the world including some Gulf countries. One suspected case of an infection with this strain in a patient who was admitted to the surgical unit in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) was investigated in order to check whether this strain has reached KSA. Methods Besides the index isolate, 46 additional isolates of CC22-MRSA-IV from patients from KSA, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait, and Germany (patients with a history of travel in the Middle East), were characterized by microarray hybridization. Results The study revealed a regional presence of as many as six distinct ‘strains' of CC22-MRSA-IV that could be distinguished based on carriage of SCC mec IV subtypes and virulence factors. No true UK-EMRSA-15/Barnim EMRSA was identified in Riyadh; all suspected isolates from Riyadh were assigned to other, albeit related strains. However, this strain was identified in Abu Dhabi and Kuwait. Conclusions CC22-MRSA-IV from KSA could be linked to other epidemic strains from the Middle East and possibly India, rather than to the Western European UK-EMRSA-15/Barnim EMRSA. High-resolution typing methods, including SCC mec subtyping, might help to differentiate related epidemic strains and to monitor routes of transmission.

Tooth agenesis in human being is the most common congenital anomaly associated with dental development. Mutations in many genes such as MSH homeobox 1 (MSX1), paired box gene 9 (PAX9), ectodysplasin A (EDA) and EDA receptor (EDAR) have been associated with familial form of this condition. However, in large majority of patients, genetic cause could not be identified. The primary aim of present study was to identify the causative mutation(s) in these genes in Saudi Arabian families diagnosed with non-syndromic form of disease. Direct sequencing of coding regions, including exon-intron boundaries of these genes was carried out. All identified nucleotide variations were also tested to exclude possibility of being rare polymorphisms. The sequence analysis of exons and exon-intronic regions of these genes revealed five new mutations that include four in MSX1, one in PAX9 and one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in majority of the patients in MMP20. One novel mutation in exon 1 of MSX1 gene (5354C > G; A40G) was found in three patients. In addition, another novel mutation was detected in two patients in exon 3 (PAX9) as g.10672A > T which changes asparagine to isoleucine at position 40. These mutations were not found in any of the control subjects. A single SNP in MMP20 genes (g.5066A > C) that changes lysine to threonine at position 18 was found in 10% controls as well. Our results for the first time demonstrates that mutations in MSX1 gene might play an important role in hypodontia cases involving pre-molars and is a risk factor for this ethnic population mainly of Arabs and is first report linking these mutations with tooth agenesis.

Molecular screening technologies have improved blood safety by reducing the number of window-period transmissions relative to serological screening. In the two years following the introduction of molecular testing in King Khalid University Hospital, Saudi Arabia, 25,920 donor samples were screened in parallel by both serological and molecular techniques for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). No HCV or HIV NAT yields were detected. However, molecular screening enabled the interdiction of two confirmed HBV NAT yields. This is only the second report of confirmed HBV NAT yield in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and amongst the few reports in the wider Middle East and North Africa region.

Antimicrobial resistance is an important global issue that impacts the efficacy of established antimicrobial therapy. This is true globally and within the Arab countries of the Middle East, where a range of key Gram-negative pathogens pose challenges to effective therapy. There is a need to establish effective treatment recommendations for this region given specific challenges to antimicrobial therapy, including variations in the availability of antimicrobials, infrastructure and specialist expertise. This consensus provides regional recommendations for the first-line treatment of hospitalized patients with serious infections caused by World Health Organization critical priority Gram-negative pathogens Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to carbapenems, and Enterobacteriaceae resistant to carbapenems and third-generation cephalosporins. A working group comprising experts in infectious disease across the region was assembled to review contemporary literature and provide additional consensus on the treatment of key pathogens. Detailed therapeutic recommendations are formulated for these pathogens with a focus on bacteraemia, nosocomial pneumonia, urinary tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and intra-abdominal infections. First-line treatment options are provided, along with alternative agents that may be used where variations in antimicrobial availability exist or where local preferences and resistance patterns should be considered. These recommendations take into consideration the diverse social and healthcare structures of the Arab countries of the Middle East, meeting a need that is not filled by international guidelines. There is a need for these recommendations to be updated continually to reflect changes in antimicrobial resistance in the region, as well as drug availability and emerging data from clinical trials.

Background Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) continues to cause intermittent community and nosocomial outbreaks. Obtaining data on specific source(s) and transmission dynamics of MERS-CoV during nosocomial outbreaks has been challenging. We performed a clinical, epidemiological and phylogenetic investigation of an outbreak of MERS-CoV at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methods Clinical, epidemiological and infection control data were obtained from patients and Healthcare workers (HCWs). Full genome sequencing was conducted on nucleic acid extracted directly from MERS-CoV PCR-confirmed clinical samples and phylogenetic analysis performed. Phylogenetic analysis combined with published MERS-CoV genomes was performed. HCWs compliance with infection control practices was also assessed. Results Of 235 persons investigated, there were 23 laboratory confirmed MERS cases, 10 were inpatients and 13 HCWs. Eight of 10 MERS inpatients died (80% mortality). There were no deaths among HCWs. The primary index case assumed from epidemiological investigation was not substantiated phylogenetically. 17/18 MERS cases were linked both phylogenetically and epidemiologically. One asymptomatic HCW yielded a MERS-CoV genome not directly linked to any other case in the investigation. Five HCWs with mild symptoms yielded >75% full MERS-CoV genome sequences. HCW compliance with use of gowns was 62.1%, gloves 69.7%, and masks 57.6%. Conclusions Several factors and sources, including a HCW MERS-CoV ‘carrier phenomenon’, occur during nosocomial MERS-CoV outbreaks. Phylogenetic analyses of MERS-CoV linked to clinical and epidemiological information is essential for outbreak investigation. The specific role of apparently healthy HCWs in causing nosocomial outbreaks requires further definition.

