Search

Elevated concentrations of Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an inherited, causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aims to investigate the clinical utility for patients, and the economic benefit to healthcare systems and society of measuring Lp(a) concentrations more widely today.We conducted a structured literature review to identify the economic and health benefits and costs of measuring the Lp(a) concentration, potential barriers hindering the uptake of the measure, and potential solutions to address them. These findings were then discussed in an advisory board attended by experts and patient organisations.It was found that if Lp(a) concentration is measured more widely today, patients, healthcare system and society would experience clinical and economic benefits even before specific Lp(a) lowering pharmacological treatments become available. Furthermore, a wider uptake of the Lp(a) measurement would support the development of epidemiological data.For Lp(a) measurement to be more widely used, key barriers which are hindering its uptake need to be addressed. These include i) the perception that the measure may have limited clinical value, ii) lack of awareness on Lp(a), iii) lack of data on the CV benefit of reducing Lp(a), iv) technical and clinical guidelines barriers, and v) healthcare system barriers. Scientific communities and industry should collaborate to address technical challenges and deficiencies in clinical guidelines. However, policy intervention will be crucial for national ASCVD plans to acknowledge the importance of Lp(a).

The recent ESC/EAS 2019 Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias are centred on the causal role of low density lipoprotein (LDL), or more generally apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins, in atherosclerosis as an essential principle. Despite updated goals and recommendations, that have further highlighted the importance of a powerful reduction in LDL-C levels to reduce the individual CV risk, some challenges remain to be addressed in view of future guideline elaboration. In this review, we will summarize the new evidence from clinical trials since 2019 guideline release and discuss the possible challenges for the future.

Background and aims: Clinical practice before 2019 suggests a substantial proportion of high and very high CV risk patients taking lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) would not achieve the new LDL-C goals recommended in the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines (18 years of age with high and very high CV risk (as assigned by the investigators) requiring LLT, with no formal patient or comparator groups. The primary objective is to document, in the real-world setting, the effectiveness of current treatment modalities in managing plasma levels of LDL-C in high-and very high-risk patients requiring LLT. Key secondary effectiveness objectives include documenting the relationship between LLT and levels of other plasma lipids, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and overall predicted CV risk over one year. Health economics and patient-relevant parameters will also be assessed. Conclusions: The SANTORINI study, which commenced after the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines were published, is ideally placed to provide important contemporary insights into the evolving management of LLT in Europe and highlight factors contributing to the low levels of LDL-C goal achievement among high and very high CV risk patients. It is hoped the findings will help enhance patient management and reduce the burden of ASCVD in Europe. ' (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

BACKGROUND: European data pre-2019 suggest statin monotherapy is the most common approach to lipid management for preventing cardiovascular (CV) events, resulting in only one-fifth of high- and very high-risk patients achieving the 2019 ESC/EAS recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Whether the treatment landscape has evolved, or gaps persist remains of interest. METHODS: Baseline data are presented from SANTORINI, an observational, prospective study that documents the use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in patients ≥18 years at high or very high CV risk between 2020 and 2021 across primary and secondary care settings in 14 European countries. FINDINGS: Of 9602 enrolled patients, 9044 with complete data were included (mean age: 65.3 ± 10.9 years; 72.6% male). Physicians reported using 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines as a basis for CV risk classification in 52.0% (4706/9044) of patients (overall: high risk 29.2%; very high risk 70.8%). However, centrally re-assessed CV risk based on 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines suggested 6.5% (308/4706) and 91.0% (4284/4706) were high- and very high-risk patients, respectively. Overall, 21.8% of patients had no documented LLTs, 54.2% were receiving monotherapy and 24.0% combination LLT. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) LDL-C was 2.1 (1.6, 3.0) mmol/L (82 [60, 117] mg/dL), with 20.1% of patients achieving risk-based LDL-C goals as per the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. INTERPRETATION: At the time of study enrolment, 80% of high- and very high-risk patients failed to achieve 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines LDL-C goals. Contributory factors may include CV risk underestimation and underutilization of combination therapies. Further efforts are needed to achieve current guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04271280. FUNDING: This study is funded by 10.13039/501100022274Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany.

