Search

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.040 Byline: Daniel Daneshvar, Janet Wei, Kirsten Tolstrup, Louise E.J. Thomson, Chrisandra Shufelt, C. Noel Bairey Merz Abstract: Diastolic heart failure is increasing in prevalence. Although the pathophysiology is incompletely understood and current therapeutic strategies are limited, identification of diastolic dysfunction is important. We review the role of contemporary techniques with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) in the assessment of diastolic dysfunction. Cardiac catheterization is the criterion standard for demonstrating impaired relaxation and filling by making direct measurements; however, echocardiography has replaced it as the most clinically used tool. By evaluating mitral inflow pulsed-wave Doppler with and without the Valsalva maneuver, isovolumetric relaxation time, pulmonary venous flow Doppler, color M-mode velocity propagation, tissue Doppler imaging, and speckle tracking, echocardiography is considered an accurate method for diagnosis and grading diastolic dysfunction. Evaluation of diastolic function can also be performed by CMRI. Mitral valve inflow velocities, early deceleration time, and pulmonary vein flow velocities are diastolic parameters that can be measured by phase-contrast CMRI. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging steady-state gradient echo can evaluate functional dimensions for time-volume curves; and myocardial tagging can assess ventricular diastolic 'untwisting,' which may be important for improved pathophysiologic understanding. Studies have compared echocardiography and CMRI for diagnosing diastolic dysfunction in small patient groups with similar results. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can now provide clinically relevant data regarding the underlying cause of diastolic dysfunction and offers promise to gain mechanistic insights for therapeutic strategy development and clinical trial planning. Article History: Received 16 January 2010; Accepted 24 June 2010

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement of proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) and vena contracta (VC) for differentiating severe from nonsevere mitral regurgitation (MR). Background: Recommendation for MR evaluation stresses the importance of VC width and effective regurgitant orifice area by PISA measurements. Reliable and accurate assessment of MR is important for clinical decision making regarding corrective surgery. We hypothesize that color Doppler-based quantitative measurements for classifying MR as severe versus nonsevere may be particularly susceptible to interobserver agreement. Methods: The PISA and VC measurements of 16 patients with MR were interpreted by 18 echocardiologists from 11 academic institutions. In addition, we obtained quantitative assessment of MR based on color flow Doppler jet area. Results: The overall interobserver agreement for grading MR as severe or nonsevere using qualitative and quantitative parameters was similar and suboptimal: 0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1 to 0.52) for jet area–based MR grade, 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11 to 0.45) for VC measurements, and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.58) for PISA measurements. Significant univariate predictors of substantial interobserver agreement for: 1) jet area–based MR grade was functional etiology (p = 0.039); 2) VC was central MR (p = 0.013) and identifiable effective regurgitant orifice (p = 0.049); and 3) PISA was presence of a central MR jet (p = 0.003), fixed proximal flow convergence (p = 0.025), and functional etiology (p = 0.049). Significant multivariate predictors of raw interobserver agreement ≥80% included: 1) for VC, identifiable effective regurgitant orifice (p = 0.035); and 2) for PISA, central regurgitant jet (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The VC and PISA measurements for distinction of severe versus nonsevere MR are only modestly reliable and associated with suboptimal interobserver agreement. The presence of an identifiable effective regurgitant orifice improves reproducibility of VC and a central regurgitant jet predicts substantial agreement among multiple observers of PISA assessment. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The accuracy of a hand-carried cardiac ultrasound (HCCU) device for the diagnosis of valvular regurgitations using color-flow Doppler was assessed. One hundred twenty hospitalized patients with at least mild valvular regurgitation by standard echocardiography were evaluated by 2 cardiologists using HCCU. The HCCU operator identified 99% of clinically significant valvular regurgitations and assessed the severity correctly in 83% of cases. For mild regurgitation, the HCCU sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 93%, respectively, resulting in correct assessments of severity in 71% of cases. HCCU used by trained cardiologists has high sensitivity for the detection and accurate assessment of the severity of clinically relevant valvular regurgitation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Aortic valve sclerosis (AVS) and mitral annular calcium (MAC) as detected by transthoracic echocardiography have been associated with atherosclerosis. Aortic root sclerosis (ARS) may have a similar association, but has not been