Search

We aimed to investigate the impact of anastrozole administration on the traditional components of the lipid profile (ie, total cholesterol [TC], LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides [TGs]) by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.We searched the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant randomized controlled trials published in the English language until January 18, 2022. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird methods).Anastrozole administration significantly lowered TC concentrations when the treatment duration was ≤3 months (WMD = -2.73 mg/dL; 95% CI, -5.09 to -0.38 mg/dL; P = 0.02) and when the baseline TC concentration was ≥200 mg/dL (WMD = -3.64 mg/dL; 95% CI, -6.30 to -0.98 mg/dL; P = 0.007). HDL-C levels decreased after anastrozole administration when the treatment duration was3 months (WMD = -1.67 mg/dL; 95% CI, -3.24 to -0.10 mg/dL; P = 0.03). Anastrozole administration had no impact on TG or LDL-C values.Anastrozole administration in humans can decrease TC and HDL-C levels but has no effect on LDL-C or TG concentrations.

Molecular tests predicting the risk of distant recurrence (DR) can be used to assist therapy decision-making in oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer patients after considerations of standard clinical markers. The Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) is a widespread tool used for this purpose. Here, we compared the RS with the StemPrintER Risk Score (SPRS), a novel genomic predictor with a unique biological basis in its ability to measure the expression of cancer stemness genes.We benchmarked the SPRS vs. RS, alone or in combination with clinicopathological variables expressed by the Clinical Treatment Score (CTS), for the prognostication of DR in a retrospective cohort of 776 postmenopausal patients with ER+/HER2-breast cancer enrolled in the translational arm of the randomised Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial. Likelihood ratio (LR) with χIn all patients, the SPRS provided significantly more prognostic information than the RS for ten-year DR prognostication (C-index = 0.688, LR-χIn postmenopausal ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients, SPRS provided more prognostic information than RS for DR when used alone or in combination with the CTS. The SPRS could therefore potentially identify high-risk patients, who might benefit from aggressive treatments, from low-risk patients who might safely avoid adjuvant chemotherapy or prolongation of endocrine therapy.

Background Hormonal therapies are commonly prescribed to patients with metastatic granulosa cell tumours (GCT), based on high response rates in small retrospective studies. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are reported to have high response rates and an accepted treatment option. We report the results of a phase 2 trial of an AI in recurrent/metastatic GCTs. Methods 41 patients with recurrent ER/PR + ve GCT received anastrozole 1 mg daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 weeks, evaluated by RECIST1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), CBR duration, quality of life and toxicity. Results The CBR at 12 weeks in 38 evaluable patients was 78.9%, which included one (2.6%; 95% CI: 0.5–13.5%) partial response and 76.3% stable disease. Two additional patients without measurable disease were stable, based on inhibin. Median PFS was 8.6 m (95% CI 5.5–13.5 m). There were delayed responses observed after 12 weeks with a total of 4 pts. (10.5%; 95% CI 4.2%–24.1%) with a RECIST partial response; 23 (59%) patients were progression-free at 6 months. The adverse effects were predominantly low grade. Conclusions This is the first prospective trial of hormonal therapy in GCTs. Although there was a high CBR, the objective response rate to anastrozole was much lower than the pooled response rates of >70% to AIs reported in most retrospective series and case reports. PARAGON demonstrates the importance of prospective trials in rare cancers and the need to reconsider the role of AIs as single agents in GCTs.

Breast cancer remains the most common cancer in women in the United States. For certain women at high risk for breast cancer, endocrine therapy (ET) can greatly decrease the risk. Tools such as the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (or Gail Model) and the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study risk calculator are available to help identify women at increased risk for breast cancer. Physician awareness of family history, reproductive and lifestyle factors, dense breast tissue, and history of benign proliferative breast disease are important when identifying high-risk women. The updated US Preventive Services Task Force and American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines encourage primary care providers to identify at-risk women and offer risk-reducing medications. Among the various ETs, which include tamoxifen, raloxifene, anastrozole, and exemestane, tamoxifen is the only one available for premenopausal women aged 35 years and older. A shared decision-making process should be used to increase the usage of ET and must be individualized. This individualized approach must account for each woman's medical history and weigh the benefits and risks of ET in combination with the personal values of the patient.

To assess the variability in management of estrogen levels in men treated with testosterone therapy (TTh). With the significant increase in the last 2 decades in the treatment of hypogonadism and the use of TTh, detailed guidelines for the management of estrogen levels are necessary.The response rate was 22.5% (489/2168). A total 62.4% of respondents indicated that they check serum estrogen at initial evaluation, but only 54.7% monitor levels in patients on TTh (P = .02). Fellowship-trained and North American respondents were more likely to monitor patients (P.05). A total of 69.4%, 47.7%, and 14.4% respondents prescribe antiestrogenic medications in symptomatic patients with elevated estrogen levels, for asymptomatic-elevated estrogen levels, and prophylactically, respectively. Academic respondents were more likely to prescribe an antiestrogen medication to symptomatic patients and prophylactically (P.05). Anastrozole was the most common medication prescribed for symptomatic hyperestrogenemia (62.3%), but starting doses varied significantly, from 1 mg weekly to 1 mg daily.Approximately 50% of practitioners treating men with TTh monitor estrogen levels. Symptoms play a role in prescribing patterns and significant variability in aromatase inhibitors regimens exists. Increased monitoring of estrogen levels in men on TTh will facilitate an understanding of the symptoms, effects of high and low estrogen levels, and aid in standardization of research and therapy.

Platelet-tumour cell interaction is implicated in the initiation of breast cancer-associated thrombosis, with hormone-therapy (Tamoxifen/Anastrozole), increasing this risk. However, recent in vitro research indicates that Tamoxifen inhibits platelet activation, while the effects of Anastrozole on platelet activation are not well characterised. This study investigated platelet activation caused by Tamoxifen or Anastrozole-treated breast cancer cells in vitro. MCF7 and T47D cells were pre-treated with Tamoxifen or Anastrozole to mimic the effects of the drugs in vivo, and co-cultured with whole blood. Platelet activation was determined using flow cytometry. Platelet (CD41a+CD62P+) was determined using an interval gating strategy. Platelet morphology was visualised using scanning electron microscopy. Our results support clinical findings, showing that hormone-therapy is associated with platelet activation. Tamoxifen-treated MCF7 cells increased P-selectin expression, with ultrastructural analysis showing fully spread platelets. Conversely, Tamoxifen-treated T47D cells decreased P-selectin expression with platelets showing signs of early aggregation. Anastrozole pre-treatment decreased P-selectin expression, with treated MCF7 cells inducing platelet membrane folds and lamellipodia extension, and treated T47D cells inducing platelet aggregation and fibrin network formation indicating hypercoagulation. The findings support clinical studies. Hormone-therapy augments tumour cell-induced platelet activation, which may be linked to cell phenotype. This may have clinical implications for treatment strategies.

Circulating natriuretic peptide (NP) levels are markedly lower in healthy men than women. A relative NP deficiency in men could contribute to their higher risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Epidemiological studies suggest testosterone may contribute to sex-specific NP differences.This study aimed to determine the effect of testosterone administration on NP levels using a randomized, placebo-controlled design.One hundred and fifty-one healthy men (20 to 50 years of age) received goserelin acetate to suppress endogenous production of gonadal steroids, and anastrazole to suppress conversion of testosterone to estradiol. Subjects were randomized to placebo gel or 4 different doses of testosterone (1%) gel for 12 weeks. Serum N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and total testosterone levels were measured at baseline and follow-up.Men who did not receive testosterone replacement (placebo gel group) after suppression of endogenous gonadal steroid production experienced a profound decrease in serum testosterone (median 540 to 36 ng/dl; p 0.0001). This was accompanied by an increase in median NT-proBNP (+8 pg/ml; p = 0.02). Each 1-g increase in testosterone dose was associated with a 4.3% lower NT-proBNP at follow-up (95% confidence interval: -7.9% to -0.45%; p = 0.029). An individual whose serum testosterone decreased by 500 ng/dl had a 26% higher predicted follow-up NT-proBNP than someone whose serum testosterone remained constant.Suppression of testosterone production in men led to increases in circulating NT-proBNP, which were attenuated by testosterone replacement. Inhibition of NP production by testosterone may partly explain the lower NP levels in men. (Dose-Response of Gonadal Steroids and Bone Turnover in Men; NCT00114114).

