Search

Background: Children with heart disease frequently require anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis. Current standard of care (SOC), vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin, has significant disadvantages., Objectives: The authors sought to describe safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of apixaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, for prevention of thromboembolism in children with congenital or acquired heart disease., Methods: Phase 2, open-label trial in children (ages, 28 days to <18 years) with heart disease requiring thromboprophylaxis. Randomization 2:1 apixaban or SOC for 1 year with intention-to-treat analysis., Primary Endpoint: a composite of adjudicated major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Secondary endpoints: PK, pharmacodynamics, quality of life, and exploration of efficacy., Results: From 2017 to 2021, 192 participants were randomized, 129 apixaban and 63 SOC. Diagnoses included single ventricle (74%), Kawasaki disease (14%), and other heart disease (12%). One apixaban participant (0.8%) and 3 with SOC (4.8%) had major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (% difference -4.0 [95% CI: -12.8 to 0.8]). Apixaban incidence rate for all bleeding events was nearly twice the rate of SOC (100.0 vs 58.2 per 100 person-years), driven by 12 participants with ≥4 minor bleeding events. No thromboembolic events or deaths occurred in either arm. Apixaban pediatric PK steady-state exposures were consistent with adult levels., Conclusions: In this pediatric multinational, randomized trial, bleeding and thromboembolism were infrequent on apixaban and SOC. Apixaban PK data correlated well with adult trials that demonstrated efficacy. These results support the use of apixaban as an alternative to SOC for thromboprophylaxis in pediatric heart disease. (A Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Apixaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonist [VKA] or Low Molecular Weight Heparin [LMWH] in Pediatric Subjects With Congenital or Acquired Heart Disease Requiring Anticoagulation; NCT02981472)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This trial was supported by the Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance, in collaboration with the NHLBI-funded Pediatric Heart Network (grant numbers: HL135646, HL135665, HL135666, HL135678, HL135680, HL135682, HL135683, HL135685, HL135689, HL135691). Bristol Myers Squibb provided all financing and drugs for this trial; managed the trial data, adjudication process, and clinical sites; and was involved in the design of the study. The Pediatric Heart Network (PHN) provided scientific input on the trial design and contributed organizational infrastructure including the Data and Safety Monitoring Board, Protocol Review Committee, Publications and Presentations Committee, and additional logistical support for United States–based sites. Editorial support was provided by Caudex and was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Any publication-related fees will be funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. In collaboration with the trial steering committee, Bristol Myers Squibb was involved in the writing of this manuscript and decision to submit the paper for publication. Dr Payne has received grants or contracts from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Friedreich Ataxia Research Alliance, and Additional Ventures non-profit organization; has received royalties or license from inventions: Wake Forest University, Larimar Therapeutics, and Indiana University; has received consulting fees from Larimar Therapeutics Inc.; has received support for attending meetings or travel from Indiana University School of Medicine; has 2 patents pending at Indiana University School of Medicine; is chair or is on the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) for NIH study on Friedreich Ataxia; has served on the scientific advisory board for Friedreich Ataxia Research Alliance; and has stock in Larimar Therapeutics, Inc. Dr Glatz has received grants or contracts from NIH/NHLBI. Dr Male has received payment or honoraria from Anthos, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, Janssen, and Norgine; and has a leadership or fiduciary role in Pediatric Anti-thrombotic Trials Leadership & Steering (Pedi-ATLAS) Group. Dr Brandão has received participation in an advisory committee for AstraZeneca (Andexxa in pediatrics) and Boehringer Ingelheim (dabigatran in children). Dr VanderPluym has received grants or contracts from the Georgia Claire Bowen Foundation; has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca and Merck; and participates in an advisory committee for the Valor Trial (Veriguciat in pediatric heart failure), and Andexxa in pediatrics in Europe. Dr Kochilas has received grants or contracts from NIH/NHLBI, Department of Defense, and Novartis Pharma; and participates in the Mitochondrial transplant study: Boston Children’s Hospital. Dr Stiller has received consulting fees from Janssen and Novartis; and has received payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Cnota has received grants or contracts from NIH/NHLBI and Additional Ventures nonprofit organization; has received support for attending meetings or travel from the American Heart Association CSSP committee; and has participated on the NIH-NHLBI DSMB, Advisory Board for Inozyme Pharma. Dr Rahkonen has received payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Adorisio has received grants or contracts from HORIZON 2022, Ministry of Italian Public Health; and has received consulting fees and payment or honoraria from PTC Therapeutics. Dr Stoica has been a co-applicant on research grants from local charities, National Institute of Health Research, the Health Foundation, and industry (Livanova, Admedus); has received payment or honoraria from LeMaitre Vascular; has received payment for expert testimony; and was audit co-lead in the Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland and at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes and Research. Dr May has received institutional support for conference fees. Dr Saraiva has a conflict of interest with AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer, Janssen, and Bayer; has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer, Janssen, and Bayer; has received payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer, Janssen, and Bayer; has received payment for expert testimony from AstraZeneca; has received support for attending meetings or travel from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, and Boehringer; and has participated in the Allbert Einstein Academic Research Organization, Brazil. Dr Rubio has stock in BMS (obtained in 2001). Dr Meador has Concurrent employment with AtriCure effective September 2022. Ms Wheaton has a contract between HealthCore (now known as Carelon Research) and BMS to conduct the SAXOPHONE study. Dr Ajavon-Hartmann and Ms Mills are employees of and have stock options in Bristol Myers Squibb. Drs Jarugula, Reedy, and Dyme and Ms Carlson-Taneja are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Monagle has received patents planned, issued, or pending from University of Melbourne and McMaster University: No commercial interests or connections since 2011. No current licensing agreements and no ongoing negotiations to license. Expect patents to expire in the next couple of years - Thrombin generation assay. Inventors: Berry LR, Ignjatovic V, Monagle PT, Chan AKC. U.S. patent, patent no. 8138308, “Modified Peptide Substrate”, issued 20 March 2012 “Enzyme Measurement Assay Using a Modified Substrate Comprising a Substrate Attached to a Macromolecule via a Spacer”: India patent no. 244241, issued November 25, 2010; Europe patent application, serial no. 06840527.3, issued October 2019; China patent application, serial no. 200680053447, filed December 21, 2006; and Japan patent application, serial no. 2008-547812, filed December 21, 2006. Dr Monagle has participated in Bayer Einstein junior suite of studies (Rivaroxaban in children): steering committee and writing committee; is an unpaid site investigator for the Bristol Myers Squibb SAXOPHONE study (apixaban in children): steering committee and writing committee; has been a site investigator (Unpaid, Ongoing) for Janssen; is an unpaid advisory board member for Milvexian; is an unpaid advisory board member for Takeda; is an unpaid advisory board member for Ceprotinin; and is an Associate Investigator for AstraZeneca, Takeda, Stago, Bayer, Janssen, and Pfizer. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institutes of Health, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neonates with symptomatic tetralogy of Fallot (sTOF) with hypoplastic pulmonary arteries (hPA) are considered high risk. Data are needed to inform the impact of hPA on outcomes, and the ideal management strategy., Objectives: The objectives of this study were to quantify the impact of hPA on outcomes in neonates with sTOF and measure the impact of strategy on pulmonary artery (PA) growth in this population., Methods: Neonates with sTOF from 2005 to 2017 were reviewed from the Congenital Cardiac Research Collaborative. Criteria for hPA included a unilateral PA z score <-2.0 and contralateral PA z score <0. Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included reintervention and PA growth., Results: We included 542 neonates with sTOF, including 188 (35%) with hPA and 354 (65%) with normal PA, with median follow-up of 4.1 years. Median right and left hPA z scores were -2.19 (25th-75th percentile: -2.55 to -1.94) and -2.23 (25th-75th percentile: -2.64 to -1.91), respectively. Staged repair (vs primary TOF repair) was less common in the hPA cohort (36 vs 44%; P = 0.07). Survival was similar between groups (unadjusted P = 0.16; adjusted P = 0.25). Reintervention was more common in the hPA group (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.01-1.63; P = 0.044); there was no difference after definitive repair (HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.93-1.58; P = 0.16). PA growth at 1 year was greater in the hPA cohort, particularly for the right PA (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Despite perception, the presence of hPA in neonates with sTOF conferred no increase in overall hazard of mortality or reintervention after definitive repair. PA growth was superior in the hPA cohort. These findings suggest that the presence of hPA does not adversely impact outcomes in sTOF., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: Recent data have demonstrated that overall mortality and adverse events are not significantly different for primary repair (PR) and staged repair (SR) approaches to management of neonates with symptomatic tetralogy of Fallot (sTOF). Cost data can be used to compare the relative value (cost for similar outcomes) of these approaches and are a potentially more sensitive measure of morbidity., Objectives: This study sought to compare the economic costs associated with PR and SR in neonates with sTOF., Methods: Data from a multicenter retrospective cohort study of neonates with sTOF were merged with administrative data to compare total costs and cost per day alive over the first 18 months of life in a propensity score-adjusted analysis. A secondary analysis evaluated differences in department-level costs., Results: In total, 324 subjects from 6 centers from January 2011 to November 2017 were studied (40% PR). The 18-month cumulative mortality (P = 0.18), procedural complications (P = 0.10), hospital complications (P = 0.94), and reinterventions (P = 0.22) did not differ between PR and SR. Total 18-month costs for PR (median $179,494 [IQR: $121,760-$310,721]) were less than for SR (median: $222,799 [IQR: $167,581-$327,113]) (P < 0.001). Cost per day alive (P = 0.005) and department-level costs were also all lower for PR. In propensity score-adjusted analyses, PR was associated with lower total cost (cost ratio: 0.73; P < 0.001) and lower department-level costs., Conclusions: In this multicenter study of neonates with sTOF, PR was associated with lower costs. Given similar overall mortality between treatment strategies, this finding suggests that PR provides superior value., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Financial support for this research was derived in part from the Kennedy Hamill Pediatric Cardiac Research Fund, the Liam Sexton Foundation, and a Heart Like Ava. Dr O’Byrne received research support from the National Institute of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23 HL130420-01). The funding agencies had no role in the planning or execution of the study, nor did they edit the manuscript as presented. The study also used resources from The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Cardiac Center Clinical Research Core. The manuscript represents the opinions of the authors alone. Dr Glatz has served as a consultant for Ampio Pharmaceuticals. Dr Goldstein has served as a consultant for Medtronic, W.L. Gore & Associates, and Mezzion Pharma; and has served as a consultant and on the advisory board for PECA Labs. Dr Qureshi has served as a consultant for Medtronic, W.L. Gore & Associates, Edwards Lifesciences, and Abiomed. Dr Shahanavaz has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, W.L Gore & Associates, and Abbott Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neonates with tetralogy of Fallot and symptomatic cyanosis (sTOF) require early intervention., Objectives: This study sought to perform a balanced multicenter comparison of staged repair (SR) (initial palliation [IP] and subsequent complete repair [CR]) versus primary repair (PR) treatment strategies., Methods: Consecutive neonates with sTOF who underwent IP or PR at ≤30 days of age from 2005 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed from the Congenital Cardiac Research Collaborative. The primary outcome was death. Secondary outcomes included component (IP, CR, PR) and cumulative (SR): hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay; durations of cardiopulmonary bypass, anesthesia, ventilation, and inotrope use; and complication and reintervention rates. Outcomes were compared using propensity score adjustment., Results: The cohort consisted of 342 patients who underwent SR (IP: surgical, n = 256; transcatheter, n = 86) and 230 patients who underwent PR. Pre-procedural ventilation, prematurity, DiGeorge syndrome, and pulmonary atresia were more common in the SR group (p ≤0.01). The observed risk of death was not different between the groups (10.2% vs 7.4%; p = 0.25) at median 4.3 years. After adjustment, the hazard of death remained similar between groups (hazard ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.49 to 1.38; p = 0.456), but it favored SR during early follow-up (<4 months; p = 0.041). Secondary outcomes favored the SR group in component analysis, whereas they largely favored PR in cumulative analysis. Reintervention risk was higher in the SR group (p = 0.002)., Conclusions: In this multicenter comparison of SR or PR for management of neonates with sTOF, adjusted for patient-related factors, early mortality and neonatal morbidity were lower in the SR group, but cumulative morbidity and reinterventions favored the PR group, findings suggesting potential benefits to each strategy., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Financial support for this research was derived, in part, from the Kennedy Hammill Pediatric Cardiac Research Fund, the Liam Sexton Foundation, and A Heart Like Ava. Dr. Goldstein has reported consulting relationships with Medtronic, W.L. Gore & Associates, and Edwards Lifesciences; and is an advisory board member for PECA Labs. Dr. Qureshi has reported consulting relationships with W.L Gore & Associates, Edwards Lifesciences, and Abiomed. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data related to the epidemiology and resource utilization of congenital heart disease (CHD)-related emergency department (ED) visits in the pediatric population is limited., Objectives: The purpose of this analysis was to describe national estimates of pediatric CHD-related ED visits and evaluate medical complexity, admissions, resource utilization, and mortality., Methods: This was an epidemiological analysis of ED visit-level data from the 2006 to 2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Patients age <18 years with CHD were identified using International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision-Clinical Modification codes. We evaluated time trends using weighted regression and tested the hypothesis that medical complexity, resource utilization, and mortality are higher in CHD patients., Results: A total of 420,452 CHD-related ED visits (95% confidence interval [CI]: 416,897 to 422,443 visits) were identified, accounting for 0.17% of all pediatric ED visits. Those with CHD were more likely to be <1 year of age (43% vs. 13%), and to have ≥1 complex chronic condition (35% vs. 2%). CHD-related ED visits had higher rates of inpatient admission (46% vs. 4%; adjusted odds ratio: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.85 to 1.93), higher median ED charges ($1,266 [interquartile range (IQR): $701 to $2,093] vs. $741 [IQR: $401 to $1,332]), and a higher mortality rate (1% vs. 0.04%; adjusted odds ratio: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.45). Adjusted median charges for CHD-related ED visits increased from $1,219 (IQR: $673 to $2,138) to $1,630 (IQR: $901 to $2,799), while the mortality rate decreased from 1.13% (95% CI: 0.71% to 1.52%) to 0.75% (95% CI: 0.41% to 1.09%) over the 9 years studied., Conclusions: Children with CHD presenting to the ED represent a medically complex population at increased risk for morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization compared with those without CHD. Over 9 years, charges increased, but the mortality rate improved., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiac catheterization is the standard of care procedure for diagnosis, choice of therapy, and longitudinal follow-up of children and adults with pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, the procedure is invasive and has risks associated with both the procedure and recovery period., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for catastrophic adverse outcomes in children with PH undergoing cardiac catheterization., Methods: We studied children and young adults up to 21 years of age with PH undergoing 1 or more cardiac catheterization at centers participating in the Pediatric Health Information Systems database between 2007 and 2012. Using mixed-effects multivariable regression, we assessed the association between pre-specified subject- and procedure-level covariates and the risk of the composite outcome of death or initiation of mechanical circulatory support within 1 day of cardiac catheterization after adjustment for patient- and procedure-level factors., Results: A total of 6,339 procedures performed on 4,401 patients with a diagnosis of PH from 38 of 43 centers contributing data to the Pediatric Health Information Systems database were included. The observed risk of composite outcome was 3.5%. In multivariate modeling, the adjusted risk of the composite outcome was 3.3%. Younger age at catheterization, cardiac operation in the same admission as the catheterization, pre-procedural systemic vasodilator infusion, and hemodialysis were independently associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Pre-procedural use of pulmonary vasodilators was associated with reduced risk of composite outcome., Conclusions: The risk of cardiac catheterization in children and young adults with PH is high relative to previously reported risk in other pediatric populations. The risk is influenced by patient-level factors. Further research is necessary to determine whether knowledge of these factors can be translated into practices that improve outcomes for children with PH., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study investigated whether cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) can replace catheterization (cath) for routine evaluation prior to Fontan and under what circumstances CMR and cath are used