Search

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe administered with simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia., Background: Despite the availability of statins, many patients do not achieve lipid targets. Combination therapy with lipid-lowering agents that act via a complementary pathway may allow additional patients to achieve recommended cholesterol goals., Methods: After dietary stabilization, a 2- to 12-week washout period, and a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, patients with baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or =145 mg/dl to < or =250 mg/dl and triglycerides (TG) < or =350 mg/dl were randomized to one of the following 10 groups administered daily for 12 consecutive weeks: ezetimibe 10 mg; simvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was percentage reduction from baseline to end point in direct LDL-C for the pooled ezetimibe plus simvastatin groups versus pooled simvastatin groups., Results: Ezetimibe plus simvastatin significantly improved LDL-C (p < 0.01), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (p = 0.03), and TG (p < 0.01) compared with simvastatin alone. Ezetimibe plus simvastatin (pooled doses) provided an incremental 13.8% LDL-C reduction, 2.4% HDL-C increase, and 7.5% TG reduction compared with pooled simvastatin alone. Coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin provided LDL-C reductions of 44% to 57%, TG reductions of 20% to 28%, and HDL-C increases of 8% to 11%, depending on the simvastatin dose. Ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin 10 mg and simvastatin 80 mg alone each provided a 44% LDL-C reduction. The coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to those of simvastatin and of placebo., Conclusions: When coadministered with simvastatin, ezetimibe provided significant incremental reductions in LDL-C and TG, as well as increases in HDL-C. Coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was well tolerated and comparable to statin alone.

Concomitant use of a pacemaker and an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) is common. Seventeen percent of patients receiving an AICD at The Johns Hopkins Hospital also had a permanent pacemaker implanted before (16 patients), at the same time as (2 patients) or after (12 patients) AICD implantation. Four types of interactions were noted: 1) transient failure to sense or capture immediately after AICD discharge (seven patients); 2) oversensing of the pacemaker stimulus by the AICD, leading to double counting (one patient); 3) AICD failure to sense ventricular fibrillation resulting from pacemaker stimulus oversensing (three patients, one only at high asynchronous output); and 4) pacemaker reprogramming caused by AICD discharge (three patients). No clinical sequelae of these interactions were noted during follow-up study. Thus, potentially adverse clinical interactions are common and routine screening is recommended. With proper attention to lead placements and programming of the devices, clinical consequences of these interactions can be avoided.

The purpose of the present study was to examine at autopsy the effect of multiple defibrillations on the myocardium and the pathologic consequences of short- and long-term placement of the intravascular and interpericardial leads of the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Twenty-five patients were examined at autopsy; 8 of them underwent lead implantation only and 17 received both leads and the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Twelve patients (48%) died of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation; seven (28%) died of other causes. Acute pericarditis occurred in all patients, resulting in a localized, progressive fibrosis around the apical patch lead without giving rise to pericardial restriction. Thrombus formation was associated with the superior vena cava spring electrode in four patients (17%) and the right ventricular rate-sensing electrode in one patient (4%). Asymptomatic pulmonary emboli occurred in two patients (8%). In one patient who underwent defibrillation 59 times, superior vena cava changes consisted of vein wall destruction, fibrosis and thrombus formation. Pathologic changes under the apical patch related to defibrillation were observed in seven patients; two of these had fewer than 5 defibrillations, one had 8 defibrillations and four had 21 to 74 defibrillations. These changes consisted of contraction band necrosis in four patients, vacuolar cytoplasmic clearing and loss of myocytes confined to the myocardium under the patch electrode in five patients who had multiple defibrillations. The observed pathologic changes were estimated to affect less than 2% of the total myocardial mass. Thus, the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead system and multiple defibrillations result in localized myocardial injury confined to the tissue under the patch electrode.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amiodarone is an investigational antiarrhythmic agent known to cause pulmonary toxicity. This report describes two patients with previous amiodarone pulmonary toxicity and complete resolution who at rechallenge 5 to 6 months later developed within 2 weeks of therapy a significant reduction in lung diffusion capacity before overt clinical toxicity occurred. This suggests that toxicity may present early with reduction in diffusion capacity and that such changes may warrant the need to alter treatment.

Forty-two patients with refractory, recurrent life-threatening ventricular tachycardia and spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (greater than or equal to 3 beats, heart rate greater than 100 beats/min) on baseline 24 hour Holter recording were treated with amiodarone. After 1 week of amiodarone therapy and during the follow-up period (22 +/- 11 months, mean +/- SD), patients had serial 24 hour Holter recordings (10.6 +/- 3.8 per patient). Twenty-four hour, 48 hour or 72 hour Holter monitoring was performed during the second week of therapy. Ventricular tachycardia was suppressed on all follow-up serial Holter recordings in 17 patients (40%). Ventricular tachycardia was suppressed in 34 (81%) of 42 patients with 24 hour Holter recordings, 21 (72%) of 29 patients with 48 hour recordings and 20 (69%) of 29 patients with 72 hour recordings during the second week of therapy. At follow-up 24 patients (57%) were free of clinical arrhythmic events (Sustained ventricular tachycardia or sudden death). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and predictive accuracy of ventricular tachycardia on 24, 48 and 72 hour Holter recordings during the second week of therapy for predicting subsequent events were analyzed. The positive and negative predictive values were 100 and 71% for 24 hour Holter recordings, 88 and 71% for 48 hour recordings and 89 and 75% for 72 hour recordings. Overall predictive accuracy was 76, 76 and 79%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To determine predictors of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation by programmed electrical stimulation in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, 14 clinical and angiographic variables were analyzed in 60 consecutive patients. All patients had angiographically documented coronary artery disease and symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia in 21, ventricular fibrillation in 21 and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 18). Baseline programmed electrical stimulation while the patient was not taking antiarrhythmic drugs was performed with use of single, double and triple extrastimuli and burst pacing from two right ventricular sites. The variables analyzed were presenting arrhythmia; presence, frequency and complexity of ventricular ectopic activity on baseline 24 h electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring; greater than or equal to 70% narrowing in either the left anterior descending, proximal left anterior descending, right coronary or circumflex coronary artery (independently assessed); single, double or triple vessel coronary disease; anterior, apical or inferior wall motion abnormalities; segmental dyskinesia and ejection fraction. Thirty-seven patients (62%) had inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (rate greater than 100 beats/min, duration greater than 30 s or requiring cardioversion) and two patients (3%) had ventricular fibrillation induced. Eleven patients (18%) had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (duration greater than or equal to 3 beats, less than 30 s) induced and 10 patients (17%) had no inducible arrhythmia (duration less than 3 beats). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis identified three independent variables predictive of inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias: sustained ventricular tachycardia as the presenting arrhythmia (p = 0.004), proximal left anterior descending artery lesion (p = 0.002) and anterior wall motion abnormality (p = 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)