Background: Treatment with an aromatase inhibitor for 5 years is the standard treatment for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. We investigated the effects of extending this treatment to 10 years on the risk of breast cancer recurrence. Methods: This prospective, randomised, multicentre open-label phase III study assessed the effect of extending anastrozole treatment for an additional 5 years in postmenopausal patients with stage I–IIIA hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who were disease-free after treatment with either 5 years of anastrozole alone or 2–3 years of tamoxifen followed by 2–3 years of anastrozole. Patients were allocated randomly (1:1) to continue anastrozole (1 mg/day orally) for an additional 5 years or stop anastrozole, using the central computer at the Comprehensive Support Project for Oncology Research Data Centre. Randomisation was stratified by type of postoperative endocrine therapy, nodal status, prior adjuvant chemotherapy, and facility. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, including breast cancer recurrence, second primary cancers, and death from any cause. This study is registered with UMIN clinical trials registry, number UMIN000000818. Findings: We enrolled 1697 patients from 117 facilities between November 2007 and November 2012. Patients were assigned randomly to the continue group (n=849) or the stop group (n=848). Follow-up information was available for 1593 patients (n=787 in the continue group, n=806 in the stop group) as the full analysis set. After a median follow-up of 5·1 years, there were 172 events involving disease recurrence or the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer (75 in the continue group and 97 in the stop group) and 40 deaths (21 in the continue group and 19 in the stop group). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89–93) in the continue group and 86% (95% CI 83–88) in the stop group (hazard ratio [HR] for disease-free survival 0·61, 95% CI 0·46–0·82; p

Aims We investigate the consequence of adjuvant anastrozole (ANA) in monotherapy or associated with biochanin A (BCA) in ovariectomized (OVX) rat model and the degree of developing bone loss in both conditions. Materials and methods Sixty female rats were assigned to six groups. Five groups were bilaterally OVX, and one was sham operated. The five groups were; ANA group (0.5 mg/kg b.wt orally), BCA (5 mg/kg b.wt intraperitoneally (I/P), co-treated group (BCA + ANA), two control groups receiving even distilled water orally or DMSO I/P for twenty weeks. Bone turnover biomarkers BALP, OC, PTH, TRAP and TNFα were determined in serum. Bone mineral content, histological and morphometric measurements on rat femurs were performed. BMD by X-ray technique on tibias of rats and CT analysis of lumbar vertebrae of all treated and sham groups were applied. Key findings There was marked elevation in bone turnover biomarkers with high serum Ca and P content in the ANA-treated rats. Moreover marked elevation of TNFα, PTH, TC and TG, ANA caused severe changes in the BMD detected by X-ray in tibial bones and CT analysis of lumbar vertebrae of OVX rats. While I/P injection of BCA ameliorated the adverse bone health decrements caused by ANA. Significance The study highlights the importance of the BCA supplementation in accordance with the ANA therapy in case of ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis which is clinically presented in Postmenopausal women with breast cancer during which considerable risk of developing osteoporosis is predicted during treatment.

Background A large trial of postmenopausal women with breast cancer reported an imbalance in colorectal cancer events with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), compared with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting. This unexpected signal was observed within 3 years of randomization. To date, no observational studies have examined this important safety question in the natural setting of clinical practice. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine whether AIs, when compared with tamoxifen, are associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Patients and methods Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified women, at least 55 years of age, with breast cancer newly treated with either AIs or tamoxifen between 1 January 1996 and 30 September 2015, with follow-up until 30 September 2016. High-dimensional propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident colorectal cancer associated with AIs when compared with tamoxifen overall, by cumulative duration of use, and time since initiation. All exposures were lagged by 1 year for latency considerations. Results A total of 9701 and 8893 patients initiated AIs and tamoxifen as first-line hormonal therapy (median follow-up of 2.4 and 2.9 years, respectively). Compared with tamoxifen, AIs were not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (incidence rates of 150 per 100 000 person-years in both groups; adjusted HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.53–1.52). Similarly, there was no evidence of an association with cumulative duration of use (P-heterogeneity = 0.54), and time since initiation (P-heterogeneity = 0.66). Conclusions In this first population-based study, the use of AIs was not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. These findings should provide reassurance to the concerned stakeholders.

The aim of the present study is to investigate the pharmacokinetics of our newly developed aromatase inhibitors (cetrozole and TMD-322) in healthy subjects by a cassette microdose strategy. A cocktail of cetrozole and TMD-322 was administered intravenously or orally (1.98 μg for each drug) to six healthy volunteers in a crossover fashion. Anastrozole (1.98 μg) was also included in the oral cocktail. Total body clearance and bioavailability were 12.1 ± 7.1 mL/min/kg and 34.9 ± 32.3% for cetrozole, and 16.8 ± 3.5 mL/min/kg and 18.4 ± 12.2% for TMD-322, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration-time curves of cetrozole and TMD-322 after oral administration was markedly lower than that of anastrozole because of their high hepatic clearance. Two subjects out of six exhibited 4- and 17-fold larger exposure of cetrozole than the others following intravenous and oral administration, respectively. Such variation was not observed for TMD-322 and anastrozole. Extensive metabolism of cetrozole and TMD-322 was observed in the CYP2C19 expression system among the test CYP isoforms (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4). We report the first clinical investigation of our aromatase inhibitors by a cassette microdose strategy in healthy Japanese subjects. This strategy offers an optional approach for candidate selection as a phase zero study in drug development.

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast carcinomas are the most common subtype, corresponding to 60% of the cases in premenopausal and 75% in postmenopausal women. The third-generation of aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the non-steroidal Anastrozole (Ana) and Letrozole (Let) and the steroidal Exemestane (Exe), are considered a first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women. Despite their clinical success, the development of resistance is the major setback in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the lack of cross-resistance between AIs hints that these drugs may act through distinct mechanisms. Therefore, this work studied the different effects induced by AIs on biological processes, such as cell proliferation, death, autophagy and senescence. Moreover, their effects on the regulation of the hormonal environment were also explored. The non-steroidal AIs induce senescence, through increased YPEL3 expression, on aromatase-overexpressing breast cancer cells (MCF-7aro), whereas Exe promotes a cytoprotective autophagy, thus blocking senescence induction. In addition, in a hormone-enriched environment, the non-steroidal AIs prevent estrogen signaling, despite up-regulating the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), while Exe down-regulates ERα and maintains its activation. In these conditions, all AIs up-regulate the androgen receptor (AR) which blocks EGR3 transcription in Exe-treated cells. On the other hand, in hormone-depleted conditions, a crosstalk between AR and ERα occurs, enhancing the estrogenic effects of Exe. This indicates that Exe modulates both ERα and AR, while Ana and Let act as pure AIs. Thus, this study highlights the potential clinical benefit of combining AR antagonists with Exe and discourages the sequential use of Exe as second-line therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer.

