Search

Introduction In experimental pain research the effect of opioids is normally assessed by verbal subjective response to analgesia. However, as many confounders in pain assessment exist, objective bed-side assessment of the effect is highly warranted. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effect of morphine on three objective pharmacodynamic markers (pupil diameter, prolactin concentration and resting electroencephalography (EEG)) and compare the changes from placebo with subjective analgesia on experimental muscle pain for convergent validation. Methods Fifteen healthy male participants received placebo or 30 mg rectal morphine at two separate sessions. At baseline and several time points after drug administration, the central effects of morphine were assessed by experimental muscle pain, pupil diameter, prolactin concentration and resting EEG. Results Morphine increased tolerance to muscle pain, together with significant reductions in pupil diameter and increase in prolactin concentration (all P < 0.001). Miosis was induced simultaneously with the onset of analgesic effect 30 min after dosing, while a significant increase in prolactin concentration was seen after 45 min. The change in pupil diameter was negatively correlated to change in tolerated muscle pressure (r =− 0.40, P < 0.001), whereas the increase in prolactin concentration was positively correlated (r = 0.32, P = 0.001). The effect of morphine on EEG was seen as a decrease in the relative theta (4–7.5 Hz) activity ( P = 0.03), but was not significant until 120 min after dosing and did not correlate to the increase in tolerated muscle pressure (r = –0.1, P = 0.43). Discussion Prolactin concentration and pupil diameter showed similar temporal development, had good dynamic ranges and were sensitive to morphine. Thus, both measures proved to be sensitive measures of morphine effects. EEG may give additive information on the brain's response to pain, however more advanced analysis may be necessary. We therefore recommend using pupil diameter in studies where a simple and reliable objective measure of the morphine-induced central activation is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Correlations between subjective and objective measures of constipation have seldom been demonstrated. This could be due to multiple confounding factors in clinical studies and the broad span of symptoms represented in questionnaires used to assess constipation. We developed a new method for categorizing gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms into relevant symptom groups, and used this in a controlled experimental study aimed to investigate whether GI transit times and colonic volumes were correlated to self-reported GI symptoms. Methods Twenty-five healthy male participants were enrolled in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, five-day crossover study with the treatments oxycodone and placebo. Objective measures of GI transit times and colonic volumes were obtained by the means of the 3D-Transit System and magnetic resonance colonography, whereas subjective GI symptoms were measures via three validated questionnaires. The symptoms were then categorized into five groups; "abdominal symptoms", "defecation difficulties", "incomplete bowel evacuation", "reduced bowel movement frequency", and "stool symptoms". Spearman's rank order correlation was used to determine correlations between the five groups of symptoms and the objective measures. Results No correlations between the GI symptoms and transit times or colonic volumes were found (all P > 0.05). Discussion GI transit times and colonic volumes were not correlated to self-reported GI symptoms even in a controlled experimental study and when symptoms were categorized into relevant symptom groups. Thus, both subjective and objective measures must be considered relevant when assessing constipation in clinical and research settings, ensuring that both physiological aspects as well as the severity and impact of symptoms experienced by patients can be assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]