Search

Among vertebrates, birds have a particularly well-developed retinopetal system, i.e., the centrifugal system projecting from the brain to the retina. Primary, secondary and tertiary neurons of the retinopetal system connect serially in a one-to-one-to-one fashion, thereby assembling several thousand retinopetal modules projecting in parallel to the retina. The signal conveyed by the retinopetal system enhances the visual responses of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), and each retinopetal module may facilitate the RGCs in a topographically restricted area. We investigated how the retinopetal signal contributes to visual search by first training Japanese quail to search and peck a target stimulus presented on one of three touch-sensor monitors around the bird and then examining the effect of retinopetal signal blockage on the task. Our results indicate that the retinopetal signal improves both stimulus detectability and target discriminability. Thus, this study confirms that the avian retinopetal system functions specifically in attentional facilitation of the retina; this new finding suggests that this system benefits early detection and late selection phases of visual search. The fast and precise target detection facilitated by the retinopetal signal may be transformed into quick and correct orienting to the target through visuomotor transformation mechanisms implemented in the optic tectum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Discrimination of proprioceptive and visual spatial information is a prerequisite for the learning of visuo-motor transformations. This study investigated the individual''s capability to discriminate the directions of seen cursor motions and felt hand movements under a visuo-motor rotation paradigm and its age-related variation. Young and older participants performed 3-stroke arm movements on a digitizing tablet without seeing their arm. The visual feedback of the second stroke was rotated randomly by various angles ranging from −30° to 30° and displayed on a monitor. Older adults were poorer in discrimination than young adults. In both age groups, the felt hand direction was shifted toward the seen cursor direction (i.e., visual capture) by approximately 25% to 30% of the rotation of the visual feedback. Older adults also showed an enhanced visual capture. The results suggest that both the increased sensory noise and the increased assimilation of the bimodal information cause the reduction of discrimination capability in older adults. These findings provide underlying reasons for age-related changes in learning a new visuo-motor transformation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: When reaching for an object in the environment, the brain often has access to multiple independent estimates of that object’s location. For example, if someone places their coffee cup on a table, then later they know where it is because they see it, but also because they remember how their reaching limb was oriented when they placed the cup. Intuitively, one would expect more accurate reaches if either of these estimates were improved (e.g., if a light were turned on so the cup were more visible). It is now well-established that the brain tends to combine two or more estimates about the same stimulus as a maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE), which is the best thing to do when estimates are unbiased. Even in the presence of small biases, relying on the MLE rule is still often better than choosing a single estimate. For this work, we designed a reaching task in which human subjects could integrate proprioceptive and allocentric (landmark-relative) visual information to reach for a remembered target. Even though both of these modalities contain some level of bias, we demonstrate via simulation that our subjects should use an MLE rule in preference to relying on one modality or the other in isolation. Furthermore, we show that when visual information is poor, subjects do, indeed, combine information in this way. However, when we improve the quality of visual information, subjects counter-intuitively switch to a sub-optimal strategy that occasionally includes reliance on a single modality. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: In the visuomotor mental rotation (VMR) task, participants point to a location that deviates from a visual target by a predetermined angle. A seminal investigation of the VMR task reported a linear increase in reaction time (RT) as a function of increasing angle, for 5°, 10°, 15°, 35°, 70°, 105°, and 140° (). This finding led to the development of the mental rotation model (MRM) and the assertion that response preparation is mediated via the imagined rotation of a movement vector. To determine if the MRM can be extrapolated to perceptually familiar angles (e.g., 90° and 180°) within a range of equally spaced angles, we evaluated two independent sets of angles: 5°, 10°, 15°, 35°, 70°, 105°, and 140° (experiment one) and 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, 150°, 180°, and 210° (experiment two). Consistent with the MRM, experiment one revealed a linear increase in RT as a function of increasing angle; however, a non-linear relation was revealed for experiment two. RTs were fastest for 180°, followed by 30°, 90°, 60°, 150°, 210°, and 120°. Such results demonstrate that response preparation was not uniquely mediated via a mental rotation process. Instead, the present work provides evidence of a temporally demanding and cognitively mediated response substitution process, wherein the computational demands of response preparation are determined by the complexity of the sensorimotor transformations mediating the response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Visually guided reaching entails multiple coordinate frame transformations between retina-centered target location and body-centered limb location. Reaching errors in optic ataxia (OA) may be caused by disruptions to these transformations. Consistent with this proposal, previous studies report that reaching errors in OA depend primarily on the location of a target relative to the patient’s gaze regardless of its location relative to the head or body midline. We attempted to replicate this finding by testing KE, a patient with OA following bilateral parietal and left premotor lesions (as well as significant non-specific white matter disease) on a reaching task that varied the orientation of his head and torso while holding the gaze-relative position of the target constant (always foveated). In contrast to previous reports, we observed that rotating the head or body away from the midline led to decreased reaching accuracy. Further analyses showed that multiple visuomotor transformation steps might have been disrupted in KE. These results suggest that gaze-relative target position is not the sole determinant of reaching errors in all OA patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]