Evinacumab, an angiopoietin-like protein 3 monoclonal antibody, reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) significantly in a Phase 2 study of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1 study, we compared safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of evinacumab between healthy Japanese and Caucasian adults.Subjects with LDL-C ≥2.6 and4.1 mmol/L were enrolled to one of four dose cohorts: evinacumab subcutaneous (SC) 300 mg single dose, SC 300 mg once weekly for eight doses, intravenous (IV) 5 mg/kg, or IV 15 mg/kg once every 4 weeks for two doses. Each cohort comprised 24 subjects (12 Japanese; 12 Caucasian), randomized (3:1) to receive evinacumab or placebo within each ethnic group with a 24-week follow-up.The safety profile of evinacumab (IV and SC) in both ethnicities was comparable with placebo, with no serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events. Pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between Japanese and Caucasian subjects across IV and SC groups. Mean calculated LDL-C decreased from baseline with both IV doses, beginning on day 3 up to week 8. Triglyceride changes observed with evinacumab IV were rapid (seen by day 2) and sustained up to week 8. Evinacumab SC doses also reduced LDL-C and triglyceride levels, although lower doses induced smaller changes. Evinacumab (IV and SC) reduced other lipids, including apolipoprotein B, versus placebo.In both ethnicities, evinacumab (IV and SC) was generally well tolerated, exhibiting comparable pharmacokinetic profiles. Dose-related reductions in LDL-C and triglycerides were observed with evinacumab in both ethnic groups.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common genetic disorder of lipid metabolism, still underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population. Pathology registers could play a crucial role in the creation of a comprehensive and integrated global approach to cover all aspects of this disease. Systematic data collection of patients affected by FH has increased dramatically worldwide in the past few years. Moreover, results from registers already established for the longest time showed their potentialities in the implementation of the knowledge of FH, comparing country-specific approaches and providing real-world data about identification, management and treatment of FH individuals in the clinical practice. The potential fields of research through registers are related to the deepening of the genetic basis of disease, the study of genotype-phenotype correlation, the local adaption and implementation of diagnostic algorithms, the comparison of pharmacological approaches and treatment gaps in real-life clinical practice, the evaluation of specific subpopulations, and the identification of factors modifying cardiovascular disease risk. Registers could become also a valid resource for other rare dyslipidaemias, contributing towards the evidence-based enhancement in the worldwide care of uncommon diseases.

Post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are at very high cardiovascular risk. Despite current guidelines strongly recommend to reduce LDL-C levels and initiation of high-intensity statins as early as possible in patients admitted with an ACS, less than half of ACS patients receive a high intensity statin, and a high percentage of has LDL-C well above the goal despite therapy. There are multiple reasons for that, including physician lack of guideline adherence, patient lack of compliance with treatment, and lack of standardized procedures. Furthermore, although the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia is higher among patients with ACS, this condition remains poorly estimated. To fill these gaps, some European countries have launched local initiatives for the in-hospital and post-discharge ACS patient lipid management. It appears that ensuring optimal therapy during hospitalization and dedicated follow-up protocols results in a significant improvement of lipid levels in these very high risk patients, which may translate into a reduced risk of recurrent future events.

Background and aims: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a powerful risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events. High levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) since birth are linked to the early onset of atherosclerotic disease. A genetic mutation determining FH is present in about one subject out of 250; FH should be more represented among subjects with a documented diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). The POSTER Study evaluated the prevalence of FH in Italian patients with a recent CAD event. Methods: Eighty-two cardiology centres enrolled patients with a documented CAD event; CV risk profile, drug therapy and biochemical parameters were collected. Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria were used to define patients with a potential FH diagnosis (score ≥6); these patients underwent molecular testing for genetic diagnosis of FH. Results: Overall, 5415 patients were enrolled and the main index events were myocardial infarction with ST-elevation, non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or a recent coronary revascularization (34.8%, 37.2%, and 28% respectively). Mean age was 66 ± 11 years, men were 78%; about 40% were already treated with statins, proportion that increased after the acute event (96.5%). Based on the DLCN score, the prevalence of potential FH was 5.1%, 0.9% of them had a diagnosis of definite FH (score >8). These patients were younger than patients with a score 190 mg/dL. FH was genetically confirmed in 42 subjects (15.9%); genetic diagnosis was defined as not conclusive for FH in 63 patients (23.9%). Finally, in 159 subjects (60.2%) no pathogenic mutations in the tested genes were identified, defining them as negative for monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia. Conclusions: Results underscore a relatively high prevalence of potential FH in patients with a recent CAD event. Therefore, an early identification of these subjects may help improve the management of their high CV risk and, by cascade screening, identify possible FH relatives.

