Search

Background: One major challenge in prioritizing health care using cost-effectiveness (CE) information is when alternatives are more expensive but more effective than existing technology. In such a situation, an external criterion in the form of a CE threshold that reflects the willingness to pay (WTP) per quality-adjusted life-year is necessary.Objectives: To determine a CE threshold for health care interventions in Malaysia.Methods: A cross-sectional, contingent valuation study was conducted using a stratified multistage cluster random sampling technique in four states in Malaysia. One thousand thirteen respondents were interviewed in person for their socioeconomic background, quality of life, and WTP for a hypothetical scenario.Results: The CE thresholds established using the nonparametric Turnbull method ranged from MYR12,810 to MYR22,840 (~US $4,000-US $7,000), whereas those estimated with the parametric interval regression model were between MYR19,929 and MYR28,470 (~US $6,200-US $8,900). Key factors that affected the CE thresholds were education level, estimated monthly household income, and the description of health state scenarios.Conclusions: These findings suggest that there is no single WTP value for a quality-adjusted life-year. The CE threshold estimated for Malaysia was found to be lower than the threshold value recommended by the World Health Organization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of starting insulin therapy with biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral glucose-lowering drugs in Saudi Arabia, India, Indonesia, and Algeria. Methods The IMS CORE Diabetes Model was used to evaluate economic outcomes associated with starting BIAsp 30, using baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes from the A 1 chieve study. Time horizons of 1 and 30 years were applied, with country-specific costs for complications, therapies, and background mortality. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in local currencies, USD, and fractions of local GDP per capita (GDPc). Cost-effectiveness was pre-defined using the World Health Organization definition of <3.0 times GDPc. Comprehensive sensitivity analyses were performed. Results In the primary 30-year analyses, starting BIAsp 30 was associated with a projected increase in life expectancy of >1 year and was highly cost-effective, with ICERs of −0.03 (Saudi Arabia), 0.25 (India), 0.48 (India), 0.47 (Indonesia), and 0.46 (Algeria) GDPc/QALY. The relative risk of developing selected complications was reduced in all countries. Sensitivity analyses including cost of self-monitoring, treatment costs, and deterioration of glucose control with time showed the results to be robust. In a 1-year analysis, ICER per QALY gained was still cost-effective or highly cost-effective. Conclusion Starting BIAsp 30 in people with type 2 diabetes in the A 1 chieve study was found to be cost-effective across all country settings at 1- and 30-year time horizons, and usefully increased predicted life expectancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Treatment with antiepileptic drugs is commonly guided by serum level monitoring. Such monitoring requires expensive laboratory equipment and products. However, well-conducted studies on the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring for antiepileptic drugs are lacking particularly in patients with structural-metabolic epilepsy. The study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of serum level monitoring services in the management of children with structural-metabolic epilepsy during the first year of diagnosis. A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the provider perspective. It included patients attended a paediatric neurology clinic. The effectiveness measures used in this analysis were the number of patients that achieved ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency, and the number of patients with 3-month seizure free. Medical records of the patients were reviewed for the required information. Medical chart/billing data obtained from the hospital were collected to estimate the resources used (One Malaysian Ringgit MYR is equivalent to 0.31 USD). The recruited children were followed for one year following their first visit. The average cost effectiveness ratio for the monitored patients (MYR 2735 per patient that achieved a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) was lower than that for non-monitored patients (MYR 2921 per patients that achieved a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency), with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of MYR 2357 per one additional patient that achieved a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency. The average cost effectiveness ratios for monitored and non-monitored group were MYR 8279 and MYR 6433 per patient with a 3-month seizure-free period, respectively, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of MYR 29,666 per one additional patient with a 3-month seizure-free period. In terms of the effectiveness measures used, serum level monitoring of antiepileptic drugs was found to be cost-effective. However, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was found to be sensitive to the cost of management. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]