Search

To analyze published reports on the efficacy and safety of CSI in CRS and evaluate the clinical implications of current gaps in evidence. Corticosteroid irrigation (CSI) is commonly used for management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps; however, such use is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Publications were obtained through PubMed searches through January 2022.Searches were conducted using 2 terms: "chronic rhinosinusitis" or "nasal polyps" as the first term and "corticosteroid irrigation," "steroid nasal lavage," or "sinus rinse" as the second term. We reviewed relevant, peer-reviewed literature (19 original research [9 controlled, 10 uncontrolled trials], 7 reviews, and 1 meta-analysis) reporting safety and efficacy of CSI in patients with CRS.Studies were difficult to compare because they used a variety of solution volumes (60 mL to 125 mL per nostril), corticosteroid agents (budesonide, betamethasone, mometasone, or fluticasone), corticosteroid doses, preparation protocols (by compounding pharmacy or by patient), and administration (frequency, time of day, body positioning). It is difficult to determine which parameters might substantially influence clinical effects because studies were generally small, showed marginal benefits, and rarely assessed safety. To date, no studies evaluating CSI have shown statistically significant differences in a type-I error-controlled primary end point over any comparator, possibly owing to small sample sizes.Designing more robust clinical trials may help determine whether CSI is a valid treatment option. Until more evidence supporting CSI use exists, health care professionals should strongly consider choosing FDA-approved therapies for the treatment of CRS.

Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) are an established intervention to improve outcomes in preterm birth. ACS are optimally timed if the administration-to-birth interval is greater than 24 h and7 days. Evidence has emerged suggesting harm associated with administration-to-birth intervals greater than seven days, or with repeated courses of ACS. Pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of iatrogenic preterm birth, as delivery of the fetus and placenta remains the only cure. This study investigated optimal ACS use in women delivering before 35 weeks' gestation in the United Kingdom with a diagnosis of preterm pre-eclampsia. Of 1,632 women with suspected pre-eclampsia, 250 delivered before 35 weeks' gestation with pre-eclampsia. 31 % (78/250) received optimally timed ACS, 49 % (122/250) received ACS more than seven days pre-delivery and 20 % (50/250) did not receive ACS. There were no significant differences in gestational age, mean birthweight, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal unit admission or neonatal death between groups. There was a higher rate of intrauterine fetal death in the group of women who did not receive ACS (p 0.05), and a corresponding increase in vaginal delivery and reduction in caesarean section (p 0.05). Optimal ACS administration is poor in women delivering preterm with pre-eclampsia and the largest group of mistimed ACS administration were those given more than 7 days prior to birth. Clinicians should defer ACS until a decision for delivery has been made, at which point ACS should be prioritised. Judicious use of ACS may improve outcomes.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is associated with a significant disease burden. The optimal use of and administration route for intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) when managing CRSwNP are unclear.We systematically synthesized the evidence addressing INCS for CRSwNP.We searched studies archived in Medline, Embase, and Central from database inception until September 1, 2021, for randomized controlled trials comparing INCS using any delivery method to placebo or other INCS administration types. Paired reviewers screened records, abstracted data, and rated risk of bias (CLARITY revision of Cochrane Risk of Bias version 1 tool) independently and in duplicate. We synthesized the evidence for each outcome using random effects network meta-analyses. We critically appraised the evidence following the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.We analyzed 61 randomized controlled trials (7176 participants, 8 interventions). Sinusitis-related quality of life might improve with INCS rinse (mean difference [MD] -6.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] -11.94 to -1.71) and exhalation delivery system (EDS) (MD -7.86, 95% CI -14.64 to -1.08) compared to placebo (both low certainty evidence). Nasal obstruction symptoms are likely improved when receiving INCS via stent/dressing (MD -0.31, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.08), spray (MD -0.51, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.41), and EDS (MD -0.35, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.18) (all moderate to high certainty) compared to placebo. We found no important differences in adverse effects among interventions (moderate certainty for INCS spray, very low to low certainty for others).Multiple delivery forms of INCS are viable therapeutic options for CRSwNP, resulting in improvement of patient-important outcomes. INCS via stent, spray, and EDS appear to be beneficial across the widest range of considered outcomes.

Medical treatment options for patients with rhinitis during pregnancy need careful considerations. It is important to distinguish between the causes of rhinitis, as this can influence treatment. Conservative options are important for patients with pregnancy-induced rhinitis (PIR) and pre-existing allergic or non-allergic rhinitis. Education and knowledge that PIR symptoms will resolve after pregnancy can offer some relief. Other strategies such as exercise, positioning, saline nasal douching/lavage, and nasal valve dilators are safe in pregnancy and can have a benefit in these patients with rhinitis of any aetiology. The main medical therapies usually used in rhinitis cannot always be directly translated to pregnant patients due to potential teratogenic effects. Topical corticosteroids have generally shown to be safe with budesonide having the strongest recommendations. Oral corticosteroids are mostly used in moderate-severe disease and should be avoided in the first trimester. Oral decongestants have associations with cardiac, ear, gut and limb abnormalities and are not recommended in the first trimester. Loratadine and cetirizine have been the most well-studied second-generation antihistamines and are generally considered safe. There has been no reported increased risk of teratogenicity with anticholinergics or cromones, with the latter being one of the first line options in pregnant women with allergic rhinitis. The role of allergen immunotherapy needs further research, but current guidance states it can be continued if already initiated prior to pregnancy. The management of rhinitis in pregnancy can therefore be complex. This review aims to evaluate the current medical management options for rhinitis in pregnancy.

An 81-year-old woman developed painful vision loss to hand motions in the right eye over a several-day period. Dilated fundus examination revealed no acute pathology, but automated perimetry showed a superotemporal visual field defect in the asymptomatic left eye, suggestive of a junctional scotoma. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated enhancement of the right optic nerve extending to its junction with the optic chiasm. The patient's vision failed to improve with intravenous corticosteroids, but demonstrated significant improvement with therapeutic plasma exchange. She was subsequently found to be seropositive for aquaporin-4 autoantibodies, confirming the diagnosis of neuromyelitis optic spectrum disorder.

COPD is a leading cause of death and disability. COPD therapy goals include reducing exacerbations and improving symptom control. Single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) or multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) is indicated for patients with frequent exacerbations despite bronchodilator therapy. No available evidence compares SITT vs MITT in Spain in terms of treatment persistence, exacerbations, and other outcomes. Do COPD patients in Spain initiating SITT vs MITT have improved persistence, exacerbations, and health care resource utilization? This real-world, observational, retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records in the Spanish National Healthcare System BIG-PAC database to identify COPD patients aged ≥ 40 years initiating SITT or MITT (using two or three inhalers) between June 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019. Comparative data on persistence (allowing up to 60 days without prescription refill), exacerbation rates, and health care resource utilization and costs during 12-month follow-up were analyzed. Multivariate adjusted analyses were performed. Eligible patients (N = 4,625) initiating SITT (n = 1,011) or MITT (n = 3,614) had a mean age of 70.9 years; most were male (73.9%) with mainly moderate (62.0%) or severe (26.5%) airflow limitation. Between-cohort baseline characteristics were similar. At 12-month follow-up, SITT patients had higher persistence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.22-1.53; P Patients initiating SITT had a clinically relevant improvement in persistence leading to reductions in mortality, incidence of exacerbations, and health care resource use with consequent mean cost savings.

