Search

Excess inflammation and oxidative stress are common themes in many pathologies of pregnancy including preeclampsia and more recently severe COVID-19. The risk of preeclampsia increases following maternal infection with COVID-19, potentially relating to significant overlap in pathophysiology with endothelial, vascular and immunological dysfunction common to both. Identifying a therapy which addresses these injurious processes and stabilises the endothelial and vascular maternal system would help address the significant global burden of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality they cause. Sulforaphane is a naturally occurring phytonutrient found most densely within cruciferous vegetables. It has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and immune modulating properties via upregulation of phase-II detoxification enzymes. This review will cover the common pathways shared by COVID-19 and preeclampsia and offer a potential therapeutic target via nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor upregulation in the form of sulforaphane. • Infection with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy increases the risk of preeclampsia. • Preeclampsia is a leading cause of global maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. • Severe preeclampsia and COVID-19 share endothelial and vascular dysfunction. • Sulforaphane is a naturally occurring phytonutrient that induces Nrf2 upregulation. • Sulforaphane has anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and anti-viral properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Activin A is a two-subunit protein belonging to the transforming growth factor β superfamily. First discovered almost three decades ago, it has since been implicated in diverse physiological roles, ranging from wound repair to reproduction. After 30 years of research, altered activin A levels are now understood to be associated with the development of various diseases, making activin A a potential therapeutic target. In pregnancy, the placenta and fetal membranes are major producers of activin A, with significantly enhanced serum concentrations now recognised as a contributor to numerous gestational disorders. Evidence now suggests that circulating levels of activin A may be clinically relevant in the early detection of pregnancy complications, including miscarriage and preeclampsia. This review aims to summarise our current understanding of activin A as a potential diagnostic marker in common pregnancy pathologies. • Altered circulating activin A is associated with serious pregnancy conditions and outcomes. • Circulating activin A may be used in the early detection of pregnancy complications including miscarriage and preeclampsia. • Activin A may be a potential therapeutic marker. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Universal screening has been proposed as a strategy to identify asymptomatic individuals infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and mitigate transmission. To investigate the rate of positive tests among pregnant women in Melbourne, Australia. We performed a cross-sectional prevalence study at three maternity hospitals (one tertiary referral hospital and two secondary maternities) in Melbourne, Australia. SARS-CoV-2 testing was offered to all pregnant women attending face-to-face antenatal visits and to those attending the hospital with symptoms of possible coronavirus disease, between 6th and 19th of May 2020. Testing was performed by multiplex-tandem polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on combined oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs. The primary outcome was the proportion of positive SARS-CoV-2 tests. SARS-CoV-2 testing was performed in 350 women, of whom 19 had symptoms of possible COVID-19. The median maternal age was 32 years (IQR 28–35 years), and the median gestational age at testing was 33 weeks and four days (IQR 28 weeks to 36 weeks and two days). All 350 tests returned negative results (p̂ = 0%, 95% CI 0–1.0%). In a two-week period of low disease prevalence, the rate of asymptomatic coronavirus infection among pregnant women in Australia during the study period was negligible, reflecting low levels of community transmission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: COVID-19 infection in pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of progression to severe disease, but vaccine uptake by pregnant women is hindered by persistent safety concerns. COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy has been shown to reduce stillbirth, but its relationship with preterm birth is uncertain.Objective: The aim of this study was to measure the rate of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among women giving birth in Melbourne, Australia, and to compare perinatal outcomes by vaccination status.Study Design: Retrospective multicenter cohort study occurring after the June 2021 government recommendations for mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. Routinely collected data from all 12 public maternity hospitals in Melbourne were extracted on births > 20 weeks' gestation from 1st July 2021 to 31 March 2022. Maternal sociodemographic characteristics were analyzed from the total birth cohort. Perinatal outcomes were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated women for whom weeks 20-43 of gestation fell entirely within the 9-month data collection period. The primary outcomes were the rates of stillbirth and preterm birth (spontaneous and iatrogenic) in singleton pregnancies of at least 24 weeks gestation, after exclusion of congenital anomalies. Secondary perinatal outcomes included the rate of congenital anomalies among infants born > 20 weeks gestation; and birthweight < 3rd centile and newborn intensive care unit (NICU) admissions among infants born without congenital anomalies at > 24 weeks gestation. We calculated the adjusted odds ratio of perinatal outcomes among vaccinated versus unvaccinated women using inverse propensity score weighting regression adjustment with multiple covariates; p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Births from 32,536 women were analyzed: 17,365 (53.4%) were vaccinated and 15,171 (47.6%) were unvaccinated. Vaccinated women were significantly more likely