Highlights • Female adnexal tumor of probable Wolffian origin (FATWO) is a rare entity. • No standard systemic treatment is established for FATWO. • STK11 mutations may occur in a substantial number of FATWO cases. • A STK11-mutated FATWO case had a remarkable response to an mTOR inhibitor., Female adnexal tumor of probable Wolffian origin (FATWO) are a rare type of cancer that originates from Wolffian duct remnants. Due to its rarity, no standard systemic treatment is established for cases of recurrent or metastatic disease. Previous literature reported the use of platinum-based chemotherapy and c-Kit tyrosine kinase inhibitors for FATWO cases with c-Kit positive expression. Currently, however, the broader availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests allows a better molecular characterization of rare cancer such as FATWO and a possibility for the use of personalized, targeted therapy. Previous case series that performed NGS for FATWO patients described the presence of STK11 mutations in a considerable number of cases, representing a potential target in this population. To our knowledge, we describe here the first case report of a patient with FATWO and STK11 mutation exhibiting a considerable and durable response after treatment with an mTOR inhibitor plus endocrine therapy.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy among women worldwide and is a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, and national health care expenditure. Unfortunately, with few exceptions like alcohol consumption, obesity, and physical activity, most BC risk factors are unmodifiable. Antiestrogen endocrine therapy, commonly known as BC chemoprevention, is an effective method of BC prevention. In multiple randomized trials, two selective estrogen receptor modulators — tamoxifen and raloxifene, and two aromatase inhibitors — exemestane and anastrozole have reduced BC incidence by 50%–65% in high-risk women. An estimated 15% of the US women between 35 and 79 years of age may qualify as high risk for BC, yet a small percentage of these women will ever have a formal BC risk assessment or a discussion of endocrine prevention options. The etiology of underutilization of endocrine prevention of BC is multifactorial — infrequent use of BC risk assessment tools in the primary care settings, insufficient knowledge of BC risk assessment tools and antiestrogen agents among primary care providers, concerns of side effects, inadequate time for counseling during primary care visit, and lack of predictive biomarkers may play significant roles. Many small studies incorporating risk assessment tools and decision-making aids showed minimal success in enhancing endocrine prevention. One critical factor for underutilization of endocrine prevention is low uptake of endocrine prevention by high-risk women even when appropriately recommended. Furthermore, adherence to BC endocrine prevention is unsatisfactorily low. Despite the current infrequent usage, endocrine prevention has the potential to reduce the public health burden of BC significantly. Innovative approaches like finding new agents, alternative dosing and schedule of currently available agents, transdermal medication delivery, increased public and professional awareness, and policymakers' commitments may bring the desired changes.

Background Management of metabolic complications of long-term adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer remained an unmet need. We aimed to compare the effects of tamoxifen (TMX) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) on the risk of fatty liver in conjunction with longitudinal changes in the serum lipid parameters. Methods Among 1203 subjects who were taking adjuvant TMX or AI (anastrozole or letrozole) without fatty liver at baseline, those taking TMX or AI were 1:1 matched on the propensity score. The primary outcome was newly developed fatty liver detected on annual liver ultrasonography. Results Among 328 matched subjects (mean age 53.5 years, body mass index 22.9 kg/m 2 ), 62 cases of fatty liver in the TMX group and 41 cases in the AI group were detected in a total of 987.4 person-years. The incidence rate of fatty liver was higher in the TMX group than in the AI group (128.7 versus 81.1 per 1000 person-years, P = 0.021), particularly within the first 2 years of therapy. TMX was associated with an increased 5-year risk of newly developed fatty liver (adjusted hazard ratio 1.61, P = 0.030) compared with AI independent of obesity and cholesterol level. Subjects who developed fatty liver had higher triglycerides (TGs) and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level at baseline than those without, which was sustained during follow-up despite the serum cholesterol–lowering effect of TMX. Conclusions TMX independently increased the 5-year risk of newly developed fatty liver compared with AI in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Our findings suggest the need for considering the risk of fatty liver as a different adverse event profile between AI and TMX, particularly in patients with obesity, high TGs and low HDL-C.

For post-menopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is an under-utilized and low-toxicity alternative to chemotherapy for increasing breast conservation rates. Individual responses to endocrine therapy can also be used to tailor systemic treatment. The Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) was developed to identify patients at low risk of relapse after NET so that adjuvant chemotherapy can safely be avoided. In a recent validation study, patients with pathological stage 1 or 2A breast cancers with a Ki67 value of 2.7% or less in the surgical specimen (PEPI = 0) after 16–18 weeks of aromatase inhibitor therapy had a 97% disease free survival after 5.5 years of median follow up. Two approaches are currently underway to extend the PEPI model. The first is to determine whether fulvestrant increases the PEPI-0 rate versus anastrozole, as this would increase the number of patients who could be safely managed without adjuvant chemotherapy. The second is to develop new approaches for tumors that exhibit endocrine therapy resistance identified during NET. Preliminary studies demonstrate that tumors that exhibit AI resistant proliferation in the neoadjuvant setting is often sensitive to palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Serial Ki67 monitoring before surgery is therefore logical approach to tailored use of adjuvant CDK4/6i adjuvant treatment. Finally serial sampling of the tumor inherent in the PEPI approach facilitates the identification of new therapeutic targets, mechanisms of resistance and monitoring of tumor evolution in response to AI therapy.

Objective Ovarian anaplastic ependymoma is a rare gynecologic malignancy that poses diagnostic and treatment challenges. Treatment of sub-optimally debulked disease usually portends poor prognosis. Molecular testing of tumor specimen can identify more specific targets for additional therapy such as estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR). Case A 29-year-old woman presented with incidental finding of large bilateral adnexal masses and elevated CA 125. Biopsy proved anaplastic ovarian ependymoma with high ER/PR expression. She underwent sub-optimal surgical debulking followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) which resulted in a partial response. Due to extensive residual disease she has been maintained on anastrozole for over fifteen months without increased tumor burden. Targeted somatic mutation testing was negative for all high risk clinically useful variants. Conclusion Aromatase inhibitors may be considered in patients with extra-axial anaplastic ependymoma and can produce prolonged stable disease., Highlights • Ovarian anaplastic ependymoma is a rare gynecologic malignancy. • Histology shows perivascular rosettes, hypercellularity, and nuclear atypia. • Standard therapy includes surgical debulking followed by chemotherapy with BEP. • Molecular diagnostics can identify estrogen and progesterone receptor expression. • ER/PR expression can help direct treatment with aromatase inhibitors.

Objective To determine whether the change in sperm parameters in subfertile hypoandrogenic men treated with anastrozole is correlated to the magnitude of increase in testosterone (T) to estrogen ratio in men responding to treatment. Design Retrospective study. Setting Male fertility clinic. Patient(s) The study group consisted of 86 subfertile hypoandrogenic men with low T/estradiol (E 2 ) ratio (n = 78) or a prior aversive reaction to clomiphene citrate (n = 8). Intervention(s) All patients were treated with 1 mg anastrozole daily, administered orally. Main Outcome Measure(s) Hormone analysis and semen analysis before and after treatment were performed. Hormone analysis included measurements of total T, E 2 , sex-hormone binding globulin, albumin, FSH, and LH, and bioavailable T was calculated. Total motile sperm count was calculated from the semen analysis. Result(s) In all, 95.3% of patients had an increased serum T and decreased serum E 2 after treatment with anastrozole. Sperm concentration and total motile counts improved in 18 of 21 subfertile hypoandrogenic oligozoospermic men treated with anastrozole. In these men the magnitude of total motile count increase was significantly correlated with the change in the T/E 2 ratio. No improvement was seen in semen parameters of men with azoospermia, cryptozoospermia, or normozoospermia at presentation. Conclusion(s) Approximately 95% of men with hypoandrogenism responded with improved endocrine parameters, and a subset of oligozoospermic men (approximately 25% of all patients) displayed significantly improved sperm parameters. In that subset, increase in sperm parameters was correlated with the change in the T/E 2 ratio, which argues for a physiologic effect of treatment.