ObjectivesContamination of blood samples can lead to serious problems in patient management. The administration of unnecessary antibiotics, wastage of hospital resources, and risks to patient life are some of the known hazards. This study aimed to calculate the rate of blood culture contamination and associated factors at King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH), Riyadh, KSA.MethodsThis is a retrospective cross-sectional study. The total study population was calculated based on a review of all of the request sheets for blood cultures submitted to the microbiology laboratory from 1st of January to 31st of December, 2012, at KKUH, Riyadh, KSA.ResultsThe rate of blood culture contamination (false positive) was 1.9%, while 8.71% of the blood culture samples had true infections (true positive). Coagulase negative staphylococcus (CoNS) was the most predominant isolate (87%). The rate of blood culture contamination was significantly higher during the summer season of June (1.38%), July (3.97%) and August (3.72%) compared to other months of the year (p value

This study was designed to determine the incidence of Clostridium perfringens and their toxin genes in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of C. perfringens isolates. A hundred and fourteen fecal samples were obtained from children aged 3–12 years old (57 samples from ASD children and 57 from healthy controls). Children were divided into four groups based on their gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms as follows: ASD group with and without GI symptoms, and control group with and without GI symptoms. Selective anaerobic media and VITEK®2 ANC ID card were used for isolation and identification of C. perfringens from fecal samples. Antimicrobial susceptibility of C. perfringnes isolates were performed using (E-Test) strips against clindamycin, penicillin and metronidazole antibiotics. Conventional PCR was used to detect the alpha toxin gene (Cpa) and the beta-2 toxin gene (Cpb2). Genetic Analyzer 3130Xi was used to confirm the sequencing of Cpb2 gene. Our findings indicated that 38.6% of ASD group samples had a significantly (p = 0.003) higher incidence of C. perfringens than that of the control group (14%). The highest incidence of C. perfringens was found in the ASD group with GI symptoms (53.8%; p = 0.001). C. perfringens isolated from the ASD group (54.5%) were significantly (p = 0.047) more resistant to clindamycin than those isolated from the control group (12.5%). The C. perfringens isolates from the ASD and the control group showed 95.5% and 100% susceptibility to penicillin, respectively. All C. perfringens isolates of ASD and control group were susceptible to metronidazole. The Cpa toxin gene was also detected in all the C. perfringens isolates of ASD and control group, both with and without GI symptoms. Cpb2 toxin gene showed 100% incidence in ASD samples with GI symptoms and in the control groups both with or without GI symptoms, while it was present at significantly lower levels (25%) in the ASD samples without GI symptoms (p = 0.001). Our findings suggests that a high incidence of C. perfringens and its toxin gene (Cpb2) are associated with the GI complications in ASD which may affect the severity of the disease.

Background Hand hygiene (HH) is single most effective preventive measure for health care–associated infection, but compliance rates remain low. This study estimated HH compliance among health care workers (HCWs) and examined factors associated with noncompliance. Methods An observational study design was carried out in 5 intensive care units (ICUs) at the University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Among 242 HCWs, a total of 3,940 HH opportunities were observed by 6 trained medical interns and students. The World Health Organization's “Five Moments for Hand Hygiene” procedure was used as a basis for the observations. Results The overall observed noncompliance rate was 58%. The factors associated with noncompliance were HCW job title (physicians, odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-4.2; allied health professionals, OR, 2.9, 95% CI, 1.9-4.6); working the a.m. shift (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.8), working in a pediatric ICU (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.2), and performance of HH before patient contact (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.6-7.8). Conclusions Overall HH noncompliance was high in ICUs of this hospital. The demanding ICU work setting was an important factor associated with noncompliance. HH compliance was highest among therapists and technicians because of fewer patient interactions and thus fewer HH noncompliance opportunities per person. Further studies on the relationship between work environment demands and HH compliance rates are needed.

Objective To compare the results of imipenem and meropenem susceptibility testing among multi-drug resistant (MDR) isolates of Acinetobacter spp., Pseaudomonas aeruginosa (P.aeruginosa) and members of the Enterobacteriacae. Methods Three methods used for susceptibility testing of 210 isolates: disk diffusion (a reference method), MicroScan (MicroScan Walk Away 96 System, Dade Behring Inc. West Sacramento CA 95691, USA) and Etest (AB Biodisk Solna, Sweden). Results Of the 210 isolates, Acinetobacter spp. accounted for the majority of isolates [110(52.4%)] followed by P.aeruginosa, 79 (37.6%). These isolates were more prevalent from respiratory specimens 98 (46.7%), Acinetobacter spp. 60(28.6%) and P.aeruginosa 34(16.2%). The study has demonstrated discrepant results for carbapenems tested by MicroScan and Etest. For imipenem, the MicroScan exhibited 2.8 % very major error, major error was 10.1% but 3.9% by Etest for Acinetobacter spp., Other discrepant results (minor errors) were 28.7% and 33% for MicroScan and Etest, respectively. For meropenem, minor errors were higher by MicroScan (13.6%) and Etest (21%). For P.aeruginosa, very major error (1.6%) was exhibited by imipenem Etest but major errors were 23% and 30.5% for both drugs by MicroScan, respectively. Minor errors were higher for both drugs by both methods (MicroScan: 15.3% to 20.8% and Etest : 34.9% to 34.2%). Conclusion Microbiology laboratories should consider the use of an additional confirmatory test for carbapenem susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. and P.aeruginosa and members of the Enterobacteriacae.