Search

It is unknown whether clinical benefit of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors is associated with baseline or on-treatment triglyceride concentrations. This study sought to examine relations between triglyceride levels and the effect of alirocumab vs placebo on cardiovascular outcomes using prespecified and post hoc analyses of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES (Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab) trial. Patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n = 18,924) and elevated atherogenic lipoproteins despite optimized statin therapy were randomized to alirocumab 75 to 150 mg or matching placebo every 2 weeks subcutaneously. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were examined in relation to continuous or dichotomous triglyceride concentrations. Median baseline triglyceride concentration was 129 mg/dL. In both treatment groups, a 10-mg/dL higher baseline concentration was associated with an adjusted MACE HR of 1.008 (95% CI: 1.003-1.013; P < 0.005). Baseline triglycerides ≥150 vs <150 mg/dL were associated with a HR of 1.184 (95% CI: 1.080-1.297; P < 0.005). Versus placebo, alirocumab reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline (average, 54.7%) and reduced MACE (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.78-0.93). At month 4, triglyceride levels were reduced from baseline by median 17.7 mg/dL (P < 0.001) and 0.9 mg/dL (P = NS) with alirocumab and placebo, respectively. A 10-mg/dL decline from baseline in triglycerides was associated with lower subsequent risk of MACE with placebo (HR: 0.988; 95% CI: 0.982-0.995; P < 0.005) but not with alirocumab (HR: 0.999; 95% CI: 0.987-1.010; P = 0.82). Among patients with recent ACS on optimized statin therapy, baseline triglycerides was associated with cardiovascular risk. However, the reduction in triglycerides with alirocumab did not contribute to its clinical benefit. (ODYSSEY Outcomes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab; NCT01663402) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Alirocumab improves cardiovascular outcomes after ACS irrespective of sex. • Reduction of total cardiovascular events was greater at higher baseline Lp(a). The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (NCT01663402) compared the effects of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab with placebo on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We assessed efficacy and safety of alirocumab versus placebo according to sex and lipoprotein(a) level. This prespecified analysis compared the effects of alirocumab versus placebo on lipoproteins, MACE (coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal/non-fatal ischemic stroke, unstable angina requiring hospitalization), death, total cardiovascular events, and adverse events in 4762 women and 14,162 men followed for a median of 2.8 years. In post-hoc analysis, we evaluated total cardiovascular events according to sex, baseline lipoprotein(a), and treatment. Women were older, had higher baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (89.6 vs 85.3 mg/dL) and lipoprotein(a) (28.0 vs 19.3 mg/dL) and had more co-morbidities than men. At 4 months, alirocumab lowered LDL-C by 49.4 mg/dL in women and 54.0 mg/dL in men and lipoprotein(a) by 9.7 and 8.1 mg/dL, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Alirocumab reduced MACE, death, and total cardiovascular events similarly in both sexes. In the placebo group, lipoprotein(a) was a risk factor for total cardiovascular events in women and men. In both sexes, reduction of total cardiovascular events was greater at higher baseline lipoprotein(a), but this effect was more evident in women than men (p interaction =0.08). Medication adherence and adverse event rates were similar in both sexes. Alirocumab improves cardiovascular outcomes after ACS irrespective of sex. Reduction of total cardiovascular events was greater at higher baseline lipoprotein(a). [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• RDW independently associates with risk of MACE and death in patients with recent ACS. • RDW adds to information provided by other risk factors and biomarkers, such as hs-CRP. • RDW is an existing component of the complete blood count. • As such, RDW provides useful predictive information after ACS at no incremental cost. Elevated red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is associated with increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and death in patients with cardiovascular disease. The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial compared alirocumab with placebo in 18,924 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and elevated atherogenic lipoproteins despite optimized statin treatment. This post hoc analysis determined whether RDW independently predicts risk of MACE and death in patients after recent ACS, whether RDW influences MACE reduction with alirocumab, and whether alirocumab treatment affects RDW. Associations of baseline RDW with risk of MACE and death were analyzed in the placebo group in adjusted proportional hazards models. Interactions of RDW and treatment on the risk of MACE and death were evaluated. An increasing quartile of RDW was associated with characteristics that predicted risk of MACE and death including age, hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerotic conditions and events, revascularizations, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. After adjusting for baseline characteristics associated with the risk of MACE or death, baseline RDW remained independently associated with the risk of MACE and death in the placebo group (hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] 1.08 [1.02–1.15] and 1.13 [1.03–1.24] per 1% increase of RDW, respectively, both p <0.001). There was no interaction of RDW and treatment on MACE or death, nor did alirocumab affect RDW. RDW was associated with an increased risk of MACE and death, independent of established risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Guidelines recommend nonstatin lipid-lowering agents in patients at very high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) if low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains ≥70 mg/dL on maximum tolerated statin treatment. It is uncertain if this approach benefits patients with LDL-C near 70 mg/dL. Lipoprotein(a) levels may influence residual risk.Objectives: In a post hoc analysis of the ODYSSEY Outcomes (Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab) trial, the authors evaluated the benefit of adding the proprotein subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab to optimized statin treatment in patients with LDL-C levels near 70 mg/dL. Effects were evaluated according to concurrent lipoprotein(a) levels.Methods: ODYSSEY Outcomes compared alirocumab with placebo in 18,924 patients with recent acute coronary syndromes receiving optimized statin treatment. In 4,351 patients (23.0%), screening or randomization LDL-C was <70 mg/dL (median 69.4 mg/dL; interquartile range: 64.3-74.0 mg/dL); in 14,573 patients (77.0%), both determinations were ≥70 mg/dL (median 94.0 mg/dL; interquartile range: 83.2-111.0 mg/dL).Results: In the lower LDL-C subgroup, MACE rates were 4.2 and 3.1 per 100 patient-years among placebo-treated patients with baseline lipoprotein(a) greater than or less than or equal to the median (13.7 mg/dL). Corresponding adjusted treatment hazard ratios were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.90) and 1.11 (95% CI: 0.83-1.49), with treatment-lipoprotein(a) interaction on MACE (Pinteraction = 0.017). In the higher LDL-C subgroup, MACE rates were 4.7 and 3.8 per 100 patient-years among placebo-treated patients with lipoprotein(a) >13.7 mg/dL or ≤13.7 mg/dL; corresponding adjusted treatment hazard ratios were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72-0.92) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.75-1.06), with Pinteraction = 0.43.Conclusions: In patients with recent acute coronary syndromes and LDL-C near 70 mg/dL on optimized statin therapy, proprotein subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition provides incremental clinical benefit only when lipoprotein(a) concentration is at least mildly elevated. (ODYSSEY Outcomes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab; NCT01663402). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration is inversely related to risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in epidemiologic studies but is a poorer predictor of MACE in patients with established coronary heart disease. HDL particle concentration (HDLP) has been proposed as a better predictor of risk. We investigated whether HDLP is associated with risk of MACE after acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Methods: The dal-Outcomes trial compared the CETP inhibitor dalcetrapib with placebo in patients with recent ACS. In a nested case-cohort analysis, total, large, medium, and small HDLPs were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy at baseline (4-12 weeks after ACS) in 476 cases with MACE and 902 controls. Hazard ratios (HRs; case-control) for 1-SD increment of HDLP or HDL-C at baseline were calculated with and without adjustment for demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment variables. Similarly, HRs for MACE were calculated for changes in HDLP or HDL-C from baseline to month 3 of assigned treatment.Results: Over median follow-up of 28 months, the risk of MACE was not associated with baseline HDLP (adjusted HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.84-1.15, P = .81), any HDLP subclass, or HDL-C. Dalcetrapib increased HDL-C and total, medium, and large HDLP and decreased small HDLP but had no effect on MACE compared with placebo. There were no association of risk of MACE with change in HDLP or HDL-C and no interaction with assigned study treatment.Conclusions: Neither baseline HDLP nor the change in HDLP on treatment with dalcetrapib or placebo was associated with risk of MACE after ACS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ORION-3 (NCT03060577) was a long-term (4-year) open-label extension to the Phase 2, double-blind, 360-day, placebo-controlled ORION-1 study. ORION-3 assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of twice-yearly inclisiran in 382 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or risk-equivalents and elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), despite maximally tolerated statin therapy or other oral lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Results from a post-hoc, exploratory, subgroup analysis in patients with established ASCVD are presented here. To evaluate the 4-year efficacy and safety of inclisiran in patients with established ASCVD and elevated LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statins or other oral LLT. Inclisiran sodium 300 mg (inclisiran 284 mg) was administered subcutaneously (SC) twice yearly. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in LDL-C from baseline of ORION-1 to Day 210 of ORION-3 (570 days of inclisiran exposure) in patients receiving inclisiran in both ORION-1 and ORION-3 (inclisiran-only arm). LDL-C levels were assessed up to Day 1440 (4 years) of ORION-3 in patients who received ≥1 dose of inclisiran and had baseline (Day 1 of ORION-3) and Day 210 LDL-C measurements (modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population). Of 190 patients with established ASCVD in the inclisiran-only arm, 181 (95.3%) were included in the mITT analysis; 150 (78.9%) completed the full 4-year study observation period. The mean age was 65.6 years; 73.7% were male. In the mITT population, mean (SD) baseline LDL-C was 116.8 (47.0) mg/dL; with inclisiran, the percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 210 was −49.5% (24.4%). LDL-C reductions were sustained over the 4-year study period (Figure); at Day 1440, the mean (SD) percentage change in LDLC from baseline was –47.2% (29.2%). Safety was assessed in patients who received ≥1 inclisiran dose (n=185), among whom cumulative inclisiran exposure (ORION-1 through ORION-3) was 794.3 patient-years. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were experienced by 96.2% and 44.9% of patients, respectively. In total, 7% of patients experienced a clinically relevant injection-site TEAE. The most frequent TESAEs (≥2%) were angina pectoris (3.2%), COVID-19 (3.2%), unstable angina (2.7%), osteoarthritis (2.7%), acute myocardial infarction (2.2%), transient ischemic attack (2.2%), and pneumonia (2.2%). In this exploratory analysis, twice-yearly SC inclisiran provided effective and sustained LDL-C reductions over 4 years in patients with established ASCVD and elevated LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statins or other oral LLT. In ORION-3, inclisiran had an overall safety and tolerability profile consistent with prior Phase 3 studies. Yes This investigation was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA. Medical writing support was provided by Rebecca Dargue, PhD, BOLDSCIENCE Ltd., and was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA, in accordance with GPP 2022 guidelines. The authors had full control of the content and made the final decision on all aspects of this publication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

After an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), patients with diabetes remain at high risk for additional cardiovascular events despite use of current therapies. Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins are epigenetic modulators of inflammation, thrombogenesis, and lipoprotein metabolism implicated in atherothrombosis. The BETonMACE trial tests the hypothesis that treatment with apabetalone, a selective BET protein inhibitor, will improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes after an ACS. DESIGN: Patients (n = 2425) with ACS in the preceding 7 to 90 days, with type 2 diabetes and low HDL cholesterol (≤40 mg/dl for men, ≤45 mg/dl for women), receiving intensive or maximum-tolerated therapy with atorvastatin or rosuvastatin, were assigned in double-blind fashion to receive apabetalone 100 mg orally twice daily or matching placebo. Baseline characteristics include female sex (25%), myocardial infarction as index ACS event (74%), coronary revascularization for index ACS (80%), treatment with dual anti-platelet therapy (87%) and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (91%), median LDL cholesterol 65 mg per deciliter, and median HbA1c 7.3%. The primary efficacy measure is time to first occurrence of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or stroke. Assumptions include a primary event rate of 7% per annum in the placebo group and median follow-up of 1.5 years. Patients will be followed until at least 250 primary endpoint events have occurred, providing 80% power to detect a 30% reduction in the primary endpoint with apabetalone. SUMMARY: BETonMACE will determine whether the addition of the selective BET protein inhibitor apabetalone to contemporary standard of care for ACS reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Results are expected in 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Most patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are treated with statins, which reduce atherogenic triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. It is uncertain whether triglycerides predict risk after ACS on a background of statin treatment. Objectives This study examined the relationship of fasting triglyceride levels to outcomes after ACS in patients treated with statins. Methods Long-term and short-term relationships of triglycerides to risk after ACS were examined in the dal-OUTCOMES trial and atorvastatin arm of the MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Acute Cholesterol Lowering) trial, respectively. Analysis of dal-OUTCOMES included 15,817 patients (97% statin-treated) randomly assigned 4 to 12 weeks after ACS to treatment with dalcetrapib (a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor) or placebo