[Background and aims]: Patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) may require proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin-type 9 (PCSK9) mAb as add-on therapy to achieve LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. However, the current cost of these therapies means that choosing suitable patients is based on consensus or clinical judgement rather than a quantitative risk assessment. We used the SAFEHEART Risk Equation (RE) to estimate the number needed to treat (NNT) at different risk thresholds and baseline LDL-C to identify those FH patients more likely to derive the greatest benefit from PCSK9 mAb., [Methods]: Five-year event rates were calculated using the SAFEHEART-RE for every patient, overall and across LDL-C strata. A 60% reduction of LDL-C after theoretical treatment with PCSK9 mAb was assumed. Individual absolute risk simulating the effects of PCSK9 inhibition was calculated using the SAFEHEART-RE and, in a similar way, by using the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration criteria. Absolute risk reduction and NNTs were calculated., [Results]: Of the total SAFEHEART population, 2,153 were FH cases aged 18 years or older, on maximum tolerated lipid lowering treatment. NNTs were dependent of both baseline predicted risk and baseline LDL-C level ranging from 44 to 17 for those with 5-year risk of ≥1 to ≥5. The smallest NNT (12) was observed among those with 5-year risk of ≥5% and LDL-C ≥160 mg/dl. Using the CTT criteria produced similar results., [Conclusions]: The SAFEHEART-RE may provide a useful quantitative tool for rationalising the selection of FH patients who might derive greater absolute benefits from PCSK9 mAb., This work was supported by Fundación Hipercolesterolemia Familiar; Grant G03/181 and FIS PI12/01289 from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Grant 08-2008 Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC).

People who maintain ideal cardiovascular heath have a low lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease. Therefore, encouraging people to achieve ideal cardiovascular health represents an important opportunity to improve the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, preventing cardiovascular disease by promoting ideal cardiovascular health requires shifting the focus from treating disease after it develops to preventing cardiovascular events before they happen by slowing the progression of atherosclerosis. Because atherogenic lipoproteins play a central causal role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, maintaining optimal lipid levels is necessary to achieve ideal cardiovascular health. This review describes the cumulative effect of lipid-carrying lipoproteins on the risk of cardiovascular disease, estimates the magnitude of the clinical benefit that can be achieved by maintaining optimal lipid levels, identifies the most effective timing for implementing strategies designed to achieve optimal lipid levels, and provides a clinical pathway to help people achieve the lipid levels necessary for ideal cardiovascular health.

People who maintain ideal cardiovascular heath have a low lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease. Therefore, encouraging people to achieve ideal cardiovascular health represents an importa...

The relationship between high-density lipoproteins (HDLs), HDL-cholesterol (HDLC) and cancer incidence and mortality is controversial. Although most studies conducted so far, including well-designed prospective studies and meta-analyses, have revealed a significant inverse association between HDL-C levels and cancer risk, several confounding factors and opposite results showing either a direct or an inverse association between HDL-C levels and cancer mortality have hindered the possibility to derive definitive conclusions. Moreover, different lines of research also pointed out that this association might actually reflect an inverse causality, which would imply that low HDL-C levels merely represent an epiphenomenon of cancer-related inflammation and cancer cell renewal. Accordingly, the pharmacological increase of plasma HDL-C levels in large lipid modifying trials has not resulted in an amelioration of cancer-related outcomes. In such an intricate scenario, we conducted a comprehensive review of the literature with the aim to provide a wide perspective on the association between HDLs, mild and extreme changes in plasma HDL-C levels and cancer incidence and mortality, touching upon the certainties, the failures and the open issues in this intriguing area of research.

High levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are directly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Reducing LDL-C levels reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events. Several lipid-lowering approaches are available to achieve the LDL-C levels recommended by current guidelines, statins being the first-line therapy. However, many patients cannot achieve the recommended LDL-C levels with current therapies. The discovery of the role of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK9) in the regulation of plasma LDL-C levels suggested it as a potential pharmacologic target and led to the development of PCSK9 inhibitors for the management of LDL-C levels.

Post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are at very high risk for recurrent events and mortality, despite the availability of effective pharmacological approaches. In 2018, the ACS EuroPath Survey, performed in collaboration with 555 European cardiologists, identified a sub-optimal LDL-C management in post-ACS patients. Based on these premises, the ACS EuroPath II project led to the development of a self-assessment tool to improve lipid management in these very high risk patients, taking into consideration the new 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. This tool is built in 3 sections. The first is a questionnaire to assess the lipid management practice from the acute phase up to 12 months of follow-up. The main topics covered in this section relate to 1) acute phase (lipid management of ACS patients during hospitalization; 2) discharge (lipid management at discharge, with focus on follow-up plan); 3) follow-up (lipid management at the time of first and subsequent follow-ups); 4) referral pathway for definitive lipid management care of post-ACS patients; 5) evaluation of the achieved goal at 6 months to 1 year and key implications. The second section is a brief report to position the results against other European Union clinical practice and European guidelines. The last section allows the physician to evaluate and consider the implementation of one or more strategies, successfully developed in leading European centers, in order to optimize their own clinical practice. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Background and aim The metabolic syndrome (MetS) has become one of the most important clinical issues in the cardiovascular field for this decade because of the marked increase in cardiovascular (CV) risk associated with a clustering of risk factors. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between MetS and its components and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods This population-based cross-sectional study was based on data from two studies carried out in Russia (ESSE-RF) and Italy (PLIC). One sample from each cohort was selected, matching individuals by sex and age. A comparison between samples of MetS components distribution and CV risk, according to SCORE chart, has been conducted. Results A total of 609 individuals (mean [SD] age 55 [8] years, about 39% males) for each cohort were selected. Almost half of PLIC cohort participants belonged to the moderate CV risk group (47% vs 27%), while in ESSE-RF cohort a relatively higher prevalence of individuals classified in the high and very high risk group was observed (19% vs 11%, 21% vs 6%, respectively). Overall, 43% of ESSE-RF participants were diagnosed with MetS, compared with the 27% of PLIC members (the difference in prevalence becomes 37% vs 21%, considering a more conservative cut-off for waist circumference). Both cohorts showed a trend towards the increase of MetS components moving from the lowest to the highest CV risk class, with a high prevalence of patients with four or five MetS determinants allocated in the high/very high CV risk group. Conclusions Developing effective public health strategies for the prevention, detection and treatment of MetS should be an urgent priority to reduce the burden of CVD, not only in subjects at high/very high CV risk, but also in those characterized by a lower risk, as even rare CV events that come from low risk group bring a tangible burden to healthcare systems.

Objectives Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common monogenic lipid disorder associated with premature coronary heart disease. Early cholesterol-lowering therapy could effectively reduce cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in these patients. However, the majority of people with FH are undiagnosed, also due to low awareness and knowledge of FH in general practice, despite the high number of contacts GPs have with most of their patients which allows a systematic and effective approach to the detection of this condition. Here, we present a simple method to improve detection and to enhance awareness of FH in primary care using GP electronic health records. Methods We used electronic data from the Co.S. Consortium, involving more than 600 Italian affiliated GPs. Electronic data include demographic information, laboratory test results, recorded history of vascular disease and prescription of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor class medication. We performed a partial assessment of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score using those data that were recorded or available. We also sought to determine the prevalence of possible FH based on age-specific LDL-cholesterol thresholds employed by the diagnostic criteria of MEDPED and the non-age adjusted cut-off point (LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL). Results Data on LDL-C were available for 162,864 subjects. Mean LDL-C levels (SD) were 124.3 (33.6) mg/dL for non-treated subjects and 106.4 (38.5) mg/dL for statin-treated subjects. The cut-off of LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL yielded a prevalence of 2.9% among non-treated subjects and of 3.5% among statin-treated patients. Using the cut-off of ≥250 mg/dL, the prevalence was 0.1% among non-treated subjects and 0.3% among statin-treated patients. Using the cut-off ≥330 mg/dL (suggesting a probable diagnosis of FH according to the DLCN score) the prevalence was 0.01% and 0.02%. According to the stratification proposed by MEDPED criteria for the general population, the age-specific LDL-cholesterol thresholds identified 0.7% among non-treated subjects and 18.5% among statin-treated patients. Conclusion The diagnosis of FH is possible in general medicine and should be an integral part of the GP's activity.

