Search

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) develops as the result of unregulated complement progression and precipitates de novo thrombotic microangiopathy. Plasma therapy is used to control the progression of the complement cascade, but that therapy is not effective in all patients and is accompanied by risk of infection and/or allergy. Eculizumab has been reported as an efficient therapy for aHUS. We report the case of a 35-year old woman who underwent effective eculizumab therapy for aHUS recurrence and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) progress after renal transplantation with preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA). She developed end-stage renal disease due to suspicious IgA nephropathy at age 33 years. Kidney transplantation was performed at age 35 years, and aHUS recurred 2 weeks later, leading to the progressive hemolytic anemia and renal dysfunction. Therefore, she underwent plasma therapy several times. Because it was difficult to continue to plasma therapy for severe allergy, eculizumab was proposed as an alternate therapy. Treatment with eculizumab was initiated 36 days after renal transplantation. After 3 years of eculizumab treatment, and without plasma therapy, schistocytes decreased, haptoglobin increased to within normal limits, creatinine levels stabilized, and no further episodes of diarrhea were reported. At protocol biopsy 1 year after transplantation, she was diagnosed with C4d-negative subclinical AMR. However, her pathologic findings at follow-up biopsy 3 years after transplantation were recovered. We conclude that eculizumab alone, without plasma therapy, is sufficient to treat recurrence of aHUS and AMR due to DSA after renal transplantation and to maintain long-term graft function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: A 61-year-old Japanese woman, who had undergone hemodialysis because of chronic glomerulonephritis, received a living renal transplant from her ABO blood type–compatible spouse. HLA typing of A, B and DRB showed 3/6 mismatches. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches, HLA antibody screening with the use of flow panel reactive antibody (PRA), and flow cytometry crossmatches (FCXM) were all negative. Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone (MP), and basiliximab induction were used as the standard immunosuppressive therapy. After renal transplantation, her serum creatinine level favorably decreased, but urine output was not sufficiently obtained, contrary to our expectations. Doppler sonography revealed disappearance of diastolic arterial flow on postoperative day 2. The episode biopsy showed acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) based on the current Banff classification, although FCXM and flow PRA were still negative. To determine the cause of acute AMR, we expanded the HLA typing at high resolution levels to Cw, DQB1, and DPB1. Retrospective analysis of perioperative sera demonstrated the presence of low levels of donor-specific HLA IgG and moderate levels of IgM antibody against DQB1 before transplantation. There was an elevation of IgM antibody at the time of rejection, whereas IgG antibody showed no remarkable change. AMR was successfully treated with plasma exchange, low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, high-dose intravenous MP pulse, and rituximab. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Cyclosporine (CSA) and tacrolimus (TAC) frequently induce nephrotoxicity and similar pathologic changes. Acute CSA-induced nephrotoxicity has been reported to be mediated by activation of vasoconstrictors such as endothelin. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the acute effects of TAC and CSA on the renal microcirculation and upon a vasodilator such as nitric oxide (NO) production.Renal blood flow (RBF) in the microcirculation was measured by a Laser Doppler flow meter in uninephrectomised rats. RBF, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and renal vascular resistance (RVR) were measured in the following groups: (a) TAC (0.1 to 2.0 mg/kg/h, n = 3∼6); CSA (20 and 50 mg/kg/h, n = 5); (b) L-NAME (10 mg/kg), an NO synthase inhibitor, 8 minutes prior to TAC (0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg/h, n = 5), or CSA (20 and 50 mg/kg/h, n = 5). Stable NO end-products, serum NO2 and NO3, were measured by the Griess method (n = 5).None of the parameters were changed by TAC alone, whereas TAC with L-NAME significantly reduced RBF (−28 ± 7%) and increased RVR (46 ± 17%) in a dose-dependent manner. CSA alone significantly reduced RBF (−37 ± 6%) and increased RVR (69 ± 22%) without any changes in MAP. The effects of CSA were enhanced by L-NAME. Serum concentration of NO2 + NO3 was significantly reduced by both L-NAME alone and CSA (50 mg/kg) (P < .05), while there were no changes with TAC (1.5 mg/kg).Blockade of NO production enhance the vasoconstrictive effect of CSA, and unmasked such an effect of TAC. These results suggest that the nephrotoxicity of CSA and TAC may involve the NO system. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Currently, there are no published data on pharmacokinetics (PK) of everolimus in combination with cyclosporine in Japanese renal transplant patients. We evaluated the PK of everolimus in Japanese de novo renal transplant patients who received everolimus in combination with cyclosporine. Methods: In this phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label study, patients were randomized (1:1) to 1 of the 2 groups: everolimus 1.5 mg (targeted C0 of 3–8 ng/mL) plus reduced-dose cyclosporine or mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/d plus standard-dose cyclosporine. PK assessments for everolimus were performed on day 28 (month 1) in the PK subpopulation. Results: A total of 11 patients (7 men), mean age 47.5 ± 11.21 years, were enrolled for PK analysis of everolimus. Starting at 1.5 mg (0.75 mg twice a day), the mean dose over a period of 28 days was 0.705 ± 0.1011 mg. Everolimus mean trough concentration was 4.307 ± 1.2459 ng/mL and mean peak concentration was 13.539 ± 3.5330 ng/mL, which peaked at 1 to 2 hours postdose. The average concentration was 7.558 ± 1.4723 ng/mL, area under the concentration-time curve was 90.70 ± 17.667 ng·h/mL, and peak-trough fluctuation was 122.6%. The PK parameters of everolimus were comparable to those in the earlier phase 3 studies (A2306 and A2307). The mean everolimus trough levels were within the target ranges at all time points ranging from 3.4 to 5.5 ng/mL (everolimus 0.75 mg twice a day, safety population). The majority of patients (>85% from day 7 onward) were maintained within the targeted everolimus trough blood levels (safety population). These data were similar to a non-Japanese study (A2309). Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic characteristics of everolimus in Japanese de novo renal transplant patients did not differ from those previously observed in non-Japanese patients, hence the same dosage of everolimus may be acceptable in Japanese patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: ABO-incompatible (ABOi) renal transplantation has been increasing, but malignant tumor is a troubling complication of kidney transplantation due to potent immunosuppression. Few previous studies, however, have demonstrated that potent immunosuppression for ABOi living-donor renal transplantation (LDRT) is a risk factor for malignancy. In the present research, data on 252 LDRT patients ftom 2003 to 2008 were retrospectively analyzed to clarify whether ABOi LDRT was associated with malignancy. A potent immunosuppressive regimen for ABOiLDRT consisted of splenectomy, cyclophosphamide, and double-filtration plasmapheresis to minimize the risk of antibody-mediated rejection, in addition to conventional immunosuppresssants including calcineurin inhibitor, prednisolone, and anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody. A total of 11 incidences of malignancy were observed during a median follow-up of 48 months. The incidence rates in ABO-compatible (ABOc; n = 189) and ABOi (n = 63) LDRT groups were 4.2 % (8/189) and 4.8 % (3/63), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no statistical difference in event-free survival for malignancy between ABOc and ABOiLDRT groups (log-rank P = .73). Multivariable Cox regression analyses identified no associations of malignancy with ABOi LDRT or any immunosuppressant use. In conclusion, our investigation suggested that potent immunosuppression with splenectomy and cyclophosphamide for ABOi LDRT may not be a risk fietor for malignancy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract Objective To improve the long-term survival rate after kidney transplantation (KTx), allograft injury should be identified as soon as possible. Regardless of aggressive immunosuppressive therapies, recipients of kidney transplants still have a significant risk of graft failure. No specific predictor for the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) after KTx has yet been found. Aberrant molecular mechanisms involving the αKlotho-fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 23 axis may be a useful determinant of renal impairment and graft failure over time. Methods Plasma and spot urine samples were collected from 47 patients 1 year after KTx. Evaluation of renal function after KTx was performed using levels of biomarkers including serum intact FGF23, soluble αKlotho, 25(OH) vitamin D (25(OH)D), and the difference in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between the first and third year after KTx (ΔeGFR). Results The median serum αKlotho, intact FGF23, and 25(OH)D were 516.3 pg/mL, 58.7 pg/mL, and 5.7 ng/mL, respectively. No marked changes in the standard biomarkers that regulate phosphate homeostasis were found. Serum αKlotho levels were associated with ΔeGFR. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that serum αKlotho levels significantly predicted a decrease in eGFR in the graft kidney 2 years after KTx, but serum 25(OH)D and FGF23 levels were not significant. Serum αKlotho levels showed an inverse correlation with fractional excretion of magnesium, which reflects tubular injury in the early stage of CKD. Conclusion Measurement of serum αKlotho may serve as a useful predictor of KTx patients who require initiation of pre-emptive medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Elderly renal transplant candidates constitute one the fastest-growing populations among end-stage renal disease patients. Since the impacts of advanced recipient age have not yet been fully defined, we evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of elderly renal transplant recipients. Methods: Among 564 adult renal transplant recipients, at our center between 2000 and 2009, 64 were at least 60 years of age (Elderly group), and 500 were younger than 60 years (Young group) at the time of the procedure. We compared their clinical features and surgical management. Results: There were significant differences in mean donor age (55.6 years vs. 53.2 years, P = .030) and gender mismatch (77.0% vs. 63.4%, P = .035). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in patient and graft survivals (P = .177 and P = .365, respectively). Malignancy after transplantation was a significant risk factor upon univariate evaluation but only ABO incompatibility upon multivariate analysis of patient and graft survival. The main cause of graft loss among the Elderly group was death with a functioning graft due to heart failure. Conclusions: Renal transplantation is a feasible, safe option for the elderly and should be actively implemented. However, screening for cancer and heart disease should be mandatory to improve outcomes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The carrier rate for hepatitis B virus (HBV) varies from 1% to 2% to 10% in Asian-Pacific countries. A survey involving 12 transplant centers from 11 countries in this region showed that 1% to 25% of kidney transplant recipients were infected with HBV, and up to 60% of these subjects showed abnormal liver biochemistry. While nearly all centers tested anti-HBs in potential kidney transplant recipients, HBV vaccination of nonimmune subjects was routine in only 66.7%. One-third of the surveyed units rejected HBsAg-positive subjects as kidney donors, while the others demonstrated differing policies in choosing the respective recipients. Two units (16.7%) excluded HBsAg-positive patients from kidney transplantation, whereas the others only excluded those with severe liver disease. Heterogeneity also applies to the immunosuppressive regimens, the use of HBV DNA in serial monitoring, and the timing of antiviral therapy in HBsAg-positive kidney transplant recipients. The data showed that despite HBV infection being a significant problem in kidney transplantation, there is a lack of uniform management policy, attributable to the clinical complexity and deficiency of research data. Although improvement in clinical outcome is likely with the advent of nucleoside analogue therapy and better monitoring, the financial implications in the adoption of these recent advances remain realistic concerns. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]