Previous studies indicate that suboptimal medication adherence may contribute to uncontrolled asthma. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines recommend treatment escalation to biologics for patients with uncontrolled asthma despite adherence to high-dose maintenance medication and who have eosinophilic/allergic biomarkers or require maintenance oral corticosteroids.This study aimed to describe the clinical status of patients with asthma escalated to biologic therapy.This retrospective claims database analysis enrolled US patients with asthma who were escalated to biologics between January 2016 and June 2020. Exacerbations, control status, GINA step, and maintenance medication adherence during the 12 months before biologic therapy initiation were analyzed. Asthma control was assessed using both the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) and Stempel criteria. Adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) by maintenance medication claims.Of 1786 patients escalated to biologics, 506 were included for analysis. During the 12 months before escalation, 346 patients had confirmed exacerbations. Uncontrolled asthma status was estimated in 55% and 70% of patients (ERS/ATS and Stempel criteria, respectively). GINA step was inferred for 395 patients: 154 were at step 2, 11 at step 3, 104 at step 4, and 126 at step 5. Of 403 patients with maintenance medication claims, 63% had suboptimal maintenance medication adherence (PDC80%).In this study, most patients initiating biologic therapy had mild-to-moderate asthma or suboptimal maintenance medication adherence, possibly indicating inappropriate escalation. Incorporating objective medication adherence monitoring into existing guidelines may reduce inappropriate escalation to biologics.

Introduction High-volume corticosteroid nasal irrigation is a treatment option in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. In Brazil, alternatives are used to optimize its cost and popularize its use, such as 1% compounded budesonide drops or betamethasone cream, and it is necessary to study these treatment modalities. Objective To evaluate the clinical response of nasal irrigation with 1% compounded budesonide drops or betamethasone cream compared to nasal sprays utilized in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Methods This was a retrospective observational study with 257 patients. One hundred and eight patients using corticosteroid nasal irrigation (292 treatment cycles) and 149 using corticosteroid nasal spray (300 treatment cycles) were included. Evaluation of subjective improvement, adverse events, exacerbations, and objective assessments with SNOT-22 and Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score were performed, in addition to sub-analyses related to nasal polyps and previous surgery. Results Corticosteroid nasal irrigation and corticosteroid nasal spray improved the Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score, with more adverse events in the corticosteroid nasal irrigation group. Previous surgery increased corticosteroid nasal irrigation improvement, with greater subjective improvement and fewer exacerbations. 1% compounded budesonide drops were better than betamethasone cream in the Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score, with fewer adverse events. A 1,000 µg dose of 1% compounded budesonide drops was more effective than 500 µg. Conclusion Corticosteroid nasal irrigation was effective in improving the Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score in chronic rhinosinusitis, especially in patients with nasal polyps and previous surgery, in addition to promoting a higher rate of subjective improvement and fewer exacerbations than corticosteroid nasal spray, but with more adverse events. 1% compounded budesonide drops improved the Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score with fewer adverse events than betamethasone cream, particularly at higher doses (1000 µg).

Corticosteroids, often known as steroids, are anti-inflammatory medicine prescribed for various conditions. There is accumulating evidence of immune dysregulation in major psychiatric disorders. Significant changes in concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers (i.e., IL-6 and TNF-a) have been previously reported in individuals with schizophrenia, autistic individuals, and depressive patients. Thus, systemic corticosteroids can be used as an adjuvant treatment to reduce inflammation in major psychiatric disorders. However, despite their well-known potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant properties, this treatment is often associated with increased severity of several psychiatric symptoms and relapse. This article reviews the available literature on psychiatric and cognitive changes during corticosteroid therapy. Specifically, we will provide data on the good and the bad of corticosteroid therapy in autism, schizophrenia, mood disorders, and PTSD. This review will summarize the vital role of corticosteroid therapy in social and cognitive behavior.

Trigger finger is a frequent complaint in which corticosteroid infiltrations play a relevant therapeutic role in intermediate degrees of severity when conservative treatment has not worked. However, there are no criteria to select which patients will benefit most from this procedure. The present study aimed to identify the factors leading to the therapeutic success of corticosteroid infiltration in these patients.We designed a prospective longitudinal study based on routine clinical practice with adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of trigger finger grade II or III on the Quinnell scale, who underwent an infiltration of 20 mg of triamcinolone acetate. The outcome variables were to achieve a Quinnell grade I or reduce the severity of the symptoms by at least one category two months after the procedure. To identify the determinants of complete or partial therapeutic success, binary logistic regression predictive modelling was performed using those variables that had a satisfactory univariate correlation.74 patients were included over three years, 42 of whom (61.8%) were classified as Quinnell grade III. After infiltration, 22 (32.4%) achieved complete resolution and 50 (73.5%) partial resolution. The variables tendon thickening (HR 10.72; 95%CI 2.88-39.93; P .001) and progression time (HR 1.23; 95%CI 1.02-1.49; P = .027) proved to be predictors of therapeutic success in complete resolution. For the modelling for partial resolution, the same variables proved to be determining predictors (HR 5.57; 95%CI 1.38-22.41; P = .016 and HR 1.18; 95%CI .99-1.41; P = .051, respectively). Pulley thickening did not demonstrate predictive ability in either model.Our results indicate that the demonstration of finger flexor apparatus thickening is the main determining factor for the success of corticosteroid infiltrations in this pathology. This is in agreement with the histological findings of specimens obtained from both tenosynovial and pulley tissue. In the former, in addition to an infiltrate of inflammatory characteristics, the presence of chondrocytoid cells producing hyaluronic acid is demonstrated. Although the therapeutic success of infiltrations in previous studies reaches 70%, the recurrence rate is similar after 12 months. The selection of patients with tendon thickening ensures therapeutic success in the short term, could reduce recurrence in the long term, and avoid delay in release surgery.

As many as 15% to 20% of patients with asthma have incompletely or poorly controlled asthma despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonist bronchodilators. They are vulnerable to burdensome symptoms, limitations to their exercise capacity, and asthma attacks that can be frightening and potentially life-threatening. This article outlines a systematic approach to their evaluation, attempting to identify remediable factors that are making their asthma more severe than most other persons with asthma. This approach includes an emphasis on ensuring the correct diagnosis, minimizing exposures to stimuli that worsen airway inflammation, alleviating modifiable comorbidities such as chronic rhinosinusitis and gastroesophageal reflux, and supporting regular medication adherence and effective technique for administering inhaled medications. A basic diagnostic laboratory work-up is recommended, to be modified and amplified according to individual patient needs.

Providers caring for patients with severe, therapy-resistant asthma have novel options for their treatment. Administration of additional inhaled corticosteroids at the time of increased symptoms, a strategy referred to as anti-inflammatory rescue or AIR, has been proved to be effective in reducing the frequency of exacerbations and improving asthma-related quality of life. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists can be used in combination with long-acting beta-agonist bronchodilators for additional bronchodilation. The care of the patient with severe asthma must also include a strategy to help avoid severe, life-threatening asthma attacks, with intense patient education and a recommended survival toolkit.

Autoimmune neuropathies are often treatable. First-line immunotherapies include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasma exchange and corticosteroids. However, nearly 15-30% of patients are either refractory, partially responsive or chronically dependent on these first-line agents. Lack of full response leads to increased disability in addition to adverse financial implications. Consequently, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments to manage this subset of patients. There has been a remarkable increase in the knowledge about immunopathogenesis, antigenic targets, clinical phenotype correlation, and novel therapeutic agents in the last two decades. These novel agents target specific components of the immune system (humoral, cellular immunity, and complement) and have the potential to improve the management of these disorders. Unfortunately, high-quality evidence from large, controlled studies is scarce considering the relative rarity of these refractory cases, heterogeneity of clinical presentations and ethical concerns limiting the use of a placebo arm. An adaptive clinical trial design in a homogenous cohort with standardized outcomes in multiple centers and the use of historical controls will likely provide valuable scientific evidence about the efficacy and safety of these therapies. In this review, we examine the status of the newer immunotherapies in the treatment of autoimmune neuropathies based on existing data.

