Search

Neurotoxicity related to cefepime is increasingly reported in the literature but specific data concerning continuous infusion (CI) of the drug are still lacking. Our primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of neurotoxicity related to CI of cefepime and the associated risk factors. Our secondary objectives were to analyse the plasma cefepime concentrations and to define the threshold above which neurotoxicity occurs. In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, all adult patients who underwent at least one cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and were treated with CI of 4 g/day between January 2017 and June 2019 were included. Neurotoxicity was evaluated according to a strict definition and was correlated with steady-state concentration at the time of toxicity presentation. Ninety-eight patients with 201 cefepime TDM studies were included, with an incidence of neurotoxicity of 14.3% (14/98). Patients with neurotoxicity had more often underlying brain disease (35.7% (5/14) vs 11.9% (10/84), p = 0.030)) and higher steady-state concentrations (mean ± standard deviation 71.8 ± 32.9 mg/L vs 49.6 ± 30.6, p = 0.036) than the others. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded a cefepime steady-state concentration of 63.2 mg/L as the best cut-off point between patients with or without neurotoxicity. A mean steady-state concentration of 46.4 mg/L was achieved if the dosages of cefepime were adapted to renal function which was under our threshold concentration but above our highest pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of 32–40 mg/L. Our results suggest that 4 g/day of cefepime adapted to renal function and infused over 24 h is a trade-off for the risk/benefit ratio, when used empirically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Objective: Aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam as add-on treatment in patients with partial-onset epilepsy in clinical practice. Methods: In this observational, multi-centre study patients were treated with levetiracetam for 16 weeks. From a starting dose of 1000mg/day, dose levels were adjusted at 2-weekly intervals in 1000-mg steps, to a maximum of 3000mg/day, based on seizure control and tolerance. Analysis of efficacy was based on reduction in seizure frequency relative to baseline, 50% and 100% responder rates (for partial seizures and all seizure types combined) and percentage of patients using levetiracetam at the end of the study. Analysis of safety was based on occurrence of adverse events. Results: The present analysis concerns the results of patients recruited in Belgium and The Netherlands. Of the 251 patients included in the study, 86.9% completed 16 weeks of treatment. Reduction in frequency of partial-onset seizures was 62.2%, with 19.3% of the patients becoming seizure free and 56.6% having a reduction in seizure frequency of ≥50%. These percentages were more or less the same when calculated for all seizure types combined. Tolerance of levetiracetam treatment was good, with most adverse events being only mild to moderate in severity, and only 10.0% of the adverse events leading to discontinuation from the study. Asthenia, somnolence, dizziness and headache were the most frequently reported adverse events. Conclusion: Levetiracetam is effective and safe as add-on treatment for partial-onset seizures in clinical practice. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]