Search

This is a narrative review. Chronic wrist pain is a common disorder that can lead to considerable disability in performing activities in daily living and at work. Patients with nonspecific chronic wrist pain are regularly referred to a physiotherapist/hand therapist. Immobilization, avoiding excessive wrist load, steroid injections, and various physical therapy methods predominantly focus on the pain itself. However, these methods often do not result in a satisfactory long-term pain relief. In this article, we will describe the principles behind and content of a sensorimotor control–based exercise program as introduced by Videler et al., modified and substantiated by current insights into sensorimotor control training and wrist kinetics. Both structure and content of the modified exercise program (SMoC-wrist) are substantiated by recent scientific literature. A clear 4-level exercise model based on sensorimotor principles is presented, that is, proprioceptive level, conscious static/isometric level, conscious dynamic level, and unconscious dynamic level. The content of each level and the transition toward the next level are described in detail. Besides the substantiation of the exercise program, possible outcome measures for joint position sense and kinesthesia of the wrist are discussed. We modified and substantiated a widely used exercise program for patients with nonspecific chronic wrist pain based on recent insights into sensorimotor control principles and wrist kinematics. The presented exercise program (SMoC-wrist) is not primarily focused on reducing pain but on functional reeducation and strengthening of the neuromusculoskeletal system on the basis of sensorimotor control principles. • Sensorimotor control is essential in training patients with chronic wrist pain. • A widely used sensorimotor control-based exercise program is substantiated by literature. • A clear structure in four distinguished levels is described for intensifying the program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: After tibialis posterior tendon transfer surgery for foot-drop correction, the foot is traditionally immobilised for several weeks. To test the feasibility of early mobilisation after this procedure in patients with Hansen''s disease, 21 consecutive patients received active mobilisation of the transfer starting on the 5th postoperative day. Transfer insertion strength was enhanced by Pulvertaft weave. The results were compared with a historical cohort of 21 patients receiving 4 weeks of immobilisation. The primary outcomes were active dorsiflexion, active plantar flexion and total active motion at the ankle, tendon-insertion pullout and time until discharge from rehabilitation with independent walking without aid. Assessments at discharge from rehabilitation and the last clinical follow-up at more than 1 year were compared between both groups. The Student''s t-test was used to compare data between the groups, and 95% confidence interval of the difference between groups was determined. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The average follow-up was 22 months for both groups. There was no incidence of insertion pullout of the tendon transfer in either group. In addition, there was no difference in active dorsiflexion angle between the groups at discharge (mean difference: 2.2°, p =0.22) and final assessment (mean difference: 2.3°, p =0.42). The plantar flexion angles were similar in both groups at discharge (mean difference: 0.5°, p =0.86) and final assessment (mean difference: 0.5°, p =0.57). In addition, there was no difference in total active motion between the groups at discharge (mean difference: 2°, p =0.54) and final assessment (mean difference: 1°, p =0.49). The patients were discharged from rehabilitation with independent walking at 44.04±7.9 days after surgery in the mobilisation group compared to 57.07±2.3 days in the immobilisation group. This indicates a significant difference in morbidity (mean difference: 13 days, p <0.001) between the two groups. In summary, this feasibility study indicates that early active mobilisation of tibialis posterior transfer in patients with Hansen''s disease is safe and has similar outcomes to immobilisation with a reduced time to independent walking, warranting the design of a controlled clinical trial to further substantiate this. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: Immobilization after tendon transfers has been the conventional postoperative management. A recent study indicated beneficial effects of an immediate active motion protocol (IAMP) after tendon transfer for claw deformity correction compared with effects in a historical cohort. In this study, we further tested this hypothesis in a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of the IAMP with that of conventional immobilization. Methods: Fifty supple claw hand deformities were randomized postoperatively into 2 equal groups for IAMP and immobilization. Therapy began on the second postoperative day for the IAMP group and on the twenty-second postoperative day for the immobilization group. The primary outcome measures were deformity correction, active range of motion of digits, tendon transfer insertion pullout, and time until discharge from rehabilitation. Secondary outcome measures were swelling, pain, hand strength, and dexterity. Both groups were compared at discharge from rehabilitation and at the last clinical follow-up (at least 1 year postoperatively). Results: Assessments were available for all 50 patients at discharge and for 23 patients in each group at follow-up. The average follow-up was 18 months for the IAMP group and 17 months for the immobilization group. Deformity correction, range of motion, swelling, dexterity, and hand strength were similar for both groups at discharge and a follow-up. There was no evidence of tendon insertion pullout in any patient of either group. Relief of pain was achieved significantly earlier with IAMP. Morbidity was reduced by, on average, 22 days with IAMP. Conclusions: We found that the immediate active motion protocol is safe and has similar outcomes compared with those of immobilization, with the added advantage of earlier pain relief and quicker restoration of hand function. Immediate motion after tendon transfer can significantly reduce morbidity and speed up the rehabilitation of paralytic limbs, and it may save expense for the patients. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic I. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: Grip strength and pinch strength measurements are often used to assess hand function. However, both measure a number of muscle groups in combination, and grip strength in particular is dominated by extrinsic hand muscles. The Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer (RIHM) was recently introduced to measure the force that individual fingers and thumb can exert in different directions. The aim of this study was to establish the reliability of these measurements with use of the RIHM in children. Methods: Sixty-three healthy children between 4 and 12 years of age participated in this study. The RIHM was used to measure thumb palmar abduction, thumb opposition, thumb flexion at the metacarpal-phalangeal (MP) joint, index finger abduction, and little finger abduction. A retest was performed with an average test-retest interval of 26 days. Results: For the thumb, palmar abduction strength had intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of .98 for both hands. For both thumb opposition and flexion at the MP joint, ICCs were .97 for the dominant hands and .98 for the nondominant hands. Index finger abduction had ICCs of .94 and .95 and little finger abduction had ICCs of .90 and .92 for the dominant and nondominant hands, respectively. The smallest detectable differences for dominant and nondominant hands respectively were thumb palmar abduction, 15% and 15%; thumb opposition, 12% and 9%; thumb flexion (at the MP joint), 12% and 9%; abduction of the index finger, 17% and 17%; and little finger abduction, 26% and 26%. Conclusions: We found that the RIHM was reliable for use in children. Intraclass correlation coefficients and smallest detectable differences were comparable with those obtained with use of the RIHM in adults and with values found for pinch and grip strength in children. Because the RIHM measures more specific aspects of hand function than grip and pinch, adding the RIHM to measurement protocols may contribute to a more complete overview of a child''s hand function. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]