Spondylolysis is a defect of the pars interarticularis of vertebrae, most commonly seen at L5 and L4. The etiology of spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis is generally considered to be a result of repetitive mechanical stress to the weak portion of the vertebrae. A higher incidence of spondylolysis is observed in young athletes. Symptomatic spondylolysis can be successfully treated conservatively, but there is currently a limited consensus on treatment modalities and a lack of large-scale clinical trials.The purpose of the present study was to investigate the optimal treatment algorithm for symptomatic spondylolysis in adolescent athletes and evaluate the functional outcomes of those undergoing the nonoperative treatment.A retrospective review.Two hundred one adolescent patients ranging from age 10 to 19 involved in athletics OUTCOME MEASURES: Injury characteristics (age, mechanism, time), sports played, bone stimulator use, bony healing at 3 months on computed tomography (CT) scans, return to sports, corticosteroid injection use.Two hundred one adolescent athlete patients (62 females and 139 males) diagnosed with spondylolysis between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnosis was based on plain radiography followed by magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were treated conservatively with cessation of sports activity, thoracolumbosacral orthosis, and external bone stimulator for three months after diagnosis. CT scans were obtained for the 3-month follow-up visits to assess bony healing. Subsequently the patients received 6 weeks of rehabilitation focused on core strengthening. Symptomatic patients after the treatment were referred for steroid injections and continued with the rehabilitation protocol.The most common age of injury was 15 years old, following a strong normal distribution. The most commonly played sport was football, followed by baseball/softball. The primary mechanism of injury was weight training closely followed by a football injury. The first quarter of the calendar year had the highest incidence of injuries with the most injuries occurring in March and the least occurring in December. One hundred fifty-two athletes reported using bone stimulators as prescribed, and these patients showed a significantly higher rate of bony healing on follow-up CT scans than those who did not use bone stimulators. One hundred ninety-seven patients (98%) returned to sports or similar level of activities. Thirty-seven patients (18%) received facet or epidural steroid injections due to continued pain and one patient underwent a surgical procedure. Follow-up CT scans showed 49.8% bony healing.Conservative treatment of spondylolysis in adolescent athletes with cessation of sports, thoracolumbosacral orthosis, and bone stimulator followed by rehabilitation was associated with excellent outcomes in terms of return to sports.

Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is the most common type of severe epilepsy in infants. However, etiological frequency and optimized therapy, particularly corticosteroid regimen and dose, remain unknown.An ambispective study of an IESS-diagnosed cohort was conducted. Etiologies were evaluated based on the 2017 International League Against Epilepsy classification system. Patients received intravenous dexamethasone or methylprednisolone for 3-5 consecutive days, followed by usual-dose (2 mg/kg/d) oral prednisone for 60-90 days with tapering doses for 1-2 months or high-dose (4 mg/kg/d) oral prednisone for 9-11 days with tapering doses for 2-4 weeks. Treatment responses were compared between the usual and high-dose prednisone groups after propensity score matching. Correlation analysis between treatment responses and underlying etiology was performed.Of the 441 included participants, 218 (49.4%) cases had proven etiologies. The most common etiology of IESS was acquired-structural (23.6%), followed by genetic (15.4%) and congenital-structural (7.0%). Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (55, 52.8%) was the most common acquired-structural etiology. Among the 242 patients administered corticosteroids, 95 received usual-dose oral prednisone and 147 received high-dose oral prednisone. After propensity score matching, 54 patients were included in the usual-dose and high-dose groups, respectively, and treatment effectiveness was compared. There were no significant differences in seizure freedom at days 13-14 (55.6% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.700) and continued seizure freedom between days 14-42 (29.6% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.311) post corticosteroid administration between the usual- and high-dose prednisone groups. The proportion of children achieving seizure cessation at days 13-14 (χIESS etiology was primarily related to structural causes. Clinical response in short-term follow-up was independent of prednisone dosage and underlying etiology. Better EEG responses may occur in patients with unknown etiology.

Systemic corticosteroids are commonly prescribed for palliation of dyspnoea in patients with cancer, despite scarce evidence to support their use. We aimed to assess the effect of high-dose dexamethasone versus placebo on cancer-related dyspnoea.The parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, controlled ABCD (Alleviating Breathlessness in Cancer Patients with Dexamethasone) trial was done at the at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and the general oncology clinic at Lyndon B Johnson General Hospital (both in Houston, TX, USA). Ambulatory patients with cancer, aged 18 years or older, and with an average dyspnoea intensity score on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0=none, 10=worst) over the past week of 4 or higher were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive dexamethasone 8 mg orally every 12 h for 7 days followed by 4 mg orally every 12 h for 7 days, or matching placebo capsules for 14 days. Pharmacists did permuted block randomisation with a block size of six, and patients were stratified by baseline dyspnoea score (4-6 vs 7-10) and study site. Patients, research staff, and clinicians were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was change in dyspnoea NRS intensity over the past 24 h from baseline to day 7 (±2 days). Analyses were done by modified intention-to-treat (ie, including all patients who were randomly assigned and started the study treatment, regardless of whether they completed the study). Enrolment was stopped after the second preplanned interim analysis, when the futility criterion was met. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03367156) and is now completed.Between Jan 11, 2018, and April 23, 2021, we screened 2867 patients, enrolled 149 patients, and randomly assigned 128 to dexamethasone (n=85) or placebo (n=43). The mean change in dyspnoea NRS intensity from baseline to day 7 (±2 days) was -1·6 (95% CI -2·0 to -1·2) in the dexamethasone group and -1·6 (-2·3 to -0·9) in the placebo group, with no significant between-group difference (mean 0 [95% CI -0·8 to 0·7]; p=0·48). The most common all-cause grade 3-4 adverse events were infections (nine [11%] of 85 patients in the dexamethasone group vs three [7%] of 43 in the placebo group), insomnia (seven [8%] vs one [2%]), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (three [4%] vs none [0%]). Serious adverse events, all resulting in hospital admissions, were reported in 24 (28%) of 85 patients in the dexamethasone group and in three (7%) of 43 patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either group.High-dose dexamethasone did not improve dyspnoea in patients with cancer more effectively than placebo and was associated with a higher frequency of adverse events. These data suggest that dexamethasone should not be routinely given to unselected patients with cancer for palliation of dyspnoea.US National Cancer Institute.

Exposure to any form of glucocorticoid preparation is associated with a risk of adrenal insufficiency (AI).To establish the contribution of oral corticosteroid (OCS) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) exposure to the risk of AI in a cohort of patients (n = 80) with severe, uncontrolled asthma.We compiled individualized cumulative OCS and ICS exposure data using a combination of health care records and electronic inhaler monitoring using an Inhaler Compliance Assessment device and estimated the risk of AI for each participant using a morning serum cortisol concentration.The predicted prevalence of AI based on morning cortisol concentrations was 25% (20 of 80). Participants on maintenance OCS therapy had the highest risk of AI at 60% (6 of 10) compared with 17% (11 of 65) in those with no recent OCS exposure. Morning serum cortisol correlated negatively with both OCS exposure (mg/kg prednisolone) (r = -0.4; P .0002) and ICS exposure (mg/kg fluticasone propionate) (r = -0.26; P = .019). Logistic regression of risk of AI against the number of standard treatment courses of OCS demonstrated a positive relationship although this did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.97-2.05; P = .073). Logistic regression analysis, categorizing patients as high-risk AI (cortisol130 nmol/L) or not (cortisol130 nmol/L), showed that cumulative ICS exposure remained a significant predictor of AI, even when exposure to OCS was controlled for (odds ratio, 2.17 per 1 mg/kg increase in cumulative fluticasone propionate exposure; 95% CI, 1.06-4.42; P = .033).Our data suggest that AI is common among patients with asthma and highlights that the risk of AI is associated with both high-dose ICS therapy and intermittent treatment courses of OCS.