Background Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been associated with cardiovascular disease in adjuvant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these drugs to tamoxifen. However, it is unclear whether this risk is real or due to cardioprotective effects of tamoxifen. To address this question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all RCTs of AIs and tamoxifen in adjuvant and extended adjuvant setting. Patients and methods We searched PubMed, Embase (OVID), Cochrane CENTRAL, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to June 2016 for all RCTs comparing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular safety of AIs to tamoxifen, AIs to placebo or no-treatment, or tamoxifen to placebo or no-treatment in the adjuvant or extended adjuvant setting. Relative risks (RRs) were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with analyses stratified by RCT design. Results A total of 19 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis (n = 62 345). In the adjuvant setting, AIs were associated with a 19% (RR: 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.34) increased risk of cardiovascular events compared with tamoxifen. AIs were not associated with an increased risk compared with placebo in the extended-adjuvant setting (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85–1.20). In the adjuvant setting, tamoxifen was associated with a 33% (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45–0.98) decreased risk compared with placebo or no-treatment. The results from extended adjuvant RCTs comparing tamoxifen to placebo were inconclusive but suggestive of a small protective effect (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77–1.07). Conclusions The increased risk of cardiovascular events with AIs relative to tamoxifen is likely the result of cardioprotective effects of the latter. This new evidence should be considered when assessing the benefits and risks of AIs in the treatment of breast cancer.

Summary Background Two large clinical trials have shown a reduced rate of breast cancer development in high-risk women in the initial 5 years of follow-up after use of aromatase inhibitors (MAP.3 and International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II [IBIS-II]). Here, we report blinded long-term follow-up results for the IBIS-II trial, which compared anastrozole with placebo, with the objective of determining the efficacy of anastrozole for preventing breast cancer (both invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ) in the post-treatment period. Methods IBIS-II is an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Postmenopausal women at increased risk of developing breast cancer were recruited and were randomly assigned (1:1) to either anastrozole (1 mg per day, oral) or matching placebo daily for 5 years. After treatment completion, women were followed on a yearly basis to collect data on breast cancer incidence, death, other cancers, and major adverse events (cardiovascular events and fractures). The primary outcome was all breast cancer. Findings 3864 women were recruited between Feb 2, 2003, and Jan 31, 2012. 1920 women were randomly assigned to 5 years anastrozole and 1944 to placebo. After a median follow-up of 131 months (IQR 105–156), a 49% reduction in breast cancer was observed for anastrozole (85 vs 165 cases, hazard ratio [HR] 0·51, 95% CI 0·39–0·66, p

Summary Background Aromatase inhibitors are a standard of care for hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. We investigated whether the selective oestrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant could improve progression-free survival compared with anastrozole in postmenopausal patients who had not received previous endocrine therapy. Methods In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind trial, we recruited eligible patients with histologically confirmed oestrogen receptor-positive or progesterone receptor-positive, or both, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer from 113 academic hospitals and community centres in 20 countries. Eligible patients were endocrine therapy-naive, with WHO performance status 0–2, and at least one measurable or non-measurable lesion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular injection; on days 0, 14, 28, then every 28 days thereafter) or anastrozole (1 mg orally daily) using a computer-generated randomisation scheme. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1·1, intervention by surgery or radiotherapy because of disease deterioration, or death from any cause, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of randomised treatment (including placebo). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01602380. Findings Between Oct 17, 2012, and July 11, 2014, 524 patients were enrolled to this study. Of these, 462 patients were randomised (230 to receive fulvestrant and 232 to receive anastrozole). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the fulvestrant group than in the anastrozole group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·797, 95% CI 0·637–0·999, p=0·0486). Median progression-free survival was 16·6 months (95% CI 13·83–20·99) in the fulvestrant group versus 13·8 months (11·99–16·59) in the anastrozole group. The most common adverse events were arthralgia (38 [17%] in the fulvestrant group vs 24 [10%] in the anastrozole group) and hot flushes (26 [11%] in the fulvestrant group vs 24 [10%] in the anastrozole group). 16 (7%) of 228 patients in in the fulvestrant group and 11 (5%) of 232 patients in the anastrozole group discontinued because of adverse events. Interpretation Fulvestrant has superior efficacy and is a preferred treatment option for patients with hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not received previous endocrine therapy compared with a third-generation aromatase inhibitor, a standard of care for first-line treatment of these patients. Funding AstraZeneca.

BackgroundMitochondrial permeability transmembrane pore [mPTP] plays a vital role in alteration of the structure and function of mitochondria. Cyclophillin D is a mitochondrial protein that regulates mPTP function and a known drug target for therapeutic studies involving mitochondria. While aromatase inhibitor’s role on mPTP has been previously studied, the role of anastrazole on mPTP is not completely elucidated.MethodsThe role of anastrozole in modulating the mPTP was evaluated by docking and molecular dynamics using human cyclophillin D data. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs] of patients with mitochondrial disorders and healthy controls were treated with anastrazole and evaluated for mean fluorescence by flow cytometer. Spectrophotometry was employed for total ATP level estimation.FindingsAnastrozole – cyclophillin D complex is more stable when compared to cyclosporine A – cyclophillin D. Anastrozole performed better than cyclosporine in inhibiting mPTP pore. Additional effects included reduction in mitochondrial swelling and mitochondrial membrane depolarization, decreased super oxide generations, caspase 3 intrinsic activity and cellular apoptosis levels and increase in ATP levels.InterpretationThese results highlights the potency of anastrozole as a promising agent in ameliorating the phenotype by inhibiting the opening of mPTP pore. However, larger functional studies are required to validate the efficacy of this molecule as a therapeutic agent in mitochondrial disorders.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors (palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib) are used to treat human epithelial growth factor receptor (HER)-2 negative and hormone receptor (HR) positive advanced breast cancer in combination with aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole) or an estrogen receptor antagonist (fulvestrant). Administration of these drugs frequently causes severe side effects, such as neutropenia and diarrhea. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of CDK4/6 inhibitors, aromatase inhibitors, and the estrogen receptor antagonist is considered important for ensuring the efficacy and safety of these drugs. In this study, we describe a simple, highly sensitive, and specific liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous quantitation of the concentrations of palbociclib, abemaciclib, ribociclib, letrozole, anastrozole, and fulvestrant. In addition, we analyzed plasma samples from patients with HER2-negative and HR-positive advanced breast cancer treated with these compounds using this novel method. In our method, the intra-assay relative error (RE) values ranged from -12.8% to 12.9%, the inter-assay RE values ranged from -4.8% to 6.2%, and the coefficient of variation (CV) values for intra- and inter-assay were ≤8.6% and ≤13.3%, respectively. The analytes showed good stability with RE values ranging from -13.5% to 13.6% and CV values

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) may increase cardiovascular risk relative to tamoxifen in post-menopausal women with breast cancer. This risk has not been well-quantified outside of clinical trials.Observational population-based cohort study of women aged55 years diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer between 2005 and 2010. Women treated with AIs or tamoxifen were followed to March 2012. The primary outcome was hospitalisation for myocardial infarction (MI). Cause-specific hazards were compared using tamoxifen as the reference group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score was used to reduce confounding due to measured baseline covariates. Results were confirmed using two cause-specific hazards models. Subgroup analyses included women aged ≥66 years, those with prior ischaemic heart disease, and a 'lower-risk group' aged74 years with stage I-II cancer and no prior ischaemic heart disease.In 7409 aromatase inhibitor-treated and 1941 tamoxifen-treated women, the median age was 71 versus 74 years, respectively (p 0.001). Baseline prevalence of ischaemic heart disease was similar (17.0% versus 16.9%, p = 0.96). Over a mean of 1184 d of follow-up, there were 123 hospitalisations for MI; the cause-specific hazard was higher with AIs (hazard ratio 2.02; 95% confidence interval 1.16-3.53 in the weighted sample). We observed comparable patterns within pre-defined subgroups and when adjusted using cause-specific hazards models.Aromatase inhibitors are associated with a higher risk of MI compared with tamoxifen. This risk should be accounted for when managing aromatase inhibitor-treated women.

