Search

Significant variations exist regarding the definition of difficult liver transplantation. The study goals were to investigate how liver transplant surgeons evaluate the surgical difficulty of liver transplantation and to use the identified factors to classify liver transplantation difficulty. A Web-based online European survey was presented to liver transplant surgeons. The survey was divided into 3 parts: (1) participant demographics and practices; (2) various situations based on recipient, liver disease, tumor treatment, and technical factors; and (3) 8 real-life clinical vignettes with different levels of complexity. In part 3 of the survey, respondents were asked whether they would perform liver transplantation but were not aware that these patients eventually underwent liver transplantation. A total of 143 invites were sent out, and 97 (67.8%) participants completed the survey. Most participants considered previous spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, previous supra-mesocolic surgery, hypertrophy of segment I, and obesity to be recipient factors for high-difficulty liver transplantation. Most participants considered liver transplantation to be challenging in patients with Budd–Chiari syndrome, Kasai surgery, polycystic liver disease, diffuse portal vein thrombosis, and a history of open hepatectomy. The proportion of participants indicating that liver transplantation was warranted varied across the 8 cases, from 69% to 100%. Our classification of the surgical difficulty of liver transplantation employed these recipient-related, surgical history–related, and liver disease–related variables and 3 difficulty groups were identified: low, intermediate, and high difficulty groups. This survey provides an overview of the surgical difficulty of various situations in liver transplantation that could be useful for further benchmark and textbook outcome studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) currently represents the gold standard after resection of the biliary confluence. This non-physiological reconstruction poses several problems such as repeated cholangitis or stricture without conventional endoscopic access. Our aim was to describe and to report both feasibility and results of duct-to-duct anastomosis with removable internal biliary drain (RIBS) as an alternative technique to the HJ after resection of the biliary confluence in patients undergoing major liver resection.Methods: Between January 2014 and January 2018, all patients who underwent a major hepatectomy associated with resection of the biliary confluence and reconstruction by duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis with RIBS were retrospectively included. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, pre- and postoperative outcomes, early and late biliary complications, endoscopic complications, and clinical follow-up were collected.Results: Twelve patients were included. The operative time was 326 ± 45 min (range 240-380 min). There was no postoperative mortality. Only one patient experienced biliary anastomotic leakage treated exclusively by radiological and endoscopic drainage. Four patients had an asymptomatic stricture of the biliary anastomosis detected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during the extraction of the RIBS requiring iterative dilatation and replacement of the RIBS. Among 21 performed ERCP, no complications such as failure of RIBS extraction, duodenal perforation, bleeding after sphincterotomy, cholangitis, or pancreatitis were observed. After a mean and a median follow-up of respectively 15.0 ± 14.9 and 8.7 months (range 2.0-46.1 months), no cholangitis occurred.Conclusion: Duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis with RIBS insertion after resection of the biliary confluence represents a feasible and safe alternative to the HJ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Anastomotic biliary strictures (ABSs) are one of the most frequent adverse events that occur after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Multiple plastic stents (MPS) have been validated for this indication. More recently, fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) have been used with positive outcomes, but also have a higher rate of migration, which may limit success. Our primary objective was to compare stent migration rates observed with standard FCSEMSs (Std-FCSEMSs) and so-called anti-migration FCSEMSs (Am-FCSEMSs), which are newly designed with reversed proximal side flaps. Secondary objectives were to compare rates of stricture resolution and procedure-related morbidity. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of a subset of patients (FCSEMSs for post-OLT ABS) from 2 prospectively maintained databases of (1) OLT patients, and (2) ERCP and stent placement. Between January 2009 and January 2016, consecutive patients presenting with ABS after OLT referred to Cochin Hospital (Paris, France) for ERCP and receiving a FCSEMS were included. Exclusion criteria were any other cause of biliary stricture (ie, malignant stricture, ischemic origin), and biliary fistulae. Results One hundred twenty-five FCSEMSs (57 Am-FCSEMSs, 52 type 1 Std-FCSEMSs, and 16 type 2 Std-FCSEMSs) were used in 75 patients for ABS after OLT, with a planned stent placement period of 6 months in all patients. Patient characteristics and rates of previous endoscopic treatment or timing of ABS occurrence after OLT were not different between the groups. The rate of FCSEMS complete migration was 16% (20/125), consisting of 1.7% (1/57) for Am-FCSEMSs and 28% (19/68) for type 1 and 2 Std-FCSEMSs (P <.0001). All attempted stent removals (100% of patients) were successful. First follow-up ERCP after each FCSEMS highlighted a stricture resolution rate of 78.4% (98/125), including 93% (53/57) for Am-FCSEMSs and 66.2% (45/68) for type 1 and 2 Std-FCSEMSs (P <.001). After a median follow-up of 28 months after stent removal (range, 12-66 months), stricture recurrence was observed in 12.3% (range, 11%-17%) of patients treated with Am-FCSEMSs against 55.9% (range, 54%-56%) of those receiving Std-FCSEMSs (P <.0001). Conclusions In patients with ABS after OLT, the use of Am-FCSEMSs significantly decreased the risk of stent migration, improved stricture resolution at the time of stent removal, and reduced the rate of stricture recurrence during follow-up. Endoscopic removal success and procedure-related morbidity were similar for both standard and anti-migration stents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metabolic diseases that involve the liver represent a heterogeneous group of disorders. Apart from the metabolic defect, the subject's liver functions may be normal. With the increasing need for organs, livers from donors with metabolic diseases other than familial amyloid polyneuropathy might be possibly used for transplantation. However, whether such livers qualify as grafts and how they might impact recipient outcome are still unanswered questions. This review of the literature summarizes current experience in the use of such grafts in the context of cadaveric, domino, and living-related liver transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often recurs after curative resection, and thus the optimal treatment strategy to treat recurrences remains uncertain. We analyzed the results of different options to treat recurrent HCC and emphasized the impact of pathologic patterns of the tumor at initial resection. Methods Between 2000 and 2014, 293 patients underwent potentially curative hepatic resection for HCC. Among them, 150 experienced a recurrence and have been treated by repeat resection (RR), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), salvage liver transplantation (SLT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), or conservative treatment, including systemic or targeted chemotherapy. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared between the treatment groups, focusing on clinical and pathologic characteristics of the tumor at initial resection. Results After a median follow-up of 26 months, the overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5 years after recurrence was 62%, 48%, and 40%, respectively. Survival rates were greater in patients treated by a curative approach (RR, RFA, SLT) than those treated by TACE, with 5-year OS of >70% and 37%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed satellitosis and microvascular invasion (MVI) at initial resection as negative prognostic factors of survival after recurrence ( P < .05). On multivariate analysis, type of treatment was the only independent factor associated with survival. A subgroup analysis showed that RR/RFA led to better survival outcomes than TACE for early stage intrahepatic recurrences in the absence of satellitosis or MVI on the primary resected tumor. Conclusion Curative treatments of recurrent HCC improve patient survival. Satellitosis and MVI on the primary resected specimen may be used as selection criteria for the best treatment strategy for intrahepatic recurrences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The estimation of liver volume ( LV) has been widely studied in normal liver, the density of which is considered to be equivalent to 1 kg/l. In cirrhosis, volumetric evaluation and its correlation to liver mass remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography ( CT) scanning to assess LV in patients with cirrhosis. Methods Liver volume was evaluated by CT ( CTLV) and correlated to the explanted liver weight ( LW) in 49 patients. Liver density (LD) and its association with clinical features were analysed. Commonly used formulae for estimating LV were also evaluated. The real density of cirrhotic liver was prospectively measured in explant specimens. Results Wide variations between CTLV (in ml) and LW (in g) were found (range: 3-748). Cirrhotic livers in patients with hepatitis B virus infection presented significantly increased LD ( P = 0.001) with lower CTLV ( P = 0.005). Liver volume as measured by CT was also decreased in patients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of >15 ( P = 0.023). Formulae estimating LV correlated poorly with CTLV and LW. The density of cirrhotic liver measured prospectively in 15 patients was 1.1 kg/l. Conclusions In cirrhotic liver, LV assessed by CT did not correspond to real LW. Liver density changed according to the aetiology and severity of liver disease. Commonly used formulae did not accurately assess