Initiation of treatment of COPD with a combination of a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is frequent irrespective of the risk of exacerbations.We performed a retrospective, population-based, observational study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of a LABA/long-acting antimuscarinic agent (LAMA) and LABA/ICS in patients with COPD over a one-year follow-up. Data were obtained from an administrative healthcare claims database. The primary outcome was the risk of first exacerbation. A sensitivity analysis was conducted in a propensity-score matched population.The population consisted of 14,046 COPD patients; 11,329 (80.6%) initiated LABA/ICS and 2717 (19.4%) LABA/LAMA. The matched population included 1650 patients in each arm. During follow-up, 69.6% patients in the LABA/ICS group and 64.4% in the LABA/LAMA group presented an exacerbation. The mean time to the first exacerbation was 6.03 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.94-6.12) for LABA/ICS and 6.4 months (95%CI: 6.21-6.59) for LABA/LAMA; p0.001. The time to scalation to triple therapy was also significantly prolonged in LABA/LAMA. Similar results were obtained in the matched population. LABA/LAMA was associated with a significantly lower risk of exacerbations and escalation to triple therapy compared to LABA/ICS, except in patients with frequent exacerbations and high blood eosinophils in which no differences were observed in the time to first exacerbation.Initiation of treatment with LABA/LAMA was associated with a lower risk of exacerbation and escalation to triple therapy compared to LABA/ICS in the majority of patients with COPD in primary care.

We sought to determine if corticosteroid administration is associated with a SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test-positive result and to describe therapies administered to SARS-CoV-2 infected children.We collected cross-sectional data from participants recruited in 41 pediatric emergency departments (ED) in 10 countries between March 2020 and June 2021. Participants were18 years old, had signs or symptoms of, or risk factors for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, and had nucleic acid testing performed. To determine if SARS-CoV-2 test status was independently associated with corticosteroid administration, we used a multivariable conditional logistic regression model matched by study site to compare treatments administered based on SARS-CoV-2 test and disposition status. This analysis was repeated for the subgroup of study participants who were hospitalized.30.3% (3,121/10,315) of participants were SARS-CoV-2-positive. Although remdesivir was more commonly administered to SARS-CoV-2-positive children, use was infrequent (25/3120 [0.8%] vs 1/7188 [0.01%]; P = .001). Corticosteroid use was less common among SARS-CoV-2-positive children (219/3120 [7.0%] vs 759/7190 [10.6%]; P.001). Among hospitalized children, there were no differences in provision of inotropes, respiratory support, chest drainage or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between groups. Corticosteroid administration was associated with age, history of asthma, wheezing, study month, hospitalization and intensive care unit admission; it was not associated with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result overall (aOR: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.74, 1.12) or among the subgroup of those hospitalized (aOR: 1.04; 95%CI: 0.75, 1.44).Few disease-specific treatments are provided to SARS-CoV-2-positive children; clinical trials evaluating therapies in children are urgently needed.

To evaluate the effect and safety of corticosteroid (CS) treatment in patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS).Patients with and without CS were retrospectively compared by Cox regression and 1:1 propensity score matching analysis to evaluate the effects of CS on mortality and secondary infections in patients with SFTS.A total of 467 patients with SFTS were enrolled in the cohort study, there were 52 fatal cases and 415 nonfatal cases, the overall fatality rate was 11.1%. The mortality was observed in 36/144 (25%) and 16/323 (5%) patients in the CS-treated and non-CS-treated groups, respectively (P0.001). Multi variate Cox regression analysis showed that the difference was not statistically significant for CS treatment in fatality (P0.05, aHR 0.767, 95% CI 0.360-1.634). Difference in survival time between the CS-treated and non-CS-treated groups after propensity score matching had no statistical significance (Log-rank test P = 0.390), whereas there was a significant difference in secondary infections between the CS-treated and non-CS-treated groups (P = 0.007).Although the CS treatment had no impact on fatality in patients with SFTS, it increased the risk of secondary infections. Administration of CS in patients with SFTS should be carefully considered and evaluated the balance between therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects.

To investigate the clinical outcomes and risk factors of mortality in patients with rheumatic diseases complicated by Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP).Between November 2015 and April 2021, patients with rheumatic diseases with PCP in a tertiary referral hospital were retrospectively enrolled. The diagnosis of PCP requires the fulfillment of clinical, radiographic, and microbiological criteria. Factors associated with in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality were evaluated.A total of 128 patients with rheumatic diseases who had a positive quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for Pneumocystis jirovecii were screened, and 72 patients were included in the final analysis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) pneumonia severity index (PSI) was 101.5 (77.0-132.0). The median (IQR) adjunctive corticosteroid dosage was 0.6 (0.4-0.9) mg/kg/day prednisolone equivalent. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff point of median adjunctive corticosteroid dosage was 0.6 mg/kg/day to predict in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, median adjunctive corticosteroid dosage ≥0.6 mg/kg/day and PSI90 were independent factors of in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality.A median adjunctive corticosteroid dosage of ≥0.6 mg/kg/day might be associated with mortality in patients with rheumatic diseases complicated by PCP.

Patients with asthma who are suboptimally responsive to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to describe a recent case of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) that rapidly progressed post corticosteroid treatment while also providing a review of the existing literature on CGCG of the head and neck (HNCGCG), with particular emphasis on extra-mandibular and maxillary cases. Materials and Methods: The investigators designed and implemented a 32-year review of literature, using the online databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and Proquest. The total number of cases analyzed was 55 (42 case reports; 3 case series; 8 comparative studies; 1 retrospective cohort). Case Presentation: We present a case of a CGCG in a 10-year old male. The lesion originated in the right anterior mandibular body and progressed after corticosteroid treatment. Diagnosis was made using a combination of imaging and histology. A timely debulking procedure of the hemi-mandible was performed and there was no recurrence of the lesion at follow up. Results: The average age at the time of diagnosis of CGCG was 27.5 years. HNCGCG was most commonly detected in the jaw (43.1%), but was also found in the temporal bone (33.3%). The most frequently employed treatment modality was complete surgical excision (76.9%). 93.2% of patients were alive with no evidence of disease at follow-up, while 6.8% of patients exhibited recurrence at follow-up. The median follow up was 13 months. Conclusion: It is important for clinicians to recognize that CGCGs are capable of manifesting outside of the jaw. CGCG should be considered in the differential diagnosis of non-odontogenic radiolucent lesions, especially in young patients. CGCGs also need to be distinguished from brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism (BTH) and giant cell tumors, which are histologically similar.