In France, women carrying BRCA1/2 mutation, at an identified high risk of breast cancer are recommended to undergo breast MRI screening. That screening does not however prevent the risk of developing a breast cancer. The only alternative to breast cancer screening available in France is surgical prevention by prophylactic mastectomy. An interesting option for women who wish to reduce their breast cancer risk, but are unready for prophylactic mastectomy is a preventive hormonal treatment by aromatase inhibitors, or selective estrogens receptor modulators (SERMs). Reliable clinical trials show the efficiency of tamoxifen, raloxifen, exemestane, and anastrozole especially, in reducing breast cancer incidence by 33%, 34%, 65% and 53% respectively. This article tries to sum up the main published trials of breast cancer prevention with hormonal treatment, and presents the latest American and English clinical guidelines concerning hormonal prevention for women at high risk of breast cancer, and starts thinking about the possibilities of hormonoprevention, especially among women carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation in France.

Aberrations in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway are common abnormalities in breast cancer and are associated with the development of resistance to endocrine- and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-targeted therapies. Because of the significant improvement in progression-free survival for everolimus plus exemestane compared with exemestane plus placebo, everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, was approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER-negative, advanced breast cancer whose disease had progressed while receiving letrozole or anastrozole. To provide optimal prevention and management strategies, it is crucial that clinicians are aware of the adverse events (AEs) associated with mTOR inhibition. Understanding the appropriate dose modifications will help reduce toxicity and improve drug tolerance, thus achieving the optimal benefit from everolimus. Analyses of data from the Breast Cancer Trials of Oral Everolimus 2 trial have shown that, despite a greater frequency of AEs in the everolimus plus exemestane treatment arm, the AEs were effectively managed with temporary dose reductions or interruptions. In some cases, the full dose of everolimus could be resumed. Despite a lower mean dose and duration of exposure in patients aged ≥ 70 versus < 70 years, everolimus plus exemestane was similarly efficacious, suggesting that appropriate dose reductions for toxicity will not adversely impact efficacy. Appropriate modification of the everolimus dose and dose delay according to the severity of AEs, with resumption of the optimal dose of everolimus when toxicity has improved, will positively affect patient outcomes in HR+ advanced breast cancer.

Summary Background Ductal carcinoma in situ is currently managed with excision, radiotherapy, and adjuvant hormone therapy, usually tamoxifen. We postulated that an aromatase inhibitor would be safer and more effective. We therefore undertook this trial to compare anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy. Methods The double-blind, randomised, phase 3 National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-35 trial was done in 333 participating NSABP centres in the USA and Canada. Postmenopausal women with hormone-positive ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy with clear resection margins and whole-breast irradiation were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral tamoxifen 20 mg per day (with matching placebo in place of anastrozole) or oral anastrozole 1 mg per day (with matching placebo in place of tamoxifen) for 5 years. Randomisation was stratified by age ( vs ≥60 years) and patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was breast cancer-free interval, defined as time from randomisation to any breast cancer event (local, regional, or distant recurrence, or contralateral breast cancer, invasive disease, or ductal carcinoma in situ), analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00053898, and is complete. Findings Between Jan 1, 2003, and June 15, 2006, 3104 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (1552 to tamoxifen and 1552 to anastrozole). As of Feb 28, 2015, follow-up information was available for 3083 patients for overall survival and 3077 for all other disease-free endpoints, with median follow-up of 9·0 years (IQR 8·2–10·0). In total, 212 breast cancer-free interval events occurred: 122 in the tamoxifen group and 90 in the anastrozole group (HR 0·73 [95% CI 0·56–0·96], p=0·0234). A significant time-by-treatment interaction (p=0·0410) became evident later in the study. There was also a significant interaction between treatment and age group (p=0·0379), showing that anastrozole is superior only in women younger than 60 years of age. Adverse events did not differ between the groups, except for thrombosis or embolism—a known side-effect of tamoxifen—for which there were 17 grade 4 or worse events in the tamoxifen group versus four in the anastrozole group. Interpretation Compared with tamoxifen, anastrozole treatment provided a significant improvement in breast cancer-free interval, mainly in women younger than 60 years of age. This finding means that women will benefit from having a choice of effective agents for ductal carcinoma in situ. Funding US National Cancer Institute and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP.

BackgroundThe NSABP B-35 trial compared 5 years of treatment with anastrozole versus tamoxifen for reducing subsequent occurrence of breast cancer in postmenopausal patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. This report assesses the effect of these drugs on quality of life and symptoms.MethodsThe study was done at 333 hospitals in North America. Postmenopausal women with hormone-positive ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy with clear resection margins and whole breast irradiation were randomly assigned to receive either tamoxifen (20 mg/day) or anastrazole (1 mg/day) for 5 years, stratified by age (

WOS: 000371187300030, PubMed ID: 26773307, Objective: Currently, medical and surgical treatment options for endometriosis are limited due to suboptimal efficacy, and also safety and tolerance issues. Long-term use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogs, androgenes, and the danazol, which are widely used drugs for endometriosis, is usually not possible due to their suboptimal safety and tolerance profile. The lack of an effective, tolerable and safe treatment option for endometriosis makes animal models of experimental endometriosis necessary to study candidate drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of imatinib on the experimental endometriosis in a rat model. Study design: Endometriosis was induced by autotransplantation of uterine tissue into the peritoneal cavity. Twenty-four rats, which had visually confirmed endometriotic implants on subsequent laparotomy, were randomized into three groups to receive imatinib (25 mg/kg/day, p.o.), anastrozole (0.004 mg/day, p.o.), or normal saline (0.1 mL, i.p.) for 14 days. After removal of endometriotic tissue and H & E staining, endometriosis score was determined according to a semiquantitative histological classification. Also, immunostaining with primary antibodies including VEGF, CD117, and Bax were used for immunohistochemical (IHC) examination. Results: Both anastrozole and imatinib suppressed the growth of endometriotic tissue and reduced the number of ovarian follicles. Although the difference was not statistically significant, imatinib was less effective than anastrozole for treatment of endometriosis. Conclusion: Imatinib effectively treats experimental endometriosis by its inhibitor effects on angiogenesis and cell proliferation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Objective To compare the effects of letrozole (2.5 mg) and anastrozole (1 mg) meant for ovulation induction in clomiphene (CC)-resistant women with PCOS. Design Prospective randomized trial. Setting University teaching hospital and private practice setting. Patient(s) The study comprised a total of 220 infertile women (574 cycles) with CC-resistant PCOS. Intervention(s) Patients were randomized to treatment with 2.5 mg of letrozole daily (111 patients, 295 cycles) or 1 mg of anastrozole daily (109 patients, 279 cycles) for 5 days from day 3 of menses. Main Outcome Measure(s) Number of follicles, serum E 2 , serum P, endometrial thickness, pregnancy rate (PR), and miscarriage rate. Result(s) The total number of follicles was significantly more in the anastrozole group (5.4 ± 0.4 vs. 5.8 ± 0.4). The number of follicles ≥14 mm (3.1 ± 0.3 vs. 2.7 ± 0.2) and ≥18 mm (2.3 ± 0.1 vs. 3.1 ± 0.2) were significantly higher in the anastrozole group. The endometrial thickness at the time of hCG administration was significantly more in the anastrozole group (9.1 ± 0.2 vs. 10.2 ± 0.7 mm). The duration to reach a dominant follicle was longer in the letrozole group (12.1 ± 1.3 days vs. 8.8 ± 1.9 days) but without statistical significant difference. Ovulation occurred in 183/295 cycles (62%) in the letrozole group and 177/279 cycles (63.4%) in the anastrozole group, whereas pregnancy occurred in 36/295 cycles (12.2%) in the letrozole group and 42/279 cycles (15.1%) in the anastrozole group and the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion(s) The results of this study did not show a significant difference in PR or miscarriage rate between anastrozole and letrozole when used for ovulation induction in women with CC-resistant PCOS.