studied. This study evaluates, by transesophageal echocardiography, the association of AVS, MAC, and ARS with aortic atheromatous disease and cardiovascular disease. Multiplane transesophageal echocardiography with evaluation of AVS, MAC, ARS, and aortic atheromatous disease by 2 experienced observers unaware of clinical data was performed in 157 male patients ≥50 years old. The presence of cardiovascular disease, defined as coronary, carotid, or peripheral artery disease, was determined by specific criteria. The prevalence of AVS, MAC, ARS, and aortic atheromatous disease was 42%, 30%, 48%, and 71%, respectively. The presence of AVS, MAC, or ARS was highly associated with aortic atheromatous disease (odds ratio 4.9 to 12.0, confidence interval 1.4 to 35.8, p <0.001). ARS was also associated with cardiovascular disease (odds ratio 2.2, confidence interval 1.0 to 4.5, p = 0.038). The presence of AVS, MAC, or ARS had a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 72%, a positive predictive value of 88%, and a negative predictive value of 55% for aortic atheromatous disease. We concluded that the prevalence of AVS, MAC, or ARS by transesophageal echocardiography in men is common, and their presence is highly associated with aortic atheromatous disease and coronary, carotid, or peripheral artery disease. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) imaging is a relatively new imaging modality that is increasingly being used to characterize a variety of cardiac pathologic features. In the present study, we reviewed the 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D TEE images from our echocardiographic database to identify patients with valve perforations. A review of the 2D TEE images resulted in the identification of 11 valvular perforations (6 aortic valves, 4 mitral valves, and 1 tricuspid valve). A review of the 3D TEE images allowed for the identification of 15 valve perforations (7 aortic valves, 7 mitral valves, and 1 tricuspid valve), including 4 perforations that could not be diagnosed using 2D imaging alone. In conclusion, 3D TEE imaging provided added benefit to traditional 2D TEE imaging because of its ability to provide en face visualization of the cardiac valves, allowing improved identification and precise anatomic localization of the perforation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to elucidate patent foramen ovale (PFO) morphology and the change of PFO size using real-time 3-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). PFO is a 3D structure, and its shape changes during the cardiac cycle. Therefore, it may be difficult to estimate accurate PFO morphology using 2-dimensional (2D) TEE. The study included 50 patients with PFO who underwent 2D and 3D TEE. PFO heights (PHs) at entrance, mid, and exit were measured by 2D and 3D TEE. Systolic and diastolic areas were also measured by 3D TEE. PH by 3D TEE was larger than that by 2D TEE (entrance 0.32 ± 0.18 vs 0.21 ± 0.15 cm, p <0.001; mid 0.25 ± 0.14 vs 0.15 ± 0.11 cm, p <0.001; exit 0.19 ± 0.11 vs 0.11 ± 0.08 cm, p <0.001). Systolic area was greater than diastolic area at each location (entrance 0.19 ± 0.17 vs 0.11 ± 0.11 cm2, p = 0.001; mid 0.13 ± 0.11 vs 0.08 ± 0.06 cm2, p = 0.001; exit 0.09 ± 0.09 vs 0.06 ± 0.05 cm2, p = 0.01). Additionally, entrance area was greater than exit area in systole and diastole (systole 0.19 ± 0.17 vs 0.09 ± 0.09 cm2, p <0.001; diastole 0.11 ± 0.11 vs 0.06 ± 0.05 cm2, p = 0.001). There were good correlations between PH by 3D TEE and PFO area (entrance r = 0.68, mid r = 0.71, exit r = 0.78) but weak correlations between PH by 2D TEE and PFO area (entrance r = 0.62, mid r = 0.50, exit r = 0.51). In conclusion, real-time 3D TEE could provide detailed and unique information on PFO morphology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Real-time 3-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides more accurate geometric information on the mitral valve (MV) than 2-dimensional (2D) TEE. The aim of this study was to quantify MV prolapse using real-time 3D TEE in patients with severe mitral regurgitation. In 102 patients with severe mitral regurgitation due to MV prolapse and/or flail, 2D TEE quantified MV prolapse, including prolapse gap and width in the commissural view. Three-dimensional TEE also determined prolapse gap and width with the use of the 3D en face view. On the basis of the locations of MV prolapse, all patients were classified into group 1 (pure middle leaflet prolapse, n = 50) or group 2 (involvement of medial and/or lateral prolapse, n = 52). Prolapse gap and prolapse width determined by 3D TEE were significantly greater than those by 2D TEE (all p values <0.001). The differences in prolapse gap and prolapse width between 2D TEE and 3D TEE were significantly greater in group 2 than group 1 (Δ gap 1.3 ± 1.4 vs 2.4 ± 1.8 mm, Δ width 2.5 ± 3.0 vs 4.4 ± 5.1 mm, all p values <0.01). The differences in prolapse gap and width between 2D TEE and 3D TEE were best correlated with 3D TEEederived prolapse width (r = 0.41 and r = 0.74, respectively). Two-dimensional TEE underestimated the width of MV prolapse and leaflet gap compared to 3D TEE. Two-dimensional TEE could not detect the largest prolapse gap and width, because of the complicated anatomy of the MV. In conclusion, 3D TEE provided more precise quantification of MV prolapse than 2D TEE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The