Search

Background Carotid endarterectomy surgery can be performed under regional anaesthesia alone or under general anaesthesia. However, there are several types of regional block available and reported complication rates after superficial cervical plexus blocks are significantly lower than deep blocks. It is not known if subcutaneous and intermediate blocks are equally effective, although anatomical evidence suggests that the latter (where the injectate diffuses below the deep cervical fascia) might provide superior quality of intraoperative anaesthesia. Methods Forty-four patients were randomized to receive either subcutaneous or intermediate cervical plexus blocks for carotid endarterectomy. The primary endpoint was supplemental lidocaine requirement during surgery. Secondary outcome measures included: total amount of fentanyl administered during surgery, recall of pain scores during surgery, complications, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. Results There was no statistically significant difference for median (range) lidocaine supplementation between the subcutaneous and intermediate groups 65 (20–170) mg vs 85 (30–345) mg, respectively; P=0.31. There were no statistical differences in the secondary outcome measures and no major complications during the study. Conclusions Intermediate and subcutaneous cervical plexus blocks are equally effective for carotid endarterectomy. This study adds to the body of evidence supporting the safe use of superficial blocks for this type of surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: The Mallampati examination is a standard component of an airway risk assessment. Existing evidence suggests that cervical spine extension improves the predictive power of the Mallampati examination for detecting difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, but a comparative effectiveness study has not been conducted.Methods: The extended Mallampati examination (EMS) was introduced to the standard preoperative airway assessment, in addition to the standard Modified Mallampati examination (MMP). This study compared the accuracy of both Mallampati examinations on the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation, and bag mask ventilation. Univariate and adjusted analyses were performed.Results: 80 801 patients with recorded MMP and EMS, and subsequent glottic view obtained during direct laryngoscopy, were examined. There was increased specificity (88.7% cf. 81.9%) but reduced sensitivity (33.3% cf. 45.7%) in the detection of difficult direct laryngoscopy with use of the EMS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of each test performed in combination with other airway predictors for the models predicting difficult laryngoscopy was 0.740 (95% CI 0.731-0.753) for MMP and 0.739 (95% CI 0.729-0.752) for EMS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of each test, performed in combination with other airway predictors for the models predicting difficult intubation was 0.699 (95% CI 0.688-0.711) for MMP and 0.695 (95% CI 0.683-0.707) for EMS.Conclusions: This retrospective observational study demonstrates that cervical extension improves the specificity but decreases sensitivity of Mallampati examination. The Mallampati evaluation should be performed with the cervical spine in the neutral position to maximize test sensitivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]