Ruthenium-based complexes currently attract great attention as they hold promise to replace platinum-based drugs as a first line cancer treatment. Whereas ruthenium arene complexes are some of the most studied species for their potential anticancer properties, other types of ruthenium complexes have been overlooked for this purpose. Here, we report the synthesis and characterization of Ru(II) cyclopentadienyl (Cp), Ru(II) cyclooctadienyl (COD) and Ru(III) complexes bearing anastrozole or letrozole ligands, third-generation aromatase inhibitors currently used to treat estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Among these complexes, Ru(II)Cp 2 was the only species found to be stable in DMSO and in cell culture media and as a result, the only complex for which the in vitro and in vivo biological activities were investigated. Unlike anastrozole alone, complex 2 was considerably cytotoxic in vitro (IC50 values < 1μM) in human ER+ breast cancer (T47D and MCF7), triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (MBA-MB-231), as well as in aggressive (H295R) adrenocortical cells. Theoretical (docking simulation) and experimental (aromatase catalytic activity) studies suggested that an interaction between 2 and the aromatase enzyme was not likely to occur and that the bulkiness of the PPh(3) ligands could be an important factor preventing the complex to reach the active site of the enzyme. Exposure of zebrafish embryos to complex 2 at concentrations around its IC(50) in vitro cytotoxicity value (0.1–1 μM) did not lead to noticeable signs of toxicity over 96h, making it a suitable candidate for further in vivo investigations. This study confirms the potential of Ru(II)Cp complexes for breasts cancer therapy, more specifically against TNBCs that are usually not responsive to currently used chemotherapeutic agents.

Purpose Palbociclib (PAL) is an oral molecular targeted drug that specifically inhibits CDK4 / 6. As a result of PALOMA-2 and 3 studies, PFS is extended in combination with primary and secondary hormone therapy in patients with HR-positive HER2-negative advanced recurrent breast cancer. This time, we examined the case of PAL administration in our hospital. Patients and Method Subjects were 16 patients who received PAL. PAL started with 125 mg. Allowed dose loss (100 mg, 75 mg) up to 2 levels. We examined the clinical findings, side effects, dose loss, and continuation of the treated cases. Result The 16 cases treated were 43-81 years old and 60.3 years old on average. The metastatic site was bone only 7 cases, pulmonary and lymph node 7 cases, lung 2 cases. The administration line was 2 cases for primary and 14 cases for secondary. At diagnosis, Stage I 2 cases, II 5 cases, III 4 cases, and IV 5 cases. The average postoperative age of 11 cases excluding 5 Stage IV patients is 11.3 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed before and after surgery in 8 of 11 patients. Two cases of primary treatment were one case of recurrence during adjuvant chemotherapy and one case of Stage IV. The most recent treatment in the second-line treatment case is letrozole + LHRH 2 cases, letrozole 10 cases, Arimidex 2 cases. As for side effects, neutropenia at 2 weeks after the start was G0 1 case, G1 1 case, G2 3 cases, G3 4 cases, G4 7 cases, G3 / 4 appearance rate was 68%. Weight loss was performed in 11 cases (68%). Seven patients were able to continue administration, 43% of the total. The drug dose in the continuous administration cases is 125 mg for 2 cases, 100 mg for 2 cases, and 75 mg for 3 cases. The average duration of continuous administration is currently 11 months. Side effects were severe fatigue G2 and acne-like eruption G2 except for hematological toxicity. Conclusion 1) PAL was administered to 16 patients and continuous administration was possible in 43%. 2) Hematological toxicity appeared in 68% of G3 / 4 appearance rate

a b s t r a c t Testosterone (T) is the most abundant biologically active hormone in women. Androgen receptors (AR) are located throughout the body including the breast where T decreases tissue proliferation. However, T can be aromatized to estradiol (E2), which increases proliferation and hence, breast cancer (BCA) risk. Increased aromatase expression and an imbalance in the ratio of stimulatory estrogens to protective androgens impacts breast homeostasis. Recent clinical data supports a role for T in BCA prevention. Women with symptoms of hormone deficiency treated with pharmacological doses of T alone or in combination with anastrozole (A), delivered by subcutaneous implants, had a reduced incidence of BCA. In addition, T combined with A effectively treated symptoms of hormone deficiency in BCA survivors and was not associated with recurrent disease. Most notably, T + A implants placed in breast tissue surrounding malignant tumors significantly reduced BCA tumor size, further supporting T direct antiproliferative, protective and therapeutic effect. © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Aim: Formulation and evaluation of anastrozole, an anti-cancer drug loaded in different biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles. Materials and methods: Different carrier systems such as poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA 50:50), poly(lacticacid) (PLA) and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) are used to prepare nanoparticles by simple emulsion technique. The surfactants polyvinyl alcohol and sodium deoxycholate were studied for their use as stabilizing agents at varying concentrations. The formulations were studied for their particle size, zeta potential, entrapment efficiency and solid state characteristics, and also were tested for their in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo behavior in rats. Key findings: The entrapment ranged from 35 to 85%, depending on the drug-polymer ratio used. Particle size ranged from 100 to 350 nm with optimal zeta potential. Accordingly, discrete spherical nanoparticles with smooth surface were obtained as evidence from Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) study. The solid state characteristics revealed dispersion of drug at the molecular level in the polymeric matrix of nanoparticles. A non-Fickian transport with initial burst release followed by slow release was observed with nanoparticles. The remarkable decrease in cell viability at various time points was observed for PLGA nanoparticles compared to other polymer matrices. The AUC(0 → ∞) of PLGA, PLA and PCL nanoparticles were found to be 4.77, 19.31 and 19.81 fold higher than (p b 0.05) anastrozole in solution, respectively. Also, pharmacokinetics study revealed the long time circulation of anastrozole loaded polymeric nanoparticles. Significance: The results suggest that developed nanoparticles could be used successfully for effective management of breast cancer chemotherapy.

Introduction : Primary endocrine therapy (PET) is an alternative treatment to surgery for oestrogen receptor (ER) positive operable breast cancer in older women. However, there is variable use of PET in the UK, with up to 40% of patients aged over 70 receiving PET instead of surgery in some regions. Treatment options offered to patients rely heavily on healthcare professional (HCP) assessment and opinion on which treatments are appropriate.\ud \ud Materials and methods : This was a mixed methods study combining semi-structured interviews with HCPs working in high and low PET regions in the UK, followed by a postal questionnaire survey distributed via the Association of Breast Surgery (ABS).\ud \ud Results : Thirty-four HCPs (20 breast surgeons; 13 nurse specialists; 1 geriatrician) were interviewed from 14 sites across the UK and 252/641 questionnaires returned (39%). There was an overriding view that PET is not suitable for patients under the age of 80 unless there are significant comorbidities. Opinion was split regarding the best way to treat patients with dementia. Patient preference was generally stated to be the most important factor when considering treatment, however only around a quarter 65/244 (26.6%) felt that all patients over the age of 70 should be offered PET as an alternative treatment option.\ud \ud Conclusions : Opinions differ on the best way to treat women over 70 with operable breast cancer, especially if they have co-existing dementia, as well as whether they should be offered PET as a treatment option. This may be a significant cause of treatment variation in the UK.\ud Keywords : Breast cancer; \ud Primary endocrine therapy; \ud Surgery; \ud Elderly; \ud Older; \ud Mixed methods.