geometries and sizes of persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defects (IASDs) after transseptal puncture during catheter-based mitral valve clip insertion (MVCI) have not been detailed. In this study, 11 IASDs were investigated in 10 patients who underwent MVCI using a guide catheter (24Fr proximally and 22Fr at the atrial septum). The diameters of the long and short axes and the area at maximum and minimum during a cardiac cycle were measured after MVCI using real-time 3-dimensional (RT3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). A circular shape was assumed on 2-dimensional TEE, resulting in an area calculation of π × (dimension/2)2. The anatomic geometries of IASDs were visualized in a 3-dimensional en face view of the atrial septum. Furthermore, 1 month after MVCI, IASDs were evaluated using echocardiography. The IASDs had a variety of irregular geometries. The mean long-axis diameter was 1.0 ± 0.24 cm, the mean short-axis diameter was 0.51 ± 0.22 cm, and the mean area was 0.40 ± 0.24 cm2 on RT3D TEE. The diameters and area changed significantly between the maximal and minimal values during the cardiac cycle. Importantly, 2-dimensional TEE underestimated the maximal diameters of IASDs (0.54 ± 0.17 vs 1.0 ± 0.24 cm by RT3D TEE, p <0.01) and the maximal areas of IASDs (0.25 ± 0.15 vs 0.40 ± 0.23 cm2 by RT3D TEE, p <0.05). One month after MVCI, the smallest and the second smallest IASDs had closed, and the other 9 remained open. In conclusion, RT3D TEE is useful to assess the irregular geometries of IASDs created during MVCI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study sought to elucidate the geometry of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) in patients with aortic stenosis and its effect on the accuracy of the continuity equation-based aortic valve area (AVA) estimation. Real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D-TEE) provides high-resolution images of LVOT in patients with aortic stenosis. Thus, AVA is derived reliably with the continuity equation. Forty patients with aortic stenosis who underwent 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE), 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE), and RT3D-TEE were studied. In 2D-TTE and 2D-TEE, the LVOT areas were calculated as π × (LVOT dimension/2)2. In RT3D-TEE, the LVOT areas and ellipticity ([diameter of the anteroposterior axis]/[diameter of the medial-lateral axis]) were evaluated by planimetry. The AVA is then determined using planimetry and the continuity equation method. LVOT shape was found to be elliptical (ellipticity of 0.80 ± 0.08). Accordingly, the LVOT areas measured by 2D-TTE (median 3.7 cm2, interquartile range 3.1 to 4.1) and 2D-TEE (median 3.7 cm2, interquartile range 3.1 to 4.0) were smaller than those by 3D-TEE (median 4.6 cm2, interquartile range 3.9 to 5.3; p <0.05 vs both 2D-TTE and 2D-TEE). RT3D-TEE yielded a larger continuity equation-based AVA (median 1.0 cm2, interquartile range 0.79 to 1.3, p <0.05 vs both 2D-TTE and 2D-TEE) than 2D-TTE (median 0.77 cm2, interquartile range 0.64 to 0.94) and 2D-TEE (median 0.76 cm2, interquartile range 0.62 to 0.95). Additionally, the continuity equation-based AVA by RT3D-TEE was consistent with the planimetry method. In conclusion, RT3D-TEE might allow more accurate evaluation of the elliptical LVOT geometry and continuity equation-based AVA in patients with aortic stenosis than 2D-TTE and 2D-TEE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The management strategy in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) is controversial. Aortic valve replacement has significant morbidity and mortality, while there is a risk for sudden cardiac death with conservative management. There is no consensus on the prognostic value of stress testing to stratify management. A pooled analysis of studies in patients with severe AS was performed to assess the prognostic value of stress testing for adverse events, including angina, dyspnea, acute heart failure, sudden death, and symptoms requiring aortic valve replacement. A search of published research was performed using the terms “stress test” and “asymptomatic aortic stenosis.” A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Data from 7 studies were included (491 patients with asymptomatic severe AS). None of the patients experienced any complications during or after stress testing. There were no sudden deaths in the patients with normal stress test results after 1 year of follow-up, while 5% with abnormal stress test results had sudden cardiac death. Overall, 52 of 253 patients (21%) with normal stress test results had adverse cardiac events, compared with 156 of 238 (66%) with abnormal stress test results (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.21, p <0.001). In conclusion, stress testing in asymptomatic patients with severe AS is safe and identifies patients at risk for adverse cardiac events and sudden cardiac death. These data suggest that stress tests can be used for risk stratification and for deciding on the timing of aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with severe AS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of dilation and abnormal elastic properties of aortic root in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients. Background: Evidence indicates that BAV is a genetic disorder. Although