Search

Background & Aims: A fast-track program is a multimodal approach for patients undergoing colonic surgery that combines stringent regimens of perioperative care (fluid restriction, optimized analgesia, forced mobilization, and early oral feeding) to reduce perioperative morbidity, hospital stay, and cost. We investigated the impact of a fast-track protocol on postoperative morbidity in patients after open colonic surgery. Methods: A randomized trial of patients in 4 teaching hospitals in Switzerland included 156 patients undergoing elective open colonic surgery who were assigned to either a fast-track program or standard care. The primary end point was the 30-day complication rate. Secondary end points were severity of complications, hospital stay, and compliance with the fast-track protocol. Results: The fast-track protocol significantly decreased the number of complications (16 of 76 in the fast-track group vs 37 of 75 in the standard care group; P = .0014), resulting in shorter hospital stays (median, 5 days; range, 2–30 vs 9 days, respectively; range, 6–30; P < .0001). There was a trend toward less severe complications in the fast-track group. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed fluid administration greater than the restriction limits (odds ratio, 4.198; 95% confidence interval, 1.7–10.366; P = .002) and a nonfunctioning epidural analgesia (odds ratio, 3.365; 95% confidence interval, 1.367–8.283; P = .008) as independent predictors of postoperative complications. Conclusions: The fast-track program reduces the rate of postoperative complications and length of hospital stay and should be considered as standard care. Fluid restriction and an effective epidural analgesia are the key factors that determine outcome of the fast-track program. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: One-lung ventilation (OLV) during thoracoscopic surgery is associated with a significant decline in arterial PO2 in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema and patients with preserved lung function. The authors hypothesized that patterns of arterial PO2 changes are different in these 2 patient groups. Design: Prospective nonrandomized study. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Twenty-five patients undergoing thoracoscopic interventions: 16 with severe pulmonary emphysema and 9 patients without emphysema. Interventions: Continuous arterial blood gas measurement (PaO2, PaCO2, pHa) during OLV of the left lung in left lateral position using the Paratrend 7 blood gas monitoring system (PT7; Pfizer Hospital Products Group, High Wycombe, UK). Main Results: The decrease of PaO2 was delayed in patients with severe emphysema. Steady state (defined as ΔPaO2 <7.5mmHg/min) was reached after 18 ± 4 minutes compared with 11 ± 3 minutes (mean ± standard deviation) in patients with normal lung function (p = 0.0002). PaO2 values at steady state were comparable (p = 0.49); the pattern of changes in PaO2 for the first 15 minutes of left-sided OLV was significantly different between the groups (p = 0.0004). The difference of predicted versus measured PaO2 at steady state was −48 ± 160 mmHg for patients with emphysema and −51 ± 60 mmHg for patients with normal lung function (p = 0.019). Conclusion: During OLV, oxygenation is better preserved for a longer period of time in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema as compared with patients with normal lung function. In contrast to patients without emphysema, prediction of oxygenation during OLV for the individual patient with emphysema is unreliable because of large interindividual differences. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Programmatic assessment is a concept to support learning through continuously providing information about learner progress to trainees and supervisors. Central to the concept are multiple low-stakes workplace-based assessments and meaningful feedback opportunities. Mobile technology may facilitate frequent and concise workplace-based assessments and trigger meaningful feedback. We designed a mobile application (app) for real-time use at the workplace utilising the concept of entrustable professional activities. As the primary outcome, we analysed completion times and as the secondary outcome the quality of documented learning goals.Methods: The prEPAred app requests trainees and supervisors to rate level of supervision of a professional activity directly after completion. Subsequently, ratings are compared, and supervisors may provide feedback via the app. We tested the app in five anaesthesiology departments at major teaching hospitals, analysing completion times, agreement on ratings, and quality of documented learning goals.Results: We recorded 1518 assessments from 159 trainees and 89 supervisors. Median time for level of supervision rating was 56 (inter-quartile range: 39-85) s for trainees and 17 (11-30) s for supervisors. Learning goals via the app were documented in 767 cases (50.5%). Median feedback time was 2 min, 31 s (confidence interval [CI]: 1 min, 20 s to 5 min, 20 s). In 443 (29%) cases, a specific learning goal was documented. A post hoc analysis revealed that the odds of documenting learning goals increased if trainees rated the level of supervision higher than their supervisors (odds ratio 1.39; CI: 1.03-1.87).Conclusions: The prEPAred mobile app enabled frequent and concise documentation of workplace-based assessments. Disagreement in level of supervision rating stimulated documentation of specific learning goals indicating more meaningful feedback. Thus, the tool could advance workplace-based assessments towards programmatic assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are commonly developed by senior clinicians and education experts. However, if postgraduate training is conceptualised as an educational alliance, the perspective of trainees should be included. This raises the question as to whether the views of trainees and supervisors on entrustability of specific EPAs differ, which we aimed to explore.Methods: A working group, including all stakeholders, selected and drafted 16 EPAs with the potential for unsupervised practice within the first year of training. For each EPA, first-year trainees, advanced trainees, and supervisors decided whether it should be possible to attain trust for unsupervised practice by the end of the first year of anaesthesiology training (i.e. whether the respective EPA qualified as a 'first-year EPA').Results: We surveyed 23 first-year trainees, 47 advanced trainees, and 51 supervisors (overall response rate: 68%). All groups fully agreed upon seven EPAs as 'first-year EPAs' and on four EPAs that should not be entrusted within the first year. For all five remaining EPAs, a significantly higher proportion of first-year trainees thought these should be entrusted as first-year EPAs compared with advanced trainees and supervisors. We found no differences between advanced trainees and supervisors.Conclusions: The views of first-year trainees, advanced trainees, and supervisors showed high agreement. Differing views of young trainees disappeared after the first year. This finding provides a fruitful basis to involve trainees in negotiations of autonomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Study Objective: To evaluate the influence of perioperative stress protection by clonidine on blood coagulation. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Setting: University hospital. Patients: 50 patients scheduled for elective gynecoabdominal surgery. Interventions and Measurements: Patients were randomly assigned to control (placebo) or clonidine group (single intravenous clonidine dose; 4 μg/kg−1 or 3 μg/kg−1 for age >65 years). Three measurement time points were defined: before administration of placebo/clonidine and anesthesia induction, (t1; baseline measurement); after surgery, before emergence of anesthesia (t2); and at the first postoperative day, 24 hours after anesthesia induction (t3). Blood coagulation was analyzed at all time points measuring international normalized ratio, platelets, thrombin-antithrombin complex, von Willebrand factor, soluble thrombomodulin, d-dimers, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, and Thrombelastograph analysis. Main Results: In the postoperative period (t2, t3), hypercoagulability was present in all patients compared with baseline measurements (t1) but without differences between the control and clonidine group. Regarding hematologic, laboratory blood coagulation, and Thrombelastograph parameters, there was no statistically and clinically relevant difference throughout the study period between the 2 groups. No hemodynamic adverse events of clonidine were observed in the perioperative period. Until day of discharge, no thrombotic or thromboembolic events were reported in both groups. Conclusions: Preoperative administration of a single dose of clonidine has no effect on perioperative blood coagulation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]