Background: In the adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, variables like tumour size, grade and nodal status have great impact on therapy decisions. As most node-positive patients with HR+ breast cancer currently receive adjuvant chemotherapy improved methods for characterization of individuals' metastasis risk are needed to reduce overtreatment. Patients and methods: Tissue specimens from node-positive patients of the ABCSG-8 and ATAC trials who received adjuvant tamoxifen and/or anastrozole were included in this study. Analysing RNA from paraffin blocks using the PAM50 test, the primary objective was to evaluate the prognostic information of the risk of recurrence (ROR) score added to combined clinical standard variables in patients with one positive node (1N+) and in patients with two or three positive nodes (2-3N+), using log-likelihood ratio tests. Results: At a median follow-up of 9.6 years, distant metastases occurred in 97 (18%) of 543 node-positive patients. In a multivariate analysis, the PAM50-derived ROR score provided reliable prognostic information in addition to and beyond established clinical factors for 1N+ (P < 0.0001) and 2-3N+ patients (P = 0.0002). Ten-year distant recurrence risk was significantly increased in the high-risk compared with the low-risk group derived from ROR score for 1N+ [25.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 17.5% to 36.1% versus 6.6%, 95% CI 3.3% to 12.8%] and compared with the combined low/intermediate risk group for 2-3N+ patients (33.7%, 95% CI 25.5% to 43.8% versus 12.5%, 95% CI 6.6% to 22.8%). Additionally, the luminal A intrinsic subtype (IS) exhibited significantly lower risk of distant recurrence compared with the luminal B subtype in 1N+ and 2-3N+ patients. Conclusion: PAM50 ROR score and IS can identify node-positive patient subgroups with limited risk of metastasis after endocrine therapy, for whom adjuvant chemotherapy can be spared. The PAM50 test is a valuable tool in determining treatment of node-positive early-stage breast cancer patients.

Androstenedione, the main circulating ovarian hormone present after menopause, has been shown to positively correlate with poor spatial memory in an ovary-intact rodent model of follicular depletion, and to impair spatial memory when administered exogenously to surgically menopausal ovariectomized rats. Androstenedione can be converted directly to estrone via the aromatase enzyme, or to testosterone. The current study investigated the hormonal mechanism underlying androstenedione-induced cognitive impairments. Young adult ovariectomized rats were given either androstenedione, androstenedione plus the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole to block conversion to estrone, androstenedione plus the androgen receptor blocker flutamide to block androgen receptor activity, or vehicle treatment, and were then administered a battery of learning and memory maze tasks. Since we have previously shown that estrone administration to ovariectomized rats impaired cognition, we hypothesized that androstenedione’s conversion to estrone underlies, in part, its negative cognitive impact. Here, androstenedione administration impaired spatial reference and working memory. Further, androstenedione did not induce memory deficits when co-administered with the aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, whereas pharmacological blockade of the androgen receptor failed to block the cognitive impairing effects of androstenedione. Anastrozole alone did not impact performance on any cognitive measure. The current data support the tenet that androstenedione impairs memory through its conversion to estrone, rather than via actions on the androgen receptor. Studying the effects of aromatase and estrogen metabolism is critical to elucidating how hormones impact women’s health across the lifespan, and results hold important implications for understanding and optimizing the hormone milieu from the many endogenous and exogenous hormone exposures across the lifetime.

There are many questions which cannot be answered without a very sensitive estradiol assay. A recombinant cell bioassay (RCBA) for estradiol was developed in 1994. The sensitivity of the bioassay is 0.02–0.2 pg/ml (0.07–0.7 pmol/L), more than 20 times more sensitive than commercial RIAs and 10 times more sensitive than newer mass spectrometry assays. The RCBA for estradiol opened the door to study low levels of estradiol equivalents (EE) across the physiological spectrum of life from prepubertal children through menopause and across the spectrum from normal physiology, in boys as well as girls, to pathology, including: premature thelarche; estradiol suppression in children treated with GnRH analogues for precocious puberty; aromatase inhibition in boys with growth hormone deficiency; the differences between oral and transdermal routes of estrogen administration in girls with Turner’s syndrome; women with breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors; and women with urogenital atrophy treated with low dose vaginal estrogen. A bioassay also allows study of endocrine disruptors, like phytoestrogens and other environmental compounds, which are relevant to public health and alternative medicine options. This paper reviews the assay and the last 20 years of applications. A bioassay for estrogen has a role because measuring biological effect is theoretically useful, increasing the understanding of physiology in addition to biochemical levels, giving different information than other assays, and opening the door to measure very low levels of estrogen activity in both humans and the environment.

We determined hormone concentrations (estradiol [E2], estrone [E1], estrone conjugates [E1-C], androstenedione [A], testosterone [T]) before and on anastrozole therapy where we also determined plasma concentrations of anastrozole and its metabolites.Postmenopausal women who were to receive adjuvant anastrozole for resected early breast cancer were studied. Pretreatment, blood samples were obtained for the acquisition of DNA and for plasma hormone measurements (E2, E1, E1-C, A, and T). A second blood draw was obtained at least 4 weeks after starting anastrozole for hormone, anastrozole and metabolite measurements. For hormone assays, a validated bioanalytical method using gas chromatography negative ionization tandem mass spectrometry was used. Anastrozole and metabolite assays involved extraction of plasma followed by LC/MS/MS assays.649 patients were evaluable. Pretreatment and during anastrozole, there was large inter-individual variability in E2, E1, and E1-C as well as anastrozole and anastrozole metabolite concentrations. E2 and E1 concentrations were below the lower limits of quantitation in 79% and 70%, respectively, of patients on anastrozole therapy, but those with reliable concentrations had a broad range (0.627-234.0 pg/mL, 1.562-183.2 pg/mL, respectively). Considering E2, 8.9% had the same or higher concentration relative to baseline while on anastrozole, documented by the presence of drug.We demonstrated large inter-individual variability in anastrozole and anastrozole metabolite concentrations as well as E1, E2, E1-C, A, and T concentrations before and while on anastrozole. These findings suggest that the standard 1mg daily dose of anastrozole is not optimal for a substantial proportion of women with breast cancer.

Objective To study the effects of aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole) on the growth and estradiol secretion of endometrioma cells in culture. Design Endometrioma cells are grown in vitro until maximum growth before used in this study. This was done in the research laboratory for tissue culture, in an academic hospital. Interventions Testosterone at a concentration of 10μg/mL was added as a substrate for the intracellular aromatase. In addition, aromatase inhibitor was added at a concentration of 200 and 300μg/mL. The effect on cell growth and estradiol secretion is evaluated using Student's t -test. Results The use of testosterone increased estradiol secretion by endometrioma cells in culture. The use of aromatase inhibitor significantly inhibited the growth of endometrioma cells, and estradiol secretion. Conclusion Aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole) may be an effective treatment for endometriosis due to inhibition of cellular aromatase.

The study was designed to formulate intravaginal devices that provide biologically active circulating concentrations of an aromatase inhibitor for a minimum of 4 days, and to determine their physiologic effects in cattle. Three compounds with estradiol inhibitory capability (letrozole, anastrozole and fenbendazole) were tested in vitro using bovine granulosa cell culture. Letrozole was found to be the most efficient and potent inhibitor. A wax-based vehicle was selected for further development of a letrozole intravaginal device based on its steady release rate. Cycling heifers were assigned randomly to be given an intravaginal device containing wax plus gel coat (n = 4), wax formulation (n = 4), no formulation (blank device, control, n = 4). Intravaginal devices were inserted on Day 3 (Day 0 = ovulation) and kept in place for 8 days. The addition of a letrozole-containing gel coating hastened the initial increase on plasma concentrations, while the letrozole-containing wax-based vehicle maintained prolonged delivery from the intravaginal device. The dominant follicle diameter profile was larger in heifers treated with the wax plus gel coat device (P < 0.04), and the interwave interval was prolonged in heifers in the letrozole-treated groups compared to controls (P < 0.001). Plasma estradiol concentrations were reduced significantly in the letrozole-treated groups. Plasma progesterone concentrations were lower in the wax letrozole-treated group (P < 0.02). We concluded that wax base plus gel coat intravaginal devices are suitable for the development of a letrozole-based protocol for the synchronization of ovulation in cattle. It effectively reduced estradiol production resulting in prolonged dominant follicle growth and lifespan, without adversely affecting progesterone production.

