Search

High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) quantifies bone microstructure and density at the distal tibia where there is also a sizable amount of myotendinous (muscle and tendon) tissue (M T ); however, there is no method for the quantification of M T . This study aimed (1) to assess the feasibility of using HR-pQCT distal tibia scans to estimate M T properties using a custom algorithm, and (2) to determine the relationship between M T properties at the distal tibia and mid-leg muscle density (MD) obtained from pQCT. Postmenopausal women from the Hamilton cohort of the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study had a single-slice (2.3 ± 0.5 mm) 66% site pQCT scan measuring muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) and MD. A standard HR-pQCT scan was acquired at the distal tibia. HR-pQCT-derived M T cross-sectional area (M T CSA) and M T density (M T D) were calculated using a custom algorithm in which thresholds (34.22–194.32 mg HA/cm 3 ) identified muscle seed volumes and were iteratively expanded. Pearson and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess correlations and systematic differences between pQCT- and HR-pQCT-derived muscle properties. Among 45 women (mean age: 74.6 ± 8.5 years, body mass index: 25.9 ± 4.3 kg/m 2 ), M T D was moderately correlated with mid-leg MD across the 2 modalities (r = 0.69–0.70, p  < 0.01). Bland-Altman analyses revealed no evidence of directional bias for M T D-MD. HR-pQCT and pQCT measures of M T CSA and MCSA were moderately correlated (r = 0.44, p  < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots for M T CSA revealed that larger MCSAs related to larger discrepancy between the distal and the mid-leg locations. This is the first study to assess the ability of HR-pQCT to measure M T size, density, and morphometry. HR-pQCT-derived M T D was moderately correlated with mid-leg MD from pQCT. This relationship suggests that distal M T may share common properties with muscle throughout the length of the leg. Future studies will assess the value of HR-pQCT-derived M T properties in the context of falls, mobility, and balance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To compare the incidence and severity of postoperative complications after oesophagectomy for carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) after randomized accrual to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Background Neoadjuvant therapy improves long-term survival after oesophagectomy. To date, evidence is insufficient to determine whether combined nCT, or nCRT alone, is the most beneficial. Methods Patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus or GOJ, resectable with a curative intention, were enrolled in this multicenter trial conducted at seven centres in Sweden and Norway. Study participants were randomized to nCT or nCRT followed by surgery with two-field lymphadenectomy. Three cycles of cisplatin/5-fluorouracil was administered in all patients, while 40 Gy of concomitant radiotherapy was administered in the nCRT group. Results Of the randomized 181 patients, 91 were assigned to nCT and 90 to nCRT. One-hundred-and-fifty-five patients, 78 nCT and 77 nCRT, underwent resection. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the incidence of surgical or nonsurgical complications (P-value = 0.69 and 0.13, respectively). There was no 30-day mortality, while the 90-day mortality was 3% (2/78) in the nCT group and 6% (5/77) in the nCRT group (P = 0.24). The median Clavien-Dindo complication severity grade was significantly higher in the nCRT group (P = 0.001). Conclusion There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between patients randomized to nCT and nCRT. However, complications were significantly more severe after nCRT. Registration trial database The trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Database (registration number NCT01362127 ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The optimal time to surgery (TTS) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for oesophageal cancer is unknown and has traditionally been 4-6 weeks in clinical practice. Observational studies have suggested better outcomes, especially in terms of histological response, after prolonged delay of up to 3 months after nCRT. The NeoRes II trial is the first randomised trial to compare standard to prolonged TTS after nCRT for oesophageal cancer. Patients with resectable, locally advanced oesophageal cancer were randomly assigned to standard delay of surgery of 4-6 weeks or prolonged delay of 10-12 weeks after nCRT. The primary endpoint was complete histological response of the primary tumour in patients with adenocarcinoma (AC). Secondary endpoints included histological tumour response, resection margins, overall and progression-free survival in all patients and stratified by histologic type. Between February 2015 and March 2019, 249 patients from 10 participating centres in Sweden, Norway and Germany were randomised: 125 to standard and 124 to prolonged TTS. There was no significant difference in complete histological response between AC patients allocated to standard (21%) compared to prolonged (26%) TTS (P = 0.429). Tumour regression, resection margins and number of resected lymph nodes, total and metastatic, did not differ between the allocated interventions. The first quartile overall survival in patients allocated to standard TTS was 26.5 months compared to 14.2 months after prolonged TTS (P = 0.003) and the overall risk of death during follow-up was 35% higher after prolonged delay (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.95, P = 0.107). Prolonged TTS did not improve histological complete response or other pathological endpoints, while there was a strong trend towards worse survival, suggesting caution in routinely delaying surgery for >6 weeks after nCRT. • The optimal timing of surgery after completed nCRT for oesophageal cancer is not