and followed for a median 31 months. Analysis of MIRACL included 1,501 patients treated with atorvastatin 80 mg daily beginning 1 to 4 days after ACS and followed for 16 weeks. Fasting triglycerides at initial random assignment were related to risk of coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and unstable angina in models adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and body mass index. Results Fasting triglyceride levels were associated with both long-term and short-term risk after ACS. In dal-OUTCOMES, long-term risk increased across quintiles of baseline triglycerides (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio in the highest/lowest quintile (>175/≤80 mg/dl) was 1.61 (95% confidence interval: 1.34 to 1.94). There was no interaction of triglycerides and treatment assignment on the primary outcome. In the atorvastatin group of MIRACL, short-term risk increased across tertiles of baseline triglycerides (p = 0.03), with a hazard ratio of 1.51 (95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 2.15) in highest/lowest tertiles (>195/≤135 mg/dl). The relationship of triglycerides to risk was independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in both studies. Conclusions Among patients with ACS treated effectively with statins, fasting triglycerides predict long-term and short-term cardiovascular risk. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins may be an important additional target for therapy. (A Study of RO4607381 in Stable Coronary Heart Disease Patients With Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome; NCT00658515 ) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Observational analyses and short-term randomized trials have suggested that statins reduce occurrence or recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We tested the hypothesis that long-term treatment with high-dose atorvastatin reduces occurrence of AF in patients with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. Methods: We examined development of new AF in the SPARCL trial that compared atorvastatin 80 mg daily with placebo in 4,731 patients with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. Patients who had chronic or paroxysmal AF or were taking medications for treatment or prophylaxis of AF at the time of enrollment were excluded. Atrial fibrillation was identified from electrocardiograms submitted to a blinded central electrocardiographic laboratory and from investigators'' adverse event reports. Results: Patients were followed up for a median of 4.8 years, corresponding to >20,000 patient-years of observation with a median of 5 electrocardiograms per patient. The primary efficacy measure, the time from randomization to first occurrence of new AF, did not differ between treatment groups. By intention to treat, there were 139 cases of new AF in the atorvastatin group and 122 cases in the placebo group, corresponding to incidence rates of 1.32 and 1.14 cases per 100 patient-years observation (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% CI 0.90-1.46, P = .26). On-treatment analysis yielded similar findings, with incidence rates of 1.26 and 1.01 cases per 100 patient-years observation in the atorvastatin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% CI 0.94-1.67, P = .12). Conclusion: High-dose atorvastatin does not prevent development of AF in patients with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: To examine the relationship of baseline tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) to early cardiovascular risk after an acute coronary syndrome, and the effect of intensive statin therapy. Methods: We measured plasma t-PA in 2860 of the 3086 (93%) subjects in the MIRACL study, an international randomized trial of atorvastatin 80mg daily versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The relationship of t-PA to death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or worsening angina over 16 weeks was assessed by Cox Proportional Hazards. D-dimer was measured in a random sample of 395 subjects. Results: Higher baseline t-PA was significantly related to the risk of recurrent events (HR=1.25, p =0.0014). This relationship was unaffected by adjustment for age, sex, troponin, hsCRP, and lipids (HR=1.17, p =0.029), but was attenuated by adjustment including body mass index and smoking (HR=1.14, p=0.08). D-dimer and t-PA concentrations were not related. Atorvastatin reduced the risk of recurrent events, but did not affect t-PA or D-dimer concentrations or the relationship of t-PA to outcomes. Conclusion: In patients with acute coronary syndromes, increasing t-PA concentration was related to a higher early risk of recurrent events, paradoxically reflecting impaired endogenous fibrinolysis. This relationship is due in part to the association of t-PA with age, body mass index and smoking. Although statins lower the risk of recurrent events after acute coronary syndromes, it is unlikely that this benefit is achieved through thrombolytic and fibrinolytic pathways. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study sought to define the relationship between oxidative biomarkers, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, and inflammatory and thrombosis biomarkers. Background: Elevated levels of oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) on apolipoprotein B particles (apoB) represent a novel biomarker of CVD. Previous studies suggest that an increase in OxPL/apoB reflects a positive response to statins and a low-fat diet. Methods: This study measured OxPL/apoB, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL) biomarkers, consisting of immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM autoantibodies to malondialdehyde (MDA)-low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and IgG and IgM apoB-100 immune complexes (IC/apoB), at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg/day or placebo in 2,342 patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) enrolled in the MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction With Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering) trial. Results: At baseline, potentially atheroprotective IgM autoantibodies and IgM IC/apoB were lower in male patients, diabetic patients, and patients >65 years of age. Patients with an LDL level greater than the median (122 mg/dl) had higher levels of OxPL/apoB, Lp(a), and OxLDL biomarkers compared with those who had an LDL level less than the median. Atorvastatin resulted in significantly larger changes in all biomarkers in female patients, patients age <65 years, patients with LDL cholesterol <122 mg/dl, nonsmokers, and nondiabetic patients (p < 0.0001 for all). In particular, a significant increase in OxPL/apoB in response to atorvastatin was noted in all 20 subgroups evaluated. Weak or no significant correlations were noted between all OxLDL biomarkers and C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, tissue plasminogen activator, interleukin-6, intercellular adhesion molecule, vascular cell adhesion molecule, P-selectin, and E-selectin at randomization and 16 weeks. Conclusions: In patients with ACS, baseline levels of oxidative biomarkers varied according to specific CVD risk factors and were largely independent of inflammatory biomarkers. Atorvastatin uniformly increased OxPL/apoB levels in all subgroups studied. Future studies are warranted to assess whether the increase in OxPL/apoB levels reflects the benefit of effective therapeutic interventions and prediction of new CVD events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

After acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), older patients are particularly susceptible to early complications, including death and recurrent ACS. Lipid management guidelines do not differentiate elderly from younger patients, and lack of evidence for statin benefits in older patients has led to underutilization of statins in the elderly. The MIRACL study randomized 3,086 patients to 16 weeks of 80 mg/day of atorvastatin or placebo 24 to 96 hours after ACS and demonstrated significant decreases in the combined primary end point (nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, recurrent symptomatic myocardial ischemia). This post hoc analysis compared benefits of 80 mg of atorvastatin in older (≥65 years) versus younger (<65 years) patients. Event rates were approximately two- to threefold higher in older than in younger patients. Treatment-by-age heterogeneity testing indicated no difference in treatment effect by age for any of the primary or secondary end points, and relative risk decreases in the primary end point with atorvastatin versus placebo were similar in younger and older patients (22% vs 14%, respectively). The safety profile of atorvastatin was similar between the 2 age groups. In conclusion, these results and a greater immediate cardiovascular risk in older patients argue for early, intensive atorvastatin therapy as routine practice after ACS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) consist of unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction and are associated with a high risk of early recurrent ischemic events. Revascularization procedures do not modify underlying pathophysiology and only modestly reduce early ischemic events after an index episode of ACS. Although statins improve dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk over the long term, efforts to identify new ACS treatments are focusing on the ability of statins to modify the arterial wall–blood interface and reduce the risk of early recurrent ischemic events. Statins have been shown to reduce circulating markers of inflammation within days of an acute ischemic event. Short-term statin therapy also has been associated with improved coronary endothelial function, reversal of prothrombotic states, and reduction in atherosclerotic plaque volume. Findings from 6 randomized, controlled intervention trials were evaluated to determine if risk reduction is associated with the intensity of statin therapy. In addition, the predictive ability of baseline lipid levels and inflammatory markers were examined. High-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin 80 mg) reduced early recurrent ischemic events after ACS compared with moderate-intensity treatment (eg, pravastatin 40 mg) or placebo. Moderate-intensity regimens (simvastatin 40 mg, pravastatin 20 to 40 mg, fluvastatin 80 mg, cerivastatin 0.4 mg) provided minimal benefit compared with placebo. Although there was no apparent relation between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels before or during randomized treatment and short-term (4-month) risk of recurrent events, the degree of LDL cholesterol reduction with statin treatment after ACS may be related to longer-term event reduction. Moreover, evidence suggests that anti-inflammatory effects of high-intensity statin treatment are associated with clinical benefit. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