Background This pilot study aimed to test the possibility of therapeutic benefit imparted by early intervention based on sequential tumour marker (TM) measurements during follow-up of primary breast cancer (PBC) patients. Methods Patients with oestrogen receptor positive PBC with no clinical and/or radiological evidence of metastases were recruited and followed-up 3-monthly with clinical assessment and TM (CA15.3 and CEA) measurements. The clinical team was blinded to the TM results. Asymptomatic patients who developed raised TMs (based on pre-defined cut-offs) were randomised to either ‘treatment change’ (either start or change of adjuvant endocrine agent to another agent) or ‘no change’ (control). Patients who developed symptomatic metastases came off the study. The primary and secondary endpoints were intervals from randomisation to symptomatic metastases and to last follow-up/death respectively. Results Eighty-five patients (median age = 54 years (30–72)) were recruited with a median follow-up of 81 months (1–124). Sixteen patients were randomised as described. There was no significant difference (treatment change versus no change) with regards to interval from randomisation to symptomatic metastases – 23 (2–62) and 22 (1–63) months respectively (p = 0.9), as well as interval from randomisation to last follow-up/death – 36 (7–63) and 37 (10–63) months respectively (p = 0.9). Conclusions Despite long follow-up (up to 10+ years), this small study has thus far shown no significant difference in outcome. However, we have confirmed the feasibility of this study design but a larger study will be required to show if there is a benefit to this approach.

Objective To review recent studies about the application of aromatase inhibitors in endometrial carcinoma and the benefits and challenges of aromatase inhibitors in this regard. Methods Relevant studies and manuscripts were searched for in Pubmed using the following terms, either alone or in combination: aromatase, aromatase inhibitors, letrozole, anastrozole, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, endocrine, therapy, and side effects. Results Endometrial carcinoma is one of the most pervasive gynecological malignancies. Type I endometrial carcinoma is estrogen-dependent. Recent studies have demonstrated that aromatase inhibitors, which interfere with estrogen biosynthesis by inhibiting the activity of aromatase, can be used to treat endometrial carcinoma and its precancerous lesions to some extent. In early-stage endometrial carcinoma or atypical hyperplasia, a precancerous lesion of endometrial carcinoma, the effects of aromatase inhibitors were promising. However, in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, the application of aromatase inhibitors cannot solve the problem evidently. In addition, these inhibitors have limitations, like side effects and drug resistance. The need for a new generation of inhibitors with higher specificity and fewer side effects should be studied further. Conclusions Aromatase inhibitors show promise in the therapy of endometrial carcinoma, especially the early stage. Further studies should be conducted to develop next-generation aromatase inhibitors with higher specificity and fewer side effects.

Although selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as tamoxifen, or aromatase inhibitors (AIs), such as anastrozole, are the preferred endocrine treatment approach for most patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, many patients progress despite this therapy or become resistant. Fulvestrant is a selective estrogen receptor down-regulator (SERD) that has demonstrated activity and efficacy in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer previously untreated or treated with hormonal therapy. The efficacy of fulvestrant has been demonstrated in the neoadjuvant and metastatic settings, either alone or in combination with other therapies such as anastrozole or targeted drugs. Additionally, 500 mg of fulvestrant have been shown to be more effective than 250 mg, without significant differences in the toxicity profile. In this review, the unique mode of action of fulvestrant and the clinical data for different dosing regimens both alone or in combination with other drugs is critically assessed.

The present work reports a simple one step synthesis of nanoscale graphene oxide magnetic composites (GO–IO) using ferrofluid (GO–IOF). The obtained GO–IO were compared with GO–IO obtained from in situ (GO–IOI) methods. Anastrozole (ANS) was loaded on the GO–IOI and GO–IOF via simple stirring method to form GO–IOA and GO–IOFA respectively. These GO–IO prepared by two techniques were characterized using spectroscopic techniques and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) analysis. Particle size and potential were measured using Malvern Zetasizer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for studying the surface morphology of GO–IO, and in addition to this elemental analysis was also performed for confirming the presence of iron. The cell viability assay was carried out using the MCF-7 cell line. It revealed that GO–IOFA had reasonably high cytotoxicity (49.7%) compared to GO (13.1%), ANS (16.6), GO–IOI (13%), GO–IOF (13.6) and GO–IOIA (18.34%). Both, GO–IOIA and GO–IOFA showed improved cytotoxicity when compared with pure ANS. GO–IOF were found to exhibit superior magnetic activity due to higher iron content along with smaller particle size and higher loading efficiency compared to GO–IOI. The overall effect suggests that GO–IO can be utilized as efficient carriers for the loading of chemotherapeutic agents.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Testosterone (T) is a hormone and regulator involved in the processes of development of the organism (ie promoting development of bone and muscle mass). Although T effects on the mesenchyme derived muscle bone and adipose tissues are well studied T effects on intervertebral disc (IVD) have not been reported. PURPOSE: The aim was to test the following hypothesis: if a physiological concentration of T (~30 nM) can improve in vitro chondrogenesis of human IVD cells and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Human IVD cells and MSCs were differentiated to chondrogenic lineage on gelatin scaffolds for 4 weeks in the presence or absence of T. METHODS: Chondrogenesis was assessed by cell viability by measuring gene expression with quantitative polymerase chain reaction and extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation with immunoblotting immunohistochemical and biochemical methods. RESULTS: Supplementation of T to chondrogenic culture did not affect viability. In male IVD cells T had a beneficial impact on chondrogenesis particularly in nucleus pulposus cells demonstrated by an increased expression of aggrecan collagen type I and especially collagen type II. Conversely T had no effects on chondrogenesis of female IVD cells or MSCs from both genders. A gene expression array of transforming growth factor ß/bone morphogenetic protein signaling cascade showed that in male IVD cells T promoted a stable general but nonsignificant increase in gene expression. Furthermore aromatase inhibitor anastrazole repressed the effect of T on ECM expression by IVD cells. The results suggest that T increased ECM accumulation in male IVD cells in combination with its conversion to estradiol by the enzyme aromatase. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that T effectively enhances in vitro chondrogenesis in male IVD cells rising the interest in the possible role of sex hormones in IVD degeneration. Nevertheless T does not affect chondrogenic differentiation of female IVD cells and MSCs from both genders. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. KEYWORDS: Aromatase; Chondrogenesis; Intervertebral disc cells; Mesenchymal stem cells; Sex hormones; Testosterone and three dimensional cultures

PAM50 is a 50-gene test that is designed to identify intrinsic breast cancer subtypes and generate a Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score. It has been developed to be carried out in qualified routine hospital pathology laboratories.One thousand four hundred seventy-eight postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)+ early breast cancer (EBC) treated with tamoxifen or tamoxifen followed by anastrozole from the prospective randomized ABCSG-8 trial were entered into this study. Patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. RNA was extracted from paraffin blocks and analyzed using the PAM50 test. Both intrinsic subtype (luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, basal-like) and ROR score were calculated. The primary analysis was designed to test whether the continuous ROR score adds prognostic value in predicting distant recurrence (DR) over and above standard clinical variables.In all tested subgroups, ROR score significantly adds prognostic information to the clinical predictor (P0.0001). PAM50 assigns an intrinsic subtype to all cases, and the luminal A cohort had a significantly lower ROR at 10 years compared with Luminal B (P0.0001). Significant and clinically relevant discrimination between low- and high-risk groups occurred also within all tested subgroups.The results of the primary analysis, in combination with recently published results from the ATAC trial, constitute Level 1 evidence for clinical validity of the PAM50 test for predicting the risk of DR in postmenopausal women with ER+ EBC. A 10-year metastasis risk of3.5% in the ROR low category makes it unlikely that additional chemotherapy would improve this outcome-this finding could help to avoid unwarranted overtreatment.ABCSG 8: NCT00291759.