The best therapeutic approach to patients with asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO) is unknown. Current treatment recommendations rely on expert opinions, roundtable discussions, and strategy documents, because patients with ACO have been excluded from most clinical studies in asthma and COPD. Because of the underlying asthma initial therapy, early use of inhaled corticosteroids along with a long-acting bronchodilator is recommended. If maintenance inhaler therapy is not effective, advanced therapies based on phenotyping and identification of treatable traits may be considered.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic autoimmune disease that is associated with the development of non-caseating granulomas. The disease especially affects the lymph nodes, lungs, skin and eyes. It is an infrequent but not rare disease, especially in northern Europe, the United States and India. Sarcoidosis affects more women and is diagnosed between the ages of 30 and 50. Etiopathogenically, it is closely linked to environmental factors, especially occupational exposures. Clinically, it stands out for a wide variety of presentation phenotypes (casual diagnosis, involvement of a single organ or systemic presentation). The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is complex and requires the integration of clinical, analytical, radiological, and histolopathogical data carried out by multidisciplinary clinical units. The evolution of the disease is variable, as is the indication for systemic treatment, based on the use of corticosteroids as first-line option, the use of immunosuppressants as second-line therapy, and anti-TNF agents in severe and/or refractory cases.

In veterinary medicine, calcinosis circumscripta is a morphological diagnosis for which the cause may be known or idiopathic. The aetiology of the lesion must be investigated because the nature of the underlying disease process will dictate appropriate treatment. We present a case of oral calcinosis circumscripta in a cat caused by a wasp sting and associated with moderate unilateral facial oedema. Following corticosteroid therapy and oedema resolution, hyperaemic, circular, firm, elevated lesions were observed on the buccal mucosa and evolved into whitish, slightly elevated multifocal plaques with an irregular surface. As antibiotic and corticosteroid therapy was ineffective, an excisional biopsy was performed after 6 months of lesion development and a diagnosis of calcinosis circumscripta of dystrophic aetiology was made. To our knowledge, this is the first report of calcinosis circumscripta in association with an insect sting in an animal. Insect stings should be included in the differential diagnosis of calcinosis circumscripta in cats.

Overuse of oral corticosteroids (OCS) is associated with serious adverse effects. It is currently unknown what proportion of patients with asthma regularly use these drugs, or whether they are optimally treated by specialists to minimize the use of these drugs.To investigate (1) the prevalence of patients requiring ≥2 courses or maintenance use of OCS (ie, frequent users), (2) their use of inhaled corticosteroids, and (3) who prescribed their asthma medications.We analyzed OCS prescription data (Dutch IQVIA Prescription Database) focusing on adult patients receiving asthma medication between March 2017 and March 2018 (focus year). An OCS course was defined as ≥20 mg prednisolone equivalent for 3 to 28 days; maintenance OCS as 2.5 to 17.5 mg/day for28 days. Prescribers were classified as specialist or general practitioners.Of 182,849 adults taking asthma medications, 77.8% had not received a prescription for OCS and 7.2% of patients were frequent OCS users: 2.6% received ≥2 OCS courses and 4.6% were on maintenance OCS. Of the frequent OCS users, 45.8% received only low or medium doses (500 μg/day) of inhaled corticosteroids. Within the preceding 3 years (2014-2017), 51.1% and 34.3% of patients prescribed ≥2 OCS courses or maintenance OCS, respectively, had received prescriptions from a general practitioner without medication adjustments by a specialist.This prescription-fill study shows that 7.2% of Dutch patients with asthma were overexposed to OCS, of whom only about half used adequate doses of inhaled corticosteroids, and 40.3% had not received specialist intervention within the previous 3 years. This suggests that OCS overuse is often underdiagnosed and inadequately addressed.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with eosinophilic airway inflammation represents a distinct phenotype that might respond to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) might predict eosinophilic inflammation and guide treatment option. We hypothesized that COPD patients with different baseline levels of FENO might have differentiated response to treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) or tiotropium (TIO).This open-label, randomized-controlled trial enrolled treatment-naïve COPD patients who were stratified into high- (≥23.5ppb) and low-FENO group, followed by 12-week treatment with SFC or TIO. A linear mixed model with repeated measures was applied to analyze the changes in FENO (primary outcome), COPD assessment test (CAT) score, FEV134 patients were divided into 4 subgroups: low-FENO/SFC (n=30), low-FENO/TIO (n=29), high-FENO/SFC (n=37), and high-FENO/TIO (n=38). At baseline, FENO 23.5ppb clearly differentiated between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic inflammation groups based on the eosinophils in induced sputum and blood. FENO significantly correlated with sputum and blood eosinophils at baseline. High-FENO/SFC (vs. high-FENO/TIO) subgroup had significant reduction in FENO and sputum inflammation profiles (including eosinophils, macrophages, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and interlukin-8) after treatment. These differences were not replicated between low-FENO/SFC and low-FENO/TIO subgroups. The improvement in CAT and FEVHigh baseline FENO can serve as an indicator of eosinophilic airway inflammation in COPD patients who may respond favorably to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting βClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02546349.

To construct an algorithm to optimize clinical outcomes in subacromial impingement based on current, high-level evidence.A systematic review of all clinical trials on subacromial impingement published from 1999 to 2020 was performed. Demographic, clinical, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) data were collected. Interventions were compared via arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis in a random-effects model and treatments ranked via surface under the cumulative ranking curves with respect to 3 domains: pain, PROMs, and ROM.A total of 35 studies comprising 3,643 shoulders (42% female, age 50 ± 5 years) were included. Arthroscopic decompression with acromioplasty ranked much greater than arthroscopic decompression alone for pain relief and PROM improvement, but the difference in absolute PROMs was not statistically significant. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) alone demonstrated inferior outcomes across all 3 domains (pain, PROMs, and ROM) with low cumulative rankings. Physical therapy (PT) with CSI demonstrated moderate-to-excellent clinical improvement across all 3 domains whereas PT alone demonstrated excellent ROM and low-moderate outcomes in pain and PROM domains. PT with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or alternative therapies ranked highly for PROM outcomes and moderate for pain and ROM domains. Finally, platelet-rich plasma injections demonstrated moderate outcomes for pain, forward flexion, and abduction with very low-ranking outcomes for PROMs and external rotation.Arthroscopic decompression with acromioplasty and PT demonstrated superior outcomes whereas CSI demonstrated poor outcomes in all 3 domains (pain, PROMs, and ROM). For patients with significant symptoms, the authors recommend PT with CSI as a first-line treatment, followed by acromioplasty and PT if conservative treatment fails. For patients with symptoms limited to 1 to 2 domains, the authors recommend a shared decision-making approach focusing on treatment rankings within domains pertinent to individual patient symptomatology.I, systematic review and network meta-analysis of Level I studies.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an important cause of cardiomyopathy. The trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with CS undergoing treatment remains unclear. Patients with CS who were treated with corticosteroids and who underwent transthoracic echocardiography were studied. Baseline characteristics, treatment, echocardiographic data (including baseline to follow-up change in LVEF), and outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Among 100 patients, 55 had baseline reduced LVEF (50%), and 45 had preserved LVEF (≥50%). At follow-up, 82% of patients demonstrated stable or improved LVEF. Change in LVEF was significantly higher in the baseline reduced than in the preserved LVEF group (5% [interquartile range 0 to 15] vs 0% [interquartile range -10% to 5%], p = 0.001). There was no difference in corticosteroid exposure or use of heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy between patients who did experience improvement in LVEF and those who did not experience improvement in LVEF. On multivariable analysis, baseline reduced LVEF (Odds ratio 54.89, 95% confidence interval 3.84 to 785.09, p = 0.003) and complete heart block (Odds ratio 28.88, 95% confidence interval 2.17 to 383.74, p = 0.011) at presentation were significantly associated with reduced LVEF after treatment. In conclusion, most patients with CS treated with corticosteroids maintain or improve LV systolic function. Cardiac characteristics at presentation impact prognosis in CS, despite treatment.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are well-documented entities in pediatric solid organ transplantation. However, the diseases are rare after bone marrow transplantation (BMT).We present an adolescent male with hemoglobin E-β-thalassemia who underwent BMT and developed chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) mimicking EGIDs. Initially, the patient presented with a presumed diagnosis of eosinophilic gastroenteritis (subserosal type) and received corticosteroids for 12 weeks. Six months after corticosteroids cessation, he again developed abdominal pain, treated with corticosteroids, azathioprine, and a six-food elimination diet. Still, he later had similar symptoms with persistent hypereosinophilia. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with chronic GVHD after excluding various potential causes. Ruxolitinib also led to significant clinical improvement and the disappearance of eosinophilia.The differential diagnosis of chronic GVHD should be a concern in BMT recipients with persistent gastrointestinal symptoms and eosinophilia. Ruxolitinib may be a treatment option in children with a steroid-refractory disease.

