Search

Molecular biomarkers and primary tumour sidedness guide treatment decisions in metastatic colorectal cancer. Comprehensive molecular profiling aims to identify targetable alterations and measure tumour mutational burden (TMB) to enable precision oncology. FoundationOne® next-generation sequencing identified single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), copy number alterations, high TMB (TMB-H) and high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in patients treated in the FIRE-3 trial. Data were correlated with objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Three hundred seventy-three (49.6%) of 752 patients provided material for this analysis. Frequent SNVs included TP53, APC, KRAS , PIK3CA , BRAF , SMAD4 and FBXW7. KRAS, BRAF V600E and SMAD4 mutations were confirmed as prognostic biomarkers by logistic penalised regression for ORR. OS was significantly longer in patients with SMAD4 wild-type (WT) tumours than in those with SMAD4-mutated tumours (hazard ratio = 0.59 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.34–1.01], p = 0.05), with a higher probability of ORR [odds ratio, SMAD4 SNV versus WT = 0.32 [95% CI = 0.10–0.98], p = 0.05] when treated with cetuximab. MSI-H (30.0%, p = 0.03) and TMB-H (17.3%, p = 0.003) tumours were enriched by FBXW7 mutations. Numerically lower ORR, OS and PFS were observed in MSI-H tumours. RAS , BRAF V600E and SMAD4 mutations were identified as poor prognostic biomarkers in patients of the FIRE-3 trial, whereas improved outcome was observed for BRAF non-V600E mutation. SMAD4 mutation might provide predictive relevance for cetuximab efficacy. MSI-H tumours showed numerically lower ORR, OS and PFS. • Next-generation sequencing identified additional mutations of KRAS and BRAF. • SMAD4- mutated tumours were associated with lower susceptibility to cetuximab. • BRAF non-V600E–mutated tumours were associated with favourable prognosis and CMS4. • Tumours of the right, transverse and left colon differed in mutational profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Upfront KRAS and NRAS gene testing (' RAS ') is the standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), to guide first-line treatment. The presence of RAS mutation (MT) is a negative predictor for the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibodies and the use of cetuximab and panitumumab is restricted to RAS wild-type (WT) mCRC. Conversion from RAS WT to RAS MT mCRC after treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies is a known and well-described acquired resistance mechanism. The by far less frequent 'Neo RAS wild-type' phenomenon (reversion from RAS MT to RAS WT) has recently drawn attention. The proposed effect of chemotherapy on RAS status in mCRC patients is not fully understood. Because of the intriguing biological consequence of a RAS MT to RAS WT reversion, subsequent treatment of Neo RAS WT patients with anti-EGFR antibodies is increasingly being discussed. Here, we report three clinical cases of Neo RAS WT mCRC patients, which received standard-of-care regimens for RAS MT mCRC. Anti-EGFR antibodies were used in two out of three patients after progression of the disease. One of the patients had a long-term response. In line with our observations, Neo RAS WT phenomenon occurs in clinical practice. Retesting of RAS status during treatment should be discussed in patients with unusual long-term clinical courses of RAS MT mCRC to optimise treatment strategy and to evaluate the use of anti-EGFR antibodies. • RAS gene status could be changed before and after the chemotherapy. • mCRC patients with Neo RAS wild-type could gain the benefit from EGFR inhibitor. • Retesting of RAS genes contributes to optimise treatment strategy of EGFR inhibitor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The XELAVIRI study compared application of fluoropyrimidine (FP) and bevacizumab (Bev) followed by sequential escalation to irinotecan (Iri), FP and Bev (arm A) to upfront combination therapy with FP, Iri and Bev (arm B) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). To elucidate the impact of age on survival, we evaluated efficacy and early mortality in the underlying trial. Patients were stratified for age in three cohorts (<65 years, 65–74 years and ≥75 years). Survival end-points were expressed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank testing and Cox regression. Objective response and 60-day mortality were evaluated by chi-square testing. The efficacy analyses suggest more substantial benefit from upfront combination chemotherapy in younger patients with mCRC. Elderly patients (≥75 years) derived limited benefit from upfront combination chemotherapy, particularly in terms of overall survival. Of 421 randomised patients, 13 patients (3.1%) died within 60 days after treatment initiation with the highest prevalence in elderly patients (1.6% < 65 years, 2.8% 65–74 years and 5.2% ≥ 75 years, p = 0.26). The frequency of 60-day mortality was significantly associated with age (with a maximum of 8.7% in patients aged ≥75 years) in patients undergoing upfront combination therapy (p = 0.027) but not in patients receiving sequential treatment (p = 0.63). Combination therapy with FP, Iri and Bev does not substantially improve the outcome of patients aged ≥75 years as compared with sequential treatment algorithm. These patients appear to be at a relevant risk for 60-day mortality under Iri-based combination chemotherapy plus Bev. • Benefit from upfront combination chemotherapy might depend on age and RAS status. • Elderly patients do not derive survival benefit from initial combination therapy. • Patients aged ≥75yrs show relevant 60-day mortality with initial combination therapy. • Elderly patients can be considered for sequential/less intensive therapy approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]