Background and aims Meta-analyses of randomized control trials investigating the association between incident diabetes and statin use showed an increased risk of new-onset diabetes (NOD) from 9% to 13% associated with statins. However, short follow-up period, unpowered sample size, and lack of pre-specified diagnostic criteria for diabetes detection could be responsible of an underestimation of this risk. We conducted a meta-analysis of published observational studies to evaluate the association between statins use and risk of NOD. Methods and results PubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched from inception to June 30, 2016 for cohort and case–control studies with risk of NOD in users vs nonusers, on ≥1000 subjects followed-up for ≥1 year. Two review authors assessed study eligibility and risk of bias and undertook data extraction independently. Pooled estimates were calculated by a random-effects model and between-study heterogeneity was tested and measured by I 2 index. Furthermore, stratified analyses and the evaluation of publication bias were performed. Finally, the meta-analysis included 20 studies, 18 cohort and 2 case–control studies. Overall, NOD risk was higher in statin users than nonusers (RR 1.44; 95% CI 1.31–1.58). High between-study heterogeneity (I 2 = 97%) was found. Estimates for all single statins showed a class effect, from rosuvastatin (RR 1.61; 1.30–1.98) to simvastatin (RR 1.38; 1.19–1.61). Conclusions The present meta-analysis confirms and reinforces the evidence of a diabetogenic effect by statins utilization. These observations confirm the need of a rigorous monitoring of patients taking statins, in particular pre-diabetic patients or patients presenting with established risk factors for diabetes.

Background European and American guidelines recommend different LDL-C goals for ASCVD patients. We simulated the residual CV risk for 2019 ESC/EAS versus 2018 ACC/AHA LDL-C goals (

The activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome-IL-1β pathway has been clearly shown to be involved in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases, but its role in cerebral atherosclerotic vascular disease has not been fully clarified. Here we provide an overview on the current knowledge about the relevance of the activation of this mechanism in the onset of acute brain atherosclerotic vascular disease and the subsequent tissue damage. Some variants of NLRP3-related genes seem to reduce the susceptibility to acute ischaemic stroke in selected cohorts, although no clear evidence exists either supporting or excluding any role of this pathway in its pathophysiology. Interestingly, robust experimental and clinical data support a major role of the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome-IL-1β pathway in the post-event inflammatory cascade which leads to neurodegeneration. This evidence highlights a potential dual role of these molecules in brain pre- and post-ischaemic events, supporting the need for further studies, including clinical trials evaluating the modulation of this pathway for stroke prevention and post-stroke treatment.