to be older, nulliparous, non-smoking, not requiring an interpreter, of higher socioeconomic status, and vaccinated against pertussis and influenza. Vaccination status also varied by region of birth.Vaccinated women had a significantly lower rate of stillbirth compared with unvaccinated women (0.2% vs 0.8%, aOR 0.18, 95%CI 0.09-0.37, P < 0.001. Vaccination was associated with a significant reduction in total preterm births < 37 weeks (5.1% vs 9.2%, aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.51-0.71, p< 0.001), spontaneous preterm birth (2.4% vs 4.0%, aOR 0.73 95% CI 0.56-0.96, p=0.02) and iatrogenic preterm birth (2.7% vs 5.2%, aOR 0.52, 95%CI 0.41-0.65, p< 0.001). Babies born to vaccinated mothers also had lower NICU admission rates.There was no significant increase in the rate of congenital anomalies or birth weight < 3rd centile in vaccinated women. Vaccinated women were significantly less like to have an infant with a major congenital anomaly compared with the unvaccinated group (2.4% vs 3.0%, aOR 0.72, 95%CI 0.56-0.94, p=0.02). This finding remained significant even when the analysis was restricted to women vaccinated before 20 weeks' gestation.Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was associated with a reduction in stillbirth and preterm birth, and not associated with any adverse impacts on fetal growth or development. Vaccine coverage was significantly influenced by known social determinants of health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Preeclampsia is a serious complication affecting 5-8% of pregnancies. Central to its pathogenesis is placental hypoxia and inflammation which leads to secretion of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1). sFlt-1 causes widespread endothelial dysfunction. The molecular mechanisms regulating sFlt-1 production remain poorly understood. Recently, a binding site for the nuclear factor activated T cells (NFAT) transcription factor has been found on fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (FLT-1) promoter.Methods: We assessed whether inhibiting NFAT impacts FLT-1, sFlt-1 and cytokine expression, as well as sFlt-1 secretion in primary cytotrophoblasts, placental explants and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). We investigated whether NFAT is regulated by hypoxia in primary cytotrophoblasts. We characterised the expression of NFAT1-4 in preterm preeclamptic compared to gestationally matched placentas.Results: Inhibiting NFAT reduced FLT-1 and sFlt-1 splice variant e15a transcription, concordant with reduced total sFlt-1 and sFlt-1 e15a secretion from primary human cytotrophoblasts. This effect appeared tissue specific as inhibiting NFAT did not change sFlt-1 secretion from endothelial cells. Inhibiting NFAT also reduced transcription of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-10 in primary cytotrophoblasts. NFAT1 and NFAT3 mRNA expression were significantly increased under hypoxia (1% O2). Inhibiting NFAT under hypoxia significantly reduced FLT-1 and sFlt-1 e15a transcription, but did not reduce sFlt-1 secretion. NFAT mRNA and protein localisation was not different in preeclamptic compared to gestationally matched placenta.Discussion: NFAT positively regulates placental FLT-1 and sFlt-1 e15a, secretion of sFlt-1 and inflammatory cytokine expression. It may be involved in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Placental growth factor (PlGF), total soluble fms-like tyrosine-kinase 1 (sFlt-1) and its placental-specific variant, sFlt-1 e15a, show promise as biomarkers for the prediction and diagnosis of preeclampsia. This study describes the degradation of PlGF, sFlt-1 and sFlt-1 e15a within maternal serum and plasma to assist clinical implementation. Whole blood was refrigerated at 4 °C for up to 48 h prior to centrifugation for isolation of plasma and serum. PlGF and sFlt-1 were quantified using the B.R.A.H.M.S Kryptor Compact PLUS; sFlt-1 e15a via a custom ELISA. All three analytes are stable for at least 48 h at 4 °C. Serum and plasma performed comparably. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a worsening of perinatal outcomes in many regions around the world. Melbourne, Australia, had one of the longest and most stringent lockdowns worldwide in 2020 while recording only rare instances of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women.Objective: This study aimed to compare the stillbirth and preterm birth rates in women who were exposed or unexposed to lockdown restrictions during pregnancy.Study Design: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne before and during the COVID-19 lockdown. The lockdown period was defined as the period from March 23, 2020 to March 14, 2021. Routinely-collected maternity data on singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation without congenital anomalies were obtained from all the 12 public hospitals in Melbourne. We defined the lockdown-exposed cohort as those women for whom weeks 20 to 40 of gestation occurred during the lockdown and the unexposed control group as women from the corresponding calendar periods 12 and 24 months before. The main outcome measures were stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction (birthweight < third centile), and iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to compare the odds of stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise, adjusting for multiple covariates.Results: There were 24,817 births in the exposed group and 50,017 births in the control group. There was a significantly higher risk of preterm stillbirth in the exposed group than the control group (0.26% vs 0.18%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.05; P=.015). There was also a significant reduction in the preterm birth of live infants <37 weeks (5.68% vs 6.07%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.99; P=.02), which was largely mediated by a significant reduction in iatrogenic preterm birth (3.01% vs 3.27%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.99; P=.03), including iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise (1.25% vs 1.51%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.93; P=.003). There were also significant reductions in special care nursery admissions during lockdown (11.53% vs 