Legionnaire's disease is a community-acquired pneumonia caused by the Gram-negative bacterium Legionella pneumophila. This disease is often associated with neurological symptoms, the clinical presentation of which can be very varied.We report a 47-year-old female patient who developed Legionnaires' disease with cerebellar symptoms (ataxia, dysarthria and hypermetria). Laboratory tests revealed a biological inflammatory syndrome. The cerebrospinal fluid was sterile. Urinary antigen test and serology were positive for L. pneumophila. An interstitial syndrome of the right upper lobe was detected on chest computed tomography (CT) scan. Brain imaging (magnetic resonance imaging and CT angiography) showed no abnormalities. The outcome was favourable after treatment with spiramycin, levofloxacin and corticosteroids.Few cases only (n=110) of Legionnaires' disease with cerebellar symptoms have been reported in the literature. The pathogenic mechanism behind neurological dysfunction in patients with Legionnaires' disease is unknown. Neurological symptoms improve with antibiotic therapy and corticosteroids. Extra-pulmonary forms of Legionnaires' disease are frequent, with neurological symptoms being the most common symptoms. Cerebellar dysfunction may be underestimated and requires appropriate management with antibiotic therapy and corticosteroid therapy. Recommendations for the management of Legionnaire's disease with severe extra-pulmonary symptoms are needed.

Uveitis is among the leading causes of visual loss in the working age population. In noninfectious uveitis, corticosteroids are the first line therapy. We sought to review systematically the evidence regarding the regional corticosteroid delivery modalities in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. A 5-database search (Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus) was performed from inception to February, 2021. Nineteen studies with a total of 1,935 eyes of 1,753 patients were selected from 8,922 abstracts retrieved by the initial search. The most frequently compared regimens were intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and orbital floor triamcinolone acetonide injection (2 studies), intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection (2 studies), and posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection with the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (2 studies). Our results show that the intravitreal injection of corticosteroids is more effective, but is associated with more adverse events, than periocular injection. Some evidence supports the use of subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide over intravitreal/periocular triamcinolone acetonide. Moreover, the overall results of 0.59 mg dosage of the intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant were superior to those from the 2.1 mg dose. The evidence, however, is not robust, and further studies with standardized outcomes are warranted.

Spinal region corticosteroid injections (CSI) are intended to act locally to relieve radicular or axial back pain, however some systemic absorption occurs, potentially placing recipients at risk for immunosuppressive effects of corticosteroids. No previous studies examine whether patients undergoing spinal region CSI are at increased risk for viral infections, particularly influenza-a common viral illness with potentially serious consequences, especially for patients with multimorbidity.To examine odds of influenza in patients who received spinal region CSI compared to matched controls.Retrospective cohort study.Adults (n=9,196) who received a spinal CSI (epidural, facet, sacroiliac, paravertebral block) during influenza seasons occurring from 2000 to 2020 were 1:1 matched to controls without spinal CSI.The primary outcome was odds of influenza diagnosis in spinal CSI patients compared to matched controls. Predetermined subgroup analyses examined odds of influenza diagnosis based on vaccination status and injection location.An institutional database was queried to identify patients that received spinal CSI during influenza season (September 1 to April 30) from 2000 to 2020. Patients were matched by age, sex, and influenza vaccination status to controls without spinal CSI within the specified influenza season. Influenza diagnosis was ascertained using International Classification of Disease codes and data was analyzed using multiple logistic regression adjusted for comorbidities associated with increased risk for influenza.A total of 9,196 adults (mean age 60.8 years, 60.4% female) received a spinal CSI and were matched to a control. There were no increased odds of influenza for spinal CSI patients as compared to matched controls (OR 1.13, [95% CI, 0.86-1.48]). When subgroups were examined, there were also no increased odds of influenza for spinal CSI patients based on immunization status (unvaccinated or vaccinated) or spinal injection location (epidural or non-epidural).Spinal region CSI was not associated with increased odds of influenza or reduced vaccine efficacy. This is reassuring given the analgesic and functional restoration benefits of these injections. Assessing risk of viral infection associated with spinal CSI is particularly relevant in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, and further work is needed to address this issue.

Objectives To determine the incidence and characteristics of superinfections in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, and the impact of dexamethasone as standard therapy. Methods This multicentre, observational, retrospective study included patients ≥ 18 years admitted from March 1st 2020 to January 31st 2021 with COVID-19 infection who received mechanical ventilation. Patient characteristics, clinical characteristics, therapy and survival were examined. Results 155/156 patients (115 men, mean age 62 years, range 26-84 years) were included. 67 patients (43%) had 90 superinfections, pneumonia dominated (78%). Superinfections were associated with receiving dexamethasone (66% vs 32%, p

The identification of patients at high risk for diseases provides clinicians essential information to better manage such patients. Persistent chronic cough (PCC) is a condition with high clinical burden and limited knowledge of the risk factors that drive the persistent symptoms.To understand the risk factors of PCC in patients with CC diagnosed by specialists.In this retrospective study, adults aged 18 to 85 years diagnosed with CC by a pulmonologist, allergist, otolaryngologist, or gastroenterologist in the period 2011 to 2016 were identified. PCC was defined by another CC code or at least 2 cough events at least 8 weeks but no more than 4 months apart in each of the 2 consecutive years beginning 1 year after the original CC diagnosis. Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios with 95% CI for patient characteristics at baseline in relationship to PCC were estimated by Poisson regression models with robust error variance.Of the adults with CC, 3270 (27.4%) had PCC and 5302 (44.5%) did not have CC during follow-up; 3341 (28.1%) had CC in only 1 follow-up year and were excluded from the analysis. Compared with patients without PCC, patients with PCC were noted to have significantly increased adjusted risk ratios for the following baseline features: (1) demographic characteristics (elderly, females, and less educated); (2) comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic sinusitis, bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, hypertension, depression, and cough complications); (3) medication dispensed (inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta-agonists, leukotriene modifiers, nasal corticosteroids, nasal short-acting muscarinic antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, antitussives with narcotics, and neuromodulators); and (4) specialist care, particularly with pulmonologists.Knowledge of the independent risk factors associated with PCC should aid clinicians in identifying such patients and improve their management.

Background Eosinophilic annular erythema (EAE) is a rare eosinophil-related skin disease which typically manifests with annular erythematous plaques and severe pruritus. Besides the diagnosis, the treatment of EAE is challenging since relevant published data are sparse. Methods The aim of this study was to assess the underlying diseases, treatments and outcomes of patients with EAE. To this end, we conducted a retrospective multicenter study and a systematic review of the MEDLINE database. Results We included 18 patients with EAE followed in 8 centers. The MEDLINE database search yielded 37 relevant publications reporting 55 cases of EAE with 106 treatment sequences. The most common and efficient treatments included topical or systemic corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine and dapsone. In refractory patients, a combination of systemic corticosteroids with hydroxychloroquine was associated with 88% of complete clinical response. Discussion To improve the management of EAE patients, we discuss the following treatment strategy: in topical steroid-resistant patients, hydroxychloroquine can be given as first-line systemic treatment. Dapsone, hydroxychloroquine or systemic corticosteroids are second-line options to consider. Last, monoclonal antibodies or JAK inhibitors targeting type 2 inflammation could represent promising last-resort options in refractory patients.

