Search

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.07.024 Byline: Ahmad A. Elesber (c), Wyatt W. Decker (a), Peter A. Smars (a), David O. Hodge (b), Win-Kuang Shen (c) Abstract: The goal of our study was to determine the accuracy of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) clinical policy in identifying patients with a cardiac cause for their syncope and its potential effect on syncope management. Author Affiliation: (a) Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (b) Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (c) Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn Article History: Received 11 November 2003; Accepted 30 July 2004 Article Note: (miscellaneous) Dr Shen has received a grant from Medtronic. Nothing in this manuscript implies endorsement by Mayo Foundation of any Medtronic product.

We sought to determine whether persons with intermediate risk factors for cardiovascular disease presenting to an emergency department with chest pain and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were triaged effectively by chest pain units (CPUs). CPUs evaluate patients with intermediate risk and acute chest pain effectively. CKD is a risk factor for poor outcomes once cardiovascular disease has developed. However, current algorithms to risk stratify patients with acute chest pain do not include renal function. A total of 408 patients enrolled previously in the CHEER study of intermediate risk patients with chest pain, assigned randomly to hospitalization or observation in a CPU where an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was available, were included. No difference was found in short-term outcomes of patients including in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization based on renal function. For the 205 patients randomized to the CPU, the rate of admission to the hospital was significantly higher in the group with CKD compared with the group with normal renal function (68.2 vs 48.2%, P = 0.007). In a multivariate analysis, decreased renal function was not associated with adverse short-term outcomes. On 5 years follow-up, the overall long-term mortality was significantly higher in the group with CKD (14.1% vs 5.5%, P = 0.003). We concluded that CKD is a strong predictor of hospitalization and overall long-term mortality in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department. Current risk factor stratification scoring systems should consider CKD as a predictor of increased risk in patients with chest pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Limited data exist on the long-term outcomes of patients who undergo evaluation in a chest pain unit (CPU). Methods: Our study included patients with chest pain at intermediate risk for acute cardiovascular events enrolled in the CHEER study. The primary outcome included a composite of death, myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, stroke, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The secondary outcome included a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, stroke, revascularization, and unstable angina. Data were obtained through a medical record review. We compared outcomes between groups randomized to the CPU versus admission, those admitted from the CPU versus dismissed home, and those who were admitted versus dismissed home after a cardiac stress test in the emergency department. Results: The final analysis included 407 patients. Median surveillance length was 5.5 years. No differences in the primary outcome or secondary outcome existed between patients randomized to the CPU versus admitted to hospital (21.6% vs 20.2% and 29.9% vs 33.0%, respectively, P > .05 for all comparisons). Patients admitted from the CPU had higher rates of the secondary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 2.26) than patients dismissed from the CPU. Patients admitted after a cardiac stress test in the CPU had higher rates of the secondary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 2.42) than patients dismissed from the CPU. Conclusions: A CPU does not increase long-term adverse outcomes in patients with chest pain at intermediate risk for an acute event. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study objective: An emergency department (ED) observation unit protocol for the management of acute onset atrial fibrillation is compared with routine hospital admission and management. Methods: Adult patients presenting to the ED with atrial fibrillation of less than 48 hours'' duration without hemodynamic instability or other comorbid conditions requiring hospitalization were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either ED observation unit care or routine inpatient care. The ED observation unit protocol included pulse rate control, cardiac monitoring, reassessment, and electrical cardioversion if atrial fibrillation persisted. Patients who reverted to sinus rhythm were discharged with a cardiology follow-up within 3 days, whereas those still in atrial fibrillation were admitted. All cases were followed up for 6 months and adverse events recorded. Results: Of the 153 patients, 75 were randomized to the ED observation unit and 78 to routine inhospital care. Eighty-five percent of ED observation unit patients converted to sinus rhythm versus 73% in the routine care group (difference 12%; 95% confidence interval [CI] −1% to 25%]; P=.06). The median length of stay was 10.1 versus 25.2 hours (difference 15.1 hours; 95% CI 11.2 to 19.6; P<.001) for ED observation unit and inhospital care respectively. Nine ED observation unit patients required inpatient admission. Eleven percent of the ED observation unit group had recurrence of atrial fibrillation during follow-up versus 10% of the routine inpatient care group (difference 1%; 95% CI −9% to 11%; P=.93). There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of hospitalization or the number of tests, and the number of adverse events during follow-up was similar in the 2 groups. Conclusion: An ED observation unit protocol that includes electrical cardioversion is a feasible alternative to routine hospital admission for acute onset of atrial fibrillation and results in a shorter initial length of stay. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Long-term outcomes of unselected patients with angina pectoris and bundle branch block (BBB) on initial electrocardiogram are not well established. The Olmsted County Chest Pain Study is a community-based cohort of 2,271 consecutive patients presenting to 3 Olmsted County emergency departments with angina from 1985 through 1992. Patients were followed for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization at 30 days and over a median follow-up period of 7.3 years and for mortality only through a median of 16.6 years. Cox models were used to estimate associations between BBB and cardiovascular outcomes. Mean age of the cohort on presentation was 63 years, and 58% were men. MACEs at 30 days occurred in 11% with right BBB (RBBB), 8.8% with left BBB (LBBB), and 6.4% in patients without BBB (p = 0.17). Over a median follow-up of 7.3 years, patients with BBB were at higher risk for MACEs (RBBB, hazard ratio [HR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44 to 2.38, p <0.001; LBBB, HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.56, p <0.001) compared to those without BBB. Over a median of 16.6 years, the 2 BBB groups had lower survival rates than patients without BBB (RBBB, HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.78, p <0.001; LBBB, HR 3.32, 95% CI 2.67 to 4.13, p ≤0.001), but after adjustment for multiple risk factors an increased risk of mortality for LBBB remained significant. In conclusion, appearance of LBBB or RBBB in patients presenting with angina predicts adverse long-term cardiovascular outcomes compared to patients without BBB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to determine short- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in unselected patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) with acute ischemic chest pain (AICP). In patients with DM presenting to the emergency department with AICP, short-term cardiovascular outcomes remain discordant between trials and registries, whereas long-term outcomes are not well-described. A consecutive cohort of all residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, presenting with AICP from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1992, was followed for a median duration of 16.6 years. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Other outcomes included a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization (major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]) as well as heart failure (HF) events at 30 days and at a median of 7.3 years, respectively. Of the 2,271 eligible patients, 336 (14.8%) were classified with DM. The crude 30-day MACCE rate was 10.1% in patients with DM and 6.1% in those without DM (p = 0.007). HF events were more common in patients with DM at 30 days (9.8% vs 3.1%, p <0.001). At 7.3 years, patients with DM were more likely to experience MACCEs and HF events than those without DM (71.2% vs 45.1%, unadjusted hazard ratio 2.15%, 95% confidence interval 1.87 to 2.48, p <0.001, and 45.1% vs 18.2%, p <0.001, respectively). Over the follow-up period, 272 patients with DM (81.9%) died, compared with 936 (49.2%) without DM (p <0.001). In conclusion, DM is associated with a higher short-term risk for MACCEs and HF and a higher long-term risk for mortality in unselected patients with AICP. DM should be included as a high-risk variable in national acute coronary syndrome guidelines. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether stress imaging for patients who are unsuitable for exercise treadmill testing (ETT) as part of a chest pain unit (CPU) triage strategy resulted in incremental benefit in clinical outcomes and relative costs compared with patients randomized to routine hospital admission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical outcomes and medical resource utilization were examined at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, for 212 Intermediate-risk patients with unstable angina randomized to a CPU and compared with 212 patients randomized to routine admission from November 21, 1995, to March 18,1997. Patients In stable condition in the CPU underwent ETT; if patients were unsuitable for ETT, stress imaging was performed. Costs for CPU evaluation and outcomes were assessed during a &-month follow-up. RESULTS: During the observation period, 60 patients (28%) were admitted to the hospital. Of the 152 remaining patients, 125 (82%) underwent ETT (91 had normal results), and 27 (18%) underwent stress imaging (3 had normal results). Patients with normal ETT or stress imaging results had no primary events at 6-month follow-up. Patients admitted to the hospital who underwent stress imaging had an insignificantly higher 6-month event rate compared with patients who underwent ETT (16.7% vs 8.1%; P=.38). The standardized resource-based relative-value units (RBRVUs) for patients who underwent ETT and stress Imaging during follow-up were 19.4 and 56.4 RBRVUs, respectively, compared with 51.4 (ETT) and 52.1 (stress imaging) RBRVUs for similar numbers of patients randomized to routine admission. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise treadmill testing safety stratified most Intermediate-risk patients with unstable angina and was less costly than routine admission. Patients not suitable for ETT are likely to have abnormal stress Imaging results. They represent a higher-risk cohort that could be routinely admitted to the hospital without reducing the effectiveness of the CPU strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]