LV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with severe portal hypertension related to liver cirrhosis, recanalization of umbilical veins may lead to both development and rupture of massive anorectal varices. In this setting, while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is considered as the treatment of choice, the management of these patients remains unclear in case of contraindications to TIPS. Laparoscopic division of massive portosystemic shunts has been reported to yield beneficial effects in patients with isolated hepatic encephalopathy but has never been attempted in a context of life-threatening lower gastrointestinal bleeding. In the present case report, we both describe the operative technique of laparoscopic division of recanalized umbilical veins to treat recurrent massive haemorrhage following rupture of giant rectal varices in a 68-year-old Child C cirrhotic patient contraindicated to TIPS and report the postoperative course of the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Appropriate risk stratification for the difficulty of liver transplantation (LT) is essential to guide the selection and acceptance of grafts and avoid morbidity and mortality. Based on 987 LTs collected from 5 centers, perioperative outcomes were analyzed across the 3 difficulty levels. Each LT was retrospectively scored from 0 to 10. Scores of 0–2, 3–5 and 6–10 were then translated into respective difficulty levels: low, moderate and high. Complications were reported according to the comprehensive complication index (CCI). The difficulty level of LT in 524 (53%), 323 (32%), and 140 (14%) patients was classified as low, moderate and high, respectively. The values of major intraoperative outcomes, such as cold ischemia time (p = 0.04) and operative time (p < 0.0001) increased gradually with statistically significant values among difficulty levels. There was a corresponding increase in CCI (p = 0.04), severe complication rates (p = 0.05) and length of ICU (p = 0.01) and hospital (p = 0.004) stays across the different difficulty levels. The LT difficulty classification has been validated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A textbook outcome (TO) describes the results of a successful liver transplantation (LT) in which all aspects of the LT and posttransplant courses were uneventful. We compared patient perceived experience of a TO with clinically defined TO. This was a single-institution cohort study with retrospective chart review including patients who underwent LT from 2019 to 2021. Patients were asked to complete the survey at a scheduled posttransplant visit. The survey was designed to assess their viewpoints on the definition of a TO. A clinically defined TO was defined as no mortality, no severe complications, no need for reintervention, no prolonged hospital and intensive care unit stays, and no readmission. Of the 182 patients who were contacted, 132 (72.5%) completed the survey. Overall, 98 patients (74%) considered that they had experienced a TO. The clinically defined TO rate was 22.0%. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who did not experience severe complications were more likely to consider that they had a TO (P = 0.01; odds ratio: 3.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.3–7.9). From patients' perspectives, survival and avoidance of complications were the major characteristics of a TO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic hepatectomy continues to be a challenging operation associated with a steep learning curve. This study aimed to evaluate the learning process during 15 years of experience with laparoscopic hepatectomy and to identify approaches to standardization of this procedure.Study Design: Prospectively collected data of 317 consecutive laparoscopic hepatectomies performed from January 2000 to December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. The operative procedures were classified into 4 categories (minor hepatectomy, left lateral sectionectomy [LLS], left hepatectomy, and right hepatectomy), and indications were classified into 5 categories (benign-borderline tumor, living donor, metastatic liver tumor, biliary malignancy, and hepatocellular carcinoma).Results: During the first 10 years, the procedures were limited mainly to minor hepatectomy and LLS, and the indications were limited to benign-borderline tumor and living donor. Implementation of major hepatectomy rapidly increased the proportion of malignant tumors, especially hepatocellular carcinoma, starting from 2011. Conversion rates decreased with experience for LLS (13.3% vs 3.4%; p = 0.054) and left hepatectomy (50.0% vs 15.0%; p = 0.012), but not for right hepatectomy (41.4% vs 35.7%; p = 0.661).Conclusions: Our 15-year experience clearly demonstrates the stepwise procedural evolution from LLS through left hepatectomy to right hepatectomy, as well as the trend in indications from benign-borderline tumor/living donor to malignant tumors. In contrast to LLS and left hepatectomy, a learning curve was not observed for right hepatectomy. The ongoing development process can contribute to faster standardization necessary for future advances in laparoscopic hepatectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]