Background and aims: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a life-threatening disease, characterized by elevated LDL-C levels and a premature, increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) that is globally underdiagnosed. The percentage of patients with possible or probable FH in various countries was examined in the Dyslipidemia International Study (DYSIS). Methods: DYSIS is a multinational, cross-sectional observational study of 54,811 adult outpatients treated with statin therapy. The percentages of patients with high levels of LDL-C, and with possible or probable FH, were assessed using the Dutch scoring method for FH across 29 countries, in age subgroups for the analysis population and among diabetes patients. Results: Despite statin therapy, 16.1% (range 4.4-27.6%) of patients had LDL-C > 3.6 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) across countries and the prevalence of possible FH was 15.0% (range 5.5-27.8%) and 1.1% (range 0.0-5.4%) for probable FH. The highest percentages of probable FH occurred in Egypt (5.4%), the Baltic states (4.2%), Russia (3.2%), and Slovenia (3.1%), with the lowest rates in Israel (0.0%), Canada (0.2%), and Sweden (0.3%). Rates of FH were the highest in younger patients (45-54 years) for secondary prevention, regardless of the presence/absence of diabetes. Conclusions: Despite statin therapy, high LDL-C levels and rates of possible and probable FH were observed in some countries. The prevalence of FH was the highest in younger age patients, and > 60% of patients with probable FH displayed CHD. Earlier diagnosis and treatment of patients with FH are needed to reduce CHD risk in these patients. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Abdominal obesity and hepatic steatosis are ectopic fat depots associated with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). Epicardial Fat Thickness (EFT) is a newly discovered one, increasing with obesity, insulin resistance and MetS. Therefore we studied whether different ectopic fat markers, and EFT in particular, are associated with MetS and markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease.868 subjects from the PLIC Study were included, EFT, aortic calcifications, carotid Intima-Media Thickness (c-IMT) and echocardiographic parameters were determined by ultrasound; extra-cardiac atherosclerotic lesions were defined in presence of plaques at both carotid and aortic levels. Hepatic steatosis degrees were defined according to a scoring system. Abdominal adiposity was determined using Dual X-ray Absorbimetry (DEXA). Independently from age, women showed higher EFT versus men (4.5 (0.20-9.00) mm vs 4.00 (0.10-8.00) mm, p = 0.013); EFT was thicker in post-menopausal women (independently from hormone-replacement therapy). EFT, liver steatosis and abdominal adiposity increased with MetS (p0.001). EFT was the only ectopic fat marker associated with cardiac dysfunction (OR = 1.340 [1.088-1.651 95% C.I., p = 0.006); liver steatosis and EFT were associated with extra-cardiac plaques (OR = 2.529 [1.328-4.819] 95% C.I., p0.001 and OR = 1.195 [1.008-1.299] 95% C.I., p = 0.042; respectively). On top of cardiovascular risk factors, only EFT improved the discrimination of subjects with cardiac dysfunction and atherosclerotic plaques.EFT is associated with left ventricular dysfunction and subclinical atherosclerosis. Our data suggest that EFT may represent an additional tool for the stratification of cardiovascular risk.

Berberine (BBR) is an isoquinoline plant alkaloid endowed with several pharmacological activities, including anti-microbial, glucose- and cholesterol-lowering, anti-tumoral and immunomodulatory properties. The main mechanism by which BBR exerts a protective role in atherosclerosis relates to its cholesterol-lowering activity. BBR significantly increases hepatic low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) expression and reduces the expression and secretion of the LDLR modulator proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). In addition to this, several other atheroprotective effects have been ascribed to BBR, including anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties, inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and improvement of endothelial dysfunction. BBR also increases glucose utilization in adipocytes and myocytes, while decreases glucose absorption in intestinal cells, resulting in a net hypoglycemic effect. In hypercholesterolemic animals, BBR significantly decreases LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) levels and reduces aortic lesions, an effect similar to that of statins. In diabetic animals, BBR significantly reduces glucose levels, improves glucose tolerance, reduces body weight gain and adipose tissue mass. Several clinical studies have also tested the efficacy of BBR in humans. In hypercholesterolemic subjects, BBR induces a significant reduction of TC, triglycerides and LDL-C levels and a significant increase of HDL-C levels, without major adverse effects. BBR also reduces glycemia and plasma cholesterol in diabetic patients, improves lipid and glucose profile and decreases body mass index and waist circumference in subjects with metabolic syndrome. These findings, together with the good tolerability, suggest that BBR administration might be considered a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia or diabetes. Given the level of evidence available to date well-designed randomized controlled trials to test safety and efficacy of BBR are warranted.