International audience; BackgroundGrowing numbers of indications for intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) in recent years has resulted in an increase in the consumption of these products. A lack of raw material has led to IVIg shortage. The objective of this work was to evaluate the impact of this situation on patient care in one French referral centre considering practice modifications and clinical impact.MethodsAll patients treated with IVIg for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy and myasthenia gravis from October 2017 to October 2018 were included.ResultsOut of 142 patients, 111 (78%) had a modification of their IVIg treatment. We noted that 75 (68%) patients had a delay in IVIg treatment, 41 (37%) patients had a decrease in IVIg doses and 31 (28%) experienced IVIg treatment interruption. Thirty percent of patients for whom IVIg treatment was discontinued were switched to other treatments mainly plasma exchange (16%) or corticosteroids (13%). Switches to plasma exchange or corticosteroids were carried out in order to save immunoglobulins for patients who had no other alternatives. Fifty-eight (52%) patients presented a deterioration of their clinical score after IVIg treatment changes including 31 (28%) patients who had a moderate or a clinically significant deterioration. Concerning practice modifications, we noted a substantial though not significant decrease in median IVIg dose for myasthenia gravis and a significant increase in the delay between IVIg courses for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy (P = 0.011 and P = 0.018 respectively).ConclusionOur study showed a rather important number of changes in IVIg treatment related to IVIg shortage during the period considered. These changes had a negative impact on the clinical status of some patients.

Both platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroid injections may be used to treat lateral epicondylitis. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of PRP injections vs. corticosteroid injections for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis.Markov modeling was used to analyze the base-case 45-year-old patient with recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis, unresponsive to conservative measures, treated with a single injection of PRP or triamcinolone 40 mg/mL. Transition probabilities were derived from randomized controlled trials, quality-of-life (QOL) values from the Tufts University Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry reported using Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, and costs from institution financial records. Analyses were performed from health care and societal perspectives. Outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), reported as US dollars / quality-adjusted life-year (USDs/QALY) and net monetary benefit (NMB) to represent the values of an intervention in monetary terms. Willingness-to-pay thresholds were set at $50,000 and $100,000. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed over 10,000 iterations.Both PRP and triamcinolone 40-mg/mL injections were considered cost-effective interventions from a health care and societal perspective below the WTP threshold of $50,000. From a health care perspective, PRP injections were dominant compared with triamcinolone 40-mg/mL injections, with an ICER of -$5846.97/QALY. PRP injections provided an NMB of $217,863.98, whereas triamcinolone 40 mg/mL provided an NMB of $197,534.18. From a societal perspective, PRP injections were dominant compared to triamcinolone 40-mg/mL injections, with an ICER of -$9392.33/QALY. PRP injections provided an NMB of $214,820.16, whereas triamcinolone 40 mg/mL provided an NMB of $193,199.75.Both PRP and triamcinolone 40-mg/mL injections provided cost-effective treatments from health care and societal perspectives. Overall, PRP injections were the dominant treatment, with the greatest NMB for recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis over the time horizon of 5 years.

Objective The aim of the study was to determine whether adjunctive hydrocortisone reduced healthcare expenditure and was cost-effective compared with placebo in New Zealand patients in the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock (ADRENAL) trial. Design This is a health economic analysis using data linkage to New Zealand Ministry of Health databases to determine resource use, costs, and cost-effectiveness for a 24-month period. Setting The study was conducted in New Zealand. Participants and intervention Patients with septic shock were randomised to receive a 7-day continuous infusion of 200 mg of hydrocortisone or placebo in the ADRENAL trial. Main outcome measures Healthcare expenditure was associated with all hospital admissions, emergency department presentations, outpatient visits, and pharmacy expenditure. Effectiveness outcomes included mortality at 6 months and 24 months and quality of life at 6 months. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were assessed with reference to quality-adjusted life years gained at 6 months and life years gained at 24 months. Results Of 3800 patients in the ADRENAL trial, 419 (11.0%) were eligible, and 405 (96.7% of those eligible) were included. The mean total costs per patient over 24 months were $143,627 ± 100,890 and $143,772 ± 97,117 for the hydrocortisone and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.99). Intensive care unit costs for the index admission were $50,492 and $62,288 per patient for the hydrocortisone and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.09). The mean number of quality-adjusted life years gained at 6 months and mean number of life years gained at 24 months was not significantly different by treatment group, and the probability of hydrocortisone being cost-effective was 55% at 24 months. Conclusions In New Zealand, adjunctive hydrocortisone did not reduce total healthcare expenditure or improve outcomes compared with placebo in patients with septic shock.

Pericardial disease secondary to sarcoidosis is a rare clinical entity with no observational studies in previous research. Therefore, we evaluated reported cases of pericarditis because of sarcoidosis to further understand its diagnosis and management. We performed a systematic review of previous research until December 16, 2020 in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. Case reports and case series demonstrating pericardial involvement in sarcoidosis were included. Fourteen reports with a total of 27 patients were identified. Dyspnea (82%) was the most common presentation, with the lungs being the primary site of sarcoidosis in most patients (77%). The most frequently encountered pericardial manifestations were pericardial effusion (89%), constrictive pericarditis and cardiac tamponade (48%). Management of these patients included use of corticosteroids (82%), colchicine (11%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (7%). Similar to the general population, the most common intervention in these patients was pericardiocentesis (59%), pericardial window (30%), and pericardiectomy (19%). Overall, the majority of this population (70%) achieved clinical improvement during median follow-up time of 8 months. In conclusion, the prevalence and incidence of sarcoid-induced pericarditial disease remain unclear. Clinical manifestations of pericardial involvement are variable, though many patients present with asymptomatic pericardial effusions. No consensus exists on the treatment of this special population, but corticosteroids and combination therapies are considered first-line therapies because of their efficacy in suppressing pericardial inflammation and underlying sarcoidosis. Patients with refractory cases of pericarditis may also benefit therapeutically from the addition of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, colchicine, and/or biologics.

To investigate the effects of electrical dry needling (DN) plus corticosteroid injection (CSI) on pain, physical function, and global change in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (KOA).A prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.Pain treatment clinic.Sixty patients with KOA were randomly assigned to the electrical dry needling plus corticosteroid injection (electrical-DN+CSI) group or CSI group.The CSI group received glucocorticoid injection only once during the trial, and the electrical-DN+CSI group received glucocorticoid injection combined with 4 sessions of electrical-DN.The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale at 3 months. The secondary outcomes were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the time to complete the Timed Up and Go test, and the score of the global rating of change scale at 3 months. A generalized linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the repeated measurement data.Baseline characteristics and measurements were similar in the 2 groups. The group by time interaction effect was significant for all variables (P.05). The electrical-DN+CSI group obtained a more significant reduction in pain intensity and more significant improvement in dysfunction than the CSI group at 3 months (P.05). The median global rating of change score for the CSI group was +3 (somewhat better), and that for the electrical-DN+CSI group was +4 (moderately better).Electrical-DN therapy at myofascial trigger points combined with CSI is more effective at alleviating pain, improving dysfunction, and creating global change than CSI alone for patients with KOA. Electrical-DN may be an essential part of treatment for KOA rehabilitation.