known. • Merely based on observational studies clinical practice has moved towards prolonged delay of surgery for up to 12 weeks. • This randomised controlled trial compared standard 4-6 weeks' TTS to prolonged delay of 10-12 weeks. • No significant differences in histological complete response, tumour regression or complete tumour resections were found. • A strong trend of worse overall survival was found after prolonged TTS, suggesting caution in routinely delaying surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A previously carried out randomized phase IIb, placebo-controlled trial of 1 year of inhaled budesonide, which was nested in a lung cancer screening study, showed that non-solid and partially solid lung nodules detected by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), and not immediately suspicious for lung cancer, tended to regress. Because some of these nodules may be slow-growing adenocarcinoma precursors, we evaluated long-term outcomes (after stopping the 1-year intervention) by annual LDCT. Patients and methods: We analyzed the evolution of target and non-target trial nodules detected by LDCT in the budesonide and placebo arms up to 5 years after randomization. The numbers and characteristics of lung cancers diagnosed during follow-up were also analyzed. Results: The mean maximum diameter of non-solid nodules reduced significantly (from 5.03 mm at baseline to 2.61 mm after 5 years) in the budesonide arm; there was no significant size change in the placebo arm. The mean diameter of partially solid lesions also decreased significantly, but only by 0.69 mm. The size of solid nodules did not change. Neither the number of new lesions nor the number of lung cancers differed in the two arms. Conclusions: Inhaled budesonide given for 1 year significantly decreased the size of non-solid nodules detected by screening LDCT after 5 years. This is of potential importance since some of these nodules may progress slowly to adenocarcinoma. However, further studies are required to assess clinical implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bendamustine (BND) treats chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and indolent, rituximab-refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). Methods An illustrative budget impact model (BIM) was developed to estimate facility perspective changes in drug and administration labor costs associated with a hypothetical shift from 50%/50% BND-L/BND-S to exclusive BND-S use. Annual per-patient infusion labor costs per BND-S patient were $75.48 for CLL and $100.64 for INHL; BND-L costs were $226.44 and $603.84, respectively. [Extracted from the article]

Background: KRAS mutations in NSCLC are associated with a lack of response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) is an oral selective MEK kinase inhibitor of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. Patients andmethods: Advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients failing one to two prior regimens underwent KRAS profiling. KRAS wild-type patients were randomized to erlotinib (150 mg daily) or a combination of selumetinib (150 mg daily) with erlotinib (100 mg daily). KRAS mutant patients were randomized to selumetinib (75 mg b.i.d.) or the combination. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) for the KRAS wild-type cohort and objective response rate (ORR) for the KRAS mutant cohort. Biomarker studies of ERK phosphorylation and immune subsets were carried out. Results: From March 2010 to May 2013, 89 patients were screened; 41 KRAS mutant and 38 KRAS wild-type patients were enrolled. Median PFS in the KRAS wild-type arm was 2.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-3.7] for erlotinib alone and 2.1 months (95% CI 1.8-5.1) for the combination. The ORR in the KRAS mutant group was 0% (95% CI 0.0% to 33.6%) for selumetinib alone and 10% (95% CI 2.1% to 26.3%) for the combination. Combination therapy resulted in increased toxicities, requiring dose reductions (56%) and discontinuation (8%). Programmed cell death-1 expression on regulatory T cells (Tregs), Tim-3 on CD8+ T cells and Th17 levels were associated with PFS and overall survival in patients receiving selumetinib. Conclusions: This study failed to show improvement in ORR or PFS with combination therapy of selumetinib and erlotinib over monotherapy in KRAS mutant and KRAS wild-type advanced NSCLC. The association of immune subsets and immune checkpoint receptor expression with selumetinib may warrant further studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This phase I/II study examined the safety and efficacy of Sepantronium Bromide (S), a small-molecule selective survivin suppressant, administered in combination with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P). Patients and methods Forty-one patients were treated on study. Twenty-two patients received escalating doses of S (3.6–12 mg/m2) and 19 with untreated stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with the maximum tolerated dose of 10 mg/m2 in combination with standard doses of C (AUC6) and P (200 mg/m2) for six cycles. S was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) over 72 h in 21-day treatment cycles. Study end points included safety and toxic effect, response rate, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS), as well as exploratory pharmacodynamic correlates. Results Treatment with S was well tolerated, and toxic effects were mostly hematological in the phase II study. Two (11%) partial responses were observed with a median PFS of 5.7 months and median OS 16.1 months. Pharmacodynamic analysis did not demonstrate an association with response. Conclusion The combination of S (10 mg/m2/day 72-h CIVI) administered with C and P every 3 weeks exhibited a favorable safety profile but failed to demonstrate an improvement in response rate in advanced NSCLC. Clinical trial number NCT01100931. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]