A causal role of hypercholesterolemia in non-ischemic heart failure has never been demonstrated. Adeno-associated viral serotype 8 (AAV8)-low-density lipoprotein receptor (AAV8-LDLr) gene transfer was performed in LDLr-deficient mice without and with pressure overload induced by transverse aortic constriction (TAC). AAV8-LDLr gene therapy resulted in an 82.8% (p 0.0001) reduction of plasma cholesterol compared with controls. Mortality rate was lower (p 0.05) in AAV8-LDLr TAC mice compared with control TAC mice (hazard ratio for mortality 0.457, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.237-0.882) during 8 weeks of follow-up. AAV8-LDLr gene therapy attenuated cardiac hypertrophy, reduced interstitial and perivascular fibrosis, and decreased lung congestion in TAC mice. Cardiac function, quantified by invasive hemodynamic measurements and magnetic resonance imaging, was significantly improved 8 weeks after sham operation or after TAC in AAV8-LDLr mice compared with respective control groups. Myocardial protein levels of mammalian target of rapamycin and of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase were strikingly decreased following cholesterol lowering in mice without and with pressure overload. AAV8-LDLr therapy potently reduced cardiac glucose uptake and counteracted metabolic remodeling following pressure overload. Furthermore, oxidative stress and myocardial apoptosis were decreased following AAV8-LDLr therapy in mice with pressure overload. In conclusion, cholesterol-lowering gene therapy potently counteracts structural and metabolic remodeling, and enhances cardiac function.

Combination therapy is often required to achieve sufficient low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering and therapeutic goals in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Bempedoic acid (BA) is an investigational, ATP-citrate lyase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy when added to background

Reduced high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels are associated with lower atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Bempedoic acid (BA) is an investigational, ATP-citrate lyase inhibitor in development for treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Prior clinical trial data support BA

Apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) has a critical role in the metabolism of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins (TRLs). Animal models lacking the APOC3 gene exhibit reduced plasma TG levels, whereas the overexpression of APOC3 leads to increased TG levels. In humans, loss-of-function mutations in APOC3 are associated with reduced plasma TG levels and reduced risk for ischemic vascular disease and coronary heart disease. Several hypolipidemic agents have been shown to reduce apoC-III, including fibrates and statins, and antisense technology aimed at inhibiting APOC3 mRNA to decrease the production of apoC-III is currently in Phase III of clinical development. Here, we review the pathophysiological role of apoC-III in TG metabolism and the evidence supporting this apolipoprotein as an emerging target for hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) and associated cardiovascular disorders.

Hypercholesterolemia, is a prominent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Undestanding of the biochemical mechanisms that regulate the expression of the low density lipoproteins receptor (LDLR) and the hepatic clearance of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) paved the way to the statin therapy as the gold standard for CVD prevention. The discovery of proteins that regulate – at a post-translational level – the activity of the LDLR has been a major breakthrough in developing new cholesterol-lowering drugs. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a key modulator of the LDLR degradation in the liver. Genetic studies confirmed that in humans PCSK9 mutations associate with hypercholesterolemia and hypocholesterolemia (gain-of-function or loss-of-function variants respectively). Moreover, PCSK9 is up-regulated by statin treatment and limits the efficacy of these agents. These findings led to the development of PCSK9 inhibitors. Anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies showed encouraging results and are currently being evaluated in phase III clinical trials. The aim of this short review is to describe the new frontier of PCSK9 inhibition in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Emphasis here is given to critical emerging issues linked to PCSK9 physiology and pharmacology, which will require future investigation to definitely address the potential of anti-PCSK9 drugs in clinical practice.

Background and aim Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) is an essential component of the humoral arm of innate immunity and, like C-reactive protein, is independently associated with the risk of developing vascular events. Aim of this study was to investigate, in two large population-based surveys, the Bruneck Study and the PLIC Study, whether PTX3 plasma levels predict the progression of common carotid artery intima–media thickness (CCA-IMT), a surrogate marker of atherosclerosis, in the general population during 5 or 6 years of follow-up. Results In the Bruneck Study, PTX3 plasma levels did not predict a faster progression of CCA-IMT either in the carotid artery or in the femoral artery. This finding was confirmed in the PLIC Study where subjects within the highest tertile of PTX3 did not show an increased progression of CCA-IMT. PTX3 plasma levels were also not associated with the fastest maximum IMT progression. In summary, in more than 2400 subjects from the general population, PTX3 plasma level is neither an independent predictor of progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in different arterial territories, including carotid and femoral arteries nor of incident cardiovascular events. Conclusion These findings support the relevance of investigating the predictive value of PTX3 plasma levels only in specific settings, like overt CVD, heart failure or acute myocardial infarction.