Controversy has arisen among the overall benefit and potential risks in the use of corticosteroids for the treatment of pediatric bacterial meningitis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide evidence of the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other databases) were searched from inception until March 9, 2021. Randomized clinical trials focused on corticosteroids as adjuvant therapy in pediatric bacterial meningitis were considered eligible. The primary outcomes were hearing loss and neurologic sequelae. Secondary outcomes were mean days before resolution of fever, mortality, secondary fever, and reactive arthritis. Fixed- or random-effects models were used to evaluate the association between corticosteroids therapy and outcomes by calculating risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Two independent reviewers completed citation screening, data extraction, and risk assessment.Twenty-nine studies with 3433 patients were included. An obvious benefit was found in the treatment of corticosteroids in hearing loss (RR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.81; I² = 17%; P = 0.0006). No benefit was found in the rate of neurologic sequelae. However, obvious benefit was found in the low-dosage subgroup (0.6 mg/kg per day) (RR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47-0.77; I² = 0%; P0.0001) but not in the high-dosage subgroup (0.8 mg/kg per day). An increasing rate of secondary fever was found when using corticosteroids (RR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.10-1.51; I² = 13%; P = 0.001). Corticosteroids could significantly decrease the mean days before resolution of fever (MD = -1.48; 95% CI, -1.79 to -1.17; I² = 84%, P0.00001). No difference was found in the rate of mortality and reactive arthritis.The findings of this study suggest that the administration of corticosteroids is associated with reduced hearing loss and neurologic sequelae especially in children using a low dose of corticosteroids. Benefits also included a reduction in the mean number of days before resolution of fever.

Asthma is a common and heterogeneous disease, characterised by lower airway inflammation and airflow limitation. Critical factors in asthma management include establishing an accurate diagnosis and ensuring appropriate selection and dosage of anti-inflammatory therapies. The majority of asthma patients exhibit type 2 (T2) inflammation, with increased interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13 signalling, often with associated eosinophilia. Identifying lower airway eosinophilia with sputum induction improves asthma outcomes, but is time consuming and costly. Increased T2-inflammation leads to upregulation of nitric oxide (NO) release into the airway, with increasing fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) reflecting greater T2-inflammation. FeNO can be easily and quickly measured in the clinic, offering a point of care surrogate measure of the degree of lower airway inflammation. FeNO testing can be used to help confirm an asthma diagnosis, to guide inhaled corticosteroid therapy, to assess adherence to treatment, and to aid selection of appropriate biologic therapy. However, FeNO levels may also be influenced by a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic factors other than asthma, including nasal polyposis and cigarette smoking, and must be interpreted in the broader clinical context rather than viewed in isolation. This review discusses the clinical application of FeNO measurement in asthma care, from diagnosis to treatment selection, and describes its place in current international expert guidelines.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease in children. Standard-of-care treatment has been topical therapy. Oral corticosteroids are also commonly used to treat intermittent flares, despite guidelines that recommend against this practice. In 2017, the first targeted biologic agent indicated for moderate-severe AD in adults received US Food and Drug Administration approval. The success of this drug, dupilumab, filled a significant unmet medical need and inspired additional interest in new drug development. This article summarizes safe and effective use of systemic therapy for moderate-severe AD in pediatric patients, highlighting dupilumab and the most promising emerging treatments.

The purpose of this study was to identify association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and clinical data at baseline and six months following platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or corticosteroid (CS; cortivazol) injection in patients with plantar fasciitis, and to identify initial MRI criteria associated with a favorable clinical response to treatment.The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03857334). MRI examinations of 36 patients with plantar fasciitis lasting more than 3 months who were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound-guided PRP (PRP group, 20 patients) or CS (CS group, 18 patients) injection were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed with respect to plantar fascia thickness, plantar fascia hyperintensity on T2-weighted STIR (HSTIR) images, calcaneal bone marrow and surrounding soft tissues. Clinical evaluation including visual analytic scale (VAS) assessment and MRI examinations were obtained before and 6 months after treatment. Good clinical response was defined as pain VAS decrease50% at 6 months. ROC curves with AUC measurements were used to determine cut-off points.In the whole study population, an association was found between MRI features (deep soft tissue and calcaneal bone marrow HSTIR) and pain VAS scores for the first steps of the day (P = 0.028 and P = 0.007, respectively). No significant radioclinical associations on post-treatment MRI examinations were found in either group. Initial coronal thickness of plantar fascia was associated with a good clinical response in the CS group (P0.01). ROC curve analysis found that 7-mm or thicker plantar aponeurosis at initial MRI was predictive of good clinical response in patients with CS treatment (Youden index = 0.6). PRP infiltrations were effective regardless of fascia thickness (73% of patients with ≤ 7 mm aponeurosis and 67% for thicker ones).Initial facia thickness (7 mm) is predictive of good clinical response six months after CS injection, whereas PRP injection shows effectiveness regardless of fascia thickness.

Asthma and bronchiectasis are different diseases; however, differentiating them can be difficult because they share several symptomatic and physiological similarities. Approximately 20% of patients with bronchiectasis have eosinophilic inflammation, 34% show wheezing, and 7-46% have comorbid asthma, although comorbidity with severe asthma may be limited as shown in 3.3% of cases of bronchiectasis. Meanwhile, 25-68% of patients with severe asthma have comorbid bronchiectasis, and at least two phenotypes are present in the accompanying bronchiectasis: eosinophilic bronchiectasis and chronic infectious bronchiolitis/bronchiectasis. Recent studies show that type-2-targeted biologics are effective for eosinophilic bronchiectasis and theoretically effective for some of the remaining cases when used before oral corticosteroids. Further studies are needed to identify treatment strategies for severe asthma with comorbid bronchiectasis and vice versa.

Purpose To evaluate the potential of a Cox marginal structural model (MSM) to estimate the time-varying causal inference of a known clinical trial association where the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroid- (ICS-) versus non-ICS-containing treatments has been compared in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods This retrospective study from 2006 to 2016 used linked data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink-GOLD, Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics mortality. A Cox MSM, incorporating a new-user design, was deemed capable of replicating a clinical trial-like pathway. Repeated outcomes for exacerbation events and stabilised weights were used to include time-varying and fixed covariate exposures. Results Of 45,958 patients, 55% were male; 52% had moderate COPD. ICS-treated patients had a higher incidence of comorbid asthma than non-ICS-treated patients. Adjusted hazard risk ratios for any exacerbation event: ICS/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) versus long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.10); ICS/LABA versus LABA/LAMA, 1.05 (1.00-1.10); ICS/LABA/LAMA versus LAMA, 1.04 (1.01-1.06); ICS/LABA/LAMA versus LABA/LAMA 1.02 (0.97-1.07). Conclusions The Cox MSM was not able to fully demonstrate results consistent with the previously established benefits of ICS-containing treatments seen in clinical trials. Future studies should continue to investigate causal inference methods and their capability to estimate the long-term outcomes of treatment in COPD.

Corticosteroids have been the cornerstone for treatment of many inflammatory and immune disorders with these beneficial effects well recognized by the medical community. It also possesses many undesirable clinical adverse effects that can occur within 2 weeks of use. Moreover, in the past decade, chronic users of corticosteroids have been linked to skeletal (vertebral and hip) osteoporosis/osteonecrosis with some patients requiring adjunctive antiresprotive medications to counteract fracture prevention. Additionally, two case reports have implicated daily prednisone user to cause osteonecrosis of the mandible. This chapter highlights current adrenal suppression classifications, pathophysiology, drug interactions, and perioperative surgical and anesthesia management.