Search

Rationale and Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes of retrograde transplantar arch angioplasty and conventional below-the-knee (BTK) anterograde recanalization. Materials and Methods: One hundred twelve limbs in 96 patients underwent attempt at antegrade tibial angioplasty. Among 27 technical failures, retrograde trans-dorsal or -planter percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was attempted in 22 limbs. Ankle-brachlal index (ABI), thrombolysis In myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, and dorsal/plantar arterial pulse score improvement were compared immediately after the procedures between patients received successful anterograde angioplasty (anterograde angioplasty group [AAG], 85 limbs in 71 patients) and retrograde angioplasty (retrograde angioplasty group [RAG], 22 limbs in 20 patients). Target vessel restenosis and limb salvage were observed during follow-up. Results: Primary technical success rate was 75.9% in the RAG (vs. 74.0% AAG, P > .05). ABI Improved from 0.55 ± 0.21 to 0.93 ± 0.19 in the RAG (vs. 0.56 ± 0.14 to 0.89 ± 0.18 AAG, P > .05). TIMI flow grade demonstrated greater reperfusion of distal foot tissue in the RAG (2.3 ± 0.8 vs. 1.0 ± 0.8, P< .05). Primary patency rates at 12 and 24 months were 63.6% (14 of 22) and 45.5% (10 of 22) in the RAG and 52.9% (45 of 85) and 37.6% (32 of 85) In the AAG, respectively (P > .05). Kaplan-Meier analysis after 24 months found limb salvage rates of 93.8% in the RAG and 96.5% in the AAG (P > .05). Conclusions: Retrograde transplantar arch angioplasty achieved better immediate blood flow and similar ABI improvement, primary patency rate, and limb salvage rate compared to conventional transtibial angioplasty for BTK occlusions. This could become a supplemen-tary technique when anterograde angioplasty fails. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]