FDRs of affected individuals have an increased prevalence of BAV, their risk of aortic root abnormalities is unknown. Methods: We studied dimensions as well as the elastic properties of the ascending aorta in 48 FDRs with morphologically normal tricuspid aortic valves, 54 BAV patients, and 45 control subjects using 2-dimensional echocardiography. Results: The prevalence of aortic root dilation was 32% in FDRs and 53% in BAV patients, whereas all control subjects showed normal aortic dimensions (p < 0.001). The FDRs and BAVs had significantly lower aortic distensibility (1.7 ± 1.4 × 10−3 mm Hg and 1.4 ± 2.0 × 10−3 mm Hg vs. 2.5 ± 1.6 × 10−3 mm Hg, p < 0.001) and greater aortic stiffness index (26.7 ± 25.8 and 55.9 ± 76.8 vs. 18.7 ± 40.1, p = 0.001) compared with control subjects. This difference remained significant in subjects without aortic root dilation or hypertension (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004, respectively). Conclusions: The aortic root is functionally abnormal and dilation is common (32%) in first-degree relatives of patients with BAV. Screening of FDRs by transthoracic 2-dimensional echocardiography should be considered for detection of aortic valve malformation and dilated ascending aorta. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This study compared the accuracy of cardiovascular diagnoses by medical students operating a small hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) device with that of board-certified cardiologists using standard physical examinations. Sixty-one patients (38% women; mean age 70 ± 19 years) with clinically significant cardiac disease had HCU studies performed by 1 of 2 medical students with 18 hours of training in cardiac ultrasound and physical examinations by 1 of 5 cardiologists. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by standard echocardiography. Two-hundred thirty-nine abnormal findings were detected by standard echocardiography. The students correctly identified 75% (180 of 239) of the pathologies, whereas cardiologists found 49% (116 of 239) (p <0.001). The students’ diagnostic specificity of 87% was also greater than cardiologists’ specificity of 76% (p <0.001). For nonvalvular pathologies (115 findings), students’ sensitivity was 61%, compared with 47% for cardiologists (p = 0.040). There were 124 clinically significant valvular lesions (111 regurgitations, 13 stenoses). Students’ and cardiologists’ sensitivities for recognizing lesions that cause a systolic murmur were 93% and 62% (p <0.001), respectively. Students’ sensitivity for diagnosing lesions that produce a diastolic murmur was 75%; cardiologists recognized 16% of these lesions (p <0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of medical students using an HCU device after brief echocardiographic training to detect valvular disease, left ventricular dysfunction, enlargement, and hypertrophy was superior to that of experienced cardiologists performing cardiac physical examinations. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

One hundred fifty patients with their first acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs) were studied. AMIs were confirmed by troponin levels, ST-segment elevation, or angiographic coronary occlusion. In 36% of patients (16 of 45) with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, the wall motion score index was normal, whereas in patients with no LV hypertrophy, only 18% (19 of 105) had no segmental wall motion abnormalities (p = 0.03). When adjusting for troponin level, the odds ratio for normal wall motion of patients with LV hypertrophy was 2.86 (95% confidence interval 1.26 to 6.50) compared with those with normal wall thickness. Consequently, normal LV wall motion by echocardiography in the setting of LV hypertrophy does not exclude AMI. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

To identify the incidence of pericardial effusion in patients after cardiac surgery using a hand-carried cardiac ultrasound device, 200 patients were assessed on postoperative day 3. If a pericardial effusion was found, patients were monitored for 3 consecutive days with a hand-carried cardiac ultrasound device. Within 72 hours after surgery, 43 patients (21.5%) had developed an effusion, of whom 2 patients had cardiac tamponade and 41 patients (21%) had a small pericardial effusion. No difference was found in the incidence of effusion based on the type of cardiac surgery. Of patients with a small pericardial effusion on day 3 after surgery, an additional 2 of 41 (5%) developed cardiac tamponade. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We assessed aortic regurgitation (AR) severity by utilizing multiple echo-Doppler variables in comparison with AR severity by aortic root angiography. Patients were divided into 3 groups: mild, moderate, and severe. An AR index (ARI) was developed, comprising 5 echocardiographic parameters: ratio of color AR jet height to left ventricular outlet flow diameter, AR signal density from continuous-wave Doppler, pressure half-time, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and aortic root diameter. There was a strong correlation between AR severity by angiography and the calculated echo-Doppler ARI (r = 0.84, p = 0.0001). As validated by aortic angiography, the ARI is an accurate reflection of AR severity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]