Objective This EAS Consensus Panel critically appraised evidence relevant to the benefit to risk relationship of functional foods with added plant sterols and/or plant stanols, as components of a healthy lifestyle, to reduce plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and thereby lower cardiovascular risk. Methods and results Plant sterols/stanols (when taken at 2 g/day) cause significant inhibition of cholesterol absorption and lower LDL-C levels by between 8 and 10%. The relative proportions of cholesterol versus sterol/stanol levels are similar in both plasma and tissue, with levels of sterols/stanols being 500-/10,000-fold lower than those of cholesterol, suggesting they are handled similarly to cholesterol in most cells. Despite possible atherogenicity of marked elevations in circulating levels of plant sterols/stanols, protective effects have been observed in some animal models of atherosclerosis. Higher plasma levels of plant sterols/stanols associated with intakes of 2 g/day in man have not been linked to adverse effects on health in long-term human studies. Importantly, at this dose, plant sterol/stanol-mediated LDL-C lowering is additive to that of statins in dyslipidaemic subjects, equivalent to doubling the dose of statin. The reported 6–9% lowering of plasma triglyceride by 2 g/day in hypertriglyceridaemic patients warrants further evaluation. Conclusion Based on LDL-C lowering and the absence of adverse signals, this EAS Consensus Panel concludes that functional foods with plant sterols/stanols may be considered 1) in individuals with high cholesterol levels at intermediate or low global cardiovascular risk who do not qualify for pharmacotherapy, 2) as an adjunct to pharmacologic therapy in high and very high risk patients who fail to achieve LDL-C targets on statins or are statin- intolerant, 3) and in adults and children (>6 years) with familial hypercholesterolaemia, in line with current guidance. However, it must be acknowledged that there are no randomised, controlled clinical trial data with hard end-points to establish clinical benefit from the use of plant sterols or plant stanols.

En el articulo titulado «Comentarios a la guia ESC/EAS 2016 sobre el tratamiento de las dislipemias» (Rev Esp Cardiol. 2017;70:72-77) se han detectado errores en la tabla 2. En el punto II.2 dice incorrectamente en dos ocasiones «comprobar las enzimas hepaticas en 46 semanas» cuando lo correcto es «comprobar las enzimas hepaticas en 4 a 6 semanas». En el punto II.4.2, en la ultima fila donde dice «en dias alternos o 12 veces por semana» debe decir «en dias alternos o 1-2 veces por semana». Estas correcciones se han introducido en la version electronica del articulo el 4 de abril de 2018. La tabla correcta es

A key strategy in preventing cardiovascular (CV) disease is the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Statins are a crucial therapy for achieving LDL-C reductions, with the highest tolerated dose often prescribed, especially for patients who are at the greatest risk of CV disease. However, statin intolerance, heterogeneous responses to statins and non-adherence make alternative therapies necessary in some cases. Statins can be combined with a multitude of therapies with synergistic mechanisms of action to effectively manage lipid profiles, while improving safety and tolerability profiles. Addition of a cholesterol absorption inhibitor, bile acid sequestrant or fibrate to statin therapy leads to greater numbers of patients achieving and maintaining LDL-C goals. Furthermore, combination therapies can alter the plasma profiles of other molecules involved in hypercholesterolaemia, including triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. An additional strategy is proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition therapy, for use in patients who are statin intolerant, patients with heterozygous or homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, and patients at very high CV risk, as a potential means for achieving large LDL-C reductions and maintaining LDL-C goals. Clinical trials have demonstrated that PCSK9 inhibition therapy is not only effective but can also be combined with statin therapy to ensure greater reductions in LDL-C. Current, ongoing studies are investigating the efficacy of novel therapies, including selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha modulators, PCSK9-specific ribonucleic acid (RNA) interference and anti-inflammatory therapies.