An economic analysis was conducted using clinical outcomes in the MIRACL trial that evaluated high-dose atorvastatin versus placebo for 16 weeks after acute coronary syndrome. The direct cost of atorvastatin was largely offset by the associated decrease in cardiovascular events. The net incremental cost of atorvastatin treatment was $157/patient with a cost-effectiveness ratio of $4,086/event avoided. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Inclisiran is a small interfering RNA agent to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The purpose of this study was to provide reliable evidence to date on the long-term safety profile of inclisiran. This post hoc analysis comprised patients treated with 300 mg inclisiran sodium or placebo in the completed (ORION-1, -3, -5, -9, -10, and -11) and ongoing (ORION-8) trials. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative incidence of reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), abnormal laboratory measurements, and incidence of antidrug antibodies were analyzed. This analysis included 3,576 patients treated with inclisiran for up to 6 years and 1,968 patients treated with placebo for up to 1.5 years, with 9,982.1 and 2,647.7 patient-years of exposure, respectively. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that TEAEs that were serious or led to discontinuation; hepatic, muscle, and kidney events; incident diabetes; and elevations of creatine kinase or creatinine accrued at a comparable rate between groups for up to 1.5 years, with similar trends continuing for inclisiran beyond this period. Numerically fewer major cardiovascular events reported as TEAEs occurred with inclisiran during this period. Treatment-induced antidrug antibodies were uncommon with inclisiran (4.6%), with few of these persistent (1.4%) and not associated with greater incidence of TEAEs leading to study drug discontinuation or serious TEAEs. Long-term treatment with inclisiran was well tolerated in a diverse population, without new safety signals, supporting the safety of inclisiran in patients with dyslipidemia. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES (Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab) trial compared alirocumab with placebo, added to high-intensity or maximum-tolerated statin treatment, after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 18,924 patients. Alirocumab reduced the first occurrence of the primary composite endpoint and was associated with fewer all-cause deaths.Objectives: This pre-specified analysis determined the extent to which alirocumab reduced total (first and subsequent) nonfatal cardiovascular events and all-cause deaths in ODYSSEY OUTCOMES.Methods: Hazard functions for total nonfatal cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure) and death were jointly estimated, linked by a shared frailty accounting for patient risk heterogeneity and correlated within-patient nonfatal events. An association parameter also quantified the strength of the linkage between risk of nonfatal events and death. The model provides accurate relative estimates of nonfatal event risk if nonfatal events are associated with increased risk for death.Results: With 3,064 first and 5,425 total events, 190 fewer first and 385 fewer total nonfatal cardiovascular events or deaths were observed with alirocumab compared with placebo. Alirocumab reduced total nonfatal cardiovascular events (hazard ratio: 0.87; 95% confidence interval: 0.82 to 0.93) and death (hazard ratio: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.71 to 0.97) in the presence of a strong association between nonfatal and fatal event risk.Conclusions: In patients with ACS, the total number of nonfatal cardiovascular events and deaths prevented with alirocumab was twice the number of first events prevented. Consequently, total event reduction is a more comprehensive metric to capture the totality of alirocumab clinical efficacy after ACS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Recurrent vascular events remain a major source of morbidity and mortality after stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The IRIS Trial is evaluating an approach to secondary prevention based on the established association between insulin resistance and increased risk for ischemic vascular events. Specifically, IRIS will test the effectiveness of pioglitazone, an insulin-sensitizing drug of the thiazolidinedione class, for reducing the risk for stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) among insulin resistant, nondiabetic patients with a recent ischemic stroke or TIA. Design Eligible patients for IRIS must have had insulin resistance defined by a Homeostasis Model Assessment–Insulin Resistance >3.0 without meeting criteria for diabetes. Within 6 months of the index stroke or TIA, patients were randomly assigned to pioglitazone (titrated from 15 to 45 mg/d) or matching placebo and followed for up to 5 years. The primary outcome is time to stroke or MI. Secondary outcomes include time to stroke alone, acute coronary syndrome, diabetes, cognitive decline, and all-cause mortality. Enrollment of 3,876 participants from 179 sites in 7 countries was completed in January 2013. Participant follow-up will continue until July 2015. Summary The IRIS Trial will determine whether treatment with pioglitazone improves cardiovascular outcomes of nondiabetic, insulin-resistant patients with stroke or TIA. Results are expected in early 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Following acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the risk for future cardiovascular events is high and is related to levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) even within the setting of intensive statin treatment. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) regulates LDL receptor expression and circulating levels of LDL-C. Antibodies to PCSK9 can produce substantial and sustained reductions of LDL-C. The ODYSSEY Outcomes trial tests the hypothesis that treatment with alirocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, improves cardiovascular outcomes after ACS. Design This Phase 3 study will randomize approximately 18,000 patients to receive biweekly injections of alirocumab (75-150 mg) or matching placebo beginning 1 to 12 months after an index hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Qualifying patients are treated with atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg daily, rosuvastatin 20 or 40 mg daily, or the maximum tolerated and approved dose of one of these agents and fulfill one of the following criteria: LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL, non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 100 mg/dL, or apolipoprotein B ≥ 80 mg/dL. The primary efficacy measure is time to first occurrence of coronary heart disease death, acute myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, or ischemic stroke. The trial is expected to continue until 1613 primary end point events have occurred with minimum follow-up of at least 2 years, providing 90% power to detect a 15% hazard reduction. Adverse events of special interest include allergic events and injection site reactions. Interim analyses are planned when approximately 50% and 75% of the targeted number of primary end points have occurred. Summary ODYSSEY Outcomes will determine whether the addition of the PCSK9 antibody alirocumab to intensive statin therapy reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after ACS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Peroxisome proliferator–activated receptors (PPARs) regulate transcription of genes involved in glucose uptake, lipid metabolism, and inflammation. Aleglitazar is a potent dual PPAR agonist with insulin-sensitizing and glucose-lowering actions and favorable effects on lipid profiles and biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. The AleCardio trial examines whether the addition of aleglitazar to standard medical therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and recent acute coronary syndrome. Study Design: AleCardio is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 7,228 patients were randomized to aleglitazar 150 μg or placebo daily in addition to standard medical therapy. The primary efficacy end point is time to the first event of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Principal safety end points are hospitalization due to heart failure and changes in renal function. Treatment will continue until 7,000 patients are followed up for at least 2.5 years and 950 primary end point events are adjudicated. Conclusions: AleCardio will establish whether the PPAR-α/γ agonist aleglitazar improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and high-risk coronary disease. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Despite contemporary therapies for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), morbidity and mortality remain high. Low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol are common among patients with ACS and may contribute to ongoing risk. Strategies that raise levels of HDL cholesterol, such as inhibition of cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP), might reduce risk after ACS. Dal-OUTCOMES is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to test the hypothesis that CETP inhibition with dalcetrapib reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with recent ACS. Design: The study will randomize approximately 15,600 patients to receive daily doses of dalcetrapib 600 mg or matching placebo, beginning 4 to 12 weeks after an index ACS event. There are no prespecified boundaries for HDL cholesterol levels at entry. Other elements of care, including management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, are to follow best evidence-based practice. The primary efficacy measure is time to first occurrence of coronary heart disease death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring hospital admission, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or atherothrombotic stroke. The trial will continue until 1,600 primary end point events have occurred, all evaluable subjects have been followed for at least 2 years, and 80% of evaluable subjects have been followed for at least 2.5 years. Summary: Dal-OUTCOMES will determine whether CETP inhibition with dalcetrapib, added to current evidence-based care, reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after