12.51%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.95; P<.0001). There was a trend to fewer spontaneous preterm births <37 weeks in the exposed group of a similar magnitude to that reported in other countries (2.69% vs 2.82%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.05; P=.32).Conclusion: Lockdown restrictions in Melbourne, Australia were associated with a significant reduction in iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise and a significant increase in preterm stillbirths. This raises concerns that pandemic conditions in 2020 may have led to a failure to identify and appropriately care for pregnant women at an increased risk of antepartum stillbirth. Further research is required to understand the relationship between these 2 findings and to inform our ongoing responses to the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia have evolved from the traditional definition of de novo hypertension and proteinuria to a broader definition of hypertension with evidence of end-organ dysfunction. Although this change is endorsed by various societies such as the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, there remains controversy with regard to the implementation of broader definitions and the most appropriate definition of end-organ dysfunction.Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of different diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia on rates of disease diagnosis, disease severity, and adverse outcomes and to identify associations between each component of the different diagnostic criteria and adverse pregnancy outcomes.Study Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies at Monash Health between January 1, 2016 and July 31, 2018. Within this population, all cases of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia were reclassified according to the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2001, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2018, and International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018 criteria. Differences in incidence of preeclampsia and maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2001 group and the extra cases identified by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2018 and International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018. Outcomes assessed included biochemical markers of preeclampsia, a composite of adverse maternal outcomes, and a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes. Multiple logistic regression analysis was also performed to assess each component of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2018 and International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018 criteria and their associations with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.Results: Of 22,094 pregnancies, 751 (3.4%) women had preeclampsia as defined by any of the 3 criteria. Compared with International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2001, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2018 criteria identified an extra 42 women (n=654 vs n=696, 6.4% relative increase) with preeclampsia, and International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018 identified an extra 97 women (n=654 vs n=751, 14.8% relative increase). The additional women identified by International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018 exhibited a milder form of disease with lower rates of severe hypertension (62.4% vs 44.3%; P<.01) and magnesium sulfate use (11.9% vs 4.1%; P<.05) and a trend toward lower rates of adverse maternal outcomes (9.8% vs 4.1%). These women also delivered at a later gestation, and their babies had a lower number of neonatal intensive care unit admissions and adverse perinatal outcomes. Objective features such as fetal growth restriction, thrombocytopenia, renal and liver impairment, and proteinuria were associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, whereas subjective neurologic features demonstrated poorer associations.Conclusion: Implementation of broader definitions of preeclampsia will result in an increased incidence of disease diagnosis. However, because women who exclusively fulfill the new criteria have a milder phenotype of the disease, it remains uncertain whether this will translate to improved outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pre-clinical studies suggest maternal dietary creatine supplementation during pregnancy could protect babies against hypoxic intrapartum events, however creatine has not been used as a supplement in pregnancy. The aim of this study was to explore pregnant women and healthcare professional's general knowledge, behaviours, and attitudes toward nutritional supplements, and their thoughts on introducing creatine as a pregnancy supplement. Pregnant women (n = 42) and partners (n = 23), attending a tertiary care pregnancy service in Melbourne, Australia, participated in focus groups or semi-structured interviews. Health professionals (n = 100), completed a semi-structured online survey. Descriptive data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and qualitative data was managed using NVivo 22.0. Use of branded nutritional supplements in pregnancy was commonplace and acceptable. All primary healthcare respondents discussed supplements with their patients at first consultation. Supplements consumed corresponded closely to those recommended. Women had good general awareness of commonly recommended nutritional supplements, however, were less aware of the rationale for supplement use. This aligned with health professional's perceptions. Women would consider taking creatine if recommended by their health professional. Health professionals would require detailed safety, beneficence, and efficacy information before recommending creatine supplementation. They would also be more likely to recommend a new supplement in higher-risk pregnancies, where benefits may outweigh any perceived side-effects. There is high acceptance of current recommended nutritional supplements in pregnancy. Implementing creatine as a new supplement will require substantive empirical evidence and changes to clinical guidelines. Public awareness and education would also be essential to consumer acceptability of creatine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]