Search

Despite the growing interest in the role of regulatory B cells (Bregs) in autoimmunity, their distinct role and function in kidney transplant outcomes remain elusive. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the proportion of Bregs, transitional Bregs (tBregs) and memory Bregs (mBregs) and their capacity to produce IL-10 in non-rejected (NR) versus rejected (RJ) kidney transplant recipients. In the NR group, we observed a significant increase in the proportion of mBregs (CD19+CD24hiCD27+) but no difference in tBregs (CD19+CD24hiCD38+), as compared to the RJ group. We also observed a significant increase in IL-10-producing mBregs (CD19+CD24hiCD27+IL-10+) in the NR group. As our group and others have previously reported a potential role of the human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) in human renal allograft survival, notably through IL-10, we then investigated possible crosstalk between HLA-G and IL-10+ mBregs. Our ex vivo data suggest a role of HLA-G in enhancing IL-10+ mBreg expansion upon stimulation, which further decreased CD3+ T cell proliferation capability. Using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), we identified potential key signaling pathways involved in HLA-G-driven IL-10+ mBreg expansion, such as the MAPK, TNF and chemokine signaling pathways. Together, our study highlights a novel HLA-G-mediated IL-10-producing mBreg pathway that may serve as a therapeutic target to improve kidney allograft survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Outcomes after liver transplantation have continuously improved over the past decades, but long-term survival rates are still lower than in the general population. The liver has distinct immunological functions linked to its unique anatomical configuration and to its harbouring of a large number of cells with fundamental immunological roles. The transplanted liver can modulate the immunological system of the recipient to promote tolerance, thus offering the potential for less aggressive immunosuppression. The selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs should be individualised to optimally control alloreactivity while mitigating toxicities. Routine laboratory tests are not accurate enough to make a confident diagnosis of allograft rejection. Although several promising biomarkers are being investigated, none of them is sufficiently validated for routine use; hence, liver biopsy remains necessary to guide clinical decisions. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors due to the unquestionable oncological benefits they provide for many patients with advanced-stage tumours. It is expected that their use will also increase in liver transplant recipients and that this might affect the incidence of allograft rejection. Currently, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients is limited and cases of severe allograft rejection have been reported. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of alloimmune disease, the role of minimisation/withdrawal of immunosuppression, and provide practical guidance for using checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of long-term immunosuppression following liver transplantation (LT) remains empirical. Surveillance liver biopsies in combination with transcriptional profiling could overcome this challenge by identifying recipients with active alloimmune-mediated liver damage despite normal liver tests, but this approach lacks applicability. Our aim was to investigate the utility of non-invasive tools for the stratification of stable long-term survivors of LT, according to their immunological risk and need for immunosuppression. We conducted a cross-sectional multicentre study of 190 adult LT recipients assessed to determine their eligibility to participate in an immunosuppression withdrawal trial. Patients had stable liver allograft function and had been transplanted for non-autoimmune non-replicative viral liver disease >3 years before inclusion. We performed histological, immunogenetic and serological studies and measured the intrahepatic transcript levels of an 11-gene classifier highly specific for T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). In this cohort, 35.8% of patients harboured clinically silent fibro-inflammatory liver lesions (13.7% had mild damage and 22.1% had moderate-to-severe damage). The severity of liver allograft damage was positively associated with TCMR-related transcripts, class II donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), ALT, AST, and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and negatively correlated with serum creatinine and tacrolimus trough levels. Liver biopsies were stratified according to their TCMR transcript levels using a cut-off derived from biopsies with clinically significant TCMR. Two multivariable prediction models, integrating ALT+LSM or ALT+class II DSAs, had a high discriminative capacity for classifying patients with or without alloimmune damage. The latter model performed well in an independent cohort of 156 liver biopsies obtained from paediatric liver recipients with similar inclusion/exclusion criteria. ALT, class II DSAs and LSM are valuable tools to non-invasively identify stable LT recipients without significant underlying alloimmunity who could benefit from minimisation of immunosuppression. A large proportion of liver transplant patients with normal liver tests have inflammatory liver lesions, which in 17% of cases are molecularly indistinguishable from those seen at the time of rejection. ALT, class II donor-specific antibodies and liver stiffness are useful in identifying patients with this form of subclinical rejection. We propose these markers as a useful tool to help clinicians determine if the immunosuppression administered is adequate. [Display omitted] • 22% of stable liver recipients harbour moderate-to-severe subclinical immune allograft damage. • Subclinical damage is linked to allograft immunogenicity and degree of immunosuppression. • Recipients with active underlying alloimmunity can be identified using non-invasive markers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The emergence of molecular systems offers opportunities for improving the assessment of rejection in heart transplant biopsy specimens. The present study developed a microarray-based system for assessing heart transplant endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) specimens. Methods We analyzed 331 protocol or for-cause EMB specimens from 221 subjects in 3 centers (Edmonton, Bologna, and Paris). Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) and archetype analysis used rejection-associated transcripts (RATs) shown in kidney transplants to be associated with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) or T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR), or both. To compare EMB specimens to kidney biopsy specimens, rejection status in both was simplified to TCMR, ABMR, or no rejection. Results The pattern of RAT expression was similar in EMB and kidney specimens, permitting use of RATs to assign scores and group (“cluster”) membership to each EMB, independent of histology. Three clusters emerged in EMB specimens, similar to kidney specimens: TCMR, ABMR, and no rejection. This permitted each EMB specimen to be given 3 scores and assigned to 1 cluster by its highest score. There was significant agreement between molecular phenotype—archetype scores or clusters—and both histologic diagnoses and donor-specific antibody. Area under curve estimates for predicting histologic TCMR, ABMR, and no rejection by molecular assessment were lower in EMB specimens than in kidney specimens, reflecting more uncertainty in EMB specimens, particularly in histologic diagnosis of TCMR. Conclusions Rejection-associated transcripts can be used to estimate the probability of TCMR and ABMR in heart transplant specimens, providing a new dimension to improve the accuracy of diagnoses and an independent system for recalibrating the histology guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins have acknowledged roles in regulation of immune responses. Moreover, their role in the evolution of allograft rejection is being elucidated. In the current investigation, we measured transcript levels of SOCS1-4 in the peripheral blood of a group of renal transplant recipients including both rejected and non-rejected allografts. Expression analyses showed that relative expression of SOCS2 was significantly higher in transplant-rejected male patients compared to non-rejected group. However, such significant difference was not detected between female subjects. Expression of SOCS2 was significantly higher in T-cell-mediated rejection group compared with non-rejected individuals with creatinine rise (Relative expression difference [95% CrI] =6.74 [0.94, 12.65], P = 0.043). Conversely, SOCS4 expression was significantly lower in T-cell-mediated rejection group compared with non-rejected individuals with creatinine rise (Relative expression difference [95% CrI] = −0.35 [−0.63, −0.1], P = 0.008). Patterns of correlations between expression levels of SOCS genes were different in non-rejected group. The obtained results indicate the role SOCS genes in development of allograft rejection. • Expression analyses showed that relative expression of SOCS2 was significantly higher in transplant-rejected male patients. • Such significant difference was not detected between female subjects. • Expression of SOCS2 was significantly higher in T-cell-mediated rejection group compared with non-rejected individuals. • SOCS4 expression was significantly lower in T-cell-mediated rejection group compared with non-rejected individuals with creatinine rise. • Patterns of correlations between expression levels of SOCS genes were different in non-rejected group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]