ACS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Despite contemporary therapies for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), rates of morbidity and mortality remain high. Low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol are common among patients with ACS and predict risk for subsequent cardiovascular events, even on a background of intensive statin treatment. An extensive body of clinical and experimental data suggests that HDL cholesterol may promote favorable remodeling of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and ameliorate endothelial dysfunction, thrombotic tendency, inflammation, oxidative stress, and ischemia-reperfusion injury, which are all effects that might be beneficial after ACS. Clinical trials are in progress to test the hypothesis that strategies to raise levels of HDL cholesterol will reduce risk after ACS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: The short-term effects of early statin therapy in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) on clinical outcomes remain unclear. Our objective was to update the evidence on patient relevant outcomes from all randomized trials comparing early statin therapy with placebo or usual care at 1 and 4months following ACS. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared statins to control, initiated within 14days after onset of ACS and with minimal follow-up of 30days. Data were extracted in duplicate and analyzed by a random effects model. Investigators from individual trials contributed additional data where needed. Results: A total of 18 trials involving 14,303 patients with ACS were included in the meta-analysis. We found no evidence for further trials on the topic. Risk ratios for the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke of early statin therapy compared to control were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–1.08; P =0.34) at 1month and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.81–1.06; P =0.27) at 4months following ACS. There were favorable trends related to statin use for all individual secondary endpoints but there was no statistically significant risk reduction except for unstable angina with a risk ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.59–0.96; P =0.02) at 4months following ACS. Conclusions: Initiation of statin therapy within 14days following ACS results in directionally favorable but non-significant reduction in death, myocardial infarction, or stroke up to 4months, and significant reduction in the occurrence of unstable angina at 4months following ACS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Inclisiran is a double-stranded small interfering RNA that suppresses proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) translation in the liver, leading to sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other atherogenic lipoproteins with twice-yearly dosing.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to conduct a patient-level pooled analysis from 3 phase 3 studies of inclisiran.Methods: Participants with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (ORION-9 [Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Inclisiran Treatment on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) in Subjects With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH)]), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (ORION-10 [Inclisiran for Participants With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]), or ASCVD and ASCVD risk equivalents (ORION-11 [Inclisiran for Subjects With ASCVD or ASCVD-Risk Equivalents and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]) taking maximally tolerated statin therapy, with or without other LDL-C-lowering agents, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either inclisiran or placebo, administered by subcutaneous injection on day 1, day 90, and every 6 months thereafter for 540 days. The coprimary endpoints were the placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline to day 510 and the time-adjusted percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline after day 90 to day 540. Levels of other atherogenic lipoproteins and treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed.Results: A total of 3,660 participants (n = 482, n = 1,561, and n = 1,617 from ORION-9, -10, and -11, respectively) underwent randomization. The placebo-corrected change in LDL-C with inclisiran at day 510 was -50.7% (95% confidence interval: -52.9% to -48.4%; p < 0.0001). The corresponding time-adjusted change in LDL-C was -50.5% (95% confidence interval: -52.1% to -48.9%; p < 0.0001). Safety was similar in both groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events at the injection site were more frequent with inclisiran than placebo (5.0% vs. 0.7%), but were predominantly mild, and none were severe or persistent. Liver and kidney function tests, creatine kinase values, and platelet counts did not differ between groups.Conclusions: These pooled safety and efficacy data show that inclisiran, given twice yearly in addition to maximally tolerated statin therapy with or without other LDL-C lowering agents, is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment to lower LDL-C in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, ASCVD, or ASCVD risk equivalents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]