Search

Abstract: 65–80% of the patients with breast cancer might not benefit from the adjuvant therapy they receive based on ‘classical’ markers used for the selection for adjuvant therapy. Therefore it is necessary to develop new markers that are able to tailor treatment for an individual patient. A number of microarray methods have been developed in recent years to accommodate this search for new factors that determine breast cancer progression. We give an overview of the most commonly used microarray methods to identify tumour progression markers (oligo- or cDNA arrays, CGH arrays, PCR arrays, and tissue microarrays). Their applications will be illustrated using the most influential examples from literature. The potentials, limitations and the related statistical analyses of each method are discussed. We conclude that microarray studies have led to an increase in the understanding of the complexity and diversity of breast carcinoma and have provided clinical relevant subgroups of breast cancer that may benefit from patient tailored treatment. Still, more extensive external validation and long-term follow-up will be necessary before such assays can be implemented into routine clinical practice. Most likely, these novel prognostic indicators will be complementary to the already available classical prognostic factors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

It is increasingly evident that not only breast cancer cells, but also the tissue embedding these cells: the tumor microenvironment, plays an important role in tumor progression, metastasis formation and treatment sensitivity. This review focuses on the current knowledge of processes by which the microenvironment affects breast cancer, including formation of the metastatic niche, metabolic stimulation, stimulation of tumor cell migration, immune modulation, angiogenesis and matrix remodeling. The number of drugs targeting key factors in these processes is expanding, and the available clinical data is increasing. Therefore current strategies for intervention and prediction of treatment response are outlined. At present, targeting the formation of the metastatic niche and metabolic stimulation by the breast cancer microenvironment, are already showing clinical efficacy. Intervening in the stimulation of tumor cell migration and immune modulation by the microenvironment upcoming fields of great research interest. In contrast, targeting microenvironmental angiogenesis or matrix remodeling appears to be of limited clinical relevance in breast cancer treatment so far. Further research is warranted to optimize intervention strategies and develop predictive tests for the relevance of targeting involved factors within the microenvironment in order to optimally personalize breast cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]