Search

Background: Interruptions have been shown to adversely impact efficiency, accuracy, and patient safety.Objective: To analyze the frequency and types of interruptions and effect on report interpretation efficiency.Materials and Methods: A business process improvement team was consulted to make detailed recordings of the activities of the radiologists. Activities were categorized as interpreting studies, active interruptions initiated by the radiologist, and passive interruptions initiated by an external source.Results: Thirteen board-certified, pediatric radiologists were observed for 61 hours. Radiologists spent 52% of their time interpreting studies, 29% on active interruptions, and 18% on passive interruptions. Approximately 50% of non-interpretive time involved in-person conversations or consults and 16% involved phone calls of which 67% were incoming. The longest time period without an interruption was 20 minutes. 85% of the time, an interruption came within 3 minutes of beginning an interpretation and lasted 1 minute or less 70% of the time. Interruptions increased the time a radiologist needed to read a study by 1 minute for radiographs, 2 minutes for ultrasounds, 6 minutes for CTs, and 10 minutes for magnetic resonance imaging.Conclusion: Total interruption time nearly equaled the total time interpreting studies for radiologists, and interruptions decreased efficiency and increased report interpretation times for all modalities studied. This study highlights the type and extent of interruptions in radiology and examines the effect on report interpretation times. With the frequency of interruptions and impact on efficiency, there is a need to dedicate resources to manage the radiologist workflow. Strategic interventions may ultimately improve outcomes, efficiency, and the overall work environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is now generally accepted that nontraumatic back pain in the pediatric population is common. The presence of isolated back pain in a child has previously been an indication for imaging; however, recently a more conservative approach has been suggested using clinical criteria. The presence of constant pain, night pain, and radicular pain, alone or in combination, lasting for 4 weeks or more, constitute clinical red flags that should prompt further imaging. Without these clinical red flags, imaging is likely not indicated. Exceptions include an abnormal neurologic examination or clinical and laboratory findings suggesting an infectious or neoplastic etiology, and when present should prompt immediate imaging. Initial imaging should consist of spine radiographs limited to area of interest, with spine MRI without contrast to evaluate further if needed. CT of the spine, limited to area of interest, and Tc-99m bone scan whole body with single-photon emission computed tomography may be useful in some patients. The addition of intravenous contrast is also recommended for evaluation of a potential neoplastic or infectious process. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We analyzed the incidence and demographic features of pediatric intracranial hypertension.Methods: Inpatient and outpatient encounters of children aged 18 years or younger who were diagnosed with primary (idiopathic) or secondary intracranial hypertension between January 2010 and December 2013 were identified. Data were collected from a subspecialty clinic devoted to intracranial hypertension and the sole children's hospital in a large Midwestern city of the United States. Estimated incidence rates were calculated based on the number of newly diagnosed patients in our hospital's primary service area, which includes seven central Ohio counties. Sex, race, body mass index, socioeconomic status, and geographic distribution were also noted.Results: A total of 74 pediatric patients were diagnosed with intracranial hypertension (49 primary/idiopathic and 25 secondary) between January 2010 and December 2013. Using census data, we determined the pediatric population in our service area during the four-year period. The Ohio Hospital Association's database indicated that 92.3% of patients aged 0 to 17 years residing in the region sought care at our institution. By combining these data, we calculated an annual incidence of primary and secondary intracranial hypertension of 0.63 and 0.32 per 100,000 children, respectively.Conclusions: The estimated annual incidence of pediatric primary intracranial hypertension in our seven county service area in central Ohio is similar to previous pediatric reports from other countries and is 67% of that reported in the US adult population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]