together., Background: Routine cath prior to Fontan has been utilized for years; noninvasive methods, however, may be sufficient., Methods: This study reviews clinical data in 119 consecutive patients investigating 3 groups: those who underwent CMR alone (MR; n = 41), cath alone (C; n = 41), or both cath and CMR (C+M; n = 37) prior to Fontan., Results: No clinically significant differences were noted in patient characteristics, hemodynamics, or clinical status prior to or after surgery between the C and MR groups. CMR added information in 82%. There were no discrepant findings between CMR and cath data in the C+M group. Diagnostic success was ≥95% in all groups. Of those undergoing Fontan completion, the C+M group had similar outcomes to C and MR; C and CMR were utilized in combination to assess aortopulmonary collaterals or the need for an intervention or evaluate its success. Echo could not delineate pulmonary arterial anatomy in 46% to 53% of patients. The C+M and C groups were exposed to 6.8 ± 4.1 mSv of radiation., Conclusions: Single ventricle patients not requiring an intervention can undergo successful Fontan completion with CMR and echo alone with similar short-term outcomes to C, which was used as a control, preventing an invasive test and exposure to radiation. CMR can add information in a significant number of patients. Cath and CMR are utilized together for interventions and assessment of aortopulmonary collaterals., (Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate Fontan peri-operative outcomes for 771 consecutive patients., Background: Since the initial description by Fontan, mortality associated with the Fontan operation has declined substantially. However, postoperative effusions remain a significant challenge. Effusions are a key determinant of postoperative length-of-stay and have been shown to be associated with the development of protein-losing enteropathy and with decreased survival., Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective review of 771 patients who underwent Fontan palliation from 1992 to 2009., Results: Patients were divided into 3 eras dictated by shift in clinical practice. Overall mortality was 3.5%, 1% since 1996. Importantly, age at Stage II palliation decreased from Era 1 to Era 3 (7.1 vs. 5.9 months; p = 0.0001), whereas age at Fontan increased (1.7 vs. 2.8 years; p = 0.0001). The proportion of patients with prolonged hospital stay (46.7% vs. 8.2% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.001) decreased substantially after Era 1. A diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome and longer operative support times were associated with prolonged pleural drainage (odds ratio [OR]: 2.17, p < 0.001; OR: 1.2, p = 0.001) and hospital stay (OR: 1.48, p = 0.05; OR: 1.34, p < 0.001). In patients who underwent invasive assessment, higher pulmonary artery pressure was associated with death (OR: 1.37, p < 0.001) and prolonged hospital stay (OR: 1.09, p = 0.019). Pulmonary arterial pressure ≥15 mm Hg was 90% specific for discriminating unfavorable outcomes., Conclusions: Mortality in the modern era is rare, whereas postoperative pleural drainage remains the dominant morbidity. Elevated pulmonary artery pressure seems to be a marker of unfavorable outcome. Continued investigation is warranted to determine whether medical interventions or alterations to operative strategy can alter peri-operative results and improve long-term outcomes., (Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of percutaneous transvenous mitral valve-in-ring (VIR) implantation using the Melody valve in an ovine model., Background: The recurrence of mitral regurgitation following surgical mitral valve (MV) repair in both adult and pediatric patients remains a significant clinical problem. Mitral annuloplasty rings are commonly used in MV repair procedures and may serve as secure landing zones for percutaneous valves., Methods: Five sheep underwent surgical MV annuloplasty (24 mm, n = 2; 26 mm, n = 2; 28 mm, n = 1). Animals underwent cardiac catheterization with VIR implantation via a transfemoral venous, transatrial septal approach 1 week following surgery. Hemodynamic, angiographic, and echocardiographic data were recorded before and after VIR., Results: VIR was technically successful and required <1 h of procedure time in all animals. Fluoroscopy demonstrated securely positioned Melody valves within the annuloplasty ring in all animals. Angiography revealed no significant MV regurgitation in 4 and moderate central MV regurgitation in the animal with the 28-mm annuloplasty. All animals demonstrated vigorous left ventricular function, no outflow tract obstruction, and no aortic valve insufficiency., Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of a purely percutaneous approach to MV replacement in patients with preexisting annuloplasty rings. This novel approach may be of particular benefit to patients with failed repair of ischemic mitral regurgitation and in pediatric patients with complex structural heart disease., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)