Search

Objectives: In the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-2 trial (ISAR-2), we sought to investigate the effect of abciximab on angiographic and clinical restenosis after stenting following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We also intended to assess the impact of abciximab on clinical outcome in this setting., Background: It is unclear whether abciximab reduces neointima formation after stenting. Such an effect may be particularly prominent in thrombus-containing lesions., Methods: Patients undergoing stenting within 48 h after onset of AMI were randomly assigned to receive either standard-dose heparin or abciximab plus reduced-dose heparin. Of 401 patients randomized, 366 without 30-day adverse events were eligible for six-month angiographic follow-up. Scheduled angiography was performed in 80% of these patients., Results: By 30 days, the composite clinical end point of death, reinfarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) was reached in 5.0% of the abciximab group and in 10.5% of the control group (p = 0.038). At one year, absolute reduction in the composite clinical end point by abciximab was still 5.7% but had lost its statistical significance. Our primary end point, late lumen loss, was 1.26+/-0.85 mm with abciximab and 1.21+/-0.74 mm with standard heparin (p = 0.61), and binary angiographic restenosis rates were 31.1% and 30.6%, respectively (p = 0.92)., Conclusions: In patients undergoing stenting following AMI, abciximab exerted beneficial effects by substantially reducing the 30-day rate of major adverse cardiac events. During one-year follow-up, there was no additional benefit from a reduction in TLR nor did abciximab reduce angiographic restenosis.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate myocardial flow reserve in patients early after coronary stent implantation using positron emission tomography., Background: Delayed restoration of coronary flow reserve after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has been observed using a variety of techniques. Altered distal vasoregulation as well as residual stenosis have been considered possible explanations for this phenomenon. Although the implantation of stents may influence some of these mechanisms, little data are available characterizing coronary flow reserve early after stent placement., Methods: In 14 patients 1.6 +/- 0.6 days after stenting, N-13-ammonia positron emission tomographic studies were performed at rest and during adenosine-induced vasodilation. Myocardial blood flow was quantified using a three-compartment model. Rest and stress flow data, as well as coronary flow reserve of stented vascular territories, were compared with that of remote areas., Results: The stenosis decreased from 72.1 +/- 7.3% to 3.7 +/- 6.7% after stent implantation. Coronary flow in the stented areas did not differ significantly from that in remote areas either at rest (76.1 +/- 18.5 and 75.7 +/- 17.7 ml/min/100 g, respectively), or during maximal vasodilation (205.5 +/- 59.9 and 179.4 +/- 47.4 ml/min/100 g, respectively). In addition, there was no significant difference in the calculated values of coronary reserve of these two regions (2.74 +/- 0.64 and 2.43 +/- 0.55, respectively)., Conclusions: The mechanical support of dilated arteries by a stent not only restores the macroscopic integrity of epicardial arteries, but also results, in contrast to conventional PTCA procedures, in early recovery of flow reserve.

Objectives: This study sought to investigate changes in myocardial perfusion after direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in acute myocardial infarction (MI)., Background: After initially successful recanalization of the infarct-related artery, coronary perfusion may deteriorate as a result of reocclusion, distal embolization of platelet aggregates formed at the dilated plaque or microvascular reperfusion injury. This change could offset the benefit from early intervention., Methods: The study included 19 patients in whom the infarct-related artery was successfully recanalized by PTCA with Palmaz-Schatz stent placement within 24 h after the onset of pain. Basal and papaverine-induced coronary blood flow were assessed by Doppler flow velocity measurements and quantitative coronary angiography. In addition, basal and adenosine-induced myocardial blood flow were measured by nitrogen-13 ammonia positron emission tomography (PET)., Results: Immediately after completion of the intervention, the average coronary flow reserve (CR) in the recanalized vessel was 1.56 +/- 0.51; it increased to 2.04 +/- 0.65 at 1 h (p = 0.013) and to 2.66 +/- 0.72 at 2 weeks after reperfusion (p = 0.008, n = 16). PET studies in 12 patients revealed that perfusion defect size and CR in the infarct region (2.19 +/- 0.89 vs. 2.33 +/- 0.86) did not change significantly between day 2 after recanalization and 2 weeks. However, we found significant (p < 0.03) increases in basal (by 26%) and adenosine-induced (by 40%) blood flow in the infarct region., Conclusions: Despite the persistence of a perfusion defect after successful recanalization of the occluded artery in acute MI, CR of the infarct region improves in most patients within 1 h and further improves within 2 weeks.

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the contribution of ticlopidine to the inhibition of platelet activation after coronary stent placement., Background: After coronary stenting, antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticlopidine improves stent patency compared with anticoagulation. However, the specific role of ticlopidine has not been elucidated., Methods: After successful coronary stent placement, we randomized 22 patients to receive ticlopidine and aspirin (ticlopidine group) and 25 to receive aspirin alone (aspirin group). Surface expression on platelets of the activated fibrinogen receptor and of P-selectin was assessed by flow cytometry., Results: In the aspirin group the percent of platelets with activated fibrinogen receptors increased between days 1 and 5 (p = 0.001), whereas there were no substantial changes in the ticlopidine group. The percent of P-selectin-positive platelets did not change significantly in the aspirin group but decreased in the ticlopidine group (p = 0.019). At day 5 after the intervention, the percent of platelets with activated fibrinogen receptors in the ticlopidine group was significantly lower (median [interquartile range]: 8.5 [3.1 to 17.8] vs. 18.1 [8.5 to 35.5], p = 0.025), and there was a trend to fewer P-selectin-positive platelets than in the aspirin group (5.8 [3.4 to 9.5] vs. 8.8 [4.0 to 15.8], p = 0.073)., Conclusions: Combined antiplatelet therapy with ticlopidine plus aspirin is superior to treatment with aspirin alone in suppressing platelet activation after coronary stenting.

Objectives: The Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen (ISAR) trial is a randomized comparison of combined antiplatelet with anticoagulant therapy after coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent placement. The objective of this study was to compare early and late clinical and angiographic outcome in a subgroup of patients with stent placement for acute myocardial infarction., Background: Stenting has become a treatment option for acute myocardial infarction, but it is not known which antithrombotic regimen is more adequate after stent implantation., Methods: One hundred twenty-three patients with successful stenting after acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive aspirin plus ticlopidine (n = 61) or intense anticoagulant therapy (n = 62). Six-month repeat angiography was performed in 101 (86.3%) eligible patients., Results: During the first 30 days after stenting, patients with antiplatelet therapy had a significantly lower clinical event rate (3.3% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.005) and stent vessel occlusion rate (0% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.03) and a trend to fewer cardiac events (1.6% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.12). After 6 months, the survival rate free of recurrent myocardial infarction was higher in patients with antiplatelet therapy (100% vs. 90.3%, p = 0.03), and the rate of stent vessel occlusion was lower (1.6% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.02). Both groups had comparable restenosis rates (26.5% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.87)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that combined antiplatelet therapy after stent placement in patients with acute myocardial infarction is associated with an overall better